San Bernardino Shooting – When Propaganda Becomes a Media Three Ring Circus Freak Show

by Scott Creighton

A number of things in this case don’t make sense,” Mr. Comey said. New York Times

Well, he got that much right.

So now the story is, while the miniature little woman, described by a witness as a “tall athletic white man“, was running around shooting up the place in San Bernardino, she was also busy contacting ISIS™ pledging her undying loyalty to the fictitious group on some CIA operated Facebook page somewhere.

“The woman, Tashfeen Malik, declared allegiance to the Islamic State on Facebook at roughly the time of the shooting on Wednesday, according to a Facebook spokesman.” New York Times

The day after the Dec. 2nd shooting, I wrote that it wouldn’t take long to use her connection with this event to link it up with ISIS™… and here we are.

She is from Saudi Arabia. Both are Muslim. They traveled there recently. I am sure that will be the ISIS™ tie-in they need so desperately.

I guess they decided to spare Saudi Arabia the indignation and used the CIA’s Facebook instead. Pay very careful attention to what they say. Talk about a media circus side show:

One startling disclosure came from social media network Facebook, which confirmed that comments praising Islamic State were posted around the time of the mass shooting to a Facebook account established under an alias by Malik. However, it was uncertain whether the comments were posted by Malik herself or someone with access to her page.

A Facebook Inc spokesman said the profile in question was removed by the company on Thursday for violating its community standards barring promotion or praise for “acts of terror.” He declined to elaborate on the material.

But CNN and other news media outlets reported that Malik’s Facebook posts included a pledge of allegiance to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Reuters

Ok. Let me see if I got this right. On FRIDAY a CIA-linked Facebook spokesman came out and said on WEDNESDAY this woman (or possibly SOMEONE ELSE) was posting stuff UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME while she was (WEARING A MASK) shooting up some location and the account was ERASED ON THURSDAY so no one can confirm it and certainly they can’t confirm the legitimacy as to whether or not it was actually her…

And CNN, the New York Times and other “respectable” news outlets ran with the story AS IF it were the gospel truth?

hahahahaha…. god damn. It’s not a media circus sideshow, it’s a media freak show. A three ring circus freak show.

Talk about wrapping it up with a neat little bow. Let’s review:

  • Comprehensive immigration reform – since she was here on a green card, legally
  • Mental Hygiene laws grabbing gun rights from “certain” folks
  • “assault” weapons and high capacity clips bans
  • ISIS™ tie-in for the Global War OF Terror
  • Impose restrictions on internet in order to prevent “radicalization”

There you go. It’s all there. As long as you don’t look too closely, it’s a great op, isn’t it?

Now, to further exemplify the media freak show aspect of all of this, I present Mockingbird asset Anderson Cooper as he watches in pretend horror as his own company, CNN, and others rummage through the home and the personal property of the recently deceased patsies suspects looking for something they can put on TV so they can sell ads for deodorant at higher prices.

This one you have too see to believe. I can’t even begin to explain it.

These ghouls were allowed, not only by law enforcement, but also by their producers and management at their various networks, to rush into the apartment and start rooting around through the personal possessions of the “suspects”. I mean, why were they there, lined up at the door, in the first place? Why did the landlord unlock the door?

Of course it was staged. But why?

Law enforcement, or should I say “the FBI”, claims they have evidence that the couple were planning the attack. And their “evidence” so far consists of two crushed cell phones found in a “nearby” trash can.

OK.

They also say the couple “recently” erased some emails. That proves it, right?

On top of that, they found some computers which means in time, once the writers are done compiling all the necessary policy agendas, they will produce the now standard “manifesto” from the couple and of course a ‘digital library” of just the sorts of web addresses and online publications that they will need to shutter to keep us all from being radicalized in the very near future a la that fake bin Laden raid from way back when.

Or maybe they wont find it but some Mockingbird “reporter” from CNN will disclose how he “found” a flash drive hidden under the toilet or something equally believable and the “manifesto” will be on that.

Who knows.

I have too say, over the course of the 8+ years of doing this shit, this event is perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have seen them stage… ever.

If they would have won an Oscar for the Boston Bombing, they would certainly deserve a Razzie for this one.

