The Fake “21 Coptic Christians Beheading” Video – Part 1: Timing

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: (H/T Chads) Even Fox News admits it’s a fake.


All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” Edmund Burke

When 21 laborers in America die because the Obama administration has cut funding to OSHA to the point where they only have one guy to check on 50,000 job sites (yes, it’s an exaggeration, slightly), neoliberal talking heads like Bill O’Reilly get hard-ons and they call it “freedom”. Or when 21 laborers anywhere die because they can’t afford things like medicine even though they are working 50 hours a week (not an exaggeration), neoliberals like Bill start salivating at the thought of all that glorious “growth”

That’s because, as we all know by now, “Freedom” to the members of the neoliberal Washington Consensus (neocons, New Dems, (big “L”) Libertarians) means “freedom from New Deal social and economic justice reforms… and “Growth” simply means “the growth of the billionaire class’ profit margins”

So imagine my shock and awe when I heard Bill O’Reilly calling for a new “Holy War”, a new Crusades if you will, over the poorly produced video of the deaths of 21 Coptic Christian laborers in Libya at the hands of the fictitious “ISIS™”

“The Holy War is here and, unfortunately, it seems the president of the United States will be the last one to acknowledge it…I’m gonna also make a call …for every cleric in the country next Sunday, Saturday, Friday in the mosques, with the imams, to address this with their congregation and to say enough, that we people of good faith have to tell our leader to get in gear. I’d like to see every cleric in this country do that. …Let’s make that happen. And I want every pastor, every priest, every rabbi and every imam to email me personally and tell me you’re gonna do that and I’ll read as many on the air as I can.” Bill O’Reilly

Simultaneously, fake progressive sites like the Huffington Post are producing equally sophomoric propaganda pieces in support of Obama’s endless war of aggression in lock-step with those of the O’Reilly faction. Thus the true nature of the Washington Consensus becomes easier to see.

Let’s break this down just a tiny bit if we could on a few of the most basic elements of this event starting with:

Part 1: Timing

Continue reading

It was a Brit Ex-Con Who Attacked CENTCOM? So Where Should ObamaGod Bomb Next?

by Scott Creighton

Let’s see if I got this straight: All of these propaganda videos and beheadings and sex-slave rings and hacks seem to be coming from British “jihadists”.

Shit man. Didn’t we invade Iraq because someone lied and said al Qaeda was hanging out in that country? Didn’t we bomb Afghanistan to keep it from being a safe haven for the evil doers?

I mean, if that’s the standard… tell me again why Obama’s precious drones aren’t flying over London? Oh yeah, that’s right… there’s no oil in London. They just steal everyone else’s like they’re doing in Iraq. Silly me. I forgot.

Continue reading

The Newest and Most Dangerous Violent Extremist Group of ALL TIME! The TARD™ Menace

by Scott Creighton

It is with extreme sadness that I have to admit, after all these years of exposing and debunking various dubious bullshite “extremist” groups that have been created in order to manufacture consent for one operation or another in service to the Global War of Terror and the banks who fund it.. I have found this latest threat is more than credible… it’s hyper-credible… it’s incredulous… and it’s all around us just waiting to strike.

We are all doomed and therefore must sacrifice any number of freedoms on the altar of security in order to preserve our way of life that currently sucks and is getting suckier because after all, USA™…USA™…USA™

When asked why the White House called an emergency press conference this morning, State Department™ Spokesman Jen Psaki said :

“ISIS™? No, this meeting isn’t about ISIS™ . ISIS™  is so August™. This is September™. Try to keep up. We’re here to talk about TARD™ , the most ruthless, vicious, evil, monstrous, impolite, unfriendly, antisocial social media expert terrorist group to ever have occupied a green screen sound stage! Duh.”

Psaki said we need to build an international coalition to put an end to  TARD™ (not to be confused with the Coalition of the Willing used as cover to create the impression of international legitimacy the Bush administration could not get at the start of the invasion of Iraq back in 2003) she called it a Coalition of the Willing TARDS™ because, as she said:

TARD™  is EVERYWHERE.  TARD™  is NOWHERE. Therefore, we must be prepared to allow ObamaGod the flexibility to bomb EVERYTHING and EVERYONE without asking congress or the people. It’s the TARD™ way!”

Like Colin Powell did at the UN Security Council, Psaki knocked it out of the park. Who in their RIGHT mind can argue with that kind of logic I ask you?

Continue reading

The Vegas Shooting – the “New World Order and Shit” and Other Dangerous Ideas

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: see several updates at the end of this article


Years ago I wrote that when they decide to make that big leap from the slightly open society we have now to the totalitarian closed one we are destined for, one of the things they need to do is round up the dissidents in a very public manner so that not only are they out of the way, but so they will serve as an example of what happens to you when you think the wrong things.

You can see examples of this taking place right now in Egypt, Thailand and Ukraine. History is rife with examples. Look no farther than Indonesia when we installed Suharto or Chile after we installed Pinochet.

The most recent mass casualty event in the on-going American Gladio op took place in Vegas a few days ago. Two police officers and a woman shopping at WalMart tragically lost their lives. Was this simply a case of two bottom feeders going off? Was it part of a destabilization campaign designed to remake the country into something else? Was Cass Sunstein right about his “dangerous ideas” and the need to wipe them all off the interwebs or is someone helping him make his point as the new CISPA is about to be rolled out?

Let’s see.

Continue reading

Aurora Massacre: Kangaroo Court Redefines “Show Trial”

by Scott Creighton

Homeland Security Prosecution: We have found a witch radicalize homegrown extremist, may we burn him?

Judge Carlos A. Samour: How do you know he’s a witch radicalized homegrown extremist?

Homeland Security Prosecution: He LOOKS like one

James: I’m not a witch radicalized homegrown extremist!

Judge Carlos A. Samour: But you are dressed as one.

James: They dressed me up like this.

Homeland Security Prosecution: Ah, no we didn’t. Ok, we did the hair. And the beard. And the thing on his head. And the Hannibal Lecter thing…. but he did turn me into a newt!

Judge Carlos A. Samour: What?

Homeland Security Prosecution: BURN HIM ANYWAY!

real deal

be honest…. Does this make my butt look guilty?

The James Holmes saga is probably one of the most ridiculous pretend prosecutions I’ve ever seen.

The court have already ruled that they can use “truth serum” on the guy as they promise to bring in something like 60 million “witnesses” to say they saw a guy in a gas mask shooting people … and yet there’s not one single clear image of James Holmes in the Century 16 theater that night from the numbers of security cameras at that location.

In a real court of justice, there’s a reason they don’t bring the accused into court dressed up like Hannibal Lecter from Silence of the Lambs. It tends  to prejudice the jury in favor of prosecution, thus preventing a fair trial.

But apparently that’s not important in Colorado. Their courts must be interested in something other than justice.

They tried to have little James Holmes manacled and wrapped up like the Butcher of Seville for the upcoming trial but that didn’t fly so the judge decided they would put a restraining harness on James under his cheap suit and literally chain him to a bolted ring on the floor like he was a mad dog.

This is supposed to be a compromise.

Need I remind anyone that the police department who arrested Holmes, found him drugged and out cold in his car behind the theater, and they would have suffered MAJOR losses to police personnel had James not warned them about booby traps set up in his apartment?

Need I remind anyone of the second gas mask found at the end of the building where Holmes could not have been, dropped there by someone who had been reported by witnesses as the gunman as he fled the scene?

Nah, just chain him to the floor like a rabid bear and the prosecution can have Homeland Security standing by with riot guns and armor “just in case” the bailiffs can’t handle a 145 pound kid.

And I know.. we’ll call it “justice”

Fuck it… they’re trying their damnedest to convict this guy in the court of public opinion, they should just bring him into the courtroom in this get-up.

Forget subtle, go for broke. This is America, no one’s paying attention. And if they are, we’ll call ‘em “truthers” and that will shut them up.

Continue reading

If You Want My Intel, I Get the Intel of the Proven Terrorists First – It’s Only Fair

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Salon Calls Me an “Edward Snowden Truther”

UPDATE: The Missing Motive of the Snowden Psyop: CISPA (yes… CISPA)

Here’s what I want.

I want access to all communications, email, snail-mail, PalTalk, Google, Hotmail, Yahoo, IM, phone calls, sex-chats, Weiner pics from Weiner, smoke signals, channeled spirits of dead ancestors, I want everything… and I want complete access to every bit of information of everything about the following people for the following reasons.

I want these things because if the whole point of collecting everything on everyone is to prevent more acts of terrorism, then we have to pay special attention to those who have a penchant to commit acts of terrorism and a motive to do so.

Sounds like common sense to me.

If someone pulls off a particularly professional looking bank job, you don’t immediately rush over to the local elementary school and start water-boarding the 3rd graders and smacking Ms. Pope around, do you?

Do you?

Well, maybe in Aurora, Colorado you do, but in the civilized world, you start looking at people who have a HISTORY of bank jobs.That’s pretty deep huh? I figured that out watching Barney Miller reruns when I was in elementary school. That’s how deep that is.

