Kerry rejects congressional subpoena over Benghazi

(As some of you might recall, Hillary Clinton did the exact same thing when she was first ordered to testify before congress on this subject)

from RT

Despite being subpoenaed by Congress to testify on the 2012 Benghazi attack later this month, US Secretary of State John Kerry will not appear before the House of Representatives’ oversight committee as demanded.

The announcement was made Monday by State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf, who stated that instead of going before Congress n May 21, Kerry will instead continue with his initial plans to travel to Mexico. Although the Telegraph reports that Harf called the subpoena “a waste of time and taxpayer dollars,” she suggested the department would work something out with the House.

[read the rest here]

How the “Smoking Document” Story Falls Short of Anything Close to the Whole Truth About Benghazi

by Scott Creighton

The newly released Benghazi emails (as they are being called) tell a story. It’s not a new story.

“Political considerations influenced the talking points that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used five days after the deadly Sept. 11 assault in Benghazi, Libya, with State Department and other senior administration officials asking that references to terror groups and prior warnings be deleted, according to department emails.” Huffington Post May 11th 2013

But what exactly is that story and why is this coming out today at a time when the new Sec. of State is facing his own demise? Kerry recently got in trouble when he said “Israel could become an apartheid state” (which it already is. “It’s not exactly like the South African apartheid. In some respects it’s not as bad, but in some respects it’s worse.” Chomsky) and called destabilization campaigns (like the ones we run everyday under the heading of “unconventional warfare”) “thuggism” and “rogue state-ism”

Army Special Operations Forces handbook on Unconventional Warfare – 2008

“The United States has conducted UW in support of resistance movements, insurgencies, and ongoing or pending conventional military operations. It has operated by, with, or through irregular forces against a variety of state and nonstate opponents… The current definition of UW is as follows: Operations conducted by, with, or through irregular forces in support of a resistance movement, an insurgency, or conventional military operations… Irregulars, or irregular forces, are individuals or groups of individuals who are not members of a regular armed force, police, or other internal security force. They are usually nonstate-sponsored and unconstrained by sovereign nation legalities and boundaries. These forces may include, but are not limited to, specific paramilitary forces, contractors, individuals, businesses , foreign political organizations, resistance or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political “undesirables.”… 4-16. Significant moral and legal considerations often exist in a UW effort. Legitimacy is the most crucial factor in developing and maintaining international and internal support. Without this support, the United States cannot sustain assistance to an irregular force. Without recognized legitimacy and credibility, military operations do not receive the support of the indigenous population, the U.S. population, or the international community.”

Secretly using disgruntled terrorists, political adversaries and other “non-state actors” to destabilize targeted nations via sabotage, violence and terrorism. It’s the American way and according to the handbook, unconventional warfare “is more relevant than ever in the 21st century international environment.”

But unfortunately for “foot in the mouth” Kerry, at least when the Russians do it, “It’s the worst order of behavior.”

So the timing of this distracting topic, a blast from the past mainly featuring Obama administration officials who are no longer with them, is dubious to say the least while certainly being grossly incomplete.

But. let’s look at it anyway and see what, if anything, it reveals.

Continue reading

CNN Covering Story of CIA Agents “all over” Benghazigate?

by Scott Creighton

The story is that there were dozens of CIA assets and agents all over the compound in Benghazi the night they staged the attack with their “Libyan” assets and the CIA has been conducting all kinds of lie detector tests on those agents to find out what they know or what they are hiding. Even CNN has to admit one thing they are looking at is the possibility of Stevens and the CIA funneling weapons from their Libyan destabilization team to their Syrian destabilization team.

But the one thing they don’t mention is the fact that all those assets and agents could have also been helping facilitate the “death of Stevens” show which ended up justifying the U.S. bringing troops and drones into the whole of Africa in support of an agenda set out by 45 major international corporations just a few months before.

So even CNN will tell a little piece of the story, just so long as the whole truth remains hidden.

New Benghazi Emails – “Penultimate” Concern was Hiding Warnings from Congress and the People

by Scott Creighton

Victoria Nuland clearly states she didn’t want to “arm” congress and the people WITH THE TRUTH… so they LIED. And somehow that is supposed to exonerate the State Department and the Obama administration?

In either an effort to curb the growing scandal or an attempt to keep it going, the White House released 100 more documents related to the Benghazi scandal late Wednesday ( part one (PDF) and part two (PDF))

Apologists rushed to press with the talking point that these emails and communications from back around the time of the Benghazi attack prove that the Obama administration was not lying in order to score political points right before the election.

On their front page, the Huffington Post actually went with the tag-line link “Benghazi Conspiracy Theories Fall Apart “. Their suggestion is that the new documents prove that the White House didn’t lie to keep them from losing the election but rather they lied “for other reasons” and thus, the “conspiracy theorists” are all wrong.

What they really show is the fact that they did lie in order to cover-up the very things I and others have been writing about for a week. They lied to protect themselves and their psyop. They lied about 4 dead Americans. They lied about what they knew and when they knew it. Period. And somehow this is supposed to clear Obama and silence the “conspiracy theorists”?

Continue reading

Ron Paul on Benghazi – Almost Sorta Gets it Right… til he gets it wrong

by Scott Creighton

According to Ron Paul, it’s all about the “unintended consequences” of partnering with “Radical Islam”

Well, he was doing OK up until that…

“It appears that the Administration scrubbed initial intelligence reports of references to extremist Islamist involvement in the attacks, preferring to craft a lie that the demonstrations were a spontaneous response to an anti-Islamic video that developed into a full-out attack on the US outpost.” Ron Paul

Yes, they did craft a lie about the anti-Islamic video causing a spontaneous uprising in Benghazi. But Ron forgets to remind his audience that the video was crafted by the FBI and one of their informants who was on federal probation a year prior to the Benghazi attacks and somehow it was retooled in order to serve as the pretext for this new uprising. So they “crafted the lie” in advance. That will be an important point in a few minutes. Keep it in mind.

