The bin Laden “Digital” Bookshelf Psyop Isn’t Over – Like “Snowden” and “Wikileaks”… More to Be Released “later”

by Scott Creighton

So Obama tasks the CIA to put together this list this past winter. This past spring, Seymour Hersh starts writing about his new “death of bin Laden” narrative and just after that comes out, the list appears. Hmmmm…..

Reuters / Pentagon / Handout

bin Laden, according to official story, was so vain, he recorded himself watching TV but he did so in such a way that you can’t really tell if it is bin Laden or it isn’t. How vain is that? Or the better question: how stupid do you have to be to believe that is Osama bin Laden?

 

Oh yes, there will be more literature to be added to the banned book/idea list very soon according to “officials”

That’s because, just like the “Snowden” psyop and the Wikileaks “leaks”, the powers that be have decided in their infinite wisdom that they needed to withhold some of those “digital” books and files on zombie bin Laden’s “bookshelf” because…

Well… because.

Continue reading

bin Laden’s “Digital” Bookshelf – Tying “Conspiracy Theorists” and Thought Criminals to al Qaeda

by Scott Creighton

“Conspiracy theorists” have been providing aid and comfort to al Qaeda by simply asking questions? investigating beyond the BS that the MSM reports from their “official sources”? That seems to be the implication.

The U.S. government is releasing this week the list of English language texts that were recovered from Osama bin Laden’s Pakistan compound after the U.S. raid that killed the al Qaeda leader in 2011…

“In terms of the materials that are there, some of the things that we’ve found to be of note were that Bin Laden was probably an avid conspiracy theorist,” Buzz Feed

It was bound to happen.

The propagandists who brought us the “death of bin Laden story” 1.0 and 2.0 (with Sy Hersh) have decided to finally go for broke by associating some of the biggest names in investigative journalism, critics of our imperial wars overseas and “conspiracy theorists” to the dreaded Osama bin Laden.

Basically anyone who writes or says anything bad about the glorious Big Brother party that is developing here and in Britain are on bin Laden’s “DIGITAL” reading list. His “digital” bookshelf.

What does that mean?

That means the powers that be have decided to exploit the new Sy Hersh bullshit story about “the truth” of the raid on the bin Laden compound (or maybe that’s why Sy’s stupid story came out in the first place) by releasing what they claim they found on disk drives or memory sticks. The fact that they are digital means they wont be able to find bin Laden’s actual fingerprints on an actual book of any kind.

Of course if you notice that, you’re a “conspiracy theorist”

In short, they can put any book or writing they want on that list. Anything they wish to be viewed in a certain light.

The English language list is republished below the fold and on it you will find a number of critics of our Global War of Terrorism along with folks like Bev Harris (exposed electronic voting machine rigging), John Perkins (economic hit-man), Michael Ruppert (great work in Crossing the Rubicon), David Ray Griffin (outstanding work on 9/11), Michel Chossudovsky (anti-globalization), Eustace Mullins (exposing the Federal Reserve) and the usual slate of unpopular investigative journalists and activists like Greg Palast, William Blum and Noam Chomsky.

These apparently are today’s leading thought criminals.

It really is the beginning of a modern day book banning movement I suppose.

I can see Fox News ranting about how the “conspiracy theorists” are providing aid and comfort to the likes of bin Laden and how he was probably using their work to further radicalize new al CIAdah members across the Middle East.

As obvious as this bit of disinformation is with regard to a new effort to demonize real investigative journalism, what might be more telling is who is NOT on the list.

There is nothing from Di$info Jone$ on that list and I thought he was King of All Conspiracy Theorists. I guess he’s just a shill.

There is nothing from Seymour Hersh either. I guess his latest story bought him a reprieve of sorts.

Our friend Jeremy Scahill (I call him Scaghill) is absent from that “to be banned” list as well and he chimed in real early on this story…

Nothing from Matt Taibbi, Amy Goodman, Glenn Beck, Steven Jones (nanothermite), Judy Wood (ray beams from space), Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Ron Paul, Glenn Greenwald, “Edward Snowden” or Hillary Clinton for that matter.

The list is below the fold. It’s pretty obvious why they made it. Of course “truth tellers” like Scaghill seem oblivious to that obvious reality. It pays to be obtuse in ‘Merika these days.

Continue reading

The Newest and Most Dangerous Violent Extremist Group of ALL TIME! The TARD™ Menace

by Scott Creighton

It is with extreme sadness that I have to admit, after all these years of exposing and debunking various dubious bullshite “extremist” groups that have been created in order to manufacture consent for one operation or another in service to the Global War of Terror and the banks who fund it.. I have found this latest threat is more than credible… it’s hyper-credible… it’s incredulous… and it’s all around us just waiting to strike.

We are all doomed and therefore must sacrifice any number of freedoms on the altar of security in order to preserve our way of life that currently sucks and is getting suckier because after all, USA™…USA™…USA™

When asked why the White House called an emergency press conference this morning, State Department™ Spokesman Jen Psaki said :

“ISIS™? No, this meeting isn’t about ISIS™ . ISIS™  is so August™. This is September™. Try to keep up. We’re here to talk about TARD™ , the most ruthless, vicious, evil, monstrous, impolite, unfriendly, antisocial social media expert terrorist group to ever have occupied a green screen sound stage! Duh.”

Psaki said we need to build an international coalition to put an end to  TARD™ (not to be confused with the Coalition of the Willing used as cover to create the impression of international legitimacy the Bush administration could not get at the start of the invasion of Iraq back in 2003) she called it a Coalition of the Willing TARDS™ because, as she said:

TARD™  is EVERYWHERE.  TARD™  is NOWHERE. Therefore, we must be prepared to allow ObamaGod the flexibility to bomb EVERYTHING and EVERYONE without asking congress or the people. It’s the TARD™ way!”

Like Colin Powell did at the UN Security Council, Psaki knocked it out of the park. Who in their RIGHT mind can argue with that kind of logic I ask you?

Continue reading

Glenn Greenwald Reviews the CIA’s Latest Movie Zero Dark Thirty – Can You Say “Limited Hangout”?

by Scott Creighton

Glenn Greenwald has a new article up about this horrendous piece of globalist propaganda called Zero Dark Thirty. It’s supposedly the “true story” of how the great ObamaGod got the “ebil” bin Laden via an assassination raid into Pakistan last year.

Glenn accurately points out that the film is complete propaganda. He can’t help but notice that. It was after all based on “intelligence” spoon fed to the government shill Kathryn Bigelow after she was granted an Oscar award for her other recent propaganda piece, the Hurt Locker.

“It was discovered that CIA and White House officials had met with its filmmakers and passed non-public information to them – at exactly the same time that DOJ officials were in federal court resisting transparency requests from media outlets and activist groups on the ground that it was all classified.” Glenn Greenwald

It’s clear that Operation Mockingbird hasn’t simply been revived, brought back from the dead in the wake of 9/11, it’s become the sole source of new material in Hollywood (they simply refused to make Cloud Atlas and snubbed Avatar by giving the academy award to Hurt Locker instead). The only thing Hollywood will fund these days is propaganda, pure and simple.

But Glenn misses the point (as he sometimes does when it comes to important fundamental stuff like this) by focusing his entire criticism of the film on the fact that it justifies torture to the exclusion of even the well-known facts surrounding the “official story” of the bin Laden raid.

and now for the rest of the story…

Continue reading

WHO WAS OSAMA? WHO IS OBAMA?

by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research

While the President and Commander in Chief of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama “celebrates” the first anniversary of the alleged death of bin Laden, the substantive issue as to WHO WAS OSAMA BIN LADEN remains unheralded.  (Remarks by President Obama in Address to the Nation from Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, see video at foot of article)

Through lies and fabrications –which he intends to use in his election campaign– president Obama`s carefully scripted speech upholds a world of total fantasy, in which “bad guys” are lurking and “plotting acts of terror”. Meanwhile, Islamic “jihadists” are said to be threatening Western civilization.

Continue reading

The Official Final Chapter of bin Laden Myth is Aptly Named After a Myth

by Scott Creighton

A myth for a myth

Aren’t they clever? They named the final chapter of the bin Laden myth after a Roman mythological figure. That should earn more than a few insider’s snickers down at the old CFR building.

One month has passed since the last bin Laden distraction card was played and they have finally got the story ironed out enough to smooth over all the little wrinkles and declare this last version, or the next to the last version, as the “official” version of what happened and who better to put forward that new, almost complete, official version, than the Council on Foreign Relations.

It’s a stunning example of what I like to call Propaganda Multitasking. Light on facts, heavy on revision, and always keeping an eye on the next prize, Pakistan.

Continue reading

Osama Bin Laden’s Death?-News Analysis-05-04-2011

Part 1

Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,179 other followers