Joe Biden, Doing His Best Rainmaker Act, Says Our Fascist Oligarchy is Based on “Trust” and Trump is Going to Spoil Everything

by Scott Creighton

VP Joe Biden, a Clinton campaign surrogate, is angry that someone would DARE insinuate that our election system is rigged and that we don’t actually live in a democracy. He says it detracts from the “good news” we should be reading like our high school graduation rate increasing to the highest it’s been in history (that’s because all those for-profit charter schools mass produce idiots and rubber stamp them as “graduates” with students barely knowing how to read, much less teaching them how to think for themselves).

According to Biden, there is a sacred “trust” that Donald Trump is undermining when he suggests the election system, and the whole system in general, is rigged against the will of the people. He delivered his little speech with that phony, slimy pedophilesque “deep emotional passion” that better befits a rainmaker or a faith healer than it does a Vice President of the United States.

“its a threat to the democratic process which is based on (clasp hands together and look pleadingly to audience) TRUST. No democratic process can be sustained without a sense of TRUST”

You have to TRUST us and the oligarchs of this country that everything is fine and that the will of the people will be done. That’s what he is saying.

And no, we don’t.

Continue reading

DNC Lawyers Argue No Liability: Neutrality Is Merely ‘Political Rhetoric’

UPDATE: You know what Bernie does as a result of this betrayal from the DNC? He runs around raising millions of dollars for them. I guess he had to something for that new cottage by the lake he bought. His supporters should sue Bernie as well.

(Let me see if I got this straight: you have a woman running for president who is extremely unpopular because she is a proven habitual liar. You have that same candidate pulling ahead with the female vote because 9 other women came forward just recently and lied about decades old interactions with the other candidate. And you have Debbie Wasserman Schultz who lied to the entire party and all the party faithful when she and the DNC claimed they would give the other candidates for the nomination a fair shot at winning and they now claim we can’t hold them accountable because all those Bernie supporters KNEW she would lie and steal the nomination for her friend Hillary Clinton. All of that and the MSM is out there lying on an hourly basis about Trump doing whatever they can to ensure that lying woman candidate becomes president. Does that about sum it up? It’s a real shame and embarrassment that this woman is going to go down in history as our first female president. Just look at what it took to usher her into office. When she is sworn in, historically speaking, it will truly be a bad day for the better half of our species.)

from the Observer

Democratic National Committee (DNC) lawyers responded on October 14 in support of their motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit against the DNC and former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, maintaining that a fair and balanced Democratic primary is just a “political promise.”

“Courts have uniformly rejected attempts to litigate on the basis of purported political promises, including ‘statements of principle and intent in the political realm’” wrote the DNC lawyers. “These decisions have not always been explicit in their reasoning, but they reflect the long-standing judicial understanding that, because they inherently raise serious questions of justiciability and threaten core First Amendment rights of political speech and association, “[p]olitical squabbles are not as easily resolved in federal courts as are some other disputes.” Wymbs v. Republican State Exec. Comm. of Fla., 719 F.2d 1072, 1077 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 281-85 (1962)); see also Berg, 574 F. Supp. 2d at 529 (“[V]oters are free to vote out of office those politicians seen to have breached campaign promises,” but “[f]ederal courts … are not and cannot be in the business of enforcing political rhetoric”); Dornan v. U.S. Sec’y of Def., 676 F. Supp. 6, 7 (D.D.C. 1987) (holding action based in part on political promise nonjusticiable); see also O’Brien v. Brown, 409 U.S. 1, 4-5 (1972); Irish v. Democratic Farmer-Labor Party of Minn., 399 F.2d 119, 120-21 (8th Cir. 1968)”

The DNC lawyers’ argument here is that the charter’s demand that the chair and DNC staff remain neutral throughout the Democratic primary is a political promise, similar to policy proposals made in campaign platforms that aren’t fulfilled when in office. The lawyers cite an argument made in another court case stating that voters are free to vote out politicians. In their initial motion to dismiss the lawsuit, DNC lawyers argued Bernie Sanders supporters were aware the DNC and Wasserman Schultz were biased against their candidate. Now their argument is a neutral DNC and DNC chair are just political promises, leaving voters susceptible to the deception that the DNC would treat Clinton and Sanders equally. The lawyers argue liability only applies to consumer-merchant relationships.