I think combating domestic terrorism might just fall under that same rubric, don’t you?

Or do I need to drop out of high school, community college and the Army Reserves basic training to become a master spy sleuth before I can make that connection?

Do you feel the sarcasm?

I personally have never terrorized anyone.

I shot a bird once when I was a kid. I still feel bad about that, so if ANYONE has information on me, something is terribly wrong with their stated reasons to be collecting my personal data, isn’t there?  That seems pretty f*cking simple to understand, doesn’t it? I’m not a terrorist, I never killed or harmed anyone… ergo… think it through now

But there are in fact many out there who have committed overt acts of terrorism in the past and some who are openly threatening to commit more acts of terrorism and some still who are in the latter stages of debating as too whether or not they should give some weapons and more money, more of MY MONEY, to admitted terrorists.

Here’s a hint congress and the NSA… these terrorists, as it just so happens, are mainly the ones claiming we should be ok with them collecting data complied on us, people who are not terrorists, in order to prevent more terrorism.

The terrorists want all the information they can get their blood-soaked hands on regarding the non-terrorists in order to prevent…. more terrorism.

Does that make any fucking sense?

Well it does if you are a terrorist and want to know when the townsfolk are coming with the torches and pitchforks.

But aside from that, no, it makes no sense whatsoever.

Does it sound like fighting the Global War on Terrorism or does it sound more like… oh I don’t know… TERRORISM?

So, if the whole thing is to prevent acts of terrorism, it only stands to reason that the ONLY people who are ALLOWED to collect data, should be the people who have not committed acts of terrorism for prolonged periods of time. Or VOTED for terrorism. Or TURNED their backs on terrorism. Or love their “special relationship” with nation states that are blatant sponsors of state terrorism.

In short, the agencies and the people who are getting all that illegal data and compiling it on us NON-TERRORISTS are the last people who should be getting information like that.

Do you take a 3 time convicted arsonist, put him in charge of the fire department and give him unrestricted access to matches and gas stations telling him when people aren’t going to be home and giving him the fire escape schematics for the local daycare? NO. That’s not a good idea.

It doesn’t take a high school dropout with a pole dancing girlfriend to figure that sh*t out, does it?

So, in order to even think about looking at illegally collected data in an attempt to stop terrorism, we should all be able to agree on the very simple concept that TERRORISTS should not be the ones getting said illegally gathered data on innocent civilians just trying to live their lives in peace.

After all, innocent civilians just living their lives in peace are OFTEN the TARGETS of the terrorists, now aren’t they?

That said, I purpose that since I am not a terrorist and so many in the intelligence circles are, I am given all the data to look at on who quite probably would be considered Public Terrorist #1 if they were from Iran.

And based on the criteria already established, you will be happy too know, I already have a list of people and organizations that I want complete access to everything they have done since they were in grade school.

Continue reading

Manufactured Hero Edward Snowden: Glenn Greenwald Goes “Full Retard”

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Salon Calls Me an “Edward Snowden Truther”

UPDATE: The Missing Motive of the Snowden Psyop: CISPA (yes… CISPA)

The other day I wondered if the Guardian set Glenn up for a fall on this one. I figured maybe they told him they vetted this new NSA whistle-blower and sent him off to Hong Kong to meet a high-school drop-out with his Rubic’s Cube in what appeared to be a secret meeting scenario written by the former writing staff of Get Smart. Turn’s out I wasn’t far off…

“Thus far we have revealed four independent programs: the bulk collection of telephone records, the PRISM program, Obama’s implementation of an aggressive foreign and domestic cyber-operations policy, and false claims by NSA officials to Congress. Every one of those articles was vetted by multiple Guardian editors and journalists – not just me. Democratic partisans have raised questions about only one of the stories – the only one that happened to be also published by the Washington Post (and presumably vetted by multiple Post editors and journalists) – in order to claim that an alleged inaccuracy in it means our journalism in general is discredited.” Glenn Greenwald

Yes Mr. Greenwald, when you make an inaccurate statement in your article, your journalism is discredited. If you come out backing some sudden NSA whistle-blower as the next Daniel Elsburg and then it turns out he’s a high school drop-out flake with no real intel to speak of, your really going to be discredited. And unfortunately I fear you don’t really understand that is why you and the filmmaker, the Academy Award-nominated Laura Poitras, were specifically requested by the career NSA employee and manufactured hero… in case you hadn’t figured that out yet.

Continue reading


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,069 other followers