by Scott Creighton
While going over some of the photos of the crash site of Flight MH17 I noticed something odd: most of the photos are taken from a low angle looking across the same debris field like when someone tries to make a crowd at a fake protest seem larger than it actually is. So I looked into it a bit further and I noticed something else: the crash site is right beside the only road into that area. In fact, all the large pieces of debris are right beside the road. Also of note, most reports claim the plane disintegrated in mid-air when it blew up but the crash site is extremely small for such a large plane and it’s relatively confined to that one space. That’s not at all conducive to the reported eye-witness statements that claim the plane came apart at around 33,000 ft traveling at around 500mph. Debris should have been spread out over several debris fields with quite a distance between them like was the case with Flight 800.
Images after the break.
Here’s a shot taken from that road I mentioned. That’s the entire debris field.
Here’s one of those low angle shots.
And another.
And another.
Just look at how massive the crash site is.

So you would think it’s a massive crash site right? You would be wrong.
Different angle.
Yes, that is the road, the only road into that area, right beside the crash site. and it just so happens the larger heavier pieces ended up closest to that road.
Passports found in pristine condition like they are brand new.
And some undamaged luggage, a few pieces.
Has anybody ever seen a plane crash site were random shirtless assholes and their kids in tank tops are allowed to rummage through the wreckage in their flip-flops? anybody?
Here’s a question: what pushed down the wheat around this piece of debris?
Here’s another picture and you can see the path leading up to it of crushed wheat…
Do you think a few random guys in flip-flops would knock down that much wheat on their way to stand on the critical evidence at a plane crash? Hmmm…
Oh look… the path leads right to the road where those cars (and heavy duty trucks?) are parked. Hmmm…
Now, I’m not saying this event was definitely staged. But if it was, the best place to do it would be right beside the road wouldn’t it? That way you could drop off whatever you had by way of debris without leaving tire tracks and the largest pieces would need to be left right beside the road because heavy equipment would leave tracks just as a large group of men surrounding a wing section couldn’t help but leave a trail of crushed wheat in the field leading from the road to the place where it was dropped.
Curious but not conclusive.
——–
Filed under: Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, Scott Creighton
















Reblogged this on Dogma and Geopolitics.
Hmm… Maybe MH17 is really MH370 strategically placed.
Thank you! Thank you! You’ve answered my question. I was wondering about this very thing last night. And the passports? Oy.
It does appear to be some kind of fakery going on here. Even the video MSM pushed yesterday of the explosion where there wasn’t any smoke trail from a falling plane. I’m pretty sure surface to air missles leave a nice trail also but the the guy recording was only concerned with that little area by the road of course.
Not sure if you look at RINF but this guy has been writting some good articles.
http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/obama-definitely-caused-malaysian-airliner-downed/
The plane was downed at 12:15 pm on 7/17…. their time.
but at what time were these photos taken? And how long does it take to carefully remove 288 bodies?
If it exploded mid air, wouldn’t the parts be burnt and black? How long would it have taken to put out the flames after it hit the ground? How long would it have taken for emergency vehicles to get to the scene?
and yes, how would so many parts have landed so close together on the ground… unless it fell with a huge hole in it… and on fire… and then burst apart when it hit the ground…..
but if that happened, then why do they report that the crash area is over a very wide spread area?
What if the plane did blow up mid air….. and fell over a wide area..
but the plane shown, might be a ‘look-a-like’ that was blown up on the spot or somewhere else and moved to the shown location. But why?
This is so strange…
Good points, Jan. If it had broken up at 30000 feet, the wreckage and bodies would have been strewn over potentially miles of land. elmysterio may be correct. Where else would they get the bits to fake the scene? How convenient that it was an identical plane. The amateur video only shows a fireball and black smoke. Wouldn’t there have been a smoky trail from the sky? It’s all too clean of a mess.
AHAHAHA! Does this mean that we can disregard the patriarchy now? I mean, it’s so darn TINY.
[…] Flight MH 17′s Tiny Roadside Crash Site (IMAGES) […]