by Scott Creighton
UPDATE (see the end of this article for an update) UPDATE 2 UPDATE 3 OMG it gets better UPDATE 4 no wait… there’s more… UPDATE 5
The “Citizens Investigation Team” or CIT for short, served a great purpose for the ongoing psyop in the Truth movement. It was a heated distraction for two years which took up a lot of time and eventually drove many in the Truth movement back into the waiting arms of the “rational” leaders who steered them right back to the official story of what hit the Pentagon. They succeeded in making any mention of what happened at the Pentagon aside from that official story such a contentious issue, that it is abruptly dismissed on even well-meaning sites (not to mention the obvious fake truth sites which dominate the blogs). With such a successful model to go by, is it any wonder that someone would come up with another attempt at it, this time dealing with the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers?
Like CIT, this new distraction is designed to be easily dismissed. CIT’s claim was that Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon after a major explosion at rush hour in clear weather, and no one saw it happen. CIT’s “evidence” is off-the-record statements from 13 “witnesses” who are employed by either the Pentagon or the Department of the Army, and most of them actually claim that they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. It’s ridiculously stupid but people like Dwain Deets (head of NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center (drone aircraft development)) supported it in a video testimonial, which probably should tell you more about Dwain Deets than anything else.
Imagine that. The head of the agency who created our drone aircraft right up until 9/11 endorsed the psyop that lead to the marginalization of research into the possibility that anything else other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Go figure.
Now we have this Dimitri Khalezov guy and his rebranded mini-nukes theory coming out about the same time BYU’s “nanothermite” distraction is losing ground. Anyone see a pattern?
I was asked by some well-meaning Truth advocates to look into this… it didn’t take long.
His videos, though they claim that Big brother has been steadily removing them from Youtube for years I guess, are up now. They’ve been up since Jan. 15th 2011. For some reason I guess, Big Brother simply forgot to censor all this secret wisdom.
I pulled up his second video because it looked like that was the one where the interview started and now I am going to transcribe, word for word, what is said in the first 2 minutes of it.
Interviewer: Ok. In your book we talk about airplanes. We talk about American Airlines Flight 11 which we are told struck the Pentagon and 9:37 am. United Airlines Flight 175 which we are told struck the South Tower at 9:16am. American Airlines Flight 77 supposedly struck the North Tower at 8:46am and United Airlines Flight 93 crashed as Shanksville at 10:06. Now one of the claims of your book is that that didn’t happen.
Interviewer: How do you justify that claim?
DK: Ok, you see… everybody who has a little experience in the military service or in the explosive core or in ordinary physics knows that the aluminum targets cannot penetrate steel… aluminum projectiles cannot penetrate steel targets. It’s obvious. So how would it happen that a subsonic aluminum plane could penetrate double walled steel perimeters of the World trade Towers which were as thick as tank armor?
Interviewer: Well, along with the rest of the world, the morning of Sept. 11th, I saw what I thought was live coverage of a plane doing exactly that.
DK: Yes but.. many people, they change their opinion since then. There is a lot of research on the internet and on the Youtube you can find a lot of movies shown by professionals who prove that uh, the contemporary Sept. 11th coverage was just a digital manipulation of the planes. It’s very easy….
Interviewer: So you are saying that at that speed a plane would not penetrate the side of the Tower?
DK: It would just smash itself flat and fall away.
Ok. You got that? Flight 77 did not hit the North Tower, it hit the Pentagon. Flight 11 did not hit the Pentagon, it hit the North Tower. The perimeters of the Twin Towers were not double walled steel as thick as tank armor, but in fact they were made up of 1/4″ steel walled columns with roughly 3 feet of glass and aluminum between them. Now, I am not going to rehash the equally ridiculous “no planes” theory, just suffice to say…
… Dimitri Khalezov was at least at the point of the interview… a “no planer” and a “tv fakery” advocate. All that aside from not knowing which planes hit which buildings, how the buildings were constructed, or the basic laws of physics.
Got that? Good.
Oh wait… again he’s wrong because then he went on to show a picture of the interior columns of the WTC and wrongly claimed that they were from the exterior walls. Not only did he show interior columns, but he showed interior columns from lower floors which are larger than even the interior columns of the upper floors where the planes hit. He shows the thickness of the steel of those columns as 2.5″ which is correct in the lower floors, but again, the thickness of the steel which made up the exterior columns was 1/4-3/8″.
Then he shows a diagram of the column layout in the towers, which is wrong, the old “tube in a tube” crap.
So let’s sum it up shall we? Dimitri Khalezov is a “no planer”/”tv fakery” proponent who has no idea about the construction of the Twin Towers and we are supposed to accept him as an expert on the demolition of the Twin Towers?
Does that about sum it up?
I don’t care what this guy says about mini-nukes or nukes underground at the Towers. Just like the tragic flaw in BOTH the “no planes” theory and the “flyover” theory, his problem is as obvious as what you see with the naked eye. We all saw those towers being demoed from the top down. Explosives were going off, floor by floor, not from underneath.
Greg Bacon left a comment over at Kenny’s Sideshow in which he claims that this nuke theory has credibility because according to him the only time we saw people and materials being “vaporized” was when we dropped atomic weapons on Japan. Thus, I suppose, this revised mini-nuke theory has some credibility.
1. A blast furnace, which quickly reduces solid metal to its liquid state, is operated between 3,600 and 4,200 °F. “The temperatures they deal with may be 2000 °C to 2300 °C (3600 °F to 4200 °F)”
2. The kind of steel that made up the trusses in the Twin Towers ( a combination of ASTM A-242 and an ASTM A-572 equivalent) melts at around 2,750 °F. ” Carbon Steel 2600 – 2800″
3. PETN is the most commonly used high explosive in the demolition industry as that it makes up the core of Det Cord, a high explosive cable that looks similar to fiber optic cable and is used to connect linear shaped charges to wireless remote detonators and is also used at the same time to break up concrete structures like…. floor systems.
4. PETN’s Explosion temperature: 4230 °C or 7646 °F
5. PETN’s Detonation velocity: roughly 8500 m/s
6. the temperature of the surface of the sun is approximately 5505 °C or 9941 °F.
These are just simple facts. The temperatures created by PETN approach that of the surface of the sun and they greatly exceed the working temperature of a blast furnace, more than enough by far to “vaporize” the metal of the missing trusses from the Twin Towers and more than enough to “vaporize” metal objects like file cabinets inside those buildings.
At a detonation velocity of 8500 m/s, PETN is certainly capable of pulverizing the floor systems and everything else that was close to them or standing under them or standing on them.
Since neither NIST, nor FEMA, nor even Steven Jones and Gregg Roberts will test for explosive residues in the dust that they have, and since det cord is commonly used in the demolition industry, and since explosive demolition contractors were on the scene at Ground Zero even before the 2nd plane hit the towers… and since NIST’s excuse for not checking for explosive residues came from that very same explosive demolition contractor…
I would recommend rather than following a “no planer”/”tv fakery” proponent who doesn’t know how the towers were even built down yet another distraction of a rabbit hole, why don’t we just push Jones and others who have Ground Zero dust to test for the one thing that is obviously capable of creating the evidence that we now have regarding what happened to the Twin Towers?
Or you can go on another embarrassing CIT snipe hunt. The choice is yours.
The following is a little info to help you out.
In addition to the spherical iron and aluminosilicate particles, a variety of heavy metal particles including lead, cadmium, vanadium, yttrium, arsenic, bismuth, and barium particles were produced by the pulverizing, melting and/or combustion of the host materials such as solder, computer screens, and paint during the WTC Event.
Combustion-related products are significant WTC Dust Markers, particularly if seen in combination.
… The differences within the WTC Dust and typical background dusts include the fineness and evidence of heat…
… The amount of energy introduced during the generation of the WTC Dust and the ensuing conflagration caused various components to vaporize. RJ Lee
The following is from David Ray Griffin, a real Truth advocate who is currently under attack from the fakes…
The RJ Lee study also found that temperatures had been reached “at which lead would have undergone vaporization”– meaning 1,749°C (3,180°F).
