by Scott Creighton
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, nearly let the cat out of the bag in an interview with Denise Maerker of Televisa on Jan. 24th of this year. When asked why we shouldn’t go ahead and legalize drug use, Hillary quipped “There is just too much money in it”. She tried her best to right the ship after it by saying something basically in line with “Won’t someone think of the Children!?”, but the damage was already done.
“QUESTION: In Mexico, there are those who propose not keeping going with this battle and legalize drug trafficking and consumption. What is your opinion?
SECRETARY CLINTON: I don’t think that will work. I mean, I hear the same debate. I hear it in my country. It is not likely to work. There is just too much money in it, and I don’t think that – you can legalize small amounts for possession, but those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped. They can’t be given an even easier road to take, because they will then find it in their interest to addict even more young people. Mexico didn’t have much of a drug problem before the last 10 years, and you want to keep it that way. So you don’t want to give any excuse to the drug traffickers to be able legally to addict young people.” America.gov website
She’s absolutely correct. There is way too much money in it. But what makes that money even more compelling, is that for the most part, that money is completely off the books, unaccounted for cash… the kind that every banker, corporate prison complex CEO, and CIA executive craves.
As Hillary was trying to fix her little slip-up, she went on and on about how the dealers make this unaccounted for cash, and that if we were to legalize it, they would just make more money, selling their product to kids.
This argument would have been ridiculed as horribly stupid and out of touch were it to have come from Sarah Palin or John McCain, but since it came from Hillary Clinton, everyone seems to be giving her a pass. The reason that low to mid level drug dealers make money at all is because of the current prohibition on drugs. In fact, it makes it easier for kids to get cocaine and other narcotics, since there is no regulation at your local crack-house.
But of course, the most widely abused narcotic in the under 18 age group is prescription pain medication made largely from all that poppy that our troops are protecting over in Afghanistan.
Obviously if there was an end to the prohibition then these drug dealers that Hillary was speaking about wouldn’t be able to just go out and sell more smack to children in their local kindergarten. Why the obfuscation? Perhaps the secretary of state was more concerned about the implications of yet another Kerry Commission report were the American public to start seriously looking at the real results of America’s War on Drugs, ie. who is being harmed and who is really profiting from the global drug racket.
“The Kerry Committee report were hearings chaired by Senator John Kerry which found the United States Department of State had paid drug traffickers. Some of these payments were after the traffickers had been indicted by federal law enforcement agencies on drug charges or while traffickers were under active investigation by these same agencies.” Wikipedia
So let’s you and I take a look at it since Hillary and the rest of the press don’t seem to be inclined to do so.
Filed under: CIA are the Real Terrorists, class warfare, Fake War on Drugs, Globalist Clinton Scum, Globalist Skank Watch, Mexican Drug War is a Scam, Scott Creighton | 13 Comments »