Evidence Suggests Syria Gas ATTACK Is False Flag

This is a comparison between two chemical weapons response teams. One group is wearing protection rated for Sarin gas the other is wearing gear rated for a spray booth in an automotive repair shop. Don’t be fooled by a hastily constructed psychological operation.

Here is Jimmy Dore’s video. He touches on some of this.

Advertisements

Act Now For Peace

DC Dave has sent me this via email. Thought I would share it with you guys. Call these fucks up and tell em to do something to stop this. I’m taking a break from this for a little while. Its getting to me.

I received the following email this morning from Mark Gaffney, the author of Black 9/11 and The 9/11 Mystery Plane:
Friends,
I’m sending this email because action is better than despair.
Our country has just attacked a nation, Syria, that did nothing to us. It is raw blatant aggression. US  warmongers have won again.
Today’s fateful missile attack by the US could easily lead to a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China in a matter of weeks, days or even hours. The die is cast. Time is short.
There is no hard evidence that Syrian president Assad ordered a chemical attack on his own people. The press headlines that Assad launched an attack are misleading at best. The facts are not yet all in, but it appears the toxic release and tragic deaths occurred when the Syrian Air Force bombed an al Qaeda weapons facility in Idlib province. If this is correct, the toxic release was inadvertent, a tragedy of war. Al Qaeda terrorists have controlled Idlib for most of the war. Although the US government often describes them as moderates, they have beheaded journalists, desecrated Christian churches and murdered non-Muslim civilians.
Syria gave up its chemical weapons in 2013 thanks to effective Russian diplomacy. At the time, that diplomacy saved the US from becoming militarily involved in Syria, which would have been a terrible blunder. Unfortunately, our leaders are incapable of learning.
It is known that al Qaeda rebels in Syria acquired chemical weapons as a result of the destruction of Libya orchestrated by the warmonger Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Ghadaffi had chemical stockpiles and these “got away” after the US toppled his government. From Libya, there was an arms pipeline to al Qaeda-associated groups in Syria. The arms included chemical precursors. Thus, US aggression against Libya was largely responsible for the proliferation of chemical weapons across the region. This is the context for the latest tragedy.
Unfortunately, the American people are in the dark about all of this; because outside the Internet there is no independent media left in our country to counter government propaganda about Syria. Today, nearly all of the US media is controlled by the military industrial complex, thanks to the media consolidation allowed by Bill Clinton in the 1990s. This also explains why our political system is so dysfunctional. As Jefferson wrote, democracy cannot function without an informed public.
So, it comes down to us. We the people are the last resort, the last line of defense, the last chance for peace. Without immediate action by us, escalating events may soon result in the unthinkable.
But perhaps if enough of us get on the phone and are persistent and loud enough, our Senators and Congressional reps will do their job, which is to represent us. Congress must immediately pass legislation rescinding the broad war powers bestowed on the president after 9/11.
Here is the Washington Capitol switchboard number (202-224-3121). Please call Friday morning — EARLY!  We must catch our reps before the weekend.
Peace, Mark

The list of Representatives by state (with phone numbers) is here: http://www.house.gov/representatives/.  Senators by state is here: https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/.

Dave

Trump’s Attack on Syrian Airfield to Support al Qaeda Terrorists killed 4 Babies… “BABIES!”

by Scott Creighton

God I hate Donald Trump.

Last night during his horribly wooden and yet strangely melodramatic announcement of his illegal attack on Syrian air force in support of our “moderate” terrorists linked to al Qaeda in Syria, The Duke of Orange said something a kin to “Assad killed innocent men, women and children… BABIES!… BABIES!” as his justification for the strike.

I have been reading in various news sources that of the 57 missiles launched, only about 23 hit the air field. A large number of the rest did not and what happened to them I am unsure.

But it’s being reported now by several of those sources that a number of civilians (nine) were killed last night by these cruise missiles that were sent, supposedly, to save the “BABIES!”

According to reporting from the Telegraph, of those, 4 Syrian civilians killed by the Duke of Orange…. were babies…. BABIES!

Four children among nine civilians killed – claims

The Syrian state news agency says that the US attack killed nine civilians, including four children, in areas near the base struck by missiles overnight.

Russian officials have said that four servicemen – none of them Russian – have been killed by the strikes and two are missing, meaning the death toll currently stands at an estimated 15 people.

This news is in fact a headline at the Telegraph right now. Watch it disappear down the memory hole.

 

Gee, if only Trump had known this kind of thing would happen before he pulled the trigger.

uh… but… BABIES!

Please help keep AE up and running if you can.

I could REALLY use the help right now

Thank you all so much

(For my mailing address, please email me at RSCdesigns@tampabay.rr.com)

output_95f0q7

Continue reading

Little Marco Defends Trump’s Unauthorized Attack on Syria in Support of al Nusra “moderates”

by Scott Creighton

In a Fox news interview, Marco Rubio defended Donald Trump’s use of military force without congressional authorization with one of the most ridiculous and insipid responses I have ever heard uttered by a bought off congress critter. He said “we have one president, not 535”

His implication is obvious: we live under a dictatorship of what Cheney called the “unitary executive” and that’s just fine with Little Marco.

Trouble is, that is not the way the constitution is written and it was specifically written so folks like Dick Cheney wouldn’t make themselves into a unitary dictator.

And oh yeah, Little Marco has lots of terrorist friends himself, so I guess he certainly would support Trump’s airstrike in their support.

Here’s his interview where he says Trump was acting on behalf of our “national security interests”

Continue reading

Russia is Currently Bombing the Shit Out of The CIA’s “moderate” al Qaeda Terrorists in Idlib

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Outstanding review of the Syrian situation right now.

In Desperation Move, Tahrir al-Sham (al Qaeda) Kidnapped Civilians from Khattab Days Before Syrian Strike on Their Base – For What Purpose?

Last night the Russians canceled the memorandum of understanding they had with the U.S. which made them share information with us on flights and locations of their attacks on the CIA’s moderate terrorists. Today they are carpet bombing al Qaeda and the other “moderates” in Idlib.

When they stopped sharing information with the U.S. they prevented the Pentagon from warning the terrorists about impending Russian airstrikes.

Imagine that. Russia steps up and bombs al Qaeda/al Nusra/Jabat al ASSHAT after our president conducts an air strike against a Syrian airfield to protect them. And Rachel Maddow is still screeching about how Russia is the enemy? My how the fucking world has turned, huh?

What Russia is saying is “if you think you saved your terrorist moderates by attacking the Syrian air force, think again. We will bomb them into oblivion and DARE you to stop us”

Trump and the Pentagon started a brinkmanship contest and Russia has responded.

Interesting Reactions to Trump’s Illegal Attack on Syrian Airbase in Support of al Qaeda

by Scott Creighton

Image result for trump attack on syrian air field

Last night’s attack on the Syrian airbase has prompted some cliched responses from the usual suspects but it has also generated some rather interesting ones.

First of all, the “coalition” has responded positively. Germany, Britain, Israel (of course) and Saudi Arabia along with a few others have said this was the perfect response to the Idlib chemical weapons attack that no one knows whether or not it really came from Assad or was in fact a chemical weapons “attack” or simply an airstrike that hit an al Qaeda chemical weapons munition depot that stored the Sarin Hillary Clinton sent over from Libya years ago. In all likelihood, that is what happened.

On Fox News, the old neocon warmongers are literally giggling this morning as they report on big brave Trumpster because he “sent a message” and “reestablished American authority in the region”

(Of course these Fox guys are steadily running down the idea of “international law” and restrictions by the United Nations Security Council as limitations to be upheld by other countries, not by an Exceptional America.)

I’m sure Chris Mathews has a new stain in his pants. Though he suggest last night that Trump only launched the attack as cover for his being Putin’s Manchurian candidate, so there is that.

Rachel Maddow spent last night trying to sit squarely on the fence at one time wondering aloud if the strike was legal (it wasn’t) and at others helping the demiGod of Orange justify his crime of aggression.

All of these reactions were completely predictable. What wasn’t is the sudden inclusion across the board of commenters wondering aloud about what rises to power in a vacuum caused by Assad being forced from office. I have seen this question raised on MSNBC, CNN and Fox News this morning and in every occasion, they conclude it would be best if we:

  1. continue the fight against “ISIS”
  2. “stabilize” the country as best we can (breaking it up and handing pieces over to folks like the Kurds)
  3. and… using the coalition to bring about a POLITICAL regime change, not a military one

For those of you paying attention that is not only a STARK departure from what ALL of these outlets were saying just 24 hours ago… but it is EXACTLY what Rex Tillerson said in response to the Idlib “chemical weapons attack”

So it looks like the limited strike has satisfied the blood lust of the war-mongers and they are now willing to adhere to Trump and Tillerson’s policy prior to the airstrike which is a fascinating development. They didn’t go so far as to suggest the Syrian people had a right of self determination, but they did say a “political solution” is preferable.

So I wonder just how much of this strike was just for show or… for the benefit of American audiences more than anything else.

To that question, the Pentagon released a statement after the attack in which they admit they warned the Russians and the Syrians of the impending strike. That is why so few (if any) Syrian planes were hit during the attack.

There are conflicting reports regarding whether or not they warned Syria about the strike. But we all know they warned Russia and certainly everyone knew Russia would warn the Syrians so either way, they warned the Syrians.

Continue reading