New Flight 9268 Photo Shows Major Charring on the Exterior of the Fuselage

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Airline says “external activity” causing massive structural failure of aircraft is responsible for crash.

——

I’m not sure exactly what this implies, but I found a new image of the wreckage of Metrojet Flight 9268 that’s a little troubling.

This photo found over at Tass news agency shows investigators examining a piece of the wreckage which appears to show some major charring on the exterior of the fuselage near an emergency escape hatch. (click on images for larger view)

Site of A321 Russian passenger jet crash in Egypt

You can barely make out the word “escape” on the hatch and the paint has been burned and peeled off. You can also tell from the color of the metal, the darker area is darker because it’s been burned.

The curvature of the wreckage as well as the lack of any kind of handle for the hatch itself indicates this charring pattern is on the exterior of the plane.

I also found a website that indicates there is an emergency escape hatch located inside the cock-pit of the A321. There was a difference of opinion regarding where it was located in the cockpit on that site, but they all agreed there was one.

From another website, I found this image shows a pilot utilizing the escape hatch in another plane (SK A340) to clean off the windshield with some water.

Boeing 747-438 aircraft picture

So I don’t really know where this hatch is located on the plane. It seems to match the relative size and shape of the one in the A340, but that isn’t definitive.

If it is located near or in the cockpit, that would leave us wondering what kind of explosion or “heat signature” would be centered on or in the cockpit, since there is no luggage or fuel stored in the front of the plane.

I’ll continue to look into this and see what I can come up with regarding the location of an emergency escape hatch on this type of aircraft. Obviously, the charring could have been the result of burning that occurred after the crash. But it could also be a clue as to what brought the plane down in the first place. The location of that emergency hatch is an important part of the puzzle that I have yet to determine.

It is possible of course that Tass released this image of this investigator on purpose. Notice the attention those troops are paying to that investigator.

On another note, the Russians have cryptically announced they have recovered something “foreign” to the aircraft and taken it for further inspection.

Experts working at the scene of the Saturday Sinai crash have found elements that are not components of the crashed A321 airliner, informed sources in Cairo have told TASS.

“They have been sent for an expertise,” one of the sources said. “It could be equipment transported by passengers, for example diving equipment,” another source said, adding that specialists were working on identification. TASS has no official confirmation of this information at the moment. Tass

Some claim it could be simply a piece of something the passengers had in their checked baggage like diving equipment. I seriously doubt the investigators would have taken a piece of diving equipment from the scene and released a statement about it.

Also of note: the Interstate Aviation Committee has refused to either confirm or deny the recent reports about a heat signature being recorded by US sources.

7 Responses

  1. I found it quite strange to have reporters stating a satellite was directly above the plane when it registered a heat signature. Immediately I was reminded of SDI and reagans Star Wars program that was created to do exactly this – shoot down a plane or missile with a laser.

    As far as the diving equipment, maybe they are trying to say that there was someone on board that knew about the plan to bring down the plane and that person had brought gear for a water crash? I don’t think it’s that far fetched since the Russians are very precise with everything they say.

    • what they are saying is…. ‘we found something that doesn’t belong. We could blow the whistle… or…. we could say it’s something else… your move’

      think about it in terms of a negotiation. a negotiation involving… say… Syria? Ukraine? Sanctions?

  2. Good work, Scott. When I first heard about this crash, I immediately thought “blowback” against the Russians for spoiling the game in Syria. Even if it were just coincidence, I wouldn’t blame the Russians for coming to that conclusion. Either way, this has the potential to escalate into tit for tat retaliations. Somehow, I don’t think the Russians will involve civilians but the truly evil NATO forces definitely have no qualms about it.

  3. “I’m not sure exactly what this implies” then the mentally disabled racist (per Social Security) goes on for 10,000 words speculating wildly–no erroneous conclusion to large to leap upon.

    Go back to ur e-begging and leave the thoughtful analysis to those whose minds are not addled by Big Pharma.

    • What an incredibly stupid misplaced comment. Of course it’s speculation – there is no claim to be otherwise. Stupid persons with nothing of their own to contribute are apparently severely threatened by speculation. But everyone already knows that.

    • And you amusingly misapprehend that someone has come to a conclusion. Reading may not be your strong suit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: