“ISIS™” Releases a New Fake Execution Video… Right on Time to Support the “Boots on the Ground” Plan

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: UPDATES on the Fake “ISIS” Tank Video… brought to you by the propaganda outlet SOHR

UPDATE: please see update at the end of the article

In the world of marketing and propaganda, production value is the key folks. Let no one tell you otherwise.

After a video was released showing the world how “ISIS™” filmed one of their fake execution videos in a studio with a green screen, the fake video propaganda cottage industry seems to have dried up a little bit. I guess it’s easy to understand why.

It’s not that some of us out here hadn’t already been exposing the fake videos as staged Hollywood-styled propaganda since they first starting hitting the “interwebs” when Barack Obama needed a justification for reengaging our military in Iraq after being praised for bringing home the troops and officially ending that war. We had.

But the video of the staging of one of the “beheadings” went mainstream and many of the MSM outlets had to start admitting the whole collection of the things were clearly phonies.

That led to folks starting to wonder why the evil arch-nemesis of ObamaGod would feel the need to pretend to kill people, rather than just kill them. And thought seeds like that, once firmly planted in logic seeking soil, would sprout all sorts of possible explanations that the powers that be didn’t want to flourish in the general population. Especially if they were watered with an ample amount of reason and truth.

Bad seeds indeed for the war industry.

So, the producers of the fake beheading videos and the burning man videos and the drowned like rats in a cage videos took a little time off. Perhaps they went on to make another “Innocence of bin Laden” film. Or went to work on Homeland or something.

Anyway, it would seem they got the band back together and we have yet another fake “ISIS™” execution video to pick apart today.

This time they upped the production value and got themselves a nice tank to use in the shoot. They’ve gone all Spielberg on us.

You’ll notice that not many websites are talking about this one. I guess people are either tired of picking these things apart or the guys who used to do it all got sick with Pancreatic cancer and passed away like Dave McGowan and Tyler Drumheller who was set to testify before the Benghazi Commission.

Whatever the case may be… I feel I have to explore this propaganda a little because while so many of us are still talking about Russia bombing the CIA’s terrorists in Syria and how everyone has to get behind building the next Saudi Arabia in Greater Kurdistan, everyone seems to have resorted to the default position on “ISIS™” and that is that it is a real, legitimate entity out there.

It isn’t. And that fact becomes more and more obvious with each one of their stupid, Obama administration serving videos they put out. And more specifically… WHEN they put them out.

Yes, the Defense Department want’s to put boots on the ground to fight “ISIS™” and we just happen to have them putting out this video on almost the exact same day the US Troops as Human Shields story comes out.

Is that a coincidence you think? No? Ah. Then you’re not as dumb as someone OBVIOUSLY thinks you are.

But let’s take a look at this stupid “ISIS™” tank video, shall we?

First of all, the video is supposedly of a Syrian soldier, or so says the British propaganda outlet, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) . Of course, there is no way to verify that and various outlets simply take that proven liar and propagandist outlet at his word (yes, it’s one, war-mongering, regime-change supporter in London)

For a soldier, the guy really doesn’t put up much of a fight. Looks like someone tortured him by shaving off some of his hair and I guess that was so demoralizing, he just kneels there and accepts his fate while the actor playing the “evil ISIS guy” role blathers on and on about whatever bullshit they figured was scary.

In fact, like so many other fake victims of fake executions in the past, this guy not only walks calmly to his demise, but he also makes sure to hop in front of the tracks of the tank when the driver missed while trying to line up the “kill”

Would you do that? I wouldn’t. I’d take death by AK over squishy squishy any time of the week. Plus I’d be going out on my feet like a soldier… which is probably exactly what a real Syrian soldier would do.

Not this guy. He hops in front of the tank tread, leans carefully on the one fender someone tech-screwed to the tank for just this purpose, then he carefully lies himself down in front of the tread in order to be run over.

Not only that… but the calm bastard doesn’t even seem to react while the tank is running him over from his toes to his head.

Pretty amazing stuff there, huh?

