Not “Ridiculous Nonsense” Anymore: Yes, British Intelligence and Others Did Spy on Trump Campaign Using the 14 Eyes Program

by Scott Creighton

After listening to a month’s worth of the complicit media yelling their outrage at Sean Spicer, Devin Nunes, Judge Napolitano, Donald Trump and all the other “conspiracy theorists” (myself included) who dared suggest it was even slightly possible that British intelligence agencies used the 5 Eyes program to spy on the Trump campaign staff in the lead-up to the election and then share that information with the Obama administration (who at the time was working as a surrogate for the Hillary team) today we have confirmation that, yes, GCHQ and other British intel services did in fact spy on team Trump and share the information they collected with Obama. And it predates the “Russian hacking” bull crap.

The narrative being sculpted is that the Brits were simply assisting in the ongoing investigation into the “Russian hacking” story but the truth is, their intel dates back to late 2015… long before the “Russian hacking” narrative.

The Guardian, who broke this story, say “It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information..” and that is it in terms of providing any substantial evidence at all that they weren’t deliberately targeting the Trump campaign staff during the election process looking for juicy info they could feed Obama and American intelligence services to use against him in the election.

Turns out, a number of foreign agencies had their hands in the effort to thwart the Trump candidacy and Russia wasn’t one of them.

Continue reading

Advertisements

The Declassified Russian Hacking “Intelligence” Report is Devoid of Any Evidence and Apparently Based on Previous Lies

by Scott Creighton

Yesterday (Friday Jan. 6th 2017) around 1pm, the Department of National Intelligence released their declassified report (PDF) on the Russian hacking story or the Russian “influence” story that has been taking shape here in the States surrounding Hillary Clinton’s crash and burn presidential campaign of 2016. At about the same time, a man got off a plane in Florida and took a gun from his checked bag and opened fire on people in the baggage claim area of an airport, emptying 3 clips before lying down on the ground and waiting to be arrested. That man claimed earlier that the CIA had been trying to force him to watch “ISIS” videos.

Each and every page of the declassified report contains in the top header an official disclaimer of sorts which reads:

“This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.”

Key here is the fact that the report contains no facts. None. Zip. Zilch. No evidence reported in the report whatsoever.

Also key is the word “assessment” and in the beginning of the declassified report, they take the time to explain that term:

“When Intelligence Community analysts use words such as “we assess” or “we judge,” they are conveying an analytic assessment or judgment. Some analytic judgments are based directly on collected information; others rest on previous judgments, which serve as building blocks in rigorous analysis

“(O)thers rest on previous judgements”. Got that? No evidence reported in this report and they tell you right off the bat that in all likelihood, this “assessment” is based on “previous” assessment, which as we all know, were bullshit. “Grizzly steppe” anyone?

Here is a little glimpse into some of those “previous judgements”:

this report is provided “as is” for informational purposes only. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within.”

The current assessment based in part on previous assessments which the intelligence services provide no “warranties of any kind” regarding the information they provided.

Got that? New bullshit based on piles of older, baseless bullshit.

Buried deep in various articles about the new release we find a little rational thought on this evidence. That of course is buried under tons of regurgitated, unsubstantiated accusations leveled at Vladamir Putin, Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks.

The report contains scant information on attribution
That may not be enough for some critics, who have been publicly calling on the intelligence community to release more information explaining how it linked hacking operations to Russia” The Verge

And by “scant information” they mean “no information”

“Some critics” may not find their baseless accusations to be “enough” to jump on the New McCarthyism bandwagon. How unfortunate. But apparently the Verge doesn’t mind Megaphoning Mockingbird fake news:

Continue reading

Democracy Wins: Electoral College Voters Cast Votes in Line With Their State’s Wishes

by Scott Creighton

First of all, stop saying Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 2.8 million votes. It’s simply not verified in my opinion.

All of those additional votes came well after the election was finalized and almost every single one of them came from one state, California, where Killary “won” by a whopping 4.3 million votes (most showed up well after the election)

Alex Padilla is the Secretary of State in California and as we know, the Sec. of State overseas the elections of a state. He’s a Democrat who also just happens to have two Mexican parents and when he took office his primary concern was to “modernize” voting in California.

“Padilla said his priorities include upgrading the state’s voting systems to use modern technology and making the act of voting more accessible and convenient..” LA Times

That’s right. He brought in more electronic voting machines.

Some of you might have forgotten the massive election fraud that took place in California during the 2016 Democratic Party primary elections, but I didn’t. Millions of likely Bernie supporters found their party affiliation suddenly switched from Democrat to Republican or Independent come election day which meant they had to ask for a certain special type of ballot or vote via an provisional ballot which were later shredded before they were actually counted.

There has been no recount of the general election results in California. Jill Stein wasn’t interested in asking for a recount in states where Hillary clearly stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders this year. In fact, she didn’t seem all that interested in doing recounts in states where Hillary won the general… for some reason.

So this story that Hillary won the popular vote is bunk because it is based entirely on a state where we know election fraud was already committed on behalf of Hillary Clinton this year. Stop making that claim.

Why would they pad the numbers in California after Hillary clearly lost the election? It’s simple: because they needed her to “win” the popular vote in order for John Podesta to run “install Hillary no matter what” campaign.

Continue reading

Is the Weiner Laptop Actually a Clintonemail.com Backup from 2013 that He Gave the FBI to Stay Out of Prison?

by Scott Creighton

huma-2People are wondering why there were so many emails on a laptop Anthony Weiner had shared with Huma Abadin which ended up in the hands of the FBI back on Oct. 3rd 2016. Even if she had linked it to her State Department account and her clintonemail.com account, there is no way there would be that many on it. I think there is a very good reason there were so many on it. It wasn’t an overflow storage unit, it was a clintonemail.com back-up created in 2013 by the private company that set up her new server after she left office at the requests of Hillary Clinton and her personal assistant, Huma Abadin. That’s why there were so many emails on it.

What did Anthony Weiner do on Oct. 3rd 2016? He was facing a charge of exchanging sexually explicit texts with a minor which was after he had been busted several times cheating on Huma Abadin in much the same way over a period of time and well after Huma publicly stood by her man and forgave him his indiscretions. Weiner’s relationship with Huma was done and thus, so to was his “in” with the political dynasty known as the Clinton family.

Weiner was undoubtedly looking at prison time and if you know anything about prison, you know other inmates (and guards for that matter) don’t think highly of pedophiles… especially silver spooner pedos who think they are bad-asses (just look at Weiner’s dic-pics if you don’t know what I am talking about)

He certainly wasn’t going to get any help from the Clinton machine staying out of prison. Hell, after what he did to Hillary’s “other daughter” he must have figured they would help the prosecution before they helped him.

So what does a weasel do in a situation like that? What does he do when he remembers his estranged wife just happened to leave a laptop in their shared home with something like 650,000 emails from Hillary’s clintonemail.com server?

I know what I would do. Cut a deal. And I think that’s what the sleazy bastard did.

It’s all over Twitter right now that the FBI has reminded folks that Huma Abadin testified to them in April of this year (full transcript here page 7 and 8 pictured below) that she and another Clinton aide talked about making a back-up of Hillary’s clintonemail.com server when they left the State Department so she could use it while writing her books in the future. The location of that laptop, she said, was unknown to her at that time.

huma-1

According to Huma’s testimony, she knew a laptop had been created as a back-up to the clintonemail.com server for the purposes of Hillary being able to access her information later when she started writing a book about her time in office. That laptop’s whereabouts were unknown to Huma at the time.

Continue reading

Joe Biden, Doing His Best Rainmaker Act, Says Our Fascist Oligarchy is Based on “Trust” and Trump is Going to Spoil Everything

by Scott Creighton

VP Joe Biden, a Clinton campaign surrogate, is angry that someone would DARE insinuate that our election system is rigged and that we don’t actually live in a democracy. He says it detracts from the “good news” we should be reading like our high school graduation rate increasing to the highest it’s been in history (that’s because all those for-profit charter schools mass produce idiots and rubber stamp them as “graduates” with students barely knowing how to read, much less teaching them how to think for themselves).

According to Biden, there is a sacred “trust” that Donald Trump is undermining when he suggests the election system, and the whole system in general, is rigged against the will of the people. He delivered his little speech with that phony, slimy pedophilesque “deep emotional passion” that better befits a rainmaker or a faith healer than it does a Vice President of the United States.

“its a threat to the democratic process which is based on (clasp hands together and look pleadingly to audience) TRUST. No democratic process can be sustained without a sense of TRUST”

You have to TRUST us and the oligarchs of this country that everything is fine and that the will of the people will be done. That’s what he is saying.

And no, we don’t.

Continue reading

Yes, the Election Will Be Stolen

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Go here to see Hillary team feeding questions to reporters in a short presser on her plane after the debate.

All of the neocons back Hillary Clinton. The war-mongering bi-partisan establishment think-tanks back Hillary Clinton. Newspapers that have backed republican candidates for decades, even centuries, back Hillary Clinton. The complicit corporate media backs Hillary Clinton to the detriment of their facade of being neutral in this election. All of this because Hillary Clinton represents a continuation of our global hegemonic ideology set in motion by Dick Cheney and those same neocons in the 2000 PNAC study paper Rebuilding Americas Defenses.

Yes, the polls are skewed to count more democrat voters and more middle aged women so that they will show Hillary Clinton with a large lead. They’ve been doing this for a while. In fact, it’s a tactic we use in other countries when we try to influence elections in favor of candidates who we know will advance our national interests. The idea is simple: make supporters of our opposition feel the fight is already lost so they don’t show up and, if needed, create a false narrative of the opinion of the population to support the rigged election results prior to the rigging.

Why do I say the election will be stolen? Here’s one reason:

The CNN moderator was all smiles when she went to ask the question about whether or not these undecided voters made up their minds during the final debate and if so, who did they now decide to vote for. After she got the results, she wasn’t smiling anymore. Five chose to vote for Hillary while 10 decided The Donald was their guy. Only one of the five saying they decided for Hillary was a woman while five women decided to vote for Trump.

You see, the problem for these war-mongers and sympathizers of theirs is that there just simply isn’t enough of them to vote Killary into office. People are sick of neoliberal austerity being shoved down our throats. People are sick of “free trade” deals that do nothing but crush worker’s standards of living while enriching a few friends of people in high places. And people are sick of the endless war, the hundred year war, the Global War OF Terror we are waging all across the globe with no authorization and against international law.

The.. people.. don’t.. want.. total.. global.. hegemony.. at the cost of the lives of their sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.

The people are sick of the lies, the spying, the political correctness and the Orwellian world we find ourselves in.

The people want something different and for all their efforts to dissuade folks from a CHANGE vote, the establishment are failing. And they are failing miserably.

So what do they do? They do what they always do… they make ready to rig the election because they can’t afford at this point to allow the people to “vote the wrong way” when the whole of the New World Order is right there at their fingertips.

Continue reading

Angry Bernie Birds. Want Revolution? Forget the House Parties… VOTE TRUMP! (what?!?)

by Scott Creighton

They stole the nomination from Bernie supporters, from the real progressives in the party and there were a lot of them. So now we are faced with only one choice… the nuclear option.

People say one of my big drawbacks is that I don’t offer enough solutions to the problems I expose in my work. Ok. Fair enough. Here’s a solution:

All you Bernie supporters out there who are mad as hell and can’t take it anymore should go out and start beating the bushes in support of… Donald Trump.

WHAT!?!? Are you KIDDING?!?!

Nope. Dead serious. Vote TRUMP. Not only vote for Trump, make it painfully obvious to everyone everywhere that you are GOING to vote Trump then see what happens.

Look:

  • Trump didn’t steal your nomination, did he?
  • Trump didn’t illegally attack and invade Libya for French and UK business interests, did he?
  • Trump didn’t set up an illegal email server so he could commit more illegal acts while acting as Sec. of State and get away with it, did he?
  • Trump isn’t (as much of a) dedicated servant to the Likudniks in Israel, is he?

Personally, I don’t see the comparison. Any halfwit can run around saying Donald Trump WILL BE EVIL if elected president (like Bernie Sanders for example) but the obvious fact here is… that is a prediction, like saying the New England Patriots will win the Super Bowl this year. It’s a guess.

However, we already KNOW Hillary Clinton is evil, so the “lesser of two evils” theory is tossed out the window. In the selection set, there is only ONE proven “evil”

That said… Donald Trump, as this article lays out, will NOT be the next president of the United States. He doesn’t want to be, first of all. He’s a Hillary fan. Always has been. Plus he’s a aging billionaire playboy who figures he can parlay this campaign into a cushy multi-million dollar TV payday or even his own network (run by Roger Ailes and Steve Bannon perhaps? Hmmm…)

So voting for The Donald isn’t about turning 1600 Pennsylvania Ave into Trump Towers East. It’s about forcing them to expose themselves stealing the election. It’s about legitimacy or the lack thereof. It’s about coming together in a common cause with other folks out there who are sick and tired of the business as usual of the Business Firsters.

It’s about firing the first shot of our real revolution and making them fire back, not just sitting around watching Bernie videos sipping lattes with our petty bourgeoisie neighbors wondering about which dog catcher nominees are “progressive” enough to get our support (while we vote for the neocon Hillary Clinton)

Continue reading