It’s absurd. Witnesses are ignored. No one wonders how they were able to escape the scene without even being chased. The new mother deciding to go postal on the family friends from his job. The assault rifles belonging to “someone else” and no one gives a shit who that might be. The third shooter vanishes. A third suspect is arrested and released after “fleeing the scene”. A active shooter drill taking place at the same time nearby. Tiny brown women being mistaken for tall athletic white men. A Facebook post, erased, could be someone else is now certainly hers. Reporters ransacking a crime scene as if they were sent there to befoul it on purpose.

It’s a freak show. I don’t know how else to describe it.

It’s like a high school theater production some lazy, untalented kids slapped together at the last minute with random set pieces and costumes from previous plays and actors holding scripts in their hands while they struggle to make up their blocking on the fly.

I understand the purpose of making even the most stable looking people appear capable of being “radicalized”. I get that part. I kind of understand the use of the new baby to show just how diabolical the radicalization process and the ISIS™ ideology can be. I get that as well.

But this whole thing, with the media frenzy and the holes in the story, it’s an absolute freak show. It’s like the entire MSM is now Alex Jones on New Years Eve 1999 screeching about Russian missiles coming over Canada and the Y2K bug wiping out power plants across the country.

All the crafters of these Gladio events have to do is put on the show and the media will apparently take it from there. It doesn’t matter how cobbled together the productions are, the “reporters” will either ignore the problems or try to fill in the holes themselves with outright lies. Toss ’em a little bone from some random Facebook spokesperson and off they go with their new scoop.

It’s.. fucking… remarkable…. I… I…. I just don’t know what to call it. As an investigative journalist of over 8 years, I’ve seen them make up stories in the past, stage “news” events, ignore hard scientific facts, ridicule anyone who doesn’t… I’ve seen all of this and today’s freak show still leaves me in awe of just how corrupt and opportunistic these ass clowns really are.

I shudder to think what they will be like in 10 years or 5 for that matter.

Meanwhile, Brian Williams is back on TV.

Five words:

Three ring circus freak show.

—–

Please help keep us up and running if you can.

Speaking truth ABOUT power since 2007

(For my mailing address, please email me at RSCdesigns@tampabay.rr.com)

output_95f0q7

34 Responses

  1. Reblogged this on Joseph Davis and commented:
    “It’s absurd. Witnesses are ignored. No one wonders how they were able to escape the scene without even being chased. The new mother deciding to go postal on the family friends from his job. The assault rifles belonging to “someone else” and no one gives a shit who that might be. The third shooter vanishes. A third suspect is arrested and released after “fleeing the scene”. An active shooter drill taking place at the same time nearby. A tiny brown woman being mistaken for a tall athletic white man. A Facebook post, erased, could be someone else is now certainly hers. Reporters ransacking a crime scene as if they were sent there to befoul it on purpose.

    It’s a freak show. I don’t know how else to describe it.”

  2. Excellent summary. This event is so bizarre that maybe more people will finally catch on to what is happening.

  3. How about : It makes the Keystone Cops seem like Sherlock Holmes.

  4. The absurder it is, the more unbelievable it is, the more T.H.E.Y. assert their dominion. They can pull any shit and it flys (and you can’t duck).
    Bad moon rising …
    Good, Scott. Thanks.

  5. I agree, Scott. It’s like they’re just making stuff up on the fly. It’s as if they’ve stopped caring whether what they do is believable anymore.

  6. The main purpose of all these staged circus events is to inflict a intellectual system overload on the public. While we react an deconstruct all the things they have done in the past, they will do new shit to us – thus creating our future. In this manner they keep their initiative and we are always a couple of steeps behind.

    We should be aware of what they do, but we must cease the initiative. Otherwise we will have a shit-storm to deconstruct…

  7. And Scott Pelley ‘correcting’ the eye witness ‘we now know one of the shooters was a woman….’

    Ben Carson really screwed the pooch yesterday, letting all the ‘terrorists’ know that ‘the FBI can only track 20-30 suspects at a time…’ Millions, maybe billions of dollars and they can only track 20-30 people? Maybe if they weren’t spying on the whole freekin’ planet, they could do a better job of figuring out which one of their ‘drills’ was gonna go live:-/

    • Nobody made a mistake. You need to be more afraid and skittish knowing that there are hundreds, maybe thousands of deranged people out there masquerading as you neighbor while being radicalized on the internet and plotting your demise while staring through your windows with their tactical night vision binoculars. And the FBI cannot even track them. They can only track 20 or 30, and there are hundreds after you! And they might be Muslim! And the probably pledge allegiance to the United Islamic States of Arabia! One nation, under Allah, with Bigotry and Prejudice for all! Somebody might even have a Facebook page for crying out loud! Where have the good times gone? OMG – I gotta run and find my Paxil [pant pant]

    • I tried to reply to this a couple of times, but the site does not seem to like what I said so my comments get suicided.

  8. You nailed it… and people are buying it. Which is the most disturbing ‘reality’ of all.

    The MSM news use to only ‘report’ on the show, now they are an integral part of the show.

    How low can they go?

    • Much, much lower. There is no limit, actually.

      Time is getting shorter, I’m afraid.

      Very strange things are on the near horizon …

      • “Very strange things are on the near horizon …”

        I concur. They are desperate. The gun-control false-flag events are not working (I guess all the gun violence American’s entertain themselves with has made them pro-gun). Desperate people tend to do stupid dangerous things…

  9. I just saw “the first picture of tashfeen malik” being reported – it’s a picture of a woman with her head covered, wearing no make-up etc., but I am 100% positive I saw a picture yesterday or the day before of an attractive woman dressed normally without a head covering, wearing make-up and flashing a smile full of beautiful white teeth..the pic seemed to be cut in half (maybe she was holding up her baby or was in the photo with someone else.) I cannot find that picture anywhere now. Does anyone else remember seeing that and maybe even where?

  10. If we get through the 10 or 5 years, and if Public Education goes private, goes to Big Business, this will be the History that’s taught

    • “If we get through the 10 or 5 years” That’s a big “if”, Roy.The people running this show/these monstrous scams, are in control of nuclear weapons aren’t they?

      • You might be right, Stan, and they’re stupid enough to use them, too. Then, they can run a cinder, from a space suit

  11. OK. We are now supposed to believe that the FBI leaves this apartment unsecured 48 hours after the investigation began? This alone is ludicrous on its face. Not to mention the media frenzy inside. And the facebook tip came from you guessed it: SITE.

  12. The Big Lie

    “All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.”

    — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

    “…and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”

    The actual narrative doesn’t even come into it. The government, via its propaganda wing, relies on the fact that it could say the Pope was Bigfoot and the sheep would still only ask one question “Why would the government lie?” If you can’t get past that, or better, if your worldview and sanity depends on a belief that the government is ‘good’, you’ll swallow virtually anything.

    Meanwhile, the bigger the lie gets, the less clothes the Emperor actually has on, the more loath a believer will be to admit his past folly.

    I’m pretty sure there was a WoT watershed point in time, where pills were taken, sides were chosen, and, whatever side you chose then, you’re pretty much stuck there, no matter what.

    That would suggest that we now have two human species – the blue ones and the red ones.

    So, are you feeling perturbed, right now? Do you wish you could cut out that agonising chunk of your brain that says “this. is. a. freak. show. and it’s killing me to have to watch it”?

    Cypher: I know what you’re thinking, ’cause right now I’m thinking the same thing. Actually, I’ve been thinking it ever since I got here: Why oh why didn’t I take the BLUE pill?

    I say that we’re past the point of sites like this being of any practical use. What we need instead are places where we can get help to manage the mediatic and social dissonance that is increasingly going to be visited upon our asses savants, as the lunatics take over the asylum.

    For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief. Ecclesiastes 1:18

  13. “It is only by obtaining some sort of insight into the psychology of crowds that it can be understood how slight is the action upon them of laws and institutions, how powerless they are to hold any opinions other than those which are imposed upon them, and that it is not with rules based on theories of pure equity that they are to be led, but by seeking what produces an impression on them and what seduces them.”

