This is Mike Walter. Mike is a liar. He is lying about what he saw on 9/11. And here is the proof.
***UPDATE*** I have found a video that gives more detail into the statement that Walter made that day. It turns out he was one of many broadcasters that happened to see the Pentagon attack, though they didn’t mention that in the interview. But what I found was another video of him explaining his comments that were taken out of context by the CNN story.
Again,there is a cut-away during the video that he shows, between where he talks about the AA jet and the “cruise missle with wings”. So I am not exactly sure what to think of that. But then he goes into great detail talking about the physics of the wings folding back into the plane.
In his mind, the wings were weak and so they couldn’t withstand the impact and therefore they folded back into the plane. But momentum doesn’t work that way.
A plane flies because the engines pull the body of the plane with them, not the other way around. And the engines themselves were massive, weighing 9 tons each. They had the momentum and they were made of steel and titanium, whereas the body of the plane was made from lightweight aluminum.
And according to this man’s story, the plane was accelerating when it struck the Pentagon, so the engines were in full thrust. They would have become dislodged from the wings and blown clean through the walls like massive cannon balls.
If anything, the body would have crumpled not the engines. There should have been three holes in the side of the building, not one.
Plus, he never mentioned the wings folding back during his original interview. Why is he repeatedly talking about that now? Did he just remember it? And how can this man have seen those wings “fold back” in the millisecond of impact before the explosion?
So I stand by my original conclusion: this man is lying.
(for the record: this officer was there that day and he reported a different flight path than the FAA reported with the flight recorder from flight 77, but aside from that, he points out the the ‘witnesses” from North 27 couldn’t have seen the impact (or the wings folding in) because from the location they claimed to have been at, the view is obscured by trees and the dip in the ground elevation. From that distance and that location, this officer says they could not have seen the impact. I will take this man at his word before I take the word of someone who’s story is still changing to this day. Again I stand by my conclusion: Mike Walter is lying about what he saw.)
Doesn’t giving false witness to a crime make you eligable to be charged as an accessory after the fact? Just a thought.
(but his story wasn’t the only one to change…)
In a new video out at 9/11 Blogger that details the Mineta testimony excluded from the 9/11 Commission Report, Mike Walter is re-interviewed about what he saw that day.
The troubling part is that his statements now are not the same as when he was originally interviewed by CNN the day of the attacks. In fact, they are vastly different. Mr. Walter needs to be interrogated about why his story has changed; who has made contact with him; and whether or not someone within the FBI or the administration has compelled him to change his story.
(see the video after the break)
Mr. Walter says in this interview that he heard the roar of the engines of the plane over head and looked up to see, quite clearly, the AA logo of American Airlines on the side of the jet.
Then he says that the plane dove and increased speed toward the Pentagon. Well, if that is the case, then he must have seen the plane a mile or so out because according to the FAA and Norad, that plane was flying low for quite a ways before it struck the Pentagon. How did he hear the “roar of the engines” so far out?
Then he adds the new story-line that he saw the wings of the plane fold back into the body of the jet when it hit.
Look at the pictures from the only release 5 frames of the actual video from the attack.
How did someone “see” the wings “fold back against the plane” in that millisecond of impact that was obscured by the fireball? He couldn’t have. It’s impossible.
But even more telling than all of this…
His original interview with CNN on the day of the attacks.
“I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon,” eyewitness Mike Walter said of the plane that hit the military complex.
“Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards,” he said.
Nothing about the wings folding back. Nothing about the AA logo. In fact, he said it was like a “cruise missile with wings“.
Now here he is, pawning off the latest story from the administration that the wings “folded in” and that explains why the wings didn’t break off and they didn’t leave an outline of a plane in the side of the Pentagon, like what happened at the Trade Center.
Mike Walters is a pathetic liar. He is lying about a terrorist attack on U.S. soil which claimed thousands of lives. In the interest of national security, he should be held for questioning.
Filed under: 001 911 Writing, 002 Scott's 911 Writing, 911 investigations, 911 Scholarly Articles, fake war on terror, Scott Creighton | Tagged: 911 truth, mike walters, pentagon attacks, Scott Creighton |