Post Tropical Cyclone Sandy: Chris Mathews Drools Over Clinton; Calls Deniers “Luddites” and “Pigs”

by Scott Creighton

Chris Mathews proves his sycophancy and his ignorance once again.

It’s all about man-made global warming … I mean climate change … I mean global warming. Can’t question those scientists because we have to get Barack Obama ready to force the failed UK carbon credits market on the U.S. just as soon as the fraud election is over (read as “Romney takes a dive like McCain, Kerry, and Gore before him”)

Chris Mathews went on Hardball yesterday and breathlessly drooled over Bill Clinton saying that Sandy proves man-made global warming is real. He also called deniers of this new religion “pigs” and “Luddites” (for the “Luddites” quote see this)

Continue reading

Street lights turned off in their thousands to meet carbon emission targets

(Turn out the lights for global warming?)

Huge swathes of Britain are being plunged into darkness as more and more streetlights are switched off by councils and roads authorities.

from the London Telegraph

Lights are being turned off on motorways and major roads, in town centres and residential streets, and on footpaths and cycle ways, as councils try to save money on energy bills and meet carbon emission targets. The switch-off begins as early as 9pm.

They are making the move despite concerns from safety campaigners and the police that it would lead to an increase in road accidents and crime.

The full extent of the blackout can be disclosed following an investigation by The Sunday Telegraph – which comes on the day that clocks moved back an hour, making it dark earlier in the evening…

[read the rest here]

CNN’s Arwa Damon is at it Again – Filing Fake Reports About Syria

by Scott Creighton

One day after Glenn Greenwald declared that CNN’s Erin Burnett was the “worst of the worst” of the lying war-mongering talking heads on corporate media, CNN’s Arwa Damon throws her hat back in the ring with a more than despicable challenge to the title.

A quick note about Arwa before we get into her new chicken hawk efforts: I exposed a fraudulent little pro-war/regime change bit she did a while back in June of 2011. She went somewhere (probably Bahrain) and filmed what she claimed was a refugee camp for Syrians suffering under the Assad led government. It was complete bullshit, but she did manage to exploit some little kids who were there, brought by their paid parents no doubt, trying to make them seem frightened and lost. They looked at her as if she was an idiot.

Arwa really likes using children to try to help spur another brutal NATO bombardment of civilian targets, this time in Syria. She must get paid well or have absolutely no conscience what-so-ever. To use children as pawns in an effort to bring about a military invasion which will undoubtedly kill and maim children in the process is morally reprehensible.

Continue reading

Global Warming Fraud Takes a Big Hit – No Warming Since 1997

by Scott Creighton

The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years.”

“… Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.” Daily Mail

The Global Warming scam was never about saving the planet from anthropomorphic climate change. It was always about setting up a global authority to dictate which nations could manufacture and develop their industries and which couldn’t. It was about setting in place a global taxation scheme which would tax individuals as well as unfavored businesses unfairly. It was about creating Carbon Markets like the failed examples in Europe and Chicago which would buy and sell carbon credits and then create the next massive derivative bubble behind them. And ultimately, Global Warming was about regulating carbon, the basic building block of all life (and most matter) on this planet. It was about money, power, and control. Just another day at the office for the globalist set.

Continue reading

Terminate Those Skeptics: Globalist Governator Has a New Project

by Scott Creighton

If being the new frontman for Global Warming is half as profitable for Arnold as it was for Gore, the Governator looks to cash in big time.

The global warming (oops… I mean “climate change”) scam is moving along and gaining momentum just in time to push for all those new carbon taxes before the complete collapse of the dollar.  They have a new spokesman… former republican governor and puppet to the neoliberal globalists, Arnold Schwarzenegger.  He was the keynote speaker at some heavyweight’s conference in which he suggested that it’s time to terminate those Global Warming skeptics.

“I’ve made a lot of action movies in the past, so I know about action. And you are the true people of action,” Schwarzenegger said. “Conan was asked, ‘What is best in life?’ He answered, ‘To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of the women.’ Now, my views have evolved since. But my point is that Conan was not big on philosophy or navel-gazing. He was big on action, just like you.” Stuart Fox

Meanwhile, the near record-setting cold of these past two years is the coldest combined for the past 25 years according to the U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC).

“For the second year in a row, the winter temperature when averaged across the contiguous United States came in below the average temperature for the 20th century. This marks the first time since the winters of 1992-93 and 1993-94 that two winters in a row have been below the long-term normal, and it makes for the coldest back-to-back winter combination for at least the past 25 years.” World Climate Report

That is easily explained by our friends who are pushing for those all important carbon taxes… global cooling is caused by global warming.

“This winter’s heavy snowfalls and other extreme storms could well be related to increased moisture in the air due to global climate change, a panel of scientists said Tuesday.” Reuters via AOL’s “Huffpuf”

Now, if you want to have a little fun, go to WRH (H/T) and read an article from 1989, back before the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was bought and paid for by the globalists. Go back and read an article from the New York Times which talks about that NOAA study, prior to them dropping all those temperature reading stations, that clearly shows that there had been no significant increase in global temperatures for the past 100 years.

“After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.

While the nation’s weather in individual years or even for periods of years has been hotter or cooler and drier or wetter than in other periods, the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend in one direction or another.

The study, made by scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was published in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters. It is based on temperature and precipitation readings taken at weather stations around the country from 1895 to 1987.” New York Times

Yes, it is time to terminate those skeptics before the whole fraud falls apart. Gotta get those carbon taxes in place to take even more of your hard-earned money and hand it over to the IMF and World Bank so they can use it to force other nations to succumb to their control.

Forgetting Francisco Lotero: Noam Chomsky Peddles End of Humanity Fear-Mongering for the IMF and Big Oil

by Scott Creighton

Modern psychology has a word that is probably used more than any other word in psychology, it is the word maladjusted. Maladjusted. I would like to say to you today that there are some things in our society, some things in our world,  for which I am proud to be maladjusted. And I call upon all men of good will to be maladjusted to these things until the good society is realized.” Martin Luther King.

Its the end of the humanity as we know it folks. Its the end of humanity because for the next two years the republicans will control one of our two houses of congress, the least powerful one at that, the House of Representatives.  At least, that is what Noam Chomsky has said.

Forget the fact that they only hold office for 2 years. Forget about the fact that the republicans in the House just repealed the corporatist ObamaCare bill which, according to Dennis Kucinich (before his great “transformation”) is actually worse than doing nothing on health care.. forget that it was a largely symbolic gesture since the corporatist democrats will kill the effort in the senate. Forget the fact that Obama is rushing as fast as he can in infuse as many bankers and corporate CEOs into the inner workings of his administration. Forget the fact that Obama now claims the right to kill U.S. citizens just because he wants to with no due process of law. Forget the fact that Hilary Clinton is running around trying to pick new wars with any nation she can in service to the MIC and the bankers.

Forget all of that.

Its the end of humanity as we know it folks. This is the message that Noam Chomsky delivered to us through a recent Nation magazine interview on the subjects of climate change and peak oil, of all things. Republicans… climate change… and peak oil. Fear mongering taken to an all new level. Somewhere little Francisco Lotero rolls in his grave.

Continue reading

The State of Climate Science

On Nov. 29th they are going to sneak in yet another Copenhagen type climate bill while all of us dissidents are worrying about North Korea.

The following is an interview with Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, Professor of Meteorology at MIT, and the Lead Author of the IPCC 3rd Assessment Report.

When asked why carbon dioxide was being focused on so much in the “climate change” campaign, he responded this way…

“How shall I put it?  It many ways, it depends again on the party who you are talking about… I think the environmental movement has different considerations from people, other people. But for a lot of people including the bureaucracy and the government and the environmental movement, the issue is power.  And it’s hard to imagine a better leverage point than carbon dioxide to assume control over a society. I mean it’s essential to the production of energy it’s essential to breathing. If you demonize and gain control over it you gain control over everything. And that’s attractive to certain people. It’s been openly stated for over 40 years that one should try to use this issue for a variety of purposes ranging from North South redistribution to energy independence to god knows what.”

Obama Administration Declines to Declare Water as a Fundamental Human Right

by Scott Creighton

The U.N. General Assembly forced a vote on a Bolivian resolution declaring that access to clean water and sanitation is a fundamental human right. The count was 122 nations FOR the resolution, 0 AGAINST, with 41 ABSTAINING.  Guess which way the neoliberal Obama delegation went?

“It was the United States and Canada, the European—not the European Union—the United Kingdom—some of the European countries voted to abstain; some were wonderful—Australia, New Zealand. So it was all of the Anglophone, neoliberal, you know, bought into this whole agenda that everything is to be commodified…” MAUDE BARLOW, Democracy NOW!

Had that been George W. Bush siding with private businesses (who, like Bechtel (San Fransisco based and close to Nancy Pelosi), have already been pushing for the privatization of water supplies in other countries as well as here in the U.S.) over the human rights of literally billions of people across the globe, then you could damn sure expect the “Progressives” to be up in arms about this right now. As it stands with the Clinton/Obama regime in place, right before an election… not a peep, not a whimper from the fraudulent “liberal” left as their precious Peace Prize puppet denies water to the thirsty all across the globe so his friends in high places can make a buck.

Continue reading

American INGSOC: “New World Order” unword – replace with “New International Order”

by Scott Creighton

See? All those conspiracy theorists were so wrong, so stupid. There is no “New World Order”. How paranoid is that?  But there will be a “New International Order”.  We need it to keep us safe and spread democracy.   Everyone knows that…”  a random Amerian progressive

In perhaps his most Orwellian speech to date, Barack Obama addressed the cadets at West Point yesterday. Though his language was stunningly dishonest to the point of a Cheneyesque caricature, the real horror lies just behind the context of what he is saying and goes straight back to the double-speak that defined his election campaign.

Gone is the man who campaigned on ending the “mindset that keeps taking us to war” and in his place is a Disney theme-ride automation programmed to read a script that would have made George Orwell blush.

Continue reading

Nearly half of Americans believe climate change threat is exaggerated

by Suzanne Goldenburg, Guardian

Nearly half of Americans – 48% – now believe the threat of global warming has been exaggerated, the highest level since polling began 13 years ago, the poll published today by Gallup said.

It directly linked the decline in concern to the controversies about media coverage of stolen emails from the University of East Anglia climate research unit and a mistake about the Himalayan glaciers melting by 2035 in the UN’s authoritative report on global warming.

(and let’s not forget the fact that even Phil Jones has admitted that the IPCC data shows the earth has been cooling since 2002…. or the fact that the leaked Copenhagen Agreement Text laid out a plan by which the IMF and the World Bank would use the massive carbon tax fund to “structurally reform” every single nation…)

EPA Head: No Warming Since 1995 Doesn’t Mean Warming Isn’t Occurring

***UPDATE**** Check out “75 Reasons to be Skeptical of “Global Warming””

(Obama is going to push through the Globalist “cap and trade” Deindustrialization and Carbon Tax for the World Bank Plan, no matter what evidence comes out. And just like the Handover Trillions to the Corrupt Bankers Plan (TARP bailout), the Give Money to the Automakers to OffShore US Jobs Plan (the AutoMaker bailout), the Big Business and Industry bailout (Stimulus Plan), the NAFTA Superhighway construction Plan (“High Speed Rail”), the Insurance Industry and Big Pharma Bailout Plan (Obamacare), the Social Security Destabilization and Corporate Giveaway Plan (The Jobs Bill), and the Privatization of Public Education Plan (Race to the Top)… Obama will speed through the process with Al Gore’s fraudulent “20 FEET OF RISING TIDES!” scare tactics at the forefront. Sadly, just like when the Clintons revamped welfare crippling families, repealed Glass Steagal which allowed banks to rape America, and passed off NAFTA as a good thing for our economy, the dems and “progressives” out there will applaud this horrible bill till they finally turn around and look at it in hindsight and realize it’s monsterous effects on America. There is no excuse for such blind loyalty in the face of all the facts that have been coming out about this “global warming” scam.  The G77 countries refused it, civil society refused it, the Copenhagen Conference refused it, the congress refused it… and now Obama is going to try and pass it by fiat… by executive order.)

by Steve Watson, Infowars

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson engaged in doublespeak of the highest degree today as she told reporters that no statistically significant increase in global temperatures since 1995 does not mean that there has not been human induced global warming.

“The science regarding climate change is settled, and human activity is responsible for global warming,” Jackson said, adding that the EPA needs more funding to ensure climate change legislation is passed.

Continue reading

The Hypocrisy of Rachel Maddow’s Tireless Propaganda (or) Welcome to “News Entertainment Television”

by Scott Creighton

News Entertainment Television

Rachel Maddow (a propagandist for the media arm of a major defense contractor, worldwide insurance conglomerate, and potential global warming profiteer … General Electric) has lit into Glenn Beck (a propagandist for a neocon war-monger, media mogul, and globalist billionaire … Rupert Murdoch) over the recent “Bill Nye the Science Guy’s” appearance on her show where he (a guy who’s Planet Green paycheck is dependent on the continuation of the Global Warming fear mongering that people like Maddow keep pushing) made the stunningly unscientific claim that questioning the status quo thinking on global warming is “unpatriotic”.

In an earlier article I already pointed out how ridiculously unscientific Bill Nye’s pathetic argument was and how Rachel should have provided her audience with a disclaimer about Bill Nye’s current employment at Planet Green. But I guess that would have made it too easy for her audience to understand why Bill was so desperate to come on Rachel’s show with absolutely no scientific information whatsoever. So I won’t go back over that except to say that this is the sum total of what Bill Nye (the “science guy”) brought to the table on Rachel Maddow’s propaganda piece about anthropogenic global warming.

There’s more energy in the atmosphere and this is stirring things up,” Nye said. “If you want to get serious about it, these guys claiming that the snow in Washington disproves climate change are almost unpatriotic 

… To deny what scientists or scientific evidence is showing, is inappropriate. And as I said earlier, to me, when I get wound up, it’s unpatriotic Bill Nye

That’s not really very “scientific” now is it, Rachel?  In fact, that seems kinda “Carl Rovian” if you ask me.  Since when is it “unpatriotic” to question flawed scientific results? Especially when those flawed results are being used to attempt to pass global measures of economic, social, and industrial hegemonic domination?

Continue reading

Frozen Wasteland

Just for the fun of it. I put this up because they have a woodburning stove in their RV. Awesome.

“Global Temps Cooling Since Jan. 2002″ – Says Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA),

by Scott Creighton

(I guess the next thing we can expect to hear from certain global warming enthusiasts is “Long term global cooling is exactly what we would expect to see from global warming.”)

The following quotes are taken from an interview with Phil Jones and recently published by the BBC.

Question: Do you agree that from January 2002 to the present there has been statistically significant global cooling?

Jones: No. This period is even shorter than 1995-2009. The trend this time is negative (-0.12C per decade), but this trend is not statistically significant

Phil Jones admits there is a global cooling trend since Jan. 2002 to the tune of -0.12C per decade.

Question: Do you agree that according to the global temperature record used by the IPCC, the rates of global warming from 1860-1880, 1910-1940 and 1975-1998 were identical?

Jones: … So, in answer to the question, the warming rates for all 4 periods are similar and not statistically significantly different from each other.

Here are the trends and significances for each period:

Period Length Trend
(Degrees C per decade)
1860-1880 21 0.163 Yes
1910-1940 31 0.15 Yes
1975-1998 24 0.166 Yes
1975-2009 35 0.161 Yes

If it is true that our increased industrial activity is causing all this “global warming” (the man-made global warming that Phil Jones himself admits has actually been in a cooling trend over the past 8 years), how is it that the earth was warming at a faster rate from 1860-1880 (0.163 degrees C per decade compared to 0.161 degrees C per decade) than it was from 1975 to 2007?

And if you believe that there is a lag between CO2 increases and the temperature change, how is it possible that the current warming trend (according to the guy who is most responsible for the theory of man-made global warming) is not “significant” since 1995 and there has even been a global cooling trend since 2002, after all the global industrial development since 1975?  How does that relate to the highly “significant”  and more rapid rise in global temperatures from 1860 to 1880?

Was there a massive amount of coal-fired electric power plants in operation prior to 1860? No. Were their tens of millions of automobiles driving around with huge carbon footprints prior to 1860? No. Were there any oil and liquid natural gas refineries pumping unlimited amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere before 1860? No.

In fact, if man-made global warming was the cause of global warming trends, then how do these trends hold up to world population numbers? Well, the world population was about 1.2 billion people in 1860, according to this chart. Today we have about 6.9 billion people. So, in 1860, when there was significantly less people than there are today ( there are 5.9 times the people now than there was in 1860) and significantly less industry and automobiles and power plants, the global temperature increased at a higher rate for a longer period of time than it is now. How does that support the idea of man-made global warming?

And now, according to Phil Jones, we are actually in an eight year period of global cooling.

Any questions?

With “evidence” like this I can understand why Bill Nye the “science” guy (a man who’s very paycheck is dependent on the maintaining of the global warming myth) needs to resort to Carl Rove type tactics like attacking people’s “patriotism” when they start questioning this kind of junk science.  His cushy lifestyle hangs in the balance.

Now don’t get me wrong, I have often said that capping industrial emissions and pollutants is a great idea. Also a good idea would be to make companies pay for these pollutants as that hitting them in the profit margins would foster not only a cleaner environment but also it would promote industries that would help this process and thus continue to create much needed jobs.

It would also seem like a pretty obvious idea would be to make industries pay those pollution fees directly to their state and local communities, as that would provide desperately needed tax money which could be used to pay for much needed public services like police, fire departments, and education. That would ease their dependency on the federal tax dollar and IMMEDIATELY begin to reduce our national deficit. It would also decrease property taxes thus slowing foreclosure rates. Less polution, more jobs, and reduced national deficit (A “win, win, win” kind of plan as opposed to the international derivatives scheme which kills small industry and sucks money out of communities and hands it over to the World Bank and the IMF).

But these pollution limits must be fair and they must be universally applied to every industry. The first suggestions of our cap and trade scam actually handed it’s carbon offsets to corporations backed by certain politicians for free allowing them to continue to pollute as they wished while crippling others. In a sense it would do for industry what the bank bailouts did for the big 5 banks; allow the biggest and greediest to consume the small to mid-sized industries because it would be too expensive for them to continue doing business.

But blindly following the Climate Change mythology as it is being sold to the world is extremely harmful to our collective future. This scam is being orchistrated to be used to create another derivatives based scheme of global proportions. The only ones who will benefit from it will be massive multinational corporations like Bechtel and GE and the World Bank and the IMF who will be set up to collect massive carbon credits taxes and then use the global governance they set up to inflict their structural reforms on every nation on earth. Of course the Wall Street banks will also be able to generate massive profits trading carbon offsets in another massive derivatives scheme.

Other things to think about:

1. IPCC admits “flaw” in sea levels study – “A background note by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said a 2007 report wrongly stated that 55 percent of the country was below sea level since the figure included areas above sea level, prone to flooding along rivers.”

2. Former IPCC author says the data they relied on was “flawed” – “The temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global change,” said John Christy, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a former lead author on the IPCC.”

3. IPCC admits melting glacier statement was “Flawed” – “The assertion, now discredited, was included in the most recent IPCC report assessing climate change science, ­published in 2007. Those reports are widely credited with convincing the world that human activity was causing global warming.”

Since all of these things have started to come out after the Glaciergate emails and the release of the Copenhagen Summit agreement that showed they wanted to hand money over to the World Bank and create a system of “global governance”… you might think that they would step back and re-evaluate the situation. But you would be wrong. Instead, it looks like they are going to try and force their plans down our throats any way they can.

Obama administration will pass climate change laws by fascist decree – “With much of his legislative agenda stalled in Congress, President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities…. “

  •      ““We are reviewing a list of presidential executive orders and directives to get the job done across a front of issues,” said Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff.”
  •      “Mr. Obama has already decided to create a bipartisan budget commission under his own authority after Congress refused to do so.”
  •      “And the Environmental Protection Agency is moving forward with possible regulations on heat-trapping gases blamed for climate change, while a bill to cap such emissions languishes in the Senate.”

As the earth gets steadily cooler, the Obama administration and their financial and industrial backers get more and more desperate to take advantage of this momentum before it fades away. This is literally a plan for global domination they (the bankers, not Obama)  have been working on since 1995 and there is no way they will allow it to collapse when they are so close to achieving their goals. A new panel, a new study would never work especially since we are in a period of global cooling so they are forced to pass this into law now or never.

Bill Nye Calls Questioning of the IPCC Report “Unpatriotic” on the Maddow Progressive Propaganda Program

by Scott Creighton

During the Rachel Maddow “Status Quo Regurgitation Show”, Rachel had Bill Nye (the Science Guy) on in an effort to pump up the volume on the anthropogenic global warming issue. Of course, the main thrust of the show was to support the lagging ideology that the science of global warming is all solved and proven (no sense in looking into it yourself folks. just take their word for it, you silly little sheep you.) just like gravity and that round earth thingy. They didn’t offer any proof or challenge any of the recent news that has come to the forefront of the debate about the IPCC fixing data to suit their claims or their emails about deliberately misleading folks. They didn’t even mention the story about the IPCC guy who claimed the glaciers would melt by 2035 when his own data showed it “might” melt by as early as 2335.

Dr Pachauri has refused to apologise for an inaccurate claim published in an IPCC report that the Himalayan glaciers could melt by 2035.  … John Sauven, director of Greenpeace UK, called on the Indian academic to be replaced to rebuild the “credibility” of the UN’s climate change body. Telegraph UK

No, Maddow did her part to sell what the early copy of the Copenhagen Summit Agreement proved was simply a World Bank scam to garner massive amounts of money and complete control over global industry. And she brought in Bill Nye, the Science Guy, to seal the deal. You might figure he would lend a bit of scientific expertise to the sneering, snide, self-satisfied sloganeering of Maddow, but you would be wrong (quick question for her fans: how is her self-absorbed narcissism any different than that of Bill O’Reilly? Just asking)

“There’s more energy in the atmosphere and this is stirring things up,” Nye said. “If you want to get serious about it, these guys claiming that the snow in Washington disproves climate change are almost unpatriotic. It’s really, they’re denying science. So they’re very happy to have the weather forecast be accurate within a few hours, but they’re displeased or un-enchanted by predictions of the world getting warmer. It’s really, it shakes me up.” Bill Nye

“There’s more energy in the atmosphere and this is stirring things up,”… whoa there big fella. Don’t get too technical on us. Now I know you used to work for the defense industry and Al Gore has paid you a check or two while you were working with the Repower America Al Gore Traveling Road show and talent review, so don’t go “over our heads” with all that fancy “stirring things up” talk. We are just simple folk compared to you, you know.

Us simple folk don’t get a weekly paycheck from the Planet Green tv network that would dry up and blow away if global warming turned out to be a fraud, so cut us a little slack, would you?

I wonder what Bill Nye, Science Guy, thought of this statement (I wonder if he thought his tv show (and his fat paycheck) might be in jeopardy…

A senior Canadian climate scientist says the United Nations’ panel on global warming has become tainted by political advocacy, that its chairman should resign, and that its approach to science should be overhauled.

Andrew Weaver, a climatologist at the University of Victoria, says the leadership of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has allowed it to advocate for action on global warming, rather than serve simply as a neutral science advisory bodyCanWest News Serivce

And you called questioning the science of global warming “Unpatriotic”? It’s now “unpatriotic” to question the science behind the largest proven scam in the history of mankind? These progressive pundits are starting to sound a lot like the Bushovian blowhards of yesteryear, if you ask me. They couldn’t possibly be playing for the same team could they? naahhhhh…….

Continue reading


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 794 other followers