by Scott Creighton
The state attorney’s report on the Sandy Hook shooting has been released and as we have stated here many times, there ends up being no motive behind the shooting of 20 kids and 6 adults and we the people are supposed to just accept that. I guess we should seeing as how so many of these hi-profile cases in the past year and a half also had no motive that anyone is aware of.
James Holmes also had no motive.
William Spengler, the man accused of the Webster, New York ambush, also had no motive.
Richard Shoop had no motive for the Paramus Mall shooting last month.
Paul Anthony Ciancia, the man accused of shooting up the L.A. airport, is said to have hated the “NWO” and was therefore a “conspiracy theorist”. Is that motive?
How about Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev? Anyone hear about a motive from them?
Kurt R. Myers of the Mohawk psyop. No motive.
Chris Dorner, no motive (other than the “angry black man” cliche)
The lack of motive and the fact that they are keeping the evidence a secret should raise more than a few eyebrows in this country. But of course, the Secret Service is allowed to gun down single mothers in the street and no one says a word (in fact congress gives the shooters a 4 minute standing ovation in congress for doing it)