by Scott Creighton
***UPDATE*** anyone want to join in on the conversation? We are having an interesting chat on the comments section… jump right in folks…
Just look at him. He’s a weasel.
Disinfo specialist, red-chip peddling, snake oil salesman. What he and Jones have done to the “Truth” movement is criminal. Their ridiculous claim about the “thermetic” material (that’s not even a WORD people) kicked the Truth movement right off the tracks.
Their own paper says that they can’t even be sure how it MAY have been used… they can’t even tell if it COULD have been used to blow up ANYTHING! Yet everyone runs around talking about this “highly thermetic material” as if it is the end all be all to the unofficial investigation.
Niels himself has gone on record saying based on the amounts of these chips they found in the dust, he estimates 10 tons of the shit was in the dust after the demolition. 10 tons? Unexploded “thermetic” material? What does that mean they actually USED to bring the towers down? 100 tons? A thousand? It’s completely ridiculous, like Jim Hoffman’s “Plausible” hypothesis for how the “thermetic material” was used in the demolition. Remember that? 100s of “illegal aliens” running around at break-neck speeds planting 1.8 MILLION individual CEILING TILE BOMBS and kicker charges disguised as FIRE EXTINGUISHERS?!?
Hey Steven and Neils, I got an idea: why not test for the exact kind of explosive residue that the controlled demolition industry ACTUALLY USES? Hey, there’s a concept. You know, the kind of tests that NIST and FEMA report that they DIDN’T run? The kind of test that you yourselves also admit you DIDN’T run? The kind of test I specifically ASKED you to run, not once but TWICE now in private communications? And the VERY kinds of tests you yourselves suggest SOMEONE ELSE RUNS in your recent bullshit “thermetic material” paper?
You know, THOSE tests. That’s an idea, huh? The kind of tests that Greg Roberts told me in an email that he DIDN’T want to run because a negative result might hurt the Truth movement. Those tests.
Niels Harrit, weasel? Yeah, here is the greasy video. Here’s a quote from the genius… “If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck…”
What a genius. Word to other Truth sites out there: stick to David Ray Griffin and quit talking about this ridiculous “thermetic material” bullshit.
here’s a video of some more of Neils doing what he does best; undermining the Truth movement from within. Enjoy.
Well, let me point out one more OBVIOUS fallacy in Mr. Harrit’s argument…
He states that these red-grey chips are CLOSE in composition to the type of paint used on the IRON BEAMS in the Trade Centers but slightly different… WHAT HE DOESN’T tell you is that the paint used on the TRUSSES would be slightly DIFFERENT than the paint used on the columns, or BEAMS.
In fact, he then goes on to argue that the NIST report tested the BEAMS with a paint deformation test to determine the temperatures that the beams were exposed to thereby setting an ignition temp for the paint on the beams… he DOESN’T mention the fact that the paint could have come from a separate source, the TRUSSES.
The trusses are what all the “molten metal” came from. Look at ANY picture of the aftermath of the collapse of the towers. You will see dust (the concrete floor systems pulverized) and you will see exterior columns and interior columns all piled up and scattered about.
What you DON’T see is the TRUSSES. The THOUSANDS of STEEL trusses are missing. Why? Because when the HIGH EXPLOSIVES that were placed under the floors and inside the TRUSS systems, was ignited, the 4,000 degree plus temperatures MELTED the TRUSSES and PULVERIZED the concrete floors of the towers.
That is why some of the red/grey chips are attached to the iron-rich micro-spheres; because they were BOTH created at the SAME TIME. The red/grey chips ARE paint, with a slightly different chemical make-up that what was used on the columns, and from the OTHER location that had red painted steel in the Twin Towers… the TRUSSES.
***UPDATE*** Hey Debunkingblogspot… you are capable of quoting someone’s dissenting opinion of my work here, because I allow anyone to comment on this site, as long as they don’t threaten violence or use racist comments. You see, I don’t mind open debate on what I write.
Your site however, forces someone to “subscribe” in order to post comments (which I am sure are then vetted for the appropriate reasons, whatever they may be) so that people can’t argue your points with you. Big difference when it comes to a real search for the truth as opposed to just regurgitating the same old talking points that someone has SPOON FED YOU.
Think for yourself. There is NO WAY someone could have “sprayed” on the “super nano thermite” evenly enough to create a controllable demolition. Besides the fact that no demo contractor would use such a ridiculously uneven method for dispersing EXPLOSIVES in a working building.
Also note, that the explosives the compare “nano thermite” to do NOT include the most COMMONLY USED EXPLOSIVE in the demolition industry… PETN… now WHY DO YOU THINK THAT IS?
I have been doing 9/11 research since LONG before your site was up and I fully supported the early work of Steven Jones. But Roberts ties with Hoffman go way back, and yes, when he writes in his paper that he thinks SOMEONE ELSE should test for explosive residues, but REFUSED to run those tests himself, I am going to call attention to that… FOR THE GOOD OF THE MOVEMENT.
Perhaps you think that ONLY people who suck up to the establishment “Truth” movement are credible… everyone else is “lying”… but that is just simply NOT the case…
That IS however, EXACTLY what they want you to do. ONLY accept THEIR investigation and no one elses as credible research.
And one more thing, as far as Jones now saying that ONLY “peer reviewed” (you should really look into the history of that publishing house) research is “credible” these days… kinda reminds me of what the debunkers used to say about EVERY piece of 911 research, INCLUDING Jones’.
Don’t you think it’s kinda ODD that Jones is taking up the same talking points now that the debunkers used for years?
Think for yourself. Investigate PETN and det cord. Investigate the re-wiring contracts that took place ON THE ENTIRE TWO BUILDINGS… NOT JUST A FEW FLOORS… (since ALL THE FLOORS were demoed)…
… and compare the metallurgic break-down of the “iron rich spheres” to the composition of High Strength Low Density trusses… you will find that they are the same.
I am not debunking 9/11 Truth, I am trying to steer it in the SAME DIRECTION that Ryan and Jones, and Roberts, and HARRIT all begrudgingly admit it HAS to go… test for PETN…. the most commonly used explosive in controlled demolition.
BTW, unlike at your site, you and yours are FREE to comment here as much as you like. If you wish to discuss any of these points, be my guest. I don’t run an echo chamber, as you can tell from the comments that I clearly leave published on my site.
I want you and yours to think about this comment I found in an article about why it is that the peace movement has all but vanished under the rule of Obama… I want you to think about it real hard as it applies to the Truth Movement and our celebrity leaders…
“Why exactly the peace movement has caved to Obama is not entirely clear. Like the single-payer movement, it is wracked by spinelessness, brimming with reverence for authority and a near insatiable appetite to be “part of the crowd.”
The “thermite” stroy didn’t hold up. The “thermate” story didn’t hold up. The thermite themobaric bomb story didn’t hold up. And the “nano thermite” story also doesn’t hold up if they can’t even be sure the stuff wasn’t used as an “electric match” as Jones et al say in their paper…
You and yours better wake the F up… You’re being led around by the nose here and told what to think and what to say… doesn’t sound like “truth” to me…