by Scott Creighton
The Details are NEVER “Irrelevant” You Fucking Jackass
Two weeks ago I attempted to point out some major problems with an article posted on the AE911Truth webite that were painfully obvious, unsupported by the statements made by the expert they interviewed (Tom Sullivan), and without any reference links to their source materials which they were misrepresenting as something other than what they were. These are the two articles I wrote…
On June 27th at 1:30 am (I was very determined to get them to fix these problems before they reflected badly on our movement) I replied to an email action alert sent out by AE911Truth which featured a link to their deeply flawed article. After going back and forth with the author of that work, Darcy Wearing, he finally agreed to make “corrections”. Those corrections are not nearly enough…
Though they have finally posted this “correction” (after two full weeks of making the Truth movement look like dishonest morons) they (and by that I mean Darcy Wearing and “Gregg” Roberts) are STILL trying their best to continue to push the main point of their “Poorly Scripted Cognitive Infiltration”… which is as it has always been… “conventional high explosives were not used in the demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7” (which just happens to be the exact same position as Shyam Sunder of NIST…)
“But, the device as described in the patent is only an igniter heat source only used to ignite larger charges…” Darcy Wearing
Misleading… the device was designed to ignite “propellent charges”… you don’t get to just drop off a word in the description then PRETEND that “charges” could IMPLY “thermite cutter charges”. Thermite cutter charges did not exist at that time and with the exception of one patent (no one can tell whether it was ever actually marketed) these is NO EVIDENCE that were used in 2001.
“… where as the Twin Towers may have been destroyed with more explosive materials like C4 and the nano-thermitic composite explosives (which have been documented in other articles).” Darcy Wearing
There is no such thing as “nano-thermitic composite (high) explosives” and even Jones himself is now leaning toward the “electric match” explanation for his “tens of tons” of the “unexploded material” he supposedly found in Ground Zero dust samples. A low explosive could NOT have pulverized the floor systems NOR could it have taken out the 47 5 foot by 3 foot columns of 5″ thick steel in a manner FAST ENOUGH to have demoed those building at near free-fall acceleration.
Notice Wearing also mentions “C-4” which is a military grade high explosive that clearly isn’t used in the demolition industry whereas PETN and RDX are used in the industry commonly. He never mentions ANY of the commercial high explosives that we SHOULD BE TESTING FOR RIGHT NOW
This entire thing, all of it, is designed to do two things…
1. undermine the credibility of AE911Truth and Richard Gage and by extension the entire Truth movement (that’s you and me by the way)..
2. continue with the primary purpose of the cognitive infiltration of the Truth movement which was and is to keep our unofficial investigation from looking at the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 as it was achieved by CONVENTIONAL HIGH EXPLOSIVES CARRIED OUT BY A DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR…. ie… CDI.
So they brought out a former CDI employee and LIFELONG friend of the family that owns CDI carefully mislead the members of the Truth movement.
To further illustrate my point, Wearing included an “editorial comment” in his correction in which he made the following statements:
Next to the discovery of Nano-thermite in the WTC dust, the question of whether such thermite-based devices were used is a side issue…
In the debate about what brought down the World Trade Center, providing the grand “problem-reaction” for which the War on Terror is the alleged “solution,” our position is solid on every important point. This is underscored by our critics’ noisy attention to small errors such as this….
The details of how the demolitions were accomplished are largely irrelevant at this point in time. Darcy Wearing
He continues to try to promote the “nanothermite” Red Herring, insinuates that misrepresenting diagrams and Tom Sullivan’s statements are “small errors”, and even says that the details of the investigation are “irrelevant” at this point.
Details are NEVER “irrelevant” for ANYONE who has spent YEARS carefully researching and documenting what happened on Sept. 11th 2001!
I SERIOUSLY DOUBT THOSE DETAILS ARE “IRRELEVANT” TO THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF THOSE WHO LOST THEIR LIVES THAT DAY
And those details are certainly NOT “irrelevant” to any prosecutor or Attorney General who will be approached and asked, based on our evidence, to reopen the investigation into 9/11.
This is NOT the kind of “correction” that I would expect from a volunteer at AE911Truth who was trying to get the accurate story out to the other Truth advocates… this is the kind of retraction one expect from someone who is trying their best to maintain the credibility of their distraction. It is pathetic and seemingly deliberately insulting to all Truth advocates who CARE about getting the research RIGHT as well as the thousands of people directly harmed by the events of 911.
In my final email exchange with Wearing, after he told me he was going to post this “correction”, I agreed to keep all email conversations between the two of us private… because he asked me too(and he asked only because he seems to be in direct contact with another “Gregg” Roberts employee). Well, I expected an honest correction not this snarky attempt to respin his BS and INSULT Truth advocates. So all bets are off.
For those of you who are interested, try looking up L-3 Communication Systems East: “Greg” Roberts: L-3 Electronics Toronto and Darcy Wearing Toronto; L-3 Titan; L-3 and Global Hawk; L-3 and Dryden Flight Research Center; “Gregg” Roberts and Dwain Deets; L-3 Communications and the National Security Agency…
[W]e suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (or CONTRACTORS LIKE L-3 COMMUNICATIONS EAST) (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity. (Page 219.) Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Cass Sunstein
It should also be noted that during the email exchange… Wearing offered me a debate… live and in person and broadcast LIVE over the internet (before the Obama administration shuts it down I hope) between me and “Gregg” Roberts, himself and others like possibly Dwain Deets… once I responded telling him that I would ACCEPT on the condition that we debated the need to test for explosive residues (therefore “nanothermite” vs. conventional demolition) rather than just a “flamewar” AND that I wanted a neutral moderator like David Ray Griffin… I NEVER heard back about it. I wanted Roberts, Jones, Harrit, and Deets to debate me live and in person… and apparently the Doctors and Professors and NASA program chiefs don’t want to debate one little college dropout…
that should tell you something about their program now shouldn’t it?
Filed under: 002 Scott's 911 Writing |