by Scott Creighton
Sounds to me like John Podesta wrote her petition to Wisconsin and it is clearly designed to help Hillary Clinton. Jill, the Russians didn’t “hack” anything to steal votes from you, now did they? So logically, since “the Russians” are the PRIMARY FOCUS of your petition, that means… you filed the petition on behalf of Hillary Clinton. Didn’t you?
Jill Stein’s petition to recount Wisconsin votes has been published online (PDF). Does she cite issues with electronic voting machines being proven to be susceptible to rigging by the companies that own them? No. Does she have any evidence at all to show the official count in Wisconsin was rigged for Trump to win? No.
Her entire argument to recount the votes in Wisconsin comes down to two things which she summarizes in section F of her petition;
f. The well-documented and conclusive evidence of foreign interference in the presidential race before the election, along with the irregularities observed in Wisconsin (more absentee ballots than usual), call into question the results and indicate the possibility that widespread breach occurred.
Stein also included an exhibit from J. Alex Halderman to further support her claims. Halderman, if you recall, met with Soros operators John Podesta, John Bonifaz and Mark Elias to discuss how they were going to move forward with a recount process without making Hillary Clinton look like a sore loser.
In his exhibit offered by Jill Stein as evidence of the stolen election, J. Alex Halderman makes these statements:
6. The 2016 presidential election was subject to unprecedented cyberattacks apparently intended to interfere with the election… The Department of Homeland Security has stated that senior officials in the Russian government commissioned these attacks... Russia has sophisticated cyber-offensive capabilities and it has shown a willingness to use them to hack elections elsewhere.
Another exhibit Stein included in her petition is an article written by April Glaser titled “Here’s What We Know About Russia and the DNC Hack”. This is part of it:
“DNC officials allege that the Russian government is behind the breach. The New York Times reports that the US intelligence agencies increasingly share that opinion. According to a number of top cybersecurity researchers, they’re probably right“
Another exhibit she offers as proof is a New York Times article titled “Private Security Group Says Russia was Behind John Podesta Email Hack”
Jill Stein tosses in a couple more MSM articles about Russians hacking everything in sight.
And that’s it. That’s her argument. The Russians did it.
This, too me, signifies the final straw of evidence we need to conclude Jill Stein is acting as John Podesta’s proxy candidate in his bid to get Hillary installed in the White House.
Jill Stein never bought into the “Russians Hacked Us!” narrative. Never once. In fact, she thought it was silly.
“…when WikiLeaks exposed massive corruption at the highest levels of the Democratic Party, high-ranking Democratic Party officials and their supporters in the media began attacking WikiLeaks as an alleged agent of Russia, despite their inability to produce any hard evidence to support this claim.” Jill Stein
This “Russia did it” meme coming from Stein is laughable because it is CLEARLY where the Clinton team was setting us up to go right before the election when they were worried they might lose.
The only thing is, they couldn’t have Hillary do it because it would look bad for them.
This morning Hillary’s Soros-paid lawyer, Mark Elias wrote a statement about this process in which he clearly states the Clinton team will be working with Stein and the others as this recount process continues.
“… , we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides. If Jill Stein follows through as she has promised and pursues recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan, we will take the same approach in those states as well.” Mark Elias
There is no doubt that this motion from Jill Stein originated in the minds of the Clinton team. Anyone saying otherwise at this point is a fool. The “Russians are hacking us” narrative is all about Hillary Clinton and has never been suggested as a reason that Jill Stein should worry about her votes being stolen.
What does that mean?
It means quite simply… this entire thing was done on behalf of Hillary Clinton and probably by her team since Jill never bought into the “Russian hackers” story in the first place.
Please help keep AE up and running if you can.
Thank you all so much
(For my mailing address, please email me at RSCdesigns@tampabay.rr.com)