    “…The most striking peculiarity presented by a psychological crowd is the following: Whoever be the individuals that compose it, however like or unlike be their mode of life, their occupations, their character, or their intelligence, the fact that they have been transformed into a crowd puts them in possession of a sort of collective mind which makes them feel, think, and act in a manner quite different from that in which each individual of them would feel, think, and act were he in a state of isolation.”

    “…This very fact that crowds possess in common ordinary qualities explains why they can never accomplish acts demanding a high degree of intelligence. The decisions affecting matters of general interest come to by an assembly of men of distinction, but specialists in different walks of life, are not sensibly superior to the decisions that would be adopted by a gathering of imbeciles. The truth is, they can only bring to bear in common on the work in hand those mediocre qualities which are the birthright of every average individual. In crowds it is stupidity and not mother-wit that is accumulated.”

    “…Such also is approximately the state of the individual forming part of a psychological crowd. He is no longer conscious of his acts. In his case, as in the case of the hypnotised subject, at the same time that certain faculties are destroyed, others may be brought to a high degree of exaltation. Under the influence of a suggestion, he will undertake the accomplishment of certain acts with irresistible impetuosity. This impetuosity is the more irresistible in the case of crowds than in that of the hypnotised subject, from the fact that, the suggestion being the same for all the individuals of the crowd, it gains in strength by reciprocity.”

    “…We see, then, that the disappearance of the conscious personality, the predominance of the unconscious personality, the turning by means of suggestion and contagion of feelings and ideas in an identical direction, the tendency to immediately transform the suggested ideas into acts; these, we see, are the principal characteristics of the individual forming part of a crowd. He is no longer himself, but has become an automaton who has ceased to be guided by his will.

    Moreover, by the mere fact that he forms part of an organised crowd, a man descends several rungs in the ladder of civilisation. Isolated, he may be a cultivated individual; in a crowd, he is a barbarian — that is, a creature acting by instinct. He possesses the spontaneity, the violence, the ferocity, and also the enthusiasm and heroism of primitive beings, whom he further tends to resemble by the facility with which he allows himself to be impressed by words and images — which would be entirely without action on each of the isolated individuals composing the crowd — and to be induced to commit acts contrary to his most obvious interests and his best-known habits. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will.

    It is for these reasons that juries are seen to deliver verdicts of which each individual juror would disapprove, that parliamentary assemblies adopt laws and measures of which each of their members would disapprove in his own person. Taken separately, the men of the Convention were enlightened citizens of peaceful habits. United in a crowd, they did not hesitate to give their adhesion to the most savage proposals, to guillotine individuals most clearly innocent, and, contrary to their interests, to renounce their inviolability and to decimate themselves.”

    All excerpts taken from The Crowd. A study Of The Popular Mind by Gustave Le Bon (1896). A must read for anyone who desires to know why the majority accept the ludicrous as fact.
    https://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/lebon/Crowds.pdf

    Also, as a person who doesn’t accept it, you might ask yourself why that is? Do you normally consider yourself part of the crowd, or more or a maverick, a rebel, a freethinker, even a troublemaker?

    I believe it will help to understand that individuals don’t swallow this garbage, just psychological crowds (convened by media). History has shown, however, that crowds are disbanded and replaced by new crowds fairly regularly. That’s not to say, however, that the new crowd will be any better (revolutions?) or that the old crowd will never again be assembled and come to power.

    • Thanks Eggman. That book has been on my ‘to buy’ list for awhile. TV and Social Media in particular play/prey upon people’s crowd persona.

      We must expose how the social engineers are controlling society(s) if we are ever going win against the globalists.

      • You’re welcome. Please pass along. Written in 1896, the book has been in the public domain for quite a while. Available to read online at the link given, and on many other sites.

        Another source to investigate are writings by and about Edward Bernays (YT videos also). Bernays was Freud’s nephew and the father of sheep dazzling (or the nephew of the father, depending on your POV).

        “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”
        ― Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda

        “Here was an extraordinary state accomplishment: mass enthusiasm at the prospect of a global brawl that otherwise would mystify those very masses, and that shattered most of those who actually took part in it. The Anglo-American drive to demonize “the Hun,” and to cast the war as a transcendent clash between Atlantic “civilization” and Prussian “barbarism,” made so powerful an impression on so many that the worlds of government and business were forever changed.”
        ― Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda

        Century of Self Documentary

        I believe it is as important to consciously and actively guard against and reject “new and improved” (etc.) as it is “War on Terror” (etc.) All of it derives from the same place.

  14. As canadaslava’s video above reports, the family’s attorney David Chesley says
    “There are a lot of disconnects and there are a lot of unknowns and there are a lot of things that quite frankly don’t add up, or seem implausible.”
    “she’s probably 90lbs so it’s unlikely she could even carry a weapon or wear some sort of a vest or do any of this.”

    And Chesley reports the most astonishing bit of info. I’ve heard so far:
    “Where the couple was found, from what I understand, that they were handcuffed lying facedown in this truck shot up. There’s a lot of things that just don’t make sense.”

    They were bloody handcuffed face down in the shot up truck??!!
    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2015/dec/04/san-bernardino-shooting-victims-named-live#block-5661822fe4b073bf0735bb2f

    Here’s TMZ’s picture of the guy in the street – though maybe the cuffs were put on him afterward:
    http://breaking911.com/pictured-san-bernardino-terrorist-pictured-dead-and-handcuffed/

  15. Awesome work Scott, as usual.🙂

  16. Nice summary and polemic. Good work. (Note: “shudder to think” is right phrase. I’ve not heard of “shutter to think” before!)

  17. Farook and his wife were actually low-level FBI informants they were patriots working part time for the FBI this is why he spent so much time at his local mosque and his brother was in the US Navy so on Wednesday at the party he got a text message telling him to come right away to meet his handler. He and his wife left the party and they were murdered inside the regional center in an elevator or in the parking garage. Their bodies were put in the back of the SUV and 20 minutes later the three men in black show up to shoot the place up.

    The news media is told it was them and they believe it they took the story and ran with what they were fed. This was a classic false-flag perfectly scripted but it was sloppy. Every single “terror attack” involving the FBI has been a set-up by the FBI using Muslim Americans as patsies. Starting in 1993 with the WTC bombing. The NY Times did an article a couple years ago and every FBI “terror bust” was due to the FBI setting up patsies who they could then sting.

    The nearby active shooter drill was used the way all the adjacent simultaneous drills have been used. This is open and shut it’s easy to solve when you realize Farook and his wife were trusting of the FBI they were being paid to inform on other Muslims at their local mosque. Ironic that they were patriots only to be used and disposed of and now smeared for all eternity after their deaths. I know this is how it happened it’s obvious.

    • it’s quite possible. When I first started researching the story, that’s what I figured as well. Like those two brothers at the Boston Bombing, seems to me Farook got a phone call which set the whole thing in motion. Also notice they needed to do the whole “shelter in place” thing and the door to door searches with the militarized police force terrifying the neighborhoods. Same thing from Boston. And remember, the FBI came out and said there had been communication between Farook and some “low level suspects” in the past (two years ago from one account). Was that him reaching out to FBI informants, or the informants reaching out to him? My guess is the latter. Either way you look at it, they were definitely patsies set up to take the fall. It’s obvious as you point out.

  18. Interesting interview with the “widow” of one of the victims. Although she does not appear to laugh or have a very noticeable disconnect with the death of a loved one like most fake victim families mew have seen, she does something peculiar and switches to present tense at some point when talking about her husband. (starting at 00:58)

    Yes, I understand that some people might have a hard time talking about a recently deceased person in the past tense… Nonetheless, she does not seem to be so shook up by it. To me, the most objectionable part of the interview is actually the way the CNN dude is leading her to the water..

    Her late-husband is also a peculiar character, who had an online presence as ProTzionist, and who defined himself as

    I am the LEAST SERVANT of Rabbi Yeshua Messiah and through him Hashem”

    There is a detailed article at heavy.com about this character who’s meant to have “evangelized” everyone he met, which “might have” done the same to Farook on the eve of the shooting.

    Nicholas Thalasinos: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know (heavy.com)

  19. […] who attended their wedding and baby shower, and, while either en route to or during said shooting, the wife would pledge her allegiance to ISIS via a Facebook account that may or may not’ve bee…. Or maybe, through his reportage, he’d be able to answer all of the oddities Scott Creighton […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: