Newt Gingrich Tweeted About “California Terrorist Attack” Relating it to ISIS™ on Nov. 13th

by Scott Creighton (H/T tommyknocker1 )

In an effort to push for a new congressional authorization for the use of military force, a real Tweet from Newt Gingrich’s Twitter account dated Nov. 13th, stated the following:

“Maybe scale of the Paris attack following Russian airline bombing and California terrorist attack will convince our leaders this is real war” Newt Gingrich

Here is the Tweet itself. If given enough attention, I’m sure it will be gone in a short while.

Considering the implications of this Tweet, I decided to ask Newt about his statement.

question

Newt was forecasting the exact talking points being used right now to push for more war in the Middle East and across the globe.

Neocon warmongers are saying that these three recent events have seriously escalated the “war with ISIS™” to the point where we need to arm the president with a new authorization for the use of military force bill. They want to make war in places like Nigeria, Libya, Sinai, Yemen, Iraq, Syria and anywhere else various populations start to take exception to our American Exceptionalism.

The problem here is that Newt seems to have tipped his hand a little with this Tweet since the San Bernardino shootings didn’t take place until Dec. 2, 2015. And that phony pledge from the Facebook spokesman aside, they still haven’t tied it into ISIS™ (though now they seem to be trying to do just that with the mysterious, kidnapped, brainwashed “friend” of Farooq)

I decided to try to nip Newt’s response in the bud a little. I figure he’s going to try to argue that he was talking about another ISIS™ terrorist attack in California just prior to the Paris attacks. Problem is, none exists.

Continue reading

Obama Uses “American Exceptionalism” Myth to Plead for Cheney’s Unitary Executive Theory

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Obama’s Coalition of the Willing have begun bombing Syrian forces directly. 3 Syrian troops killed several others wounded Coalition authorities say “we see no evidence of this”

UPDATE: Why Does the FBI Have to Manufacture its Own Plots if Terrorism and ISIS Are Such Grave Threats?

—-

“let’s make sure we never forget what makes us exceptional”

Last night our president, Barack Obama, the president of “CHANGE”, went before the nation to plead his case for endless war, more unconventional warfare by means of terrorism and the stripping of US citizen’s rights by the arbitrary means of simply adding their names to the MASSIVE and growing “no fly” list.

And as the basis of all of this, Obama said we can and should do these things, because we’re just so damn exceptional.

“My fellow Americans, I am confident we will succeed in this mission because we are on the right side of history. We were founded upon a belief in human dignity — that no matter who you are, or where you come from, or what you look like, or what religion you practice, you are equal in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law.”

Does anyone here feel we are on the right side of history after the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq? How about Afghanistan, Libya, Ukraine, Vietnam, Nigeria or Sudan? How about Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina or Chile in 1973?

Continue reading

San Bernardino Shooting UPDATES: 2nd Witness “3 White Male Shooters”, Lawyer Baffled at Absurd Story

by Scott Creighton

There have been a couple new developments in the case of the San Bernardino shooting. Some readers of the website have left us some useful information and we should keep track of it before it disappears down the memory hole.

Take note: in the third video, the CNN interview with lawyer David Chelsey, the “reporter” conducting the interview, Chris Cuomo, becomes visibly upset when David explains some very real issues with the official story. The “reporter” then says that one of the officers reported exchanging gunfire with the suspects as they drove to the location where the truck was shot-up and that “proves” the official story is correct. He practically yelled that at him (as you will see in the video)

“Cus you know, the officer(s?) say they took fire from this SUV, the people in the SUV were him and her, that’s kind of the end of the analysis of possibilities” Chris Cuomo

Think about what Chris is saying: because one cop(s?) SAID they fired at him, we MUST believe the story in spite of the glaring contradictions developing around it.

Just keep this in mind:

  1. Police Claims About Laquan McDonald Differ Dramatically From Video
  2. New York Police Officer Is Convicted of Lying About Photographer’s Arrest
  3. 5 Mass. police officer will face charges after allegedly lying …
  4. Alabama Police Officer Breaks Down on Stand, Admits to lying…
  5. Commerce City police officer Kevin Lord arrested for lying …
  6. Police Officer Fired For Racial Bias After Falsely Claiming …

In the case of the Mass. officer, the guy made up a story: “A part-time Massachusetts police officer accused of concocting a story about a shootout with a gunman before his cruiser crashed into a tree

He lied about a shoot-out. Made up the whole story. And that was just recently.

How many other cases of officers lying have been in the press in the last few years?That little list I put up there was just a fraction of the recent cases that have been taken to court. God only knows how many never got that far or were never discovered.

News flash for CNN “reporter” Chris Cuomo: Cops… lie.

And this reporter says we have to ignore all the obvious problems with this story because a cop SAYS she fired at him from the back of the SUV?

Bullshit.

Continue reading

San Bernardino Shooting – When Propaganda Becomes a Media Three Ring Circus Freak Show

by Scott Creighton

A number of things in this case don’t make sense,” Mr. Comey said. New York Times

Well, he got that much right.

So now the story is, while the miniature little woman, described by a witness as a “tall athletic white man“, was running around shooting up the place in San Bernardino, she was also busy contacting ISIS™ pledging her undying loyalty to the fictitious group on some CIA operated Facebook page somewhere.

“The woman, Tashfeen Malik, declared allegiance to the Islamic State on Facebook at roughly the time of the shooting on Wednesday, according to a Facebook spokesman.” New York Times

The day after the Dec. 2nd shooting, I wrote that it wouldn’t take long to use her connection with this event to link it up with ISIS™… and here we are.

She is from Saudi Arabia. Both are Muslim. They traveled there recently. I am sure that will be the ISIS™ tie-in they need so desperately.

I guess they decided to spare Saudi Arabia the indignation and used the CIA’s Facebook instead. Pay very careful attention to what they say. Talk about a media circus side show:

One startling disclosure came from social media network Facebook, which confirmed that comments praising Islamic State were posted around the time of the mass shooting to a Facebook account established under an alias by Malik. However, it was uncertain whether the comments were posted by Malik herself or someone with access to her page.

A Facebook Inc spokesman said the profile in question was removed by the company on Thursday for violating its community standards barring promotion or praise for “acts of terror.” He declined to elaborate on the material.

But CNN and other news media outlets reported that Malik’s Facebook posts included a pledge of allegiance to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Reuters

Ok. Let me see if I got this right. On FRIDAY a CIA-linked Facebook spokesman came out and said on WEDNESDAY this woman (or possibly SOMEONE ELSE) was posting stuff UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME while she was (WEARING A MASK) shooting up some location and the account was ERASED ON THURSDAY so no one can confirm it and certainly they can’t confirm the legitimacy as to whether or not it was actually her…

And CNN, the New York Times and other “respectable” news outlets ran with the story AS IF it were the gospel truth?

hahahahaha…. god damn. It’s not a media circus sideshow, it’s a media freak show. A three ring circus freak show.

Continue reading

San Bernardino Shooting – Inconvenient Details Glossed Over by Corporate Press

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE:San Bernardino Shooting UPDATES: 2nd Witness “3 White Male Shooters”, Lawyer Baffled at Absurd Story

San Bernardino Shooting – When Propaganda Becomes a Media Three Ring Circus Freak Show

——

One way you can tell a mass casualty psyop event is when the MSM deliberately gloss over inconvenient details of the official story like they’re not even there. It’s kind of like when the 9/11 Commission Report made the statement that they didn’t really care who financed the operation because “ultimately it’s of little significance”

Keep moving folks. Nothing too see here.

In the case of the San Bernardino shooting spree, there are a lot of inconvenient details. Glaring inconvenient details which scream to be flushed out by the phony “journalists” making big bucks working for the usual suspects… but they wont be.

Continue reading

My Take on the New “ISIS” Threat to D.C.

by Scott Creighton

“ISIS” polls low on the hearts and minds concern studies… so… BINGO! A threat to D.C. comes out two days later

Even though Americans are told ad nauseum that the drive-by shooting spree in Paris was an attack on “the whole world” (and not just on anti-war progressives in the leftist city of Paris), it seems we are logically more concerned with things like living conditions, the economy, the far-right austerity measures loving crazies in DC and issues that more directly effect the quality of our lives and those of the people we keep dear to us like family, friends and neighbors.

It’s not that we don’t care about the people in Paris effected by this tragedy. We do. We’ve just become kind of desensitized to all the various American Gladio operations over here and all the fake beheading videos created to make us fear the latest boogie man of the al Qaeda variety.(and frankly, that fake-ass Charlie Hebdo shooting didn’t do much to help you case either… just sayin…)

Since false flag terrorism is apparently the only play in our one-trick-pony government’s playbook, it’s not hard to understand that even the most brain-dead of our citizenry is starting to pick up on this particular head-fake and are failing to fall for it for the hundreth time.

And of course, that is too say nothing of the “fool me once” law as it applies to 9/11, which I personally believe most Americans have become wise to over these past 14 years.

69 to 21% is [t]he ratio by which voters rank domestic issues as a priority over foreign policy matters such as terrorism and ISIS.

Seems reasonable, right?

Continue reading

Paris Attacks: An Attack on Progressive French Society and Remembering Operation Gladio

by Scott Creighton

“Destabilize the public order to stabilize the political order and justify a repressive intervention that would be welcomed with relief by the population. People want to live in peace. They don’t want to walk into a bank or a train and die by a bomb from some unknown killer.”

A reader, Observer, has left a link to a video reminding us what Operation Gladio was. In light of what I wrote earlier this morning about the targets of the attacks last night, specifically their socialist/leftist inclinations, I thought it might be informative to post a quote about the nature of the people targeted last night alongside that video reminder left to us by Observer. Because when you look at it in this context with the timing involved, it seems pretty obvious what is going on here.

Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,513 other followers