Here are some stills I am taking from the video which show this laughable “execution”. Notice, when he lays down in front of the tread… he moves his feet to the left of the tread on the inside and then, just then, the video edits to another view so you don’t see the guy get run over. Instead, what you see is him pretend to be in position to be run over, they stop the tank, and edit to another camera showing them running over  a dead body they stuck in his place.

345

2

6

Someone who is certainly smarter than I am could probably take a look at the length of the shadows and determine how much time was spent between takes in this video production. All I am going to sat to that is, take a look at the shadows and tell me these shots were all filmed simultaneously. It’s pretty obvious that they weren’t.

It’s also pretty obvious that this video wasn’t shot in Syria near Homs like they claim it was considering the fact that so many aircraft from the Russians and the US are zipping around in the skies looking for idiots with “ISIS™” flags, cameras and guys in orange jump-suits to blow to bits.

And lastly, the real evidence… remember when this video was released and who’s interests it really serves. “ISIS™”? No. Sec. of Defense Ashton Carter? You betcha.

Yep. Another fake execution video. And I thought we were done with this ridiculous crap. Oh well. I guess you can’t teach an old war dog new tricks.

But the increased production value was nice. You think they had to get a Teamster to drive that tank or did they use scab labor? They better unionize if they want SAG or IATSE benefits.

UPDATE: I left the following as a comment answering a few questions posed by one of the readers. They were good questions and I think the answers may help shed a little more light on the relative validity of this video.

OK. Lets take this one bit by bit.

Yeah Lilaleo, I think you got taken a bit on this one.

First of all, the guy is not trying to hop out of the way of the tread, he’s hoping into position to be run over by it, and even Heavy.com’s article had to acknowledge that fact. Those treads are only about 18″ wide so unless you are completely incapacitated, it would take some work to not get out of it’s way when moving that slowly. Second, if you notice, the guy even once he hit the ONE fender on the tank, could EASILY have rolled out of the way.

In fact, to that point, even after one of his feet is crushed under the tread, he still could have, and naturally would have, by reflex reaction, moved the rest of his body to the left of the tread, and gotten out of the way. Your knees do move and bend you know. That’s like a hand on the hot stove. Your body is going to react, even if you have “resigned yourself” to your doom.

Notice, in the shot from full front as he is rolled up on… the body doesn’t move. Doesn’t squirm, shake, twist, try to escape.. nothing. nada. zippo.

I’m sorry Lilaleo, but that’s impossible for someone living even IF as Heavy.com says, he wanted to “get it over with”

Now, when you investigate any of these events, one of the first things you look for is something out of place. Something odd that doesn’t seem to fit.

When I first watched it I thought to myself… why did they do that to his hair? Is that supposed to be torture? embarrassment?

They didn’t do it to ANY of their other “victims”
They didn’t do it to ANY of their other “victims”

That’s what you call a “clue”

So why do it?

Well, when they cut the scene from the shot on the right side (one showing him moving around and obviously alive) they had to shoot from the front… way back…

…. WHY?

Why cut at all if you wanted to “fix” the issues with the other videos, like you claim. Because they didn’t “fix” the issue at all… in fact,…. they did the EXACT same thing… cut away at the moment of the “death”… so WHY would they do that if they wanted to show themselves killing this victim? There is only ONE reason for that… and you know what it is…

Back to the hair…

They shot the “kill moment” from the front for a reason… from the right or the left… you would be able to see the FACE of the body… from the FRONT all you can see is the TOP OF THE HEAD… the hair.

So WHY CUT HIS HAIR LIKE THAT?… so people would say it’s the same guy BECAUSE of the patch of shaved hair…

… that’s why. It’s an identifier used instead of his face as they run over the body. And if they didn’t want to use his face to identify him when they ran him over,,,, well… why is that Lilaleo?

Because it isn’t his face. It’s someone elses.

Now, let’s talk about how they would plan it. Yes, they tried to fix some of the problems. But, clearly you understand it would difficult to get someone, especially a soldier, to stand there in front of a tank and make sure they got run over by the 18″ tread, right? he would move. Run. Roll out of the way. Or simply refuse to do it and rather, opt for a soldiers death, being shot by an AK. Right? In the planning stages, you have to imagine that came up.

So what would they do? Have 50 guys in a cage and keep shooting the videos until one of them let them run him over? That’s ridiculous. They were on a deadline as well. Ashton Carter needed his new, scary “ISIS” video for his “boots on the ground” campaign roll-out.

The only way to ensure someone wouldn’t screw it up would be to stage the whole thing. Get a stuntman from Indonesia or a whole stunt crew for example to produce the video.

Or maybe, a stunt crew from Saudi Arabia… isn’t that “terrorist” wearing Saudi garb? hmmm.

And remember, here we are 6 or so days after the release of this video, and the ONLY proof we have that this guy is a Syrian soldier… comes from the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights… uh… that’s not really proof.

I wonder if this wasn’t created first to effect some support for Ashton Carter’s boots on the ground campaign, but maybe also to gin up support for a recruit drive… in Saudi Arabia. I mean.. why change the “ISIS” costume like they did? Is it hard to get recruits in the Wahhabist community these days? Is this another twisted version of “Innocence of bin Laden”?

Anyway, my guess is, staging the whole thing would make for a better, more stable, shoot. And as I mentioned before, the only reason to cut away at the moment of truth, is because they didn’t run that guy over… they ran over a dead body and shaved patches in his hair to make him identifiable as the victim.

Lastly… and this is the most telling… when the video ends and you see the result… the right leg is crushed and the pants leg torn open showing the horrible wound to the corpse. Now, had that happened while he was being crushed, you would CLEARLY see him reacting to it while being run over, but his head doesn’t move a centimeter. Aside from that… the obvious part…

… there’s almost no blood and in fact, on the pavement right there where the leg is busted open… no blood at all.

That’s not physically possible. If he was alive when that massive wound was inflicted… there would be blood everywhere right there. His heart was still pumping and the wound, crushing wound, would cause MASSIVE blood loss.

So, for these reasons, along with the timing of the release of the video… my guess is, the guy featured in the first part of the video with all the nifty barbershop work is alive and well and probably back to work on some movie set somewhere in Saudi Arabia, Jordan or Thailand.

————–

My situation is … better.  :) 

The current donation drive has resulted in several responses for which I am thankful

Please help keep AE online

You can use the DONATION button on the right side of the page

Your help is very much appreciated 

(For my mailing address, please email me at RSCdesigns@tampabay.rr.com)

output_95f0q7

36 Responses

  1. Reblogged this on Dreams of Liberty and commented:
    Oh boy!

  2. Seems like the ISIS fashion has also changed. Orange is still in for prisoners, while the executioner is in his comfy and airy all-white summer outfit, which replaced the menacing looking black ninja attire of the past seasons. Balaclavas might have gone the way of stone washed jeans, and desert dwelling terrorists are preferring the much more versatile, day&night turban, while some more daring outfits seem to have shed head and face cover altogether.

    The designers at ISIS™ seem to have put a lot of effort in to this season, marketing their creations with a spectacular, “We’ll squish your brains out!” themed viral video. The company, which was recently challenged by competition from Russian designer Putin, declared that they are busy expanding their operations into Europe and the U.S., and plan to produce flash-mob style fashion shows on the streets in five continents.

    Jihadist Wear Daily
    October 29, 2015

  3. In my opinion, the stupidest part is how they left that cut that shows him leaping and aligning himself with the tread even though they obviously shot this thing in many takes as you point out. Why not do a take two after all this effort that went into the video.

    Anyway… Great job dissection and breakdown of this nonsense, Scott. Thank you.

  4. The real failure here is the missed opportunity to use ‘Dead Skunk in the Middle of the Road’ as the sound track. Come on, Rita Katz- if your
    crew is going to make these bullshit videos, at least make ’em funny.

    • I saw that video earlier and its alright, but here’s the problem… his source is the “former CIA agent” from right down here in Tampa (he mentions MacDill AFB). Uh… I don’t believe any of these ‘former” guys for one minute. My father was career Navy and I know how many of these guys retire, then go to work in the private sector for military and intelligence contractors. And one of those lucrative lines of work is counter-intel, or spreading disinfo to folks like us. My father worked on Subs and for a decade and a half after retiring from the Navy, he worked for NUSC and ADCAP helping build and test torpedoes. They all do it. make lots of money. And anyone working at MacDill is going to certainly be offered opportunities like this. Plus… he talks about this “new site”?

      My guess is, they want to spook Russia so they use these guys to float disinfo to alternative sites. I’m sure the guy making the video doesn’t know that, but that would be my guess.

      They are having that talk today between Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the US about Syria and what to do with it. I hope tomorrow there is some good news and they don’t really end up sending 3,000 of our boys over there to be human shields for al Qaeda. That would be sickening… even if they are only Special Ops guys.

      thanks

  5. I am with you on this one personally I never trust “formers or analysts”on MSM . Always consider them pay actors for whatever bulshit propaganda networks pushing . Good to now we on the same page on this garbage

  6. Fake from start to finish. It’s so obvious. I’ve seen almost all of these vids full length, it’s just ridiculous. They put out a video a couple of weeks ago, I heard, where the roles were reversed, with the ISIS * guys getting executed – this time it was them wearing the orange jump suits. Seems, they are now producing this crap for different target audiences. This one here doesn’t seem to be aimed at Western news watchers, they didn’t even bother to use subtitles. Remember the Japanese guy? The entire story was simply completely dropped – as if it never existed. Yep, and the timing back then was aimed at the Japanese population, just in time for their Premier Abe to make his plea for re-arming Japan and join in a coalition to send troops overseas where needed. Anybody with half a brain left, is able to see through the bullshit by now. 🙂

    • you bring up a great point in that they always seem to have an “ISIS” video for whatever global agenda they are pushing, don’t they? And that goes all the way back to when they first started making them in order to help Obama with his decision to re-commit military forces back in Iraq after pulling out. It’s so obvious.

  7. The first thing I noticed was the “wind”. They are going to have to work on this. Then there is the photoshopped smoke. Why is it there? Maybe to distract from the tank track jumping as they slam on the brakes. A tank would not need to gun the motor to run over a body. The tanker would not even feel the bump.

  8. Hi Scott. I got a chance to watch this video a few more times. And, I am not so sure anymore.

    After paying some frame-by-frame attention to the two key instances in the video, which are, one the hopping, and two, the moment when he is going under, I am not able to reconcile my initial, somewhat prejudiced (from previous bogus beheadings) conclusions I had drawn, and those in your article that I previously agreed with.

    To be clear… I am 110% convinced that these people are not real ISIS, this is a multi camera staged event with professional production value, and they are definitely made to further the agenda by the Katz klan…

    However, I’m thinking they might have really done it this time… Abduct or capture a poor guy, who might have been as good as dead anyway because of his circumstances, drug him up, have him read some crap, etc… and then run over him for real.

    I don’t think the guy was very alert when the tank was moving towards him. When he realized it was not going to stop, he gives a look of disbelief towards the right of the camera as he makes a feeble attempt to hop out of the way, and his feet are already caught in the treads when video cuts.

    And no matter how may times I watched, I could not find any discrepancies between the cuts before and after that instant right at the moment of impact… In things like the tank’s angle, the guy’s position in relation to the side of the asphalt, his position before getting run over and after, tread tracks on the asphalt, etc. Even the exhaust smoke seems to match.

    Granted, I don’t speak any arabic, let alone being able recognize the nuances of their respective speeches like we did with the english speaking beheading “victims”. Even then, I can guarantee you that the dude in white is an actor, a very bad actor in any language.

    The video seems to have been produced almost like a point by point rebuttal of all of the shortcomings of their previous masterpieces, which you (and others) pointed out and deconstructed after every video release. This one was not shot in studio, no green screen, no ninja outfits, no balaclavas, no stupid fake knives or cages, no fake lighting, no british spokesperson… So, I can easily imagine people in the HQ having a meeting where someone goes “Boss, they are not buying the fake heads and fake bodies”, and the boss saying “So, they want a real dead body? We’ll give them a real fuckin’ dead body!!!”

