“T.” Carter’s Video Resurgence and the Gatekeepers of the Pentagon

by Scott Creighton

There seems to be a huge effort going on right now to frame the entire question of what happened at the Pentagon on Sept. 11th between two artificially opposed positions:

1. (CIT) – “Fly Over” Theory – Endorsed by the father of modern drones – (CIT actually created their own “Hit List” of people who dared question their all important “13 witnesses” (all of whom work for either the Pentagon or the Department of the Army…go figure))

2. (Gregg Roberts’) – “Believe the Official Story” Theory – endorsed by Donald Rumsfeld (no link needed)

When you get down to it, these aren’t as opposed as you might first think. One says that Flight 77 “flew over” the Pentagon and a bomb or something blew up just before they got there and the other says Flight 77 flew into the Pentagon, even though evidence doesn’t suggest that. Nor does logic for that matter.

Do you see it?  “Flight 77” . In both cases, Flight 77 has to be what people saw at the Pentagon.  And that is the entire point. And that is why someone posted up an old video of a highly questionable ‘witness” over at 9/11 Blogger. Seems that even unbelievable testimony supporting the official story of 9/11 is better than none at all, at our friendly neighborhood “Truth” site.

Of course, the other possibility, that something made to look like Flight 77,  is absolutely forbidden to speak about in 9/11 forums because of course, Gregg Roberts and Jim Hoffman (and their amen choir) have told everyone that the big bad government is craftily waiting for just the right moment to produce videos of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon and then I guess somehow, we are all in trouble and going to bed without supper.

That is called “fearful thinking” and its a useful ploy when attempting to create an artificial barrier to “critical thinking”.  Gregg Roberts’ background (“bachelor’s degree in psychology, master’s-level study in social work”) would certainly mean he was capable of understanding that old ploy.

Anyway, I don’t want to get caught up in this debate right now, it’s sucking enough energy out of the Truth movement as it is.

But, over on 911 Blogger, someone put up a video of “T. Carter” from John Judge’s COPA Conference in 2002. They dusted this one off and slapped it up on Blogger to show that an airline flight attendant claims that it was Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon after all.

I wanted you guys to watch this speech she gives and tell me what you think about it. What does her body language say? What do her eyes say?

One thing to keep in mind was actually reported by John Judge, supposedly her friend (the guy who introduces her in the video and is seen walking off the stage), in an article he wrote about her back in 2004. Now he makes all kinds of claims like she was allowed to walk through the crash scene on Sept. 21st 2001, either that day or the next while “body parts were still laying on the ground” (bones)? And “they were still looking for survivors”? I find that hard to believe, but he also makes a rather telling statement or two. Read these then watch her video.

She was immediately invited in to a series of briefings and grief counseling sessions by both the airline and the Pentagon. These briefings continue to this day.” John Judge in 2004

“… She went to briefings by Pentagon people at the Sheraton for 3 months afterwards, and the clean-up lasted for a long period. She is a union representative for attendants as well, and briefings continue. Families and attendants were at the briefings, along with Pentagon and airline people.” John Judge

I remember April Gallop mentioning that the FBI was trying to tell her what she saw or didn’t see right after the explosion (for those of you who don’t know, April was in the Pentagon on Sept. 11th with her child and she walked out of the hole in the side of the building without seeing a massive 100 ton 757 in stuffed into that little office. Kinda hard to miss if you ask me)

I also remember a witness at the Trade Center talking to a reporter saying he heard and saw explosions and mentioning that the FBI had brought in an architect to specifically tell the surviving witnesses what they saw. To “explain” it to them.

I wonder if “T. Carter” is simply a by-product of that kind of programing. Hard to say. Watch the video, let me know what you think.

Now, here is the jist of the story according to John Judge… follow along now.

According to Judge, either the night of the crash or the day after (he suggests it was the night of Sept. 11th) “T.” was given a “tour” of the crash scene…

“At the end of her shift on Saturday morning, September 22nd, she was approached along with other attendants to visit the crash site.”

“… As they waited, members of a psychological support group talked to them about their feelings. She will never forget what she saw there.

The area was covered with rescue equipment, fire trucks, small carts, and ambulances. They were still hoping to find survivors. Small jeeps with wagons attached were being used to transport workers and others at the site. One flight attendant was driving one of these around the site. Once inside the fence, she was unable to clearly discern where the original wall had been. There was just a gaping hole. She got off the van and walked inside the crash site. The other attendants broke down crying once they were inside. But my friend went in further than the others and kept her emotions in check as she has been trained to do and usually does in emergency situations.” John Judge

Let’s see if I got this straight…

They brought Flight Attendants to tour the crash scene. The same crash scene where they were “still looking for survivors”. The same crash scene where supposedly a 100 ton airliner was stuffed into a few small offices. The same crash scene that was being investigated for the biggest crime in the history of this country. The same crash scene that was still structurally unsound and located in the most sensitive building in the world. The same crash scene that still had “human body parts lying burnt on the ground”.

And this is John Judge’s story?

Advertisements

8 Responses

  1. I’ve bought cars from salesmen who weren’t trying that hard.

    To me she is all in with the pitch, all in with doing her job and telling the lies to the very best of her abilities. But she is not a dupe, or doing it against her will.

    For sure her speech was scripted by pros, very time efficient re points covered. Since spooks lie, and presume everyone is a liar they always overplay the ‘explanation of their behavior’ card.
    Too many times, she gives brief effective plausible explanations for her behavior.
    She is rather flippant, humorous and vain for about 8 minutes and 50 seconds. Then she closes with the weepy soft vulnerable chick in distress act while inviting anyone to come and talk to her all day long. How much for a hummer?

    She tries to serve up a nice fat red herring with her “who was the 6th hijacker” pitch. She gets a big fat F for that lame attempt.
    She only seems strong and determined on one call for action………..an investigation into 911.
    Oh my, how brave. Too bad she did this only 5 days before the whitewash 911 Commission was formed. The insiders from Zellikow to Hamilton had already been selected, after Darth Kissinger had already been rejected. So her bold calls for an investigation are shit, like the rest of her.

  2. I agree. Her script was written by pros. That is for sure.

    Did you notice how she lightened up when she started talking about all the phone calls she got that day? And is it just me, or is she beaming showing off the bracelet?

  3. She’s ‘beaming’ all the way… never seen anyone so happy to be talking about death and destruction.

    And on the 22nd of Sept. they were still looking for survivers? Does she have the Twin Towers confused with the pentagon? CNN said after one day that ‘they’ were no longer searching for any more people at the pentagon.
    And her eyes… good grief, she couldn’t keep a straight face if her life depended on it while ‘telling’ her fabricated tale….
    and her hands ….. yeah, she was trying to sell a bit of goods……..
    she is a bad actor…….

  4. “As they waited, members of a psychological support group talked to them about their feelings” PSYOPS anyone?

    Hi, I’m here to listen to any concerns you might have. What’s your name?
    ..Uh, Sara.
    That’s a pretty name. Can I call you T?
    But my name is Sara.
    Okay T, would you like to share any fears you have about crazed Muslims attacking you in your sleep or visions of exploding walls, screaming children, or your favorite plane crashing into the Pentagon the way it did. This must be a very hard time for you. Now, I know you might be a little scared of what will see here, but I’ll be right there with you when you see the dismembered parts of your dear friends scattered about. Don’t worry, chances are you won’t even recognize them. Can your be brave for me? Remember, T is for tiger… and terror.

    Meanwhile back on the set:
    Director: Okay you guys make sure the body parts look like they fell randomly, not too evenly spaced and I want everyone to look stressed and worn out. Move that fire truck to other side. What the hell are those hobbits doing here? Get back to your own set you idiots! Okay here they come, cue the flight attendant in the cart. Action!

    It’s the least Hollywood could do to repay the military’s generous cooperation in their films.

  5. I was listening to the radio in a work van before the Pentagon was hit that day. When news of the attack on the Pentagon came the first reports were that a “small plane or helicopter” had hit the Pentagon. After about an hour the story changed to an entire jet airliner had hit the Pentagon.
    A year later all the major news networks had their one year specials about September 11th. I never bothered to watch any of them because I assumed they would all parrot the official story that day.
    Some months later I was at a whole sale trift store and there were a number of video copies of CNN’s 911 Special for sale for $1.00.
    I bought one a later watched it leisurely. To my surprise when the program got to the attack on the Pentagon CNN’s eye witness to the event said, ” It was like a cruise missle with wings”

    Cruise missles have wings.
    There should be a genuine debate on what hit the Pentagon given the fact that Flight 77 was an unscheduled flight that mostly had government personell & executives of Lockeed Martin & Raytheon on board. Gee, how did 5 Arab hijackers with box cutters get on board on standby?
    This is the flight where Barbara Olsen, wife of the U.S. Solicitor General, allegedly made the cell phone call identifying the hijackers as Arabs with box cutters.
    I old enough to remember the initial reports the day Kennedy was shot. When I returned home from school, I remember watching film coverage where a number of people were ducking on a lawn because they heard shots fired from behind them from an area called “the Grassy Knoll”.
    I never heard the word again until Jim Garrison indicted Clay Shaw for the assassination of JFK in New Orleans some 6 years later.
    So the initial report that was broadcast when the Pentagon was hit was that it was a small plane or helicopter–not an air liner. It seems like they had to work very fast that day to psyop the public with the script of the official story.
    JC

  6. Joseph, please check the alleged full statement left out of the edited clip you linked. Debunkers have jumped on this over the years.

    http://archives.cnn.com/2001/CAREER/trends/09/11/witnesses/

    Mike Walter, USA Today, on the road when a jet slammed into the Pentagon: “I was sitting in the northbound on 27 and the traffic was, you know, typical rush-hour — it had ground to a standstill. I looked out my window and I saw this plane, this jet, an American Airlines jet, coming. And I thought, ‘This doesn’t add up, it’s really low.’ “And I saw
    it. I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings. It went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon. “Huge explosion, great ball of fire,
    smoke started billowing out.”

    Editing 911 videos is the job of the government and NIST. Individuals doing it don’t help our cause.

    If I’m wrong about this clip and it’s CNN lying, let me know.

  7. You’re not wrong about the clip. Walters was refering to the behavior of the thing he saw, not the appearance of it.

    However, if you look, you will find that he also said that when the “plane’ made contact with the side of the Pentagon, the “wings folded back against the plane” as it went into the Pentagon, and that is why there was only a small hole in the side of the building.

    This, of course, is physically impossible. The massive engines that were pulling the plane were located on the wings…. they could not have “folded back” as he claims. He was trying to help explain the lack of visible evidence of a 757 at the site. Ergo, Mike Walters is a liar and I don’t trust anything he says anyway.

  8. Jesus Christ…I thought 911 Blogger was legit…

    http://911blogger.com/news/2011-02-05/dr-frank-legge-visibility-9-11-mounting-evidence-shows-boeing-757-200-impact-pentagon-probable

    I’d be interested to see even one scrap of physical evidence that places flight 77 anywhere near the Pentagon. Suspect I’ll be waiting a while…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: