As Trump Surges in Polls, “Russian Election Hacking” Story Serves as Pretext to Cover Massive Election Fraud in November

by Scott Creighton

As Donald Trump starts surging again in the national polls, suddenly and without any real evidence to support the claims, the press is parroting an FBI report that the Russians are hacking our election systems and essentially wiping voters off the registration lists.

“I’m less concerned about the attackers getting access to and downloading the information. I’m more concerned about the information being altered, modified or deleted. That’s where the real potential is for any sort of meddling in the election,” said Brian Kalkin, vice president of operations for the Center for ­Internet Security,“…

James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, has told Congress that ma­nipu­la­tion or deletion of data is the next big cyberthreat — “the next push on the envelope.” Washington Post

For those of you who don’t recall, Hillary Clinton stole the Democratic Party nomination via a number of illegal election rigging techniques, one of which was by purging hundreds of thousands of voters from the registration lists who were likely to vote for Bernie Sanders.

In California, the DNC purge of likely Sanders voters resulted in hundreds of thousands of his supporters having to fill out a provisional ballot, which of course, wasn’t counted… resulting in Hillary’s “victory” in a state where her rallies drew 500 people while his, 50,000.

Oddly enough:

“Until now, countries such as Russia and China have shown little interest in voting systems in the United States. But experts said that if a foreign government gained the ability to tamper with voter data — for instance by deleting registration recordssuch a hack could cast doubt on the legitimacy of U.S. elections...

For example, if a voter’s name were deleted and did not show up on the precinct list, the individual could still cast a provisional ballot, Hicks said. Once the voter’s status was confirmed, the ballot would be counted.” Washington Post

Some estimate up to a million provisional ballots were illegally shredded before they were counted by the DNC just after the California primary.

Continue reading

Scary (not really): Hillary Clinton’s “Nanna Nanna Boo Boo” Speech Demonizes Folks for “Thinking Outside the Norm”

by Scott Creighton

Well OK then.

Hillary Clinton’s team has apparently decided to counter all the horrible news that came out about her this past week regarding her “pay to play” policy at the State Department by pointing a finger at Donald Trump and proclaiming “nanna nanna boo boo, you’re racist doo doo”

That’s literally all they have. That’s it. That’s what they got. “Don’t pay attention to our Republican-leaning neocon-backed warmongering “Democratic Party” candidate’s VAST record of MAJOR criminal activity because… Trump knows some racists”

That’s it. That’s the campaign strategy, apparently scripted by the dim-witted middle school kids running her campaign.

This is nothing new, really. Whenever another Clinton family crime is rudely mentioned during this campaign, suddenly The Donald magically becomes even more racist than he was the day before and it’s always by some form of 6 degrees of separation:

“The Donald is supported by David Duke… ergo The Donald wants to shank all black people”

“There was a 6-pointed star on a Tweet The Donald reTweeted… ergo The Donald cooks Jews in his oven in Trump Tower”

The newest version of this trend was rolled out yesterday in the wake of all those revelations by the AP about Hillary Clinton setting up meets with donors to the Clinton Globalist Slush Fund Foundation and it deals with what they are now calling the “alt right” which apparently translates to “black, Latino and Jewish baby raping monsters”

On a side note, the only racist “baby raping monsters” I know of that have anything to do with this “election” were hired by Hillary Clinton to destabilize Libya and Syria by killing people of other faiths and… well… and raping babies. Talk about 6 degrees of separation. That’s like one degree. Or half a degree. At best it’s two degrees as our freedom fighters below seem to suggest.

Image result for hillary clinton libya

That said, the “alt right” attack spewing from the Clintonistas today like Mika Brzezinski on Morning Joe, is quite stunning in it’s audacity.

Continue reading

Irony or Pathos? 50 War-mongers, Liars and Terrorists from Bush Admin Say Trump is “too Reckless” to be President (so vote Killary)

by Scott Creighton

the Face of Stability according to the liars, war-mongers and terrorists of the Bush/Cheney administration

“Decision 2016!” has morphed from a Freakshow into Theater of the Absurd. White is black, up is down and Hillary Clinton is the “stable” candidate according to the war-mongers and zealots who brought us 9/11, Iraq and the Endless War of Terror.

The folks who made up some of the worst aspects of the previous administration in the White House, folks that brought us things like the USA Patriot Act, the anthrax attack, the abuse of the phony “Color Coded Terrorism Threat Level” alerts, Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, torture, extraordinary rendition, WMD lies galore, the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq and the Endless War (of) Terrorism…. Dov Zakheim, Philip Zelikow, Robert Zoellick, Tom Ridge, John Negroponte, Michael Hayden and Michael Chertoff (and 40 or so others)… have all signed a letter saying they don’t believe Donald Trump is fit to be president of the United States because he’s to “reckless” to occupy the Oval Office. Thus they are effectively endorsing Hillary Clinton by default as she is the only realistic alternative in our phony two party system.

We also know that many have doubts about Hillary Clinton, as do many of us. But Donald Trump is not the answer to America’s daunting challenges and to this critical election. We are convinced that in the Oval Office, he would be the most reckless President in American history50 Bush administration terrorists, war-mongers and habitual liars

Their argument is fraught with obvious contradictions which I blush to point out to my knowledgeable readership. But for the purposes of the historical record, I feel I must.

