by Scott Creighton
The push to create Greater Kurdistan is ramping up and as everyone knows, the next block of property they need to acquire to that end has to come from eastern Syria. Turkey will be next so the demonizing of Erdogan and the requisite color revolution in are well underway.
Perhaps the government has long been pondering seizing the assets of Koza İpek Holding, but the raid on their corporate offices, as well as 23 different companies owned by the group, appears to have been prompted by the fact that the group’s flagship daily Bugün published further evidence of the government’s involvement in aiding and abetting ISIL. On the day Bugün published still shots from Customs’ closed circuit security camera at the border gate with Syria, showing that materials for the manufacturing of bombs and arms were freely transported through the gate without any interference from Customs officials, the police raided Koza İpek. It is very clear that the Islamists in the government do not want the clandestine business in which they were intimately involved getting publicized in the media. Today’s Zaman
(Yes, that is right. All the BS you’ve been reading and repeating recently about Erdogan arming “ISIS™” comes from a neoliberal media publication in Turkey whose parent company, Koza İpek Holdings, also holds interests in mining, energy and other media businesses. In short, they simply made it up looking to help Obama push his regime change operation in their country)
In Britain the “refugee crisis” is being used by Finance Minister George Osborne to justify bombing Syria and more specifically, the legitimate government of Syria, back into the stone ages on behalf of the refugees who are fleeing from our drone strikes and destabilization campaign “moderate” terrorists.
Finance minister George Osborne said Britain and Europe had to find a way to tackle the conflict in Syria as well as provide asylum to those genuinely fleeing persecution.
“You’ve got to deal with the problem at source, which is this evil Assad regime and the ISIL (Islamic State) terrorists, and you need a comprehensive plan for a more stable, peaceful Syria,” Osborne told Reuters in an interview. Reuters
Curiously enough, the same ridiculous language was recently used by US State Department spokesman Mark Toner in early August:
“The Assad regime is, quite frankly, the root of all evil here and frankly has been instrumental in creating the kind of lawless area…”
Identical propaganda coming from two separate countries. Does this remind anyone of Bush and Blair during the lead-up to the Iraq war?
In short, the plan is to depopulate the eastern regions of Syria so Obama can call them “lawless areas” and effectively take control of the area in order to hand them over to a regional power which will bring “stability” to the region. The regional power of course is Iraqi Kurdistan.
To that end, President Obama and David Cameron are stepping up their targeted assassination programs in Syria, illegally.
In order to justify doing that, they are using the age-old “national security” myth in that they are both claiming some “terrorist” in Syria is somehow orchestrating terrorist attacks in the US and Britain.
Of course, their propaganda is marching in lock-step once again.
The CIA and US special operations forces are carrying out a secret campaign using armed drones to target and kill Islamic State leaders in Syria, the Washington Post reported Tuesday.
The clandestine program is separate from America’s wider military operations against IS fighters, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed US officials.
Among those so far killed is Junaid Hussain, a jihadist hacker from Britain who the Pentagon said was recruiting Islamic State sympathizers to carry out lone wolf attacks in the West. Defense News
Britain has killed two of its own nationals who had been fighting for Islamic State (IS) and plotting attacks on British soil, in its first air strike in Syria, Prime Minister David Cameron said on Monday.
Despite not having a parliamentary mandate to take military action in Syria, Cameron told lawmakers that, as an act of self-defense, Briton Reyaad Khan had been targeted and killed in a precision drone strike in the country…
… “There was a terrorist directing murder on our streets and no other means to stop him,” Cameron said. “We took this action because there was no alternative.” Reuters
Once again we see identical propaganda being used to justify illegal attacks on foreign soil coming from two supposedly separate governments.
Perhaps they aren’t so separate. Or perhaps they both get their talking points and marching orders from the same place?
Either way you look at it, what we are seeing here is a ramped-up agenda in the mergers and acquisitions departments of Great Britain and the United States. But the propaganda is false. They aren’t targeting British “ISIS™” members because, if you recall, the British “ISIS™” members are actually their own SAS units:
“The unorthodox tactic, which is seeing SAS units dressed in black and flying ISIS flags, has been likened to the methods used by the Long Range Desert Group against Rommel’s forces during the Second World War.
More than 120 members belonging to the elite regiment are currently in the war-torn country on operation Shader, tasked with destroying IS equipment and munitions which insurgents constantly move to avoid Coalition air strikes…
Instead the teams, part of a force known as the Coalition Joint Special Operations Task Force, are under American command.
Dubbed “smash” the units, which travel in civilian pick-ups, can even launch their own unmanned aerial vehicles, or mini-drones, to scan terrain ahead of them and pinpoint IS forces.” Express UK
Ever wonder why we don’t simply bomb those convoys of “ISIS™” fighters driving around in broad daylight in their Special Ops Helix trucks dressed in black and waving “ISIS™” flags?