    Yes, it is all staged, it is all fake ISIS and all that, but I don’t think killing a poor prisoner on camera is beyond the scope of this propaganda production. After all, the agenda they are serving with that propaganda kills hundreds of thousands every year, not to mention that the same fake isis has killed thousands of Syrian soldiers to date

    In any case, I am not trying to argue against your conclusions in the article… Just wanted to run this by you and see what you thought of it all. Am I falling for the illusion?

    (I can’t believe I watched this horrible imagery, so many times. Not healthy! Not healthy at all. I don’t know how the people who dream these up and then produce these videos sleep at night, whether it’s 100% fake or or 0% fake or anywhere in between)

    • Lilaleo, I felt the same way until I realized that there is no reason to stop filming right at the point where it appears the man’s legs are beginning to be rolled onto…. so, the film does not show the continuing murder… why? Because they have to stop and replace the live man with a dead one.
      the hair cut? Scott pointed out: strange that the hair is the only identifiable part of head left… and the strange hair cut is very noticeable…. so, they cut the live man’s hair in a special strange fashion and then they cut the dead’s man hair in the same fashion. Pronto…. everybody would recognize the body,even though no one saw him actually being run over.

    • OK. Lets take this one bit by bit.

      Yeah Lilaleo, I think you got taken a bit on this one.

      First of all, the guy is not trying to hop out of the way of the tread, he’s hoping into position to be run over by it, and even Heavy.com’s article had to acknowledge that fact. Those treads are only about 18″ wide so unless you are completely incapacitated, it would take some work to not get out of it’s way when moving that slowly. Second, if you notice, the guy even once he hit the ONE fender on the tank, could EASILY have rolled out of the way.

      In fact, to that point, even after one of his feet is crushed under the tread, he still could have, and naturally would have, by reflex reaction, moved the rest of his body to the left of the tread, and gotten out of the way. Your knees do move and bend you know. That’s like a hand on the hot stove. Your body is going to react, even if you have “resigned yourself” to your doom.

      Notice, in the shot from full front as he is rolled up on… the body doesn’t move. Doesn’t squirm, shake, twist, try to escape.. nothing. nada. zippo.

      I’m sorry Lilaleo, but that’s impossible for someone living even IF as Heavy.com says, he wanted to “get it over with”

      Now, when you investigate any of these events, one of the first things you look for is something out of place. Something odd that doesn’t seem to fit.

      When I first watched it I thought to myself… why did they do that to his hair? Is that supposed to be torture? embarrassment?

      They didn’t do it to ANY of their other “victims”
      They didn’t do it to ANY of their other “victims”

      That’s what you call a “clue”

      So why do it?

      Well, when they cut the scene from the shot on the right side (one showing him moving around and obviously alive) they had to shoot from the front… way back…

      …. WHY?

      Why cut at all if you wanted to “fix” the issues with the other videos, like you claim. Because they didn’t “fix” the issue at all… in fact,…. they did the EXACT same thing… cut away at the moment of the “death”… so WHY would they do that if they wanted to show themselves killing this victim? There is only ONE reason for that… and you know what it is…

      Back to the hair…

      They shot the “kill moment” from the front for a reason… from the right or the left… you would be able to see the FACE of the body… from the FRONT all you can see is the TOP OF THE HEAD… the hair.

      So WHY CUT HIS HAIR LIKE THAT?… so people would say it’s the same guy BECAUSE of the patch of shaved hair…

      … that’s why. It’s an identifier used instead of his face as they run over the body. And if they didn’t want to use his face to identify him when they ran him over,,,, well… why is that Lilaleo?

      Because it isn’t his face. It’s someone elses.

      Now, let’s talk about how they would plan it. Yes, they tried to fix some of the problems. But, clearly you understand it would difficult to get someone, especially a soldier, to stand there in front of a tank and make sure they got run over by the 18″ tread, right? he would move. Run. Roll out of the way. Or simply refuse to do it and rather, opt for a soldiers death, being shot by an AK. Right? In the planning stages, you have to imagine that came up.

      So what would they do? Have 50 guys in a cage and keep shooting the videos until one of them let them run him over? That’s ridiculous. They were on a deadline as well. Ashton Carter needed his new, scary “ISIS” video for his “boots on the ground” campaign roll-out.

      The only way to ensure someone wouldn’t screw it up would be to stage the whole thing. Get a stuntman from Indonesia or a whole stunt crew for example to produce the video.

      Or maybe, a stunt crew from Saudi Arabia… isn’t that “terrorist” wearing Saudi garb? hmmm.

      And remember, here we are 6 or so days after the release of this video, and the ONLY proof we have that this guy is a Syrian soldier… comes from the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights… uh… that’s not really proof.

      I wonder if this wasn’t created first to effect some support for Ashton Carter’s boots on the ground campaign, but maybe also to gin up support for a recruit drive… in Saudi Arabia. I mean.. why change the “ISIS” costume like they did? Is it hard to get recruits in the Wahhabist community these days? Is this another twisted version of “Innocence of bin Laden”?

      Anyway, my guess is, staging the whole thing would make for a better, more stable, shoot. And as I mentioned before, the only reason to cut away at the moment of truth, is because they didn’t run that guy over… they ran over a dead body and shaved patches in his hair to make him identifiable as the victim.

      Lastly… and this is the most telling… when the video ends and you see the result… the right leg is crushed and the pants leg torn open showing the horrible wound to the corpse. Now, had that happened while he was being crushed, you would CLEARLY see him reacting to it while being run over, but his head doesn’t move a centimeter. Aside from that… the obvious part…

      … there’s almost no blood and in fact, on the pavement right there where the leg is busted open… no blood at all.

      That’s not physically possible. If he was alive when that massive wound was inflicted… there would be blood everywhere right there. His heart was still pumping and the wound, crushing wound, would cause MASSIVE blood loss.

      So, for these reasons, along with the timing of the release of the video… my guess is, the guy featured in the first part of the video with all the nifty barbershop work is alive and well and probably back to work on some movie set somewhere in Saudi Arabia, Jordan or Thailand.

      • Thanks for setting me straight, Scott. And I am not being sarcastic. As I had expressed in my post I was very doubtful of myself as I wrote it.

        The single issue that I am stuck at for the moment is that his feet really look like they are ALREADY caught in the tread and the tank is still in motion as the video cuts to the wider shot. In your version of the script, the tank would have had to stop abruptly, possibly a hairline away from the guys feet if not already on the feet.

        The reaction time (or the lack of reaction, convulsion, etc) could be explained away by sedatives and a gruesome, repetitive “rehearsal” that might have left him exhausted and numb to an approaching tank which had always stopped in the previous takes.

        All of your other points do make a lot of sense though…

        To the issue of the haircut… When I was initially convinced of utter fakery, I thought the reason for the bizarre haircut might have been the fact that they got the real dead body from a morgue, of a guy who had been operated on. As you know, before anything, whether for surgery or ER treatment, the hair is shaved off the areas that require medical attention. Which could explain the weird “hole” in his hair and the half mustache. The “live” victim’s bald spots sure look like they were freshly shaved right before shoot.

        Thanks again for your detailed (and patient) reply.

        • why would the “evil ISIS” give him sedatives? took pity on him? didn’t want him running away? Fact is, the guy has only been identified by SOHR as far as I know and therefore, he’s certainly NOT a Syrian soldier. Which means he could be anything. he could be the best friend of the guy driving the tank for instance. Or a stunt guy from Hollywood for all we know.

          and how do we know it didn’t accidentally run over part of his foot? We know that because they would have used the footage in their video if they had.

          production value
          production value
          production value

          The guy probably pulled his feet to the left miliseconds after that edit. then he rolled under the tank as it stopped short.

          It was a good stunt. Looked ridiculous with him lining himself up with the tread, but still, a good stunt none the less. But again, why edit away from the moneyshot if they really ran him over? It makes no sense and if it makes no sense… it’s fake. Because, there IS a LOGIC to that choice. And, just like 9/11, you have to follow the LOGIC… not the emotional context… if you want to find the truth.

          • I hear you Scott.

            In my opinion, whether or not the depicted murder is real or simulated has very little relevance as far as the fakeness of both Isis itself and all of these videos are concerned.

            A friend, who actually believes everything he reads in New York Times, sent me this link today:

            NYTimes – Deso Dogg, Ex-Rapper Who Joined ISIS, Is Killed by U.S. Airstrike

            The story is: Rapper, German, radicalized, joined ISIS, dead!

            As I am googling for other sources, thinking “where did this come from now?” and “since there is no real Isis to join, this guy must be an asset or an agent”… And this is what I see:(it’s a copy/paste of the top search results)

            ISIS Poster Boy’s Wife Was A Spy For The FBI – Western Journalism
            http://www.westernjournalism.com › isis-poster…
            Mobile-friendly – Feb 18, 2015 – Denis Cuspert, a former German rapper who went by the moniker “Deso Dogg,” now an ISIS militant …

            Operation Seduction: FBI Spy Posed as Wife To German Rapper …
            news.jammedup.com › 2015/02/17 › ope…
            Mobile-friendly – Feb 17, 2015 – A new report reveals that the lady “Deso Dogg” thought was he married was a spy for the Federal …
            ISIS German rapper ‘Deso Dogg’ caught in honey trap by FBI, spied …

            Dailymotion › video
            Mobile-friendly – Apr 14, 2015 – Denis Cuspert, 39, aka Deso Dogg, converted to radical Islam, changed his name to Abu … It is not clear when he married his unidentified spy wife, but she secretly transmitted critical …

            German ISIS jihadist has an FBI wife? – Al Bawaba
            http://www.albawaba.com › … › Latest News
            Mobile-friendly – Feb 18, 2015 – Deso Dogg was married to an FBI agent and he didn’t even know it! (Image: Vice. com). A German …

            Turkey returns US spy married to German ISIL fighter – BGNNews
            national.bgnnews.com › turkey-returns-u…
            Feb 15, 2015 – An FBI spy the US sent to cover a German Islamıc State of Iraq and the … Rapper Denis Cuspert, who also goes by the name Deso Dogg and Abu Talha al-Almani, has participated in …

            Wife spies on German rapper-turned-IS militant – The …
            tribune.com.pk › story › wife-spies-on-g…
            Mobile-friendly – Feb 17, 2015 – Alleged spouse goes undercover for the FBI. … Wife spies on German rapper- turned-IS militant … Cuspert spent years in the Berlin hip-hop scene under the pseudonym ‘Deso Dogg

            I feel I don’t even need to click on any of the links to figure out what’s going on.

            His stepfather was an American. His wife an FBI agent…. He “starred” in a beheading video… Wife was in Turkey… Goes on and on…

            What’s an FBI spy doing spying on a German citizen engaging in “global terrorism” in a foreign land, anyway??

  9. Lilaeo, yes they are hard to watch. But distance yourself by remembering that you are watching for many who can not and will not. Remember it is just theater! Being a sheep dog is not for the weak but for the benefit of the many. I know from your posts that you are strong. Peace and love.

    • Thank you, Chuck Smarr. I appreciate your gentle moral support. It was much needed :-}]

      Viewing it as “theater” was never a problem for me until this one. . However, the mere thought that I might be watching a real person getting slaughtered this time around put me in a very different state.

      Thanks again.

      • check out my comment to you and rest assured, it’s not real. Better in production value (which is the point I was trying to make in the article) but not real.

  10. I’m w Lilaleo. In your third still pic above, a dead body’s head would have been lying on the asphalt, and this guy’s head is up. It also appears to have the same shaved hair.

    Also, the body is to the left. I would say the left leg did not really get run over.

    • I should have said “last” or 5th pic…not 3rd.

    • the fact that you note “the same shaved hair” goes to make my point from my previous comment. This is the first and ONLY time they shaved the head of a victim in that patchy way… why do you think they did that? it’s a clue… they did that so when they cut the scene from the side view to the front view, people would say “see? the patch is the same… its the same guy”…. but of course, they edited the shot from the front, not the side, so you WOULDN’T say… “hey, that guy has a different FACE than the first guy… this is staged”

  11. The shot up to him leaning on the fender looks like a stuntman. He’s bouncing like an athlete/stuntman getting ready to do a difficult trick. If you look carefully right before the cut it looks like he’s actually jumping just inside the tread, as I’m sure a good stuntman could do with sufficient pay and practice.
    But this video is perhaps the best-executed “execution vid” of the whole lot – give them credit for improvement.