[read more here]

(Pardon me for asking, but doesn’t a party member’s donation to the DNC fall under that category of “consumer-merchant relationships“? and therefore, wouldn’t that argument in and of itself set up the DNC for another lawsuit filed on behalf of Bernie voters who donated to the Democratic National Committee? Just a thought.)

Yes, the Election Will Be Stolen

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Go here to see Hillary team feeding questions to reporters in a short presser on her plane after the debate.

All of the neocons back Hillary Clinton. The war-mongering bi-partisan establishment think-tanks back Hillary Clinton. Newspapers that have backed republican candidates for decades, even centuries, back Hillary Clinton. The complicit corporate media backs Hillary Clinton to the detriment of their facade of being neutral in this election. All of this because Hillary Clinton represents a continuation of our global hegemonic ideology set in motion by Dick Cheney and those same neocons in the 2000 PNAC study paper Rebuilding Americas Defenses.

Yes, the polls are skewed to count more democrat voters and more middle aged women so that they will show Hillary Clinton with a large lead. They’ve been doing this for a while. In fact, it’s a tactic we use in other countries when we try to influence elections in favor of candidates who we know will advance our national interests. The idea is simple: make supporters of our opposition feel the fight is already lost so they don’t show up and, if needed, create a false narrative of the opinion of the population to support the rigged election results prior to the rigging.

Why do I say the election will be stolen? Here’s one reason:

The CNN moderator was all smiles when she went to ask the question about whether or not these undecided voters made up their minds during the final debate and if so, who did they now decide to vote for. After she got the results, she wasn’t smiling anymore. Five chose to vote for Hillary while 10 decided The Donald was their guy. Only one of the five saying they decided for Hillary was a woman while five women decided to vote for Trump.

You see, the problem for these war-mongers and sympathizers of theirs is that there just simply isn’t enough of them to vote Killary into office. People are sick of neoliberal austerity being shoved down our throats. People are sick of “free trade” deals that do nothing but crush worker’s standards of living while enriching a few friends of people in high places. And people are sick of the endless war, the hundred year war, the Global War OF Terror we are waging all across the globe with no authorization and against international law.

The.. people.. don’t.. want.. total.. global.. hegemony.. at the cost of the lives of their sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.

The people are sick of the lies, the spying, the political correctness and the Orwellian world we find ourselves in.

The people want something different and for all their efforts to dissuade folks from a CHANGE vote, the establishment are failing. And they are failing miserably.

So what do they do? They do what they always do… they make ready to rig the election because they can’t afford at this point to allow the people to “vote the wrong way” when the whole of the New World Order is right there at their fingertips.

Continue reading

All Hell Breaks Loose Last Night in New York and Syria So Obama Goes Ahead with Race-baiting Campaign Event for Hillary

by Scott Creighton


With bombs going off and being found in New York (8:30pm EST) and an emergency UN Security Council meeting (7:30 pm EST) called to discuss the Pentagon openly attacking the Syrian military yesterday (which killed 63 Syrian soldiers and allowed “ISIS” to surge after the attack) President Obama went forward with his scheduled speech at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation conference in which he angrily instructed black people to get out the vote for Hillary. He told them he would be “insulted” if they didn’t come out for the corrupt war-monger this year like they did for him in 2008 and 2012 when Obama represented the idea of “CHANGE” and supposedly opposed interventionism across the world.

After the initial explosion a second device, a pressure cooker with a phone taped to it, was found. The validity of that device remains in question as it was not detonated at the site but rather taken back to be investigated and it supposedly had a note written on a piece of paper found with it.

Bombs going off in New York city, a possible war unfolding in the Middle East… and Obama’s primary objective is to go out and angrily instruct black people that they need to vote for one of the most disliked war-mongering candidates in the history of American politics? The same candidate who’s previous campaign produced the Birther movement?

Is this a joke?

Nope. No joke.

Continue reading

Looks Like The DNC is Readying the Flock to Replace Hillary with Biden

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: As I said in the article, they are screwed if they try to force Joe Biden on the Dems. Don’t take my word for it…

Hillary’s flailing poll numbers, her constant reveals relating to her various crimes of the past and her sagging health issues are making it seem quite clear that she may have to be removed from the ticket in order for the Goldman Sachs crowd to be happy about their chances in November. To that end, there’s a lot of talk circulating in the media right now on the fringes about Hillary Clinton being replaced by someone at the top of the ticket.

David Shuster started the whole thing off yesterday afternoon with a simple Tweet:

From there the story has spread and it looks like the selection process will be about as democratic as the primary process was:

“Should Mrs Clinton drop out of the race, the DNC would hold a special meeting to vote for a successor. Party rules indicate that a new nominee would be elected by a simple majority vote.” Express UK

Yes, the establishment DNC who cheated Bernie Sanders voters out of their primary pick will be the only ones allowed to have any say in who replaces Killary at the top of the ticket:

“If Hillary Clinton or any other Democratic nominee had to leave the race, the DNC would need to gavel back into session and re-do the process all over again. The DNC consists of more than 200 members, selected by Democrats in all 50 states as well as the chairs and vice chairs of each state party. Except this time, the average Joe rank-and-file Democrat would be shut out; it is the DNC officials that were railed at throughout this year’s campaign who are afforded the power of finding a replacement.  Article III, Section 1, the clause that provides the DNC with that power, is as straightforward as can be: “The Democratic National Committee shall have general responsibility for the affairs of the Democratic Party between National Conventions…This responsibility shall include…filling vacancies in the nominations for the office of President and Vice President.” National Interests blog

Continue reading

Conspiracy Theorists Were Right Again: Something is Seriously Wrong with Hillary Clinton’s Health

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: I guess I was a little late: according to David Shuster, they are considering replacing Hillary Clinton as the nominee.


It would appear that the Dems have rigged the nomination process once again now stating that if she backs out, then THEY get to have a little vote in their back offices and decide who becomes the nominee instead of it going to Bernie (who actually won the nomination in the first place before they stole it from him)

“Should Mrs Clinton drop out of the race, the DNC would hold a special meeting to vote for a successor. Party rules indicate that a new nominee would be elected by a simple majority vote.” Express UK

The Express article says that Bernie Sanders, Tim Kaine and Joe Biden are the potential candidates to replace Hillary Clinton on the ticket. The only one of that group who had a single vote cast for them during the primary process is Bernie Sanders but according to the article, he’s largely considered the last person in line for the task.

Last week Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post wrote an article titled “Can We Just Stop Talking About Hillary Clinton’s Health Now?“ which I took him to task for on Sept. the 7th. I wrote that the totality of evidence proved that something was seriously wrong with Hillary Clinton’s health and used my own personal experience with similar medical issues to do so.

The vast majority of the MSM attacked anyone who wondered about Hillary Clinton’s health issues claiming were were all “conspiracy theorists” for simply acknowledging what appeared to be serious respiratory issues she was having recently.

Yesterday, Hillary had to leave a ceremony commemorating the events of 9/11 in New York a little early due to what the Clinton camp called an “overheating” episode. The temperature in New York was only 79 degs. She was helped to a waiting vehicle by an aid while holding here chest.

Then, as she was waiting to get into the van, she was clearly being held up by the same aid while leaning on a concrete barricade. When the vehicle door opened for her, she stumbled toward the door and seems to have collapsed before getting in. Her staff kept her from hitting the ground.

Turns out, her doctors now say Hillary had been diagnosed with pneumonia and “was put on antibiotics” on this past Friday.

Continue reading

The Dallas Morning News Endorses the Republican Candidate for President: Hillary Clinton

by Scott Creighton

The Dallas Morning News hasn’t endorsed a Democrat for president since before WWII but they have decided to endorse Hillary Clinton this year and did so with a front page editorial explaining why:

“As President Barack Obama’s first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It’s no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.” Dallas Morning News

Their argument is that Donald Trump “is no republican” and I guess by extrapolation that means they figure Hillary Clinton is.

Her foray into the New McCarthyism, her support from various Bush-era war-mongering neocons and of course her love of all things neoliberal makes Hillary Clinton the best republican in the race according to the died in the wool republicans over at the Dallas Morning News. And they should know. They’ve picked republican for over half a century.

I hope before it’s all over, Bernie Sanders has to get on stage to hold up one of Hillary’s arms while Dick Cheney holds up the other one. Maybe then the Berners will know how to vote.