Hybrid units called “omega” or “cross matrix” teams have operated in Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen, according to senior U.S. military officials.
Those employed in Afghanistan were “mostly designed against specific high-value targets with the intent of looking across the border” into Pakistan, said a former senior U.S. military official involved in Special Operations missions. They wore civilian clothes and traveled in Toyota Hilux trucks rather than military vehicles. Washington Post
Well, now you know.
Another chink in the armor of their current propaganda campaign happens to be the fact that the individual David Cameron claims they had to kill because “there was no other way” to keep him from ordering more murders on British soil just happens to have already been killed a while ago and it was widely reported by British papers:
Jihadist who wanted to be Britain’s first Asian PM ‘killed’ in drone strike (Daily Telegraph); British ISIS fighter who posed next to Ed Balls and dreamed of becoming the first Asian Prime Minister ‘is killed in drone strike’ (Daily Mail) Boy who wanted to be PM ‘has died on jihad in Syria’ (The Times) and Briton Reyaad Khan believed killed in air strike on Islamic State in Syria (The Guardian)
The guy’s name is Reyaad Khan and he has a rather interesting background. Seems he was hooked up the young political “in crowd” and wanted to “rid the world of evil” and become Britain’s first Asian Prime Minister. Here he is with then Education Minister Ed Balls in 2009.
In the photo above, Khan was about 15 years old. Now it’s 5 years later and he’s of the right age to be in the military. And apparently he’s serving in some secret service providing David Cameron ample justification to start arbitrarily bombing targets in Syria in order to “rid the world of evil”… the “evil” of the Assad regime that is.
Seems like Khan figured out a way to fast-track his political ambitions.
That’s why he’s never been killed in Syria or Iraq or anywhere else while wearing an all black costume and waving around an “ISIS” flag prop: because he’s an SAS asset just like the British “terrorist” we pretended to kill a little while ago.
But the US and Great Britain are killing people in Syria. Even the supposed strike against Khan was illegal according to British law. Military zealots simply aren’t allowed to arbitrarily decide who lives and who dies with regard to British citizens. And so far their military has no authorization to bomb ANYONE in Syria, much less a British citizen.
That of course is the whole point of this combined psyop.
But who are we really killing in Syria if not the British SAS forces running around doing photoshoots dressed up as ‘ISIS’?
Well, if history tells us anything:
A new analysis of the data available to the public about drone strikes, conducted by the human-rights group Reprieve, indicates that even when operators target specific individuals – the most focused effort of what Barack Obama calls “targeted killing” – they kill vastly more people than their targets, often needing to strike multiple times. Attempts to kill 41 men resulted in the deaths of an estimated 1,147 people, as of 24 November. Guardian
US drone strikes kill 28 unknown people for every intended target, new Reprieve report reveals Reprieve
First of all, that assumption is bullshit.
Drone strikes don’t kill 28 people for every 1 who is targeted.
A better understanding of the situation goes something like this:
The CIA terrorists directing drone strikes in occupied countries can JUSTIFY only 1 drone killing for every 28 they commit.
That’s more accurate.
When they hit a home of some peaceful organizer who is working to bring the people of a region together to oppose our occupation and they ruthlessly murder his family and friends in the process, that’s not an accident and the collateral damage certainly isn’t unintentional.
They are sending a message. If you have a problem understanding that our military operates this way, just do some research into the Kandahar Massacre
And that’s what’s happening in Iraq and Syria right now. Soon it will be happening in Turkey as well.
That’s what is causing all those people to flee the targeted areas in Syria and consequently, their exodus is being used by the very people who are bombing them and forcing them to flee in order to justify more bombings and thus a stepped-up cleansing of the area soon to be known as Syrian Kurdistan.
“I would draw new lines for Kurdistan and I would promise them a country,” Rand Paul
“To bypass the Saudi Barrier” and “all that stands in the way is Assad“. That was penned in 2012.
UPDATE: From this guy
“Chomsky: Some of the worst crimes of the late 20th century (and might I add the early 21st century) could have been ended (and CAN be ended) very easily, simply by US withdrawing crucial participation”
Filed under: CIA are the Real Terrorists, Color Revolution Turkey, destabilization Campaign Syria, destabilization campaign Turkey, destabilizing Turkey, Fake Syrian Revolution, Gen Petraeus Operation, General Military Council for Iraqi Revolutionaries, Global Free Market Wars, Greater Kurdistan, Kurdistan, Neoliberalizing Syria, Refugee "crisis", Scott Creighton |