Another study was carried out by the US Geological Survey, the purpose of which was to aid the “identification of WTC dust components.” Besides also finding iron particles, the scientists involved in this study found that molybdenum had been melted. This finding was especially significant, because this metal does not melt until it reaches 2,623°C (4,753°F). Griffin
This diagram shows the construction of the pre-fabricated floor sections of the WTC. Notice the built in electric ducts that would have been inside the actual pour of the concrete.
Now look at what I theorise as the placement of the det cord as we all know there was an ongoing contract to upgrade the fiber-optic cables in both the towers and it was handled by the security company.
Imagine that kind of heat and that kind of pressure right above the ceiling tile and the occupied office spaces of the Twin Towers.
That’s how it was taken out. That’s what happened to the desks, the lamps, the computers, the carpet, the doors, and tragically, the people who were still there. It wasn’t super secret government magic pixie dust, it wasn’t ray beams from space, it wasn’t mini-nukes or earthquake weapons. It was a controlled demolition.. the one thing no one will really test for.
UPDATE: I just listened to an interview on Kevin Barrett’s show with Gordon Duff and Dimitri Khalezov and it’s even worse than I thought. It’s literally every single despicable “conspiracy theory” from no-planes, to TV fakery, and now you can actually add… “the Jews did it”. On this show Dimitri talks about how he is good friends with legendary Mossad agent Mike Harari and he tells of how on Sept. 12th 2001, Harari had him over for breakfast and they were celebrating the demolition of the Twin Towers, which according to Dimitri, Hariri took full credit for. Not only that, but apparently Dimitri spends ALOT of time in Thailand and that is where he just happened to meet Harari who, once he got to know him and liked him, told him about the super secret “nuclear controlled demolition” process sometime before 9/11. That’s right… “the Jews did it”… we can add that to the list of things Dimitri brings to the table right before the tenth anniversary of 9/11.
Dimitry goes on to say he was arrested several times in Thailand in 2003 and that the first time he paid $50,000 U.S. and the cops just let him go. Does anyone here know what Thailand is famous for?
UPDATE 2: Gordon Duff then wraps the whole thing up with this statement: “Dimitry is the ONLY admissible evidence we have in the 9/11 truth movement of a conspiracy” Does that sound right to anyone?
UPDATE 3: During the interview, Dimitry states that
“under the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centers in New York, there were special underground nuclear demolition devices intended for the emergency demolition of the Towers and these devices were 150 kiloton thermonuclear devices” Dimitry
Nagasaki, on August 9, 1945 – plutonium based Fat Man was dropped on Nagasaki… Fat Man was a 21 kiloton nuclear device… this was the result…
So Dimitry says that the weapons that brought down the towers were at least 7 times larger than those used in Japan at the end of WWII?
can we please stop with the bullshit now?
UPDATE 4: Why couldn’t I just stop watching the interview? Dimitry is left to his own devices for a few minutes when Gordon is off the air and Demitry starts to explain the whole thing. Apparently what hit the Pentagon was an old Soviet missile that had been rigged with a nuclear warhead. That’s right. He also claims that the planes that didn’t hit the Twin Towers were actually missiles with even more nuclear warheads. Are you with me? But they didn’t go off, but since somehow everyone knew the two missiles stuck in the Twin Towers were actually nuclear warheads with a half megaton yield, the powers that be decided to use the emergency demolition nuclear devices that were built under the Twin Towers back in the 60s when the basin was created. Now of course, according to Dimitry here, those three (one built under Building 7 as well I suppose) were 150 kilotons each, which added up equals 450 kilotons, which is about equal to the half megaton stuck in the Twin Towers. Now, apparently someone told the American officials that the planes were really nukes and so, of course, to minimize the damage, they used the underground nukes to nuke the power of the above ground nukes stuck in the Twin Towers. Got it? ok.
UPDATE 5: I can’t believe I am writing this… According to Demitry and Gordon Duff, the 1970’s Soviet missile that was tipped with a nuclear device that hit the Pentagon was stolen by the “God of War” and sold to “the terrorists” and had to be launched from a submarine. Ok? is that it? I’m not writing any more. (you can actually hear someone trying to keep from laughing in the background, probably Barrett)(yeah, that is definitely Kevin Barrett laughing at the end of this ridiculous show)
do I really need to keep going here? do I have to hear anything else about nuclear bombs in the basement of the Twin Towers again?