Convinced that Zika causes birth defects? Take a look at how weak the government’s official explanation actually is.
by Scott Creighton
In the video below, TRUTHstreammedia does a good job explaining what is happening with the ZikaBABY psyop in terms of how it is a manufactured crisis with no footing in scientific evidence to support the claim that Zika (which has been around for decades) causes microcephaly.
What they don’t get into enough is the part of the story that shows how this Bill Gates start-up company intends to patent this pest control approach in order to grab as much of the 14 billion dollar a year pest control industry.
You can imagine them taking this Frankensquio trial from here to creating and releasing Frankenticks or Frankenrats or even FrankenROACHES, which if you recall, was already covered in a little film called Mimic. The point of that story was that the modified roaches might not die as expected and may just morph into something totally unexpected.
In reality, the people of the Keys are having a chance to vote (ha ha … he said “vote”) on some electronic voting machines about whether or not these GatesBugs are going to be released on them in November. Hopefully they will actually count real votes (ha ha… he said “real votes”)
“So, why is the establishment, its media and major “health” institutions such as the World Health Organisation and the CDC, continuing to promote the Zika/microcephaly connection as a done deal? Why is the CDC openly asserting that “Zika causes microcephaly” even though the only research it cites found only the smallest possible correlation? (go here for a good breakdown of that). Why, on the basis of inconclusive science, pseudo-science and poor reasoning, is the US government instigating nationwide “prevention and containment” efforts aimed at stopping the spread of the virus, which includes the spraying of urban areas with highly toxic pesticides? How much sense can it possibly make for the the US govt to drench parts of its own population with Naled, a compound that is known to cause, amongst other things,reduced-brain-size in unborn foetuses, in order to kill mosquitoes that might be carrying a virus that might be linked to a small risk of – reduced brain size in unborn fetuses? ” Off Guardian
“Residents of the Florida Keys are up in arms over a plan to release genetically-modified (GM) mosquitoes in the Key Haven neighborhood and are trying to get the word out about the trial, which they say would make them “lab rats” in their own community.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the controversial study by U.K.-firm Oxitec earlier this month, amid renewed fears over mosquito transmission of the Zika virus.
“We need to help educate the public about the very real, scientifically based problems with this genetically modified mosquito release,” Mara Daly, who has been helping organize a protest at the Florida Keys Mosquito Control Board meeting Tuesday afternoon, told the Miami Herald…
According to the Guardian, “If the trial goes well, the technology would be on track to commercial approval in the United States, opening a slice of the nation’s $14bn pest control market to the company. Globally, analysts predict Oxitec’s mosquito could bring in up to $400m in annual sales for its parent company, Intrexon.“” Common Dreams
Expectant Mothers of America Fear Not: There is no Jersey Devil, no Babadook and No Jersey Zika Baby™. It’s a PR Stunt and a Sick One
by Scott Creighton
Everything that happens in the US these days seems like a publicity stunt designed to aid one money-grabbing/gun-grabbing/regime change-backing agenda or another. And that’s because everything is.
No, the first microcephaly/Zika Baby™ was NOT “born” here in the United States. Do not be alarmed.
Big Pharma shipped in some desperate woman from a third world shit-hole, ripped out her fetus as quickly as they could and then waved it around in front of the complicit, soulless, corporatist media so they could FUCKING TERRORIZE PREGNANT MOTHERS HERE IN THE U.S. and get their Goddamned 1.9 billion dollars from congress.
That makes Zika Baby™ a wholly owned subsidiary of whatever pharmaceutical company it is that stands to cash in big on Obama’s 1.9 billion dollar plan to “fight Zika”
That’s as simple as it is. That’s what they did and they should be ashamed of themselves for having any part of this charade. It’s a contemptible, loathsome, hateful, detestable, reprehensible, abhorrent, abominable, awful and heinous PR stunt. And that is as gently as I can put it.
And it is the most jaded publicity stunt I have seen in a very long time.
Big Pharma has literally imported and then harvested a deformed child from an impoverished mother so they could terrify pregnant women across the US and turn a profit by doing it.
And yes, I am going to rant about it and yes, I am going to use colorful language while doing so because language like this was made for fucking stories like this one. If you don’t like “bad words” tune in for the next article. Otherwise, lets get started.
by Scott Creighton
UPDATE: (H/T Kevin Scott King) This is just another example of biased industry sponsored research which appears to be a growing trend in America today.
“Given the recognition of this causal relationship, we need to intensify our efforts toward the prevention of adverse outcomes caused by congenital Zika virus infection…
… Moving from a hypothesis that Zika virus is linked to certain adverse outcomes to a statement (?)that Zika virus is a cause of certain adverse outcomes allows for …. the development of a Zika virus vaccine” New England Journal of Medicine
So this isn’t a fact? It isn’t proven? This is merely a “statement”? What conclusion can we draw from that?
While Robert DeNiro goes from daytime talk-show to daytime talk-show saying he regrets pulling Vaxxed from the line-up of his Tribeca Film Festival, the CDC has cobbled together a new study that purports to use a new type of evaluation process to determine a causal relationship between the Zika Virus and microcephaly. The report was written by CDC authors and forms the basis of their new conclusion.
On the CDC webpage, the fraud is evident if you take the time to read it:
“This study marks a turning point in the Zika outbreak. It is now clear that the virus causes microcephaly.” study
“The report notes that no single piece of evidence provides conclusive proof that Zika virus infection is a cause of microcephaly and other fetal brain defects.” CDC announcement
“This cautious approach toward ascribing Zika virus as a cause of birth defects is not surprising, given that… no flavivirus has ever been shown definitively to cause birth defects in humans,4 and no reports of adverse pregnancy or birth outcomes were noted during previous outbreaks of Zika virus disease in the Pacific Islands.5,6″ study
So there is no concrete proof of causality, no flavivirus has ever caused this type of birth defect and previous Zika outbreaks never resulted in increased cases of microcephaly in effected populations.
So their conclusion stands in direct conflict with all of that, yet they still published their findings and thus, the debate is over.