    The two shots that you thought were separate takes do not appear to be separate takes. The two cameras look to me as if they are just outside each other’s view and his body action looks consistent between those two shots. The shadows on the ground appear to be consistent too. They look the same length when you account for perspective foreshortening. The victim’s shadow in the first photo looks consistent with the shadow of the guy on the right in the last photo. The ones that look different are merely foreshortened by perspective.
    So those two shots appear to be from the same take on two cameras.

    Not that it doesn’t function in the video exactly as you say, but the patchy head shave is a common middle eastern shaming tradition. Police and others use it all over the place – it both humiliates and advertises that you’ve been in trouble.

    The overarching ridiculosity of these videos is always, as you say, that they always cut just before the ostensible “action moment”, and the victim always totally accepts horrifying medieval death with no apparent care, which makes them seem not believable.

    But for the general audience, this one seems a tad more demanding to parse than the earlier ones.

  12. Tangential to the main point, but did Dave McGowan pass away? I saw his post about cancer a few months ago, but I hadn’t seen that he died.

  13. Not buying it.

    1) That’s a (really beat up) T-55. So a fender was never “added” to that tank.. In fact, it’s the other one that has been removed or by the looks of it, been broken. 55’s have fenders by default: This is easy to look up and you should have done it before making what is really baseless claims as to the purpose of the “added” fender.

    2) The tank turns to hit him as he hops, it even does this twice. First as he hops to the right (right from the camera’s POV) and then back left a bit as he starts hopping back a little. Obviously he’s not hopping into the track but the opposite as the tank turns to “correct for” his hopping around.

    3) The “absent cameraman” when shot from the side.. note how quite a bit of the tank are out of picture and how the camera movements are a bit “wobbly” or exaggerated, and doesn’t quite follow the action? For example centering on the exhaust of the tank instead of the whole “running over” just as it’s beginning, and then quickly trying to center that instead? And note how it’s all a bit blurry? These are signs that said angle was shot from some distance using zoom.. and that’s probably why you can’t see a cameraman.

    4) Atleast one of his legs are clearly caught by the thread at the end of that angle. If that’s a stuntman, he’s not walking away. At the very least, one of his legs is going to be wrecked.

    And besides.. Why even bother faking stuff like this anyway? It’s would be way easier to actually run someone over with a tank for real, than it would be to fake it. And anyone willing to fake such for political purposes or intimidation.. probably wouldn’t have much of a moral problem with doing it for real either.

  14. All of you who really think that this was is fake are some seriously retarded people. How the hell would a tank instantaneously stop RIGHT at the feet? there is no way the driver would ever be able to react fast enough to stop the tank before running over the man. Also, tanks don’t stop instantaneously, you would have to have seen some type of sign indicating that the tank is slowing down in order for it to have stopped in time. Also, all the shadows match, that’s out of question. Also, it seemed as though the soldier was severely drugged and tortured. This would result in a delay in response as seen when he gets ran over. You said that the body looks dead because of how its lying down? Dead bodies do not keep their head up as they’re being ran over. You’ll ask “why drug him if they are a terror group?” Because they obviously want him to get ran over, it shocks the western world. The Middle East is a hostile place with hostile people. Face the fact that this is real and no anarchist mentality will ever make it not real. I don’t like my government either, but not even Clinton could conjur up something like this.

    • never seen a tank run someone over in a movie? what did they do? run the actor over? come on man, it’s wag the dog. they faked the burning man video. faked the beheading videos. and they faked this one. it’s that simple.

  15. no way that this is faked. You see the man being gripped by the tank. No way to stop it in time

  16. Ok I’m willing to indulge all kinds of conspiracy theories but the guy they ran over wasn’t dead. You can clearly see his head lifted off the ground. Dead guys can’t do that.

    • I believe this guy was alive, whether staged or not. But just to add that his head could be lifted due to his shirt being pulled on by the track as his body mass is squeezed out. Sick to think about but weve come this far so why not…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: