Hillary Was “Careless” not Criminal: James Comey Says the Emperor’s New Clothes are Fabulous!

by Scott Creighton

“Like my new threads? Say you like them. SAY YOU LIKE THEM!”

Did we expect anything different for a Clinton? Slick Willy and Slimy Hilly get away with anything they want. The are the Duke and Duchess of Untouchable.

James Comey of the FBI has just released a statement which essentially clears our new glorious leader of all wrong-doing in the private email server scandal that has plagued Hillary Clinton for the past couple of years. He stated, in part:

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.” Comey statement from FBI press release

So there you have it… no “CLEAR EVIDENCE” that Hillary “INTENDED TO VIOLATE LAWS”

Instead, she was extremely careless in how she attended to matters of our national security while serving as Sec. of State.

Oh, well, in that case, let’s make her president. Better yet, let’s just do away with the pretense and make her emperor for life or until Jeb or Chelsea can take over.

I guess by saying they found no “clear” evidence, they mean too say they did find EVIDENCE that she INTENDED to violate laws… just not “clear evidence”

In terms of the recommendation from the corrupt FBI to the Justice Department regarding prosecution, Comey himself makes it quite clear the fix is always in when it comes to a Clinton:

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past….

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity (who is not named “Clinton”) would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.” Comey statement from FBI press release

To be clear, anyone else trying this kind of deceitful tactic to keep public records from public view will be prosecuted, just so long as they aren’t named “Clinton”

So thus ends the phony “investigation” into the Clinton email server scandal. They couldn’t come right out and say she didn’t commit any crimes nor could they say she didn’t do it in order to hide various emails from the public record for personal reasons (like all those thousands of emails relating to the Clinton Foundation, which will now be hidden from public view for the next 27 months)

But what they could say was no “reasonable” prosecutor should bring the Clintons to court on the eve of the queen’s coronation. I guess that means any prosecutor who wishes to remain a prosecutor (and above ground) and wants to show he has his mind right when it comes to professional advancement.

I guess that “reasonable” criteria holds true for FBI directors as well.

Comey fully understands his decision is going to be ripped to shreds by journalists and pundits across the political divide. That’s because he knows what he is doing is only really considered legitimate in a third world tin-pot dictatorship country, like all those Hillary Clinton and Bill get donations from sent to their foundation.

“God damn, Hillary’s new clothes are just FABULOUS! please don’t Vince Foster me” James Comey

12 Responses

  1. “To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity (who is not named “Clinton”) would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.” – Comey statement from FBI press release

    To be clear, anyone else trying this kind of deceitful tactic to keep public records from public view will be prosecuted, just so long as they aren’t named “Clinton””
    —————-

    I think Comey meant that if she were an employee under his control she would have her security clearance revoked or other administrative punishments including being fired. But she is not a government employee currently thus no administrative punishment is possible. Well why not revoke her security license? You’d have to ask Obama. When Hillz was a government employee as SOS her boss was Obama and only he could punish her and take her clearance. Also, when she is president, even if she had her security clearance revoked, it would be illegal for any agency to deny her access.

  2. […] Source: Hillary Was “Careless” not Criminal: James Comey Says the Emperor’s New Clothes are Fabulous! … […]

  3. My eyes, my eyes. I’m blind. Dam you….

    • that image is a WMD. they “found” in in Iraq. It was the only one, but they had to get it. Saddam could have done serious damage with it.

    • Be grateful WC, there is quite enough PTSD floating around without contemplating a nude rendering of our soon to be “president”.

  4. Hello from Cape Town, South Africa🙂. I was watching the press conference last night and didnt it look like Comey had a tear in his eye when he left the podium? His voice caught on his last sentence and then he walked off looking at the wall. Maybe, Im just reading too much into it, but if my observation is correct then perhaps he could have been shedding a tear at his complicity and betrayel of the American people. The whole world is a stage…..

    • I read the statement. Did not watch his performance yesterday. But when I watch clips from it now, I am struck by how mechanical his delivery was. And I can tell there is conflict in his demeanor. You have to remember, even giving that speech is highly irregular for the FBI. Typically they make their recommendations to Justice and let it go at that. His speech seems to have been designed to coincide with the Clinton/Obama pep rally yesterday and it’s such a fucking show, like you said, all the world’s a stage, it makes me sick.

  5. There was a time (not long ago) when being “extremely careless” with the nation’s top secrets in order to gain a personal advantage was considered TREASON. I believe capital punishment was among the penalties for such crimes.

    • if not treason, it was (and is) worthy of prosecution as a crime. there is a statue that says basically, acting with gross negligence (as defined in the statue as “with extreme carelessness”) in handling of military and/or State secrets is against the law and several people have been prosecuted on those grounds. One last year, a Naval reservist from Iraq who put stuff on his laptop that was marked “secret” and the FBI found no intent to do anything nefarious with it, but he was still prosecuted and convicted. Now I agree. There was intent from the beginning. That’s why she created the server in the first place and then lied repeatedly about all of this over the past year. The lying implies intent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: