The 5 Eyes Continue Attack on President Trump (AE video)

Advertisements

The “Less Than Nothing” Russia Hacking Hoax Lives On While the TRUTH of the 5-Eyes Spying is Forgotten

by Scott Creighton

“When it appeared to (the Deep State) that Secretary Clinton was likely to (lose) the presidency the (5-Eyes) influence campaign focused more on undercutting (President Trump’s) legitimacy and crippling (his) presidency from its start, including by impugning the fairness of the election”

No truer words have ever been written by the Deep State’s 5-Eyes political influence and destabilization campaigns.

In early March of this year, Judge Napolitano of Fox News broke a story about how the former president Barack Obama was aided by British intelligence agency GCHQ to spy on the campaign of then Republican candidate Donald J. Trump in 2016 through the use of the 5-Eyes program which allows various nations to use their spying services to aid each other, spying on their own citizens without actually having to break national laws about spying on their own citizens. This “intelligence sharing” deal allows members to ask other nations to spy on their citizens so they can’t be accused of violating their rules and the constitutions of the various member states.

When this story came out, the complicit media viciously attacked Judge Nap. and anyone else who reported on the story.

GCHQ, who typically never comments on anything they are accused of, spoke up IMMEDIATELY, denying the charge.

The British GCHQ has responded with the following statement: “Recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct ‘wire tapping’ against the then President Elect are nonsense. They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.”

For a brief moment in time, the general public started hearing about 5-Eyes, many for the first time and for the next month Mockingbird personalities like Scarborough and Maddow breathlessly ranted about how dangerous it was to insult our glorious intel partners across the pond as they forecast dire possibilities about what might happen were we to lose their trust.

Then this happened on April 13th…

“Britain’s spy agencies played a crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between members of Donald Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, the Guardian has been told.

GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.” Guardian

To my knowledge, the CIA’s Mockingbird assets in the media never apologized to Judge Nap. and the others they slandered before the Guardian’s story broke. Instead, they turned the GCHQ spying story into some kind of glorious effort to help protect America from the Russians who were trying to thwart all this “democracy” we have over here.

But the facts are the facts. Judge Napolitano was right. The Brits and others were spying on our political transition process and feeding information to the Obama administration who had a vested interest in seeing his own legacy was maintained by the installation of Hillary Clinton as the next president of these United States.

It wasn’t Russia who was trying to influence our election or Donald Trump teaming up with them to do it… it was Britain… and the Deep State… teaming up with Hillary Clinton through her friends in the Obama White House.

So is it any wonder that they are still pushing the “Russia hacking” narrative as hard as they can through their talking heads on every network news channel and in the print media? If this story were to break, if people REALLY understood who was screwing with their election process, it would be the end of the 5-Eyes and the most valuable tool of public control they have.

Continue reading