Poll: Who is the Biggest Beneficiary of the Chemical Weapons False Flag in Syria?

by Scott Creighton

Answer after the break.

Continue reading

Howard Dean’s Disgusting Smears Of Tulsi Gabbard Call For Peace

Russia Vetoes UN Security Council Resolution Condemning Syrian Government (Bolivia votes “NO” and China Abstains)

from RT

A UN Security Council resolution condemning the Syrian government for the alleged gas attack in the country’s Idlib province has been vetoed by Russia as a permanent member of the Security Council.

A draft resolution condemning the Syrian government for the alleged chemical attack in the country that was introduced by the UK, France and the US was blocked by Russia on Wednesday.

“The result of the vote is as follows: ten votes in favor, two votes against, three abstentions. The draft resolution has not been adopted owing to the negative vote of a permanent member of Council,” current Security Council President Nikki Haley of the US announced following the vote.

The resolution asked the Syrian government to provide flight plans and logs of its military operations on the day of the incident and for the country to open its air bases to UN investigators…

[read more here]

White House “Intelligence Assessment” Is No-Such-Thing – Shows Support for Al-Qaeda

from Moon of Alabama

The Trump White House published three and a half pages of accusations against the governments of Syria and Russia. These are simple white pages with no header or footer, no date, no classification or declassification marks, no issuing agency and no signatures. It is indiscernible who has written them.

U.S. media call this a Declassified U.S. Report on Chemical Weapons Attack. It is no such thing.

It starts with “The United States is confident that the Syrian government conducted a chemical weapon attack, …”

The U.S. “is confident”, it does not “know”, it does not have “proof” – it is just “confident”.

The whole paper contains only seven paragraphs that are allegedly a “Summary of the U.S. intelligence community assessment” on the issue. The seven paragraphs are followed by eight(!) paragraphs that try to refute the Russian and Syrian statements on the issue. Some political fluff makes up the sorry rest…

[read more here]

White House claims on Syria chemical attack ‘obviously false’ – MIT professor

from RT

A professor who challenged the 2013 claims of a chemical attack in Syria is now questioning the Trump administration’s narrative blaming the Assad government for the April 4 attack in the Idlib province town of Khan Shaykhun.

On Tuesday, the White House released a declassified intelligence brief accusing Syrian President Bashar Assad of ordering and organizing the attack, in which Syrian planes allegedly dropped chemical ordnance on civilians in the rebel-held town.

The report “contains absolutely no evidence that this attack was the result of a munition being dropped from an aircraft,” wrote Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Professor Theodore Postol, who reviewed it and put together a 14-page assessment, which he provided to RT on Wednesday.

“I believe it can be shown, without doubt, that the document does not provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete knowledge that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical attack in Khan Shaykhun,” wrote Postol…

[read more here]

Society Is Being Programmed By A Black Box

While Talking about his “beautiful piece of cake” Trump Lies About Success Rate of 59 Missiles “heading toward Iraq”

by Scott Creighton

This guy is an idiot and what’s more, it seems the Pentagon may have launched the attack without his approval.

In this interview, President Trump finally answers the tough question: what exactly was he doing when they launched missiles at Syria (a crime of aggression and unconstitutional)

He says he and the president of China were eating “the most beautiful piece of chocolate cake.” when someone leaned over to him and told him “the generals” said the “ships were locked and loaded. What do you do? And we made the determination to do it”

The idiot interviewing him is actually giggling about the situation. She’s gleeful. Like a kid talking to her parents about going to Disney World or something. It’s disgusting.

Notice right when he starts to talk about the “message”, he keeps looking off to the right as he recounts what happened. He doesn’t do that talking about the fucking cake. Just the “message”.

Continue reading