by Scott Creighton
There seems to be a huge effort going on right now to frame the entire question of what happened at the Pentagon on Sept. 11th between two artificially opposed positions:
1. (CIT) – “Fly Over” Theory – Endorsed by the father of modern drones – (CIT actually created their own “Hit List” of people who dared question their all important “13 witnesses” (all of whom work for either the Pentagon or the Department of the Army…go figure))
When you get down to it, these aren’t as opposed as you might first think. One says that Flight 77 “flew over” the Pentagon and a bomb or something blew up just before they got there and the other says Flight 77 flew into the Pentagon, even though evidence doesn’t suggest that. Nor does logic for that matter.
Do you see it? “Flight 77” . In both cases, Flight 77 has to be what people saw at the Pentagon. And that is the entire point. And that is why someone posted up an old video of a highly questionable ‘witness” over at 9/11 Blogger. Seems that even unbelievable testimony supporting the official story of 9/11 is better than none at all, at our friendly neighborhood “Truth” site.
Of course, the other possibility, that something made to look like Flight 77, is absolutely forbidden to speak about in 9/11 forums because of course, Gregg Roberts and Jim Hoffman (and their amen choir) have told everyone that the big bad government is craftily waiting for just the right moment to produce videos of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon and then I guess somehow, we are all in trouble and going to bed without supper.
That is called “fearful thinking” and its a useful ploy when attempting to create an artificial barrier to “critical thinking”. Gregg Roberts’ background (“bachelor’s degree in psychology, master’s-level study in social work”) would certainly mean he was capable of understanding that old ploy.
Anyway, I don’t want to get caught up in this debate right now, it’s sucking enough energy out of the Truth movement as it is.
But, over on 911 Blogger, someone put up a video of “T. Carter” from John Judge’s COPA Conference in 2002. They dusted this one off and slapped it up on Blogger to show that an airline flight attendant claims that it was Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon after all.
I wanted you guys to watch this speech she gives and tell me what you think about it. What does her body language say? What do her eyes say?
One thing to keep in mind was actually reported by John Judge, supposedly her friend (the guy who introduces her in the video and is seen walking off the stage), in an article he wrote about her back in 2004. Now he makes all kinds of claims like she was allowed to walk through the crash scene on Sept. 21st 2001, either that day or the next while “body parts were still laying on the ground” (bones)? And “they were still looking for survivors”? I find that hard to believe, but he also makes a rather telling statement or two. Read these then watch her video.
“She was immediately invited in to a series of briefings and grief counseling sessions by both the airline and the Pentagon. These briefings continue to this day.” John Judge in 2004
“… She went to briefings by Pentagon people at the Sheraton for 3 months afterwards, and the clean-up lasted for a long period. She is a union representative for attendants as well, and briefings continue. Families and attendants were at the briefings, along with Pentagon and airline people.” John Judge
I remember April Gallop mentioning that the FBI was trying to tell her what she saw or didn’t see right after the explosion (for those of you who don’t know, April was in the Pentagon on Sept. 11th with her child and she walked out of the hole in the side of the building without seeing a massive 100 ton 757 in stuffed into that little office. Kinda hard to miss if you ask me)
I also remember a witness at the Trade Center talking to a reporter saying he heard and saw explosions and mentioning that the FBI had brought in an architect to specifically tell the surviving witnesses what they saw. To “explain” it to them.
I wonder if “T. Carter” is simply a by-product of that kind of programing. Hard to say. Watch the video, let me know what you think.
Now, here is the jist of the story according to John Judge… follow along now.
According to Judge, either the night of the crash or the day after (he suggests it was the night of Sept. 11th) “T.” was given a “tour” of the crash scene…
“At the end of her shift on Saturday morning, September 22nd, she was approached along with other attendants to visit the crash site.”
“… As they waited, members of a psychological support group talked to them about their feelings. She will never forget what she saw there.
The area was covered with rescue equipment, fire trucks, small carts, and ambulances. They were still hoping to find survivors. Small jeeps with wagons attached were being used to transport workers and others at the site. One flight attendant was driving one of these around the site. Once inside the fence, she was unable to clearly discern where the original wall had been. There was just a gaping hole. She got off the van and walked inside the crash site. The other attendants broke down crying once they were inside. But my friend went in further than the others and kept her emotions in check as she has been trained to do and usually does in emergency situations.” John Judge
Let’s see if I got this straight…
They brought Flight Attendants to tour the crash scene. The same crash scene where they were “still looking for survivors”. The same crash scene where supposedly a 100 ton airliner was stuffed into a few small offices. The same crash scene that was being investigated for the biggest crime in the history of this country. The same crash scene that was still structurally unsound and located in the most sensitive building in the world. The same crash scene that still had “human body parts lying burnt on the ground”.
And this is John Judge’s story?