AE Donation Drive

Please help keep AE up and running if you can.

My situation has changed a bit. I now have legal representation and I plan to fight this wrongful SSD decision tooth and nail.

But I am still receiving no support from disability. Anything you can do to help with my desperate situation would be appreciated. Hopefully next month I will get a favorable decision from the review board and it doesn’t go back to this reactionary activist Administrative Law Judge who rendered this decision in the first place.

Thank you all so much

(For my mailing address, please email me at


What is Going On with Wikileaks? Assange MIA, MacFadyen Dead and the CIA Honeypot Trying to Tank the Clinton Campaign? What Gives?

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Please see UPDATE at end of article which details Cass Sunstein’s involvement in the creation of Wikileaks. Then read about Sunstein and his work on the cognitive infiltration of the alternative dissident movements.

I’ve been asked on several occasions about what I think is going on with Wikileaks and all these document dumps they are releasing trying to derail the Hillary train, at least in terms of appearances, when in fact we all know that Wikileaks is a CIA honeypot designed to:

  1. aid various regime change propaganda as needed by influencing the more left-wing of the alternative media outlets
  2. serve as a black hole for real leaks from real whistle-blowers when they make the mistake of trusting Wikileaks and sending something to them

Wikileaks was established in 2006 at a time when real whistle-blowers like William Binney, Russ Tice, Mark Klein (Room 641A ) and a few others were starting to make things really difficult for our glorious leaders who had a totally different world in mind for us to live in. You may also recall in 2004 the story of Abu Ghraib broke complete with leaked photos depicting horrific torture being conducted by our troops who were running the detention center.

So in 2006 something needed to be done in order to keep real whistle-blowers from getting their stories on the front pages of every news paper and website in the country and thus, Wikileaks was born. The idea of a honeypot was hatched.

They got Julian Assange to act as it’s front-man. A sleazy character, who, like most other assets they procure for such operations, had a long history of criminal behavior and a strange history of being forgiven for it.

“As a teenager in Melbourne, he (Assange) belonged to a hacker collective called the International Subversives. He eventually pled guilty to 24 counts of breaking into Australian government and commercial websites to test their security gaps, but was released on bond for good behavior. His official bio describes him as “Australia’s most famous ethical hacker.” In the years that followed, Assange helped write a book about his exploits in the online underground and says he went on to become an investigative journalist for Australian and British newspapers.” Mother Jones, 2010

In 1987, part of the folklore of Julian Assange has him hacking the Pentagon at the tender age of 16. Four years later in 1991, he was caught hacking an Australian multinational telecom company and arrested. He was charge with 31 major hacking crimes and later, in 1996, he pled guilty to 25 of those. 25 felony charges. He was released for “good behavior”

What was that “good behavior” you ask?

In 1993 Assange gave technical advice to the Victoria Police Child Exploitation Unit and assisted with prosecutions.[37] In the same year he was involved in starting one of the first public Internet service providers in Australia, Suburbia Public Access Network

That’s right. He got his mind right and helped the system bust other criminals.

It should also be noted that when Wikileaks first started up, they openly admitted they were run by a bunch of Chinese dissident “hackers”. These are the same types of “hacktivists” who work for groups like USAID and the Soros’ Open Society Foundation who work to promote regime change in various countries on behalf of the CIA and the masters of the universe. Julian Assange describes his ideology as being in support of market libertarianism. Yeah, free market neoliberalism.

I am certainly not the only one out here who sees Wikileaks and Assange for what they really are.

Continue reading

US-led coalition strike killed dozens of civilian mourners 30km from Kirkuk – Russian MoD

(I’ve been hearing reports all evening that “ISIS” attacked someone just outside Kirkuk as a “distraction” from Mosul. I thought “a distraction? what would that do for them?” Turns out… ah…)

from RT

The Russian Ministry of Defense says that the US-led coalition is responsible for striking mourners in the Iraqi city of Daquq on Friday, killing dozens of civilians, including women and children.

The coalition jets apparently identified the mourning procession as Islamic State terrorists, said General Igor Konashenkov, spokesperson for the Russian Defense Ministry.

“Judging by the eyewitness accounts, the mourning procession was mistaken for terrorists by the coalition aviation. Dozens of Iraqi civilians died, including women and children,” Konashenkov said.

“Russian reconnaissance pinpointed two jets conducting airstrikes on Daquq, located 30 kilometers to the south of Kirkuk, where, according to our data, there are no ISIS fighters,” he added.

[read more here]

Joe Biden, Doing His Best Rainmaker Act, Says Our Fascist Oligarchy is Based on “Trust” and Trump is Going to Spoil Everything

by Scott Creighton

VP Joe Biden, a Clinton campaign surrogate, is angry that someone would DARE insinuate that our election system is rigged and that we don’t actually live in a democracy. He says it detracts from the “good news” we should be reading like our high school graduation rate increasing to the highest it’s been in history (that’s because all those for-profit charter schools mass produce idiots and rubber stamp them as “graduates” with students barely knowing how to read, much less teaching them how to think for themselves).

According to Biden, there is a sacred “trust” that Donald Trump is undermining when he suggests the election system, and the whole system in general, is rigged against the will of the people. He delivered his little speech with that phony, slimy pedophilesque “deep emotional passion” that better befits a rainmaker or a faith healer than it does a Vice President of the United States.

“its a threat to the democratic process which is based on (clasp hands together and look pleadingly to audience) TRUST. No democratic process can be sustained without a sense of TRUST”

You have to TRUST us and the oligarchs of this country that everything is fine and that the will of the people will be done. That’s what he is saying.

And no, we don’t.

Continue reading

Clinton Journalist Has Meltdown After His Russian Conspiracy Theory Is Debunked

from the Observer  (emphasis is mine)

In August 2016, Politico reported top Democrats held a conference call discussing damage control surrounding future releases from WikiLeaks, apparently deciding to collectively allege the leaks will include fabricated content. In a desperate and sloppy attempt to create a link between Russia and Donald Trump, Newsweek writer Kurt Eichenwald wrote an article titled “Dear Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, I am not Sidney Blumenthal.” The article claimed the publication Sputnik and Trump coordinated an attack on Hillary Clinton.

In reality, Sputnik news editor and Georgetown graduate Bill Moran rushed to publish a story about a WikiLeaks email in which Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal copy and pasted an Eichenwald article about Benghazi and sent it to Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. Moran misidentified the writer of the piece as Blumenthal, and quickly wrote and published a story about it. Trump tweeted the article, and cited it during a speech at a rally in Pennsylvania.

Once Sputnik became aware the article had misinterpreted the email, they removed it. Eichenwald, without researching what had happened, claimed Trump citing the article was proof of a conspiracy between Trump and Russia. Eichenwald’s article was used by Clinton partisans as evidence WikiLeaks had released fake documents.

Moran attempted to reach out to Eichenwald to correct his story. Eichenwald blocked him on Twitter, and the two engaged in bizarre correspondence via email, which was later published by Paste Magazine and confirmed as legitimate by Eichenwald.

Continue reading

DNC Lawyers Argue No Liability: Neutrality Is Merely ‘Political Rhetoric’

UPDATE: You know what Bernie does as a result of this betrayal from the DNC? He runs around raising millions of dollars for them. I guess he had to something for that new cottage by the lake he bought. His supporters should sue Bernie as well.

(Let me see if I got this straight: you have a woman running for president who is extremely unpopular because she is a proven habitual liar. You have that same candidate pulling ahead with the female vote because 9 other women came forward just recently and lied about decades old interactions with the other candidate. And you have Debbie Wasserman Schultz who lied to the entire party and all the party faithful when she and the DNC claimed they would give the other candidates for the nomination a fair shot at winning and they now claim we can’t hold them accountable because all those Bernie supporters KNEW she would lie and steal the nomination for her friend Hillary Clinton. All of that and the MSM is out there lying on an hourly basis about Trump doing whatever they can to ensure that lying woman candidate becomes president. Does that about sum it up? It’s a real shame and embarrassment that this woman is going to go down in history as our first female president. Just look at what it took to usher her into office. When she is sworn in, historically speaking, it will truly be a bad day for the better half of our species.)

from the Observer

Democratic National Committee (DNC) lawyers responded on October 14 in support of their motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit against the DNC and former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, maintaining that a fair and balanced Democratic primary is just a “political promise.”

“Courts have uniformly rejected attempts to litigate on the basis of purported political promises, including ‘statements of principle and intent in the political realm’” wrote the DNC lawyers. “These decisions have not always been explicit in their reasoning, but they reflect the long-standing judicial understanding that, because they inherently raise serious questions of justiciability and threaten core First Amendment rights of political speech and association, “[p]olitical squabbles are not as easily resolved in federal courts as are some other disputes.” Wymbs v. Republican State Exec. Comm. of Fla., 719 F.2d 1072, 1077 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 281-85 (1962)); see also Berg, 574 F. Supp. 2d at 529 (“[V]oters are free to vote out of office those politicians seen to have breached campaign promises,” but “[f]ederal courts … are not and cannot be in the business of enforcing political rhetoric”); Dornan v. U.S. Sec’y of Def., 676 F. Supp. 6, 7 (D.D.C. 1987) (holding action based in part on political promise nonjusticiable); see also O’Brien v. Brown, 409 U.S. 1, 4-5 (1972); Irish v. Democratic Farmer-Labor Party of Minn., 399 F.2d 119, 120-21 (8th Cir. 1968)”

The DNC lawyers’ argument here is that the charter’s demand that the chair and DNC staff remain neutral throughout the Democratic primary is a political promise, similar to policy proposals made in campaign platforms that aren’t fulfilled when in office. The lawyers cite an argument made in another court case stating that voters are free to vote out politicians. In their initial motion to dismiss the lawsuit, DNC lawyers argued Bernie Sanders supporters were aware the DNC and Wasserman Schultz were biased against their candidate. Now their argument is a neutral DNC and DNC chair are just political promises, leaving voters susceptible to the deception that the DNC would treat Clinton and Sanders equally. The lawyers argue liability only applies to consumer-merchant relationships.

[read more here]

(Pardon me for asking, but doesn’t a party member’s donation to the DNC fall under that category of “consumer-merchant relationships“? and therefore, wouldn’t that argument in and of itself set up the DNC for another lawsuit filed on behalf of Bernie voters who donated to the Democratic National Committee? Just a thought.)

Yes, the Election Will Be Stolen

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Go here to see Hillary team feeding questions to reporters in a short presser on her plane after the debate.

All of the neocons back Hillary Clinton. The war-mongering bi-partisan establishment think-tanks back Hillary Clinton. Newspapers that have backed republican candidates for decades, even centuries, back Hillary Clinton. The complicit corporate media backs Hillary Clinton to the detriment of their facade of being neutral in this election. All of this because Hillary Clinton represents a continuation of our global hegemonic ideology set in motion by Dick Cheney and those same neocons in the 2000 PNAC study paper Rebuilding Americas Defenses.

Yes, the polls are skewed to count more democrat voters and more middle aged women so that they will show Hillary Clinton with a large lead. They’ve been doing this for a while. In fact, it’s a tactic we use in other countries when we try to influence elections in favor of candidates who we know will advance our national interests. The idea is simple: make supporters of our opposition feel the fight is already lost so they don’t show up and, if needed, create a false narrative of the opinion of the population to support the rigged election results prior to the rigging.

Why do I say the election will be stolen? Here’s one reason:

The CNN moderator was all smiles when she went to ask the question about whether or not these undecided voters made up their minds during the final debate and if so, who did they now decide to vote for. After she got the results, she wasn’t smiling anymore. Five chose to vote for Hillary while 10 decided The Donald was their guy. Only one of the five saying they decided for Hillary was a woman while five women decided to vote for Trump.

You see, the problem for these war-mongers and sympathizers of theirs is that there just simply isn’t enough of them to vote Killary into office. People are sick of neoliberal austerity being shoved down our throats. People are sick of “free trade” deals that do nothing but crush worker’s standards of living while enriching a few friends of people in high places. And people are sick of the endless war, the hundred year war, the Global War OF Terror we are waging all across the globe with no authorization and against international law.

The.. people.. don’t.. want.. total.. global.. hegemony.. at the cost of the lives of their sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.

The people are sick of the lies, the spying, the political correctness and the Orwellian world we find ourselves in.

The people want something different and for all their efforts to dissuade folks from a CHANGE vote, the establishment are failing. And they are failing miserably.

So what do they do? They do what they always do… they make ready to rig the election because they can’t afford at this point to allow the people to “vote the wrong way” when the whole of the New World Order is right there at their fingertips.

Continue reading

What You Are Not Being Told About the Afghanistan War