Continue reading

The “Why?” of Benghazi: “a pretext to kill more Muslims, to steal more resources” for 45 Different Corporations

by Scott Creighton

May, 2012 – “The New Alliance was announced in conjunction with the G8 meeting last Friday. Under the scheme, some 45 corporations, including Monsanto, Syngenta, Yara International, Cargill, DuPont, and PepsiCo, have pledged a total of $3.5 billion in investment in Africa. The full list of corporations and commitments has just been released, and one of the most notable is Yara International’s promise to build a $2 billion fertilizer plant in Africa.” How the US Sold Africa to Multinationals Like Monsanto, Cargill, DuPont, PepsiCo and Others

A $3.5 billion dollar investment is one hell of a “why” now isn’t it? The conference mentioned above actually took place at the The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, “Founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations

In May of 2012, a plan is announced at the Council on Foreign Relations to effectively recolonize the whole of Africa for 45 of our favorite crony corporations. Immediately a film created by the FBI via one of their confidential informants, a guy on federal probation, is retooled and released as the pretext for a new “angry Muslim” uprising. In Sept. of 2012 an attack takes place killing one of our ambassadors. It was conducted by a group who previously worked for us and who currently worked for the government of the town that was attacked. In Nov. of that same year, the military launched a new wave of invasions, small quiet invasions, all across Africa. Those Special Forces led operations paved the way for our crony corporations and their conquest of the African continent. No one questioned why the first black president was committing U.S. troops to Africa in the wake of the Benghazi psyop.

The invasion has almost nothing to do with “Islamism”, and almost everything to do with the acquisition of resources, notably minerals, and an accelerating rivalry with China.

Unlike China, the US and its allies are prepared to use a degree of violence demonstrated in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Palestine.” John Pilger, Feb. 2013

——–

Clinton with al-Qaeda linked terrorists who destabilized Libya

Across the artificial political divide of the MSM, there is a fire-storm brewing over the Benghazi attacks, something I like to call the Innocence of the Muslims Psyop.

The left is busy reinforcing the notion that nothing too illegal happened and if it did, their most popular product spokespeople (Obama and Clinton) aren’t to be tainted with the blood of the fallen while the republican leaning centrist Business First organizations carefully dance around the issue pretending to get to the bottom of the new revelations from the whistle-blowers without really doing anything of the sort.

This isn’t “dereliction of duty”.  Clinton’s State Department was all over this thing from the very beginning just like they were the destabilization of Libya with these same terrorists. This is something much worse and Rand Paul knows it.

But what has clearly been forgotten in the ongoing narrative is what actually happened in Benghazi, what led up to it, who did it and what happened in the aftermath. These are the things you can’t forget. These are the things that made it what it was.

When an operation like this takes place, there is a reason for it and though professional apologists like Jon Stewart will tell you there is no “why” out there being discussed by the republicans, which he is correct in saying, it does exist. I myself have seen it since the very beginning (Sept. 14th 2012) and so have many others:

This major crisis in all the countries will be a justification for more boots on the ground the same way they’re ready to go into Libya now…It becomes a pretext to kill more Muslims, to steal more resources,member of Dignity, Human Rights and Peace Randy Short, Sept. 15th 2012

No, the republicrats aren’t saying why it was done or how involved in the planning of the operation the current administration was and there is good reason for that: they as an institution support the overall agenda, using our military and Special Forces to garner greater control of the resources of Africa for the various corporations who pay their unofficial off-the-books salaries.

But if you remember the facts of the case as reported by “legitimate” main-stream sources over the past few months, you find that it’s pretty obvious that there were crimes committed and accountability should be sought for those responsible.

Continue reading

What Really Happened in Benghazi and Why

by Scott Creighton

I call it the “Innocence of the Muslims Psyop” for a very good reason: because the pretext of the attack, the 14 minute “movie” that was released just prior to the attack, gives us defining proof of the simple fact that the entire thing was staged and then used to fulfill an agenda.

While everyone is talking new revelations about the attack, who was told to lie, who ordered the stand down of U.S. troops, who directed the current cover-up… all these things that are of vital importance… no one is remembering how all of this started, how it was clearly stage-managed from beginning to end.

Why did this psyop take place? What was the purpose behind it? What was the grand plan behind the Innocence of the Muslims Psyop?

Those questions are surprisingly simple as that they have already been answered by both Hillary Clinton and David Cameron. Our policies and their actions have made it all quite clear. The “why” is the renewed resource war in Africa and our ongoing colonization campaign in Africa.

The “how” of it all is not that hard to see if you fail to forget the details of the story.

click on image for larger view

The Innocence of the Muslims Psyop: What Happened and Why

  1. The Often Forgotten Question of “Why?”
  2. The “Innocence of bin Laden the Muslims” Film and the FBI’s Confidential Informant Nakoula Basseley Nakoula a.k.a. “Sam Bacile”
  3. Preparations for the Attack – Our Destabilization Contractors, Ansar al-Shariah, at the Helm from the Beginning, Middle and End
  4. Stand Down Orders Came from AFRICOM Who Also Just Happened to Benefit from the Psyop
  5. Conclusion: It’s Isn’t All That Hard to See

Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 885 other followers