by Scott Creighton
A small group of “hackers” called VandaSec (yes, your BS senses should be tingling at this point) claims they have traced 3 separate ISIS™ online jihadists back to their base of operations in London and the British government.
“The hacking collective showed Mirror Online details of the IP addresses used by a trio of separate digital jihadis to access Twitter accounts, which have been used to spread extremist propaganda.
At first glance, the IP addresses seem to be based in Saudi Arabia, but upon further inspection using specialist tools they appeared to link back to the DWP.
“Don’t you think that’s strange?” one of the hackers asked Mirror Online. “We traced these accounts back to London, the home of the British intelligence services.”
VandaSec’s work has sparked wild rumours suggesting someone inside the DWP is running ISIS-supporting accounts, or they were created by intelligence services as a honeypot to trap wannabe jihadis.” The Mirror
The British government was quick to find someone else to blame: Saudi Arabia. They said that the IP addresses were indeed theirs but they sold they a while ago (two months) in a secret deal with a Saudi firm. What did they use to blame them? You got it. More secret evidence.
“The U.K. government stated that the sales of the IP addresses are classified as being commercially sensitive, therefore are not commonly announced when they occur. The IP addresses were finally revealed to have been sold to Saudi Telecom, who in turn distributed them accordingly.
VandaSec’s findings caused minor panic when they revealed the connection, coercing claims and rumors that ISIS operatives were actively working inside the U.K. government. However, officials from the U.K. claim that simply is not so.” Inquisitor
No ladies and gentlemen, ISIS™ hasn’t “infiltrated” the British government. ISIS™ is the British government or at least part of it.
How many ISIS™ figures have turned out to be Jewish kids in Florida or some young girl living in Washington state?
How about British Reyaad Khan? He was the ISIS™ extremist who ushered in Britain’s new “kill without due process” plan.
Jihadist who wanted to be Britain’s first Asian PM ‘killed’ in drone strike (Daily Telegraph); British ISIS fighter who posed next to Ed Balls and dreamed of becoming the first Asian Prime Minister ‘is killed in drone strike’ (Daily Mail) Boy who wanted to be PM ‘has died on jihad in Syria’ (The Times) and Briton Reyaad Khan believed killed in air strike on Islamic State in Syria (The Guardian)
Yet, oddly enough, he had ties to the British government as well. Here he is with then Education Minister Ed Balls in 2009.
Or how about all those British soldiers dressing up as ISIS™ driving around in Helix trucks?
“The unorthodox tactic, which is seeing SAS unitsdressed in black and flying ISIS flags, has been likened to the methods used by the Long Range Desert Group against Rommel’s forces during the Second World War.
More than 120 members belonging to the elite regiment are currently in the war-torn country on operation Shader, tasked with destroying IS equipment and munitions which insurgents constantly move to avoid Coalition air strikes…
Instead the teams, part of a force known as the Coalition Joint Special Operations Task Force, are under American command.
Dubbed “smash” the units, which travel in civilian pick-ups, can even launch their own unmanned aerial vehicles, or mini-drones, to scan terrain ahead of them and pinpoint IS forces.” Express UK
Hybrid units called “omega” or “cross matrix” teams have operated in Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen, according to senior U.S. military officials.
Those employed in Afghanistan were “mostly designed against specific high-value targets with the intent of looking across the border” into Pakistan, said a former senior U.S. military official involved in Special Operations missions. They wore civilian clothes and traveled in Toyota Hilux trucks rather than military vehicles. Washington Post
You see why I have a problem when someone claims “so and so” is supporting ISIS™? It’s as if they can’t put 2 and 2 together or they think you can’t.
- ISIS™ showed up in Iraq when Obama needed an excuse to go back into the country to put down the understandable uprising of the General Military Council for Iraqi Revolutionaries
- ISIS™ showed up in Syria when he realized his CIA “moderate” terrorists weren’t going to be successful in completely destabilizing the country on their own and they needed some help from the US Air Force.
- ISIS™ showed up in Libya after the elections produced a real government which opposed all the “reforms” our puppet put into place after the regime change operation run by Hillary Clinton killed Gaddafi and about 50,000 Libyans.
- ISIS™ showed up in Sinai after John Kerry got together with al Sisi and overthrew the democratically elected government of that country once they seemed set on rejecting yet another IMF loan.
- ISIS™ has recently showed up, with no evidence of course, in San Bernardino in order to help generate traction for more wars everywhere and apparently the entire script of the republican presidential debate.
The war-mongers in the US and Britain don’t want the Endless War Against All Things ISIS™ to be confined to a specific location or nation because, quite frankly, their enemy de jour is far too valuable as a boogieman asset to be limited in time and space.
ISIS™ is a terror campaign waged as a hearts and minds operation by the purveyors of irregular warfare against the people of this country and all the other 5 Eyes nations. It’s that simple folks. There is no ISIS™. It’s an endless, vapid shadow for the MIC to box with as our dutiful politicians jostle over who can promise them more and more money to fight the Great Evil.
ISIS™ is whatever rises in the future to oppose our imperialist agenda across the world.
ISIS™ is whomever opposes them in either word or deed.
Some “hackers” tracked ISIS™ back to the British government? And that is supposed to be news? You can’t swing a dead cat in a ISIS™ stolen oil convoy without hitting British government contractors. That’s why we don’t bomb them or those stupid photo-op convoys with the Helix trucks.
Of course, the story will drop down the memory hole soon enough and we’ll be back to talking about which republican will bomb more civilians to fight ISIS™.
But they are refreshing, these little peeks we get, aren’t they?
Filed under: Uncategorized