“Why willyloman”?

 So this was a very good question put to me by a friend, Zooey Z; 

 So last night, while I should have been reading Federalist No. 10, I was reading the “Death of a Salesman” entry on the Wiki, and the main question I came away with was this: Why do you call yourself “Willy Loman?”"

and this is the best I could come up with as an answer;

“Well, that’s an interesting question.

There is a page that defines some of what I feel Willy is about on the site.

But that doesn’t really answer your question, now does it?

Perhaps a less materialistic view of the meaning of “Death…” is necessary to understand my choice. Wiki, though a great source, isn’t always…well…right.

First of all, Willy is not just fired by a man (Howard) young enough to be his son, he is his God Son, and Willy helped pick his name, with Howard’s father.

The “age of entitlement” is best represented by Howard than it is by Biff and Happy (Willy’s sons); because he inherits the company that Willy helped create and then won’t even give him a desk job to keep him off the road when Willy begs in his office.

Second of all, Happy is very much like the woman in my “Apostles…” story. He believes whole heartedly in this new economic American dream, and keeps professing he will “make it” and thus make his father proud. But Happy is limited, mentally, and will never be more than “an assistant to the assistant Buyer”. He will never realize the American Dream, as he pictures it. But will always push for it, and measure himself by it; and in that way, he is like his father.

The John Malkovitch part, Biff, is probably the second most complicated part in the play. He has all the capacity to “make it” and has even held several jobs and positions that had serious promise…but he keeps “stealing his way out of them”. Over and over he gets jobs based on his youth and ability and likeability, but sooner or later, he self-destructs. He can’t figure out why, till this great scene right before Willy goes out to the car to “go for a drive”. Biff comes to understand that the whole time, he has been following “the wrong dream” and he begs his father to understand… to give up on the “dream” and to see things, in this world, for what they are and to accept them as the true nature of life, rather than chasing after some delusion of greatness based on an artificial measuring stick.

Were this story only about Willy’s inability to let go of the American Dream, it could very well end with this. But that is not what this story, and by extension, willyloman, is about.

Willy; Ah, Willy. He is probably the most misunderstood contemporary character of our time.

You will notice that even Wiki mentions his “tragic flaw”. That is because Willy is a Tragic Hero in the classic Greek Tragedy mold. The formula is that a Hero must fall from some position of honor and respect due to his “tragic flaw” after a prolonged struggle with the world in which the play is set, and in so doing, he is destroyed by it, but only after coming to a new understanding of the world.

Often times, many of those around the Hero, plead with them to just “let it go” but what makes them Heroic, is that they cannot no matter how hard they try, “let it go”. They see the world, in some ways, as it should be, though they try as hard as they can, they cannot make it so. This is very important to the formula of the “tragic hero”.

The tragic hero must have many viable opportunities to step off the inevitable course of self destruction thru-out the development of the play. Biff does, in the end, come to that realization and does step outside of himself long enough to see what is really important in life. And he pleads with Willy to do the same. But the play isn’t about Biff any more than Biff is heroic in our eyes.

The real problem with people’s perception of the play is that people don’t think Biff reaches Willy in the final scene where he tries to tell him to burn that “phony dream”.

Biff does reach him. So much so, Willy happily goes off to do what he must. The general public will reject the notion of the play for the most part because they don’t like its message, which can really be summed up quite nicely by what the two of you (and Wayne) wrote the other night.

It is the flawed system that crushes the nature of the man and doesn’t serve him but enslaves him with the fantasy of the American Dream. The third “Noble Lie”.

willyloman comes to know and see the true greatness of his son, but the reason the play is about Willy and not Biff, is because willyloman also sees the world for which it is and that his ability to provide for his children has come to an end, save his one last contract.

He comes to understand it is the wrong dream. But he also knows his children must survive and thrive within it and that it is his duty to provide for them. It is his last measure of devotion to his family; to his sons. He goes off happily to meet his end, knowing that with “20,000 behind them…they will be great”.

He struggles with his tragic flaw, comes to a deeper understanding of the world, and in the end he is destroyed by it.

I would love to sign all my work with my real name, and Goggle myself from time to time, because that is, after all, the “new measure” of our blogging worth.

But this isn’t about me, I’m not even sure it is me anymore.

I don’t mean to lecture you about the play anymore than I mean to lecture about the stuff I write. I just love the play, and what it means and I hope more people understand what Mr. Miller was driving at and why they gave him a Pulitzer Prize for it at a time when this new “American Dream” was being sold to our nation.”

11 Responses

  1. Awww, Willy. :)

  2. Awesome. And thank you for the brief primer about the play. It is on my “Things To Read Before I’m Unable To Read” list (and I don’t mean that in a sarcastic way, just a realistic one). And thanks for the mention.

    I’m becoming a fan of your writing style. I may try to “steal” it some day. ;)

  3. Hi Willy, Pax here. Did you see the curfew headline? You can read it here. Getting closer to complete martial law…
    http://www.helena-arkansas.com/news/x33718822/City-council-will-address-H-WH-curfew-at-noon-today

  4. You know, I did that Pax, but I hadn’t read it till just now.

    The Mayor says, I haven’t SEEN any evidence “that innocent citizen’s rights are being violated”. He hasn’t seen the evidence. nice huh?

    “There are going to be instances where innocent people are inconvenienced for the safety of the entire community,” Now isn’t THAT nice? He knows there are GOING to be people “inconvenienced” by his police state…

    “Police have stepped up their game,”“I want them to fix the problem, fix it legally and I want them to be aggressive,”

    Now when this blows up in his short-sighted face, and some 50 ear old spinster school marm gets shot by a 21 year old community college dropout SWAT team member, you think the City Council will hold this Mayor responcible or just chalk it up to “the war on terror”?

    Hey! Maybe they could blame it on bin Laden’s gardener or some “crazed loner” who once said “girls smell different” in 4th grade or something?

  5. You must forgive me if I’m out of touch–I haven’t read death of a salesman since high school. . . but this is not at all how I remember that character In fact, if I recall correctly, he was not at all a classic hero, but rather the quintessential modern hero–whiny, controlling, out of touch with reality, ultimately accomplishing almost nothing–certainly accomplishing no part of what he had intended to accomplish–an anti-hero.

    What causes you to read him so sympathetically?

    P.S. For the record I do love Arthur Miller.

  6. Hello Day;

    It’s a good question.

    You might ask the same thing of Hamlet. He was definitely “out of touch” and he accomplished next to nothing, except getting a bunch of people killed. All he did really was walk around talking to himself, and then once he did find out what happened, he argued with himself endlessly about what to do about it. All he had to do was kill the bastard and marry Ophelia, and he would be king. Now what is so tragic about him? He could have been king, and lived happily ever after.

    Willy Loman is an American “Everyman” figure trying to understand his place in what was then, a changing world. And he was unable to do so because it conflicted with his nature. In some ways, I think Death of a Salesman is Miller’s best example of social critique. We were a nation coming out of WWII, when social connection and shared commitment, were being cast off, for the me-first capitalist “consumer movement” of the 50s was taking shape.

    Our position as citizens went from collectivism to consumerism overnight. That was our new role to fill.

    Willy struggles with that transition. He keeps talking about his job having changed; no longer do people relate to him the same way. It’s not about a “handshake” anymore. It’s not about your reputation. His job is going to end, at a company that he helped it’s owner’s dad build. There is no loyalty anymore. It’s just about the numbers, and nothing else. He is fired by his god-son.

    In the dramatic scene between Biff and Willy, Biff begs him to see “a different dream”… he tells him “the dream is a lie. It’s the wrong dream” and that Willy has got to let it go before it kills him.

    And as close as Willy comes, after Biff goes to bed, Willy, left alone with just his thoughts, falls victim to the whispers of the American Dream again.

    The original play was to be called “Inside His Head” and the staging for the 1949 Broadway production opens as a huge skull on the stage… then it splits in half, and the house set is inside.

    The idea is that this commercialism is destructive to the American psychology. It works on us, under the surface, corrupting what we are, and what this nation was founded on. It may be more geared toward the overall human condition, than simply the American one, but in this case, it was specifically targeting a era in American history.

    I choose this as the theme of this site, because IMO, we haven’t learned a damn thing since then.

    “Why am I trying to become what I don’t want to be? What am I doing in an office, making a contemptuous, begging fool of myself, when all I want is out there, waiting for me the minute I say I know who I am! Why can’t I say that, Willy?” Biff…

    It’s a good question. What makes tragic heros tragic, is that they can’t move off the course set for them. A course steered by their tragic flaw.

    Willy Loman is refered to as a “prince’ several times in the play, and his tragic flaw, is the New American Dream.

    I am very sympathetic to his character, as I sympathetic to Hamlet. The problem is, most communities don’t really like the notion that an American literary classic is based on a scathing indictment of this capitalist dogma.

  7. Just passing by.Btw, you website have great content!

    _________________________________
    Making Money $150 An Hour

  8. Bloody excellent site:-)
    and thanks for the detail, I knew I knew the name from somewhere…duh!
    did,nt “do” Arthur Miller in our school:-( , mores the pity!
    In 70,s Aus about 10 of the 30 in my Class could’nt read or write fluently, From what I see now, 30 years on, is closer to 10 can, others can’t, and the class now hold 40!
    Seems like jump cuts and sound bites, are the time frame available for attention.
    I will be hours checking this all out:-)
    treasure trove:-) indeed, well done:-)

  9. psycho

  10. If anyone wants to know who the “psycho” is… have a look at the last comment Karla posted…

    “You are a worthless piece of shit and I hope someone you love gets one in the heart and spits out blood and we can all dance around his or her bloody face dreaming about al the CIA operatives who faked a death.”

    true humanitarian

  11. OO page 55 time, he continues to work towards building his own business, dabuzz marketing solutions. ,

Leave a Reply