Continue reading

A Bad Mix: In the State Department, Transparency is Laughable and Proof of Accusations… not Necessary

by Scott Creighton (H/T Blacklisted News)

This is a good article for folks who don’t really understand American politics and foreign yet. It’s a crash course sort of.

In the first video Mark Toner, spokesman for the State Department, mentions the interns watching in the back of the room at a press conference. He tells the assorted press members they are back there and then chirps out the standard line that those interns would expect coming straight out of college, that this press conference is an example of the “transparency and democracy” they’ve been taught in school that our system attempts to promote. After saying that to the older, wiser reporters in the room, he can’t help but laugh. It’s a cruel lesson perhaps for the interns but a valuable one.

In this video the State Department says they don’t need to provide evidence of their claims that Russia violated Turkish airspace during their mission to provide assistance to the legitimate government of Syria against our “moderate” terrorists. The reporter keeps asking for proof and the spokesman is clearly upset that someone in the press corp would dare to be so insolent.

This is the state of affairs in our State Department at this time. Transparency is a laughable concept. Proof of their accusations is simply not necessary. I’m not exactly sure there could be a more dangerous combination of policies for any government to follow much less one that is by far the most funded and most intrusive in terms of waging aggressive campaigns against any country in the world where they see potential profits for the “national interests” they serve.

Another GOP Insider to Vote and Raise Money for “Progressive” Hillary Clinton

by Scott Creighton

Former President George W. Bush Hosts Economic Conference At Bush Center

Meg Whitman, former president and CEO of eBay, gives the closing remarks at The 4% Project Conference on April 12, 2011 at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. The economic conference, sponsored by the George W. Bush Presidential Center, intends to increase awareness of public policies and private business strategies that increase opportunity and prosperity for Americans.

REPUBLICANS FOR HILLARY!

What do you do when you actually lose the Democratic Party primary but steal it anyway and then are looking at the general election knowing full well you didn’t really win the nomination of your party? You court the Republican vote. That’s what you do.

“Calling Donald Trump an “authoritarian character” and a threat to democracy, Meg Whitman, a prominent Republican fundraiser and chief executive of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, endorsed Democrat Hillary Clinton’s White House bid late Tuesday…

In an interview with the New York Times, which first reported the endorsement, Whitman said it was time “to put country first before party” and that she would give a “substantial” contribution to Clinton’s campaign.

Trump’s unsteady hand would endanger our prosperity and national security. His authoritarian character could threaten much more,” Whitman wrote on Facebook.” Reuters

Electing Trump would “endanger” the prosperity of the billionaire class of America. That says it all doesn’t it?

“She (Whitman) revealed that Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic nominee, had reached out to her in a phone call about a month ago, one of the first indications that Mrs. Clinton is aggressively courting Republican leaders. ..

While Democrats openly appealed at their convention last week to Republicans uneasy with Mr. Trump, Mrs. Clinton and her top supporters have been making a similar cross-party pitch in private since before the Democratic nomination fight even came to its conclusion.” New York Times

During last night’s chat with Tom Keily, I spoke a little about how this current campaign being waged  by the unDemocratic Party was starting to look like Bush/Cheney 2004. Tom and I spoke about the definitively Republican tone of the campaign in it’s current form and why that was.

And here we are.

Continue reading

The Perversion of the unDNC Convention: Part 1 – “Vote for Hillary Because She Doesn’t Have a Penis” (you can’t make this stuff up)

by Scott Creighton

The unDemocratic National Committee”s (unDNC) convention has ironically been turned into a showcase of the basest most deplorable electioneering I’ve seen in a long time. You have to go back to Rudy “noun, verb, 9/11” Giuliani or George W. Bush’s “Orange Level Terror Alert” reelection campaign of 2004 to see anything even closely comparable to this. And it’s ironic because anything Hillary Clinton touches turns into slime. She’s like a snail: you can always tell where she’s been.

Just ask all those Haitians protesting at the unDNC convention this week, asking where that 6 billion dollars of rebuilding money went after Hillary put her sleazy husband in charge of the project. Ask them if everything she touches becomes tainted by her corruption. They’ll tell you. No one is listening in Happy Happy Joy Joy New Dem Land, but they will tell you, if you were to care enough to ask.

Two things strike me as the most jaw-droppingly perverse characteristics coming out of the convention thus far:

  1. Vote for Hillary because she has a vagina
  2. Da Ebil Ruskies are Colluding with Da Ebil Donald to Deny Saint Hillary the White House

The absurdity of the unDNC convention has reached level boss status and that is directly attributable to the person whom they have chosen to represent them this fall in the race for the most important office of the land. With a start like this, I am deeply ashamed to have ever called myself a Democrat.

(I have decided to break my coverage of these two perversity-laden developments of the unDNC convention into two articles since the second is so much longer than the first and requires less offensive language. Part 1 is below)

Continue reading

And then, there were none: Now there were “no snipers” involved in the Dallas Sniper Attack

by Scott Creighton

“Tonight it appears that two snipers shot ten police officers from elevated positions during the protest/rally,” Dallas Police Chief Brown

Over at AlterNet they are condemning “the media” for falsely suggesting there were multiple snipers firing from elevated positions in Dallas on Thursday night. Their claim is that Micah X. Johnson, an Army CARPENTER, took out 5 Dallas police officers and wounded 7 more in ground level tactical combat. A CARPENTER did that. Well, I guess if a carpenter could walk on water and resurrect himself from the dead, anything is possible.

Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,717 other followers