by Scott Creighton
In 2008 the majority of the general population of the U.S. was angry about the illegal Iraq invasion and occupation. It was a point of contention on the right just as it was on the left. So what did the Republican Party decide to run against the Democratic Party nominee? John “the Flaming Warmonger” McCain.
In 2012 people were up in arms about how an out of control financial sector deliberately destroyed our economy so they could reap the harvest of unending bailouts and rampant banking consolidation schemes. Republicans and Democrats alike lost massive amounts of their 401ks and many even lost their homes in the recession/depression brought on by the hedge-funders and banksters. So what did the Republican Party decide to run against President Peace Prize? Mitt “the Mormon Vulture Capitalist” Romney.
Here we are in 2016 and the tide has turned against the billionaire class and the undemocratic influence they have in politics. It’s a major part of Bernie’s platform, so much so, even Killary is forced to get in on the act. It’s the major theme of the Republican front-runner’s campaign as well. But what is he? A billionaire. Trying to get into politics.
Anyone notice a theme developing here?
It wasn’t that different back in 2000 and 2004. In 2000 the people, even the left, were getting sick of Slick Willy so the Dems ran his VP, a man so lacking in character and personality, that deficit became his defining trademark. And in 2004, when over half the country was singing “how great we are because we killed Saddam” along with “Let the Eagle Soar” the “We’ll Put a Boot Up Your Ass”, when we were banning the sale of French Fries because the French didn’t support our illegal invasion of Iraq, the Dems decided to put forward a candidate who famously threw his medals on the steps of congress back when he still had a soul and was a hippy peace activist.
Today we have billionaire celebrity “reality” TV star and professional wrestler Donald Trump making ready to lose an election to the presumptive nominee from the fake left, Hillary Clinton and nobody bats an eye every time he does something to disenfranchise yet another large segment of the voting population.
How many times to you have to hear Killary say “he’s not a serious candidate” before you understand that’s he’s not?
She’s been quoting an American poet the last couple of days everywhere she goes, talking about Trump. “When someone tells you who they are, you should take their word for it”
I agree completely, but with a little twist: When someone on the inside tells you what’s going on, you should take their word for it.
Right at the time when it seems inevitable that Killary is going to be his competition, The Donald’s “campaign” (if you want to call it that) has entered the “let’s insult women as much as we can” phase. A couple weeks ago The Donald decided to threaten to “expose” Ted Cruz’s wife by laying out her Wiki page for all who cared to pay attention and then his campaign manager grabbed some reporter from Drudge of all places and did their level best to call her a liar with every breath they could muster until The Donald’s own staff release a video of his doing just that. The Donald stuck by his man. After all, who are his fans going to believe? Him or their lying eyes.
Then yesterday The Comb-over decided to step it up a notch and he said, off the cuff, that he would favor punishing women for having abortions.
That story is custom made for the first female president, don’t you think? I mean, aside from running against a war-monger in 2008 and a vulture capitalist in 2012, it don’t get any easier than that.
You notice no one paid attention to a couple of other statements made yesterday?
John Kasich uttered what I call “the voice of Gladio” when he said the following to Anderson “Mockingbird” Cooper at a CNN town-hall meeting:
KASICH: … Secondly, of course, I think, Anderson, that we need really good worldwide intelligence. I think that the lemons we’re seeing can be turned into lemonade and I think a president of the United States can rally the civilized world to destroy these folks who are intent on destroying us.
And secondly, we talked about NATO. That was another thing I talked about. We need to change NATO from not just a military organization, but an intelligence-gathering and also a policing organization that works across boundaries.
… Now, look, it’s really important that we get these countries to pitch in and do more. They’ll never do as much as we want. I mean, I lived through a whole time when we would push them, pressure them.
Part of the problem is it’s their governments over there. You know, there is too much socialism, there is too much political correctness. That’s why they didn’t even catch this thing in Brussels. And you know that the screw-ups that we saw with the intelligence. CNN
No one noticed. No one cared. Blame the socialists for false flag terrorism across Europe while talking about changing “their governments over there” and no one bats an eye at that. But talk about potential penalties for abortions and everyone goes crazy in this country.
Please help keep us up and running if you can.
Speaking truth ABOUT power since 2007
(For my mailing address, please email me at RSCdesigns@tampabay.rr.com)