WHO WAS OSAMA? WHO IS OBAMA?

by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research

While the President and Commander in Chief of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama “celebrates” the first anniversary of the alleged death of bin Laden, the substantive issue as to WHO WAS OSAMA BIN LADEN remains unheralded.  (Remarks by President Obama in Address to the Nation from Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, see video at foot of article)

Through lies and fabrications –which he intends to use in his election campaign– president Obama`s carefully scripted speech upholds a world of total fantasy, in which “bad guys” are lurking and “plotting acts of terror”. Meanwhile, Islamic “jihadists” are said to be threatening Western civilization.

Continue reading

Dr. Graeme MacQueen @ Harvard University : “The Fictional Basis of the War on Terror”

Iran Did 9/11?: Part 1 – The Excellent Foppery of the World

by Scott Creighton

Families of a very small percentage of the victims of 9/11 seek to steal 2 billion dollars from the people of Iran based on Donald Rumsfeld quotes, the absence of an Iranian stamp on passports given to the hijackers by the US State Department, and the hearsay testimony of an already discredited MEK terrorist.

“This is the excellent foppery of the world, that,
when we are sick in fortune,–often the surfeit
of our own behavior,–we make guilty of our
disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars: as
if we were villains by necessity; fools by
heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and
treachers, by spherical predominance; drunkards,
liars, and adulterers, by an enforced obedience of
planetary influence; and all that we are evil in,
by a divine thrusting on: an admirable evasion
of whoremaster man, to lay his goatish
disposition to the charge of a star” William Shakespeare, King Lear, Edmund the Bastard, 1.2.132

Edmund the bastard lays bare the excellent foppery of the world, that as we suffer from the our own misdeeds, we find ways to lay the blame elsewhere as if by some divine plan our fate was not of our own design. The Sun (al Qaeda), the Moon (Iraq), and the Stars (Iran) have now all been blamed for what was our own invention, all that we are evil in. Thus is the nature of whore-master man.

Continue reading

Chossudovsky: Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism

Occupy Wall Street Current Official Demands, Voting Closed Oct. 21, 2011

(Re-investigate 9/11 generated the most votes by an extremely large percentage.  Overall some 70,000 + people voted on this measure to be adopted in the OWS official demands poll and “Yes” beat out the “No” votes by a margin of something like 6 to 1 (60 thousand to 12 thousand). Another interesting aspect to all of this is the little known fact that the Federal Reserve central banking system, privately owned and the model of what we are forcing on other nations across the world, can be bought back from the banks that own it at a cost of only 1 billion dollars.  Buying it back and ending the FED in that way is one of their demands that they have adopted by a vote of 83% in favor.)

by Ralph Lopez, ADS

At the official Occupy Wall Street media site coupmedia.org. Voting software prevents voting from the same ISP more than once. The following is an initial demands list on which voting closed on Oct. 21, 2011.   Items required a vote of 2/3 “yes” or more to remain on the list.  Voting is still open on other demands.

From “Occupy Wall Street – Official Demands”

The Sovereign People’s Movement, represented nationally through the people occupying the various Liberty Square locations across this great country, have laid out and democratically submitted and are currently voting on the list of following Demands to then be distilled into one Unified Common demand of the people.

Demand synopses

Official Voting Page

OCCUPY WALL STREET OFFICIAL DEMANDS PASSED, AS OF OCT. 21, 2011

1. Repeal of the Patriot Act

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” — Fourth Amendment to the Constitution

Forty-five days after 9/11, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act without reading it. This new law was supposed to protect you from terrorism, but it has really left you unprotected against lawless federal agents. The Patriot Act contains numerous violations of the Fourth Amendment. It gives federal agents vast new powers that have been abused to investigate innocent Americans.

2. ELIMINATE “PERSONHOOD” LEGAL STATUS FOR CORPORATIONS

3. Forced Acquisition of the Federal Reserve for $1Billion

No Congress, no President has been strong enough to stand up to the foreign-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. Yet there is a catch – one that President Kennedy recognized before he was slain – the original deal in 1913 creating the Federal Reserve Bank had a simple backout clause. The investors loaned the United States Government $1 billion. And the backout clause allows the United States to buy out the system for that $1 billion. If the Federal Reserve Bank were demolished and the Congress of the United States took control of the currency, as required in the Constitution, the National Debt would virtually end overnight, and the need for more taxes and even the income tax, itself. Thomas Jefferson was concise in his early warning to the American nation, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Article I, Section 8, Clause 5, of the United States Constitution provides that Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof and of any foreign coins. But that is not the case. The United States government has no power to issue money, control the flow of money, or to even distribute it – that belongs to a private corporation registered in the State of Delaware – the Federal Reserve Bank.

4. Re Investigate the Attacks of 9-11-2001

More and more evidence is being released to the public surrounding the suspicious circumstances surrounding 911. This measure would be included in the list of demands to show that the original investigation was significantly flawed.

Continue reading

9/11 The Myth and The Reality – David Ray Griffin

The United States has also engaged in false flag terrorist attacks, killing innocent civilians then blaming the attacks on enemy country or group, often by planting evidence. As Daniel Ganser has shown in his recent book “NATO’s Secret Armies“, NATO, guided by the CIA and the Pentagon, arranged many such attacks (false flag terrorist attacks) in western European countries during the cold war in which hundreds of people were killed by bombs or hooded men with shotguns. These attacks were successfully blamed on communists or other leftists (like Moammar Gadhafi?) to discredit them in the eyes of the voting public.” David Ray Griffin, 2010

.

In other news, the people of America have reported in to the folks at Gallop with the highest percentage of people who hold a negative view of the federal government since Gallop began asking the question of them in Aug of 2003.The previous high was in 2008 and that means that more people hold a negative view toward the current government than they did in the last year of the Bush administration when they were pushing to give nearly a trillion dollars to the banks that deliberately destroyed the economy.

A total of 63 percent said they had a negative view of the federal government, including 34 percent who said they had a somewhat negative view and 29 percent who said they had a very negative view.

The previous high for the percentage of Americans telling Gallup they had a negative view of the federal government was 60 percent—in a survey conducted Aug. 7-10, 2008. At that time, 34 percent said they had a somewhat negative view of the federal government and 26 percent said they had a very negative view..” CNS News

I guess the Juan Cole types have their work cut out for them trying to gin up some kind of “progressive” rationalization for Pax Americana’s new Operation Gladio campaign in the Middle East and Africa. Apparently the sheep aren’t buying it anymore. Though I doubt that pointing out these facts makes me “trendy” in any stretch of the imagination. I thought it just made me a journalist.

.

In the Company of Laymen – BYU’s Latest Distraction Campaign: Steven Jones and the Telsa Demolition Machine “Thump Thump”

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: I had joked earlier that almost every single demolition distraction theory makes an appearance in Fallout New Vegas including “mini-nukes“, “ray beams from space“, “C-4 charges“, and “thermite“. Well, it turns out that Steven Jones’ new distraction theory is also to be found in the popular video game. Say hi to “Thump Thump

——–

Just a quick note.

Steven Jones’ “nanothermite” distraction is falling out of favor with the remaining Truth advocates so in a desperate attempt to keep them from testing for residues of the high explosives that were used to demolish the Twin Towers and Building 7, Steven has come out with a couple of new trial balloons to float in front of them to see if either of them resonate with the community.

First of all understand that Steven Jones is paid and paid well by neocon university BYU as per Steven’s own admission. Read the following for details of Jones’ admission that BYU financed and peer reviewed his “nanothermite” paper and then paid to have it published at the vanity press publishing house.

9/11 Truth Red Herring: Neoliberal BYU Has Financed, Staffed, and Peer-Reviewed Prof. Jones’ Flawed Thermite Distraction Since Day One

Also remember that BYU honored Dick Cheney in 2007 with an honorary doctorate around the same time they elevated Steven Jones to the position of Professor Emeritus. And then consider this statement from the then head of the Church of Latter Day Saints and BYU, their flagship university:

It may even be that [the Lord] will hold us responsible if we try to impede or hedge up the way of those who are involved in a contest with forces of evil and repression.”  Gordon B. Hinckley, 2003

Keep in mind that Gordon B. Hinckley and his family have a history with the Bush family and that before he left office, George W. Bush rewarded BYU with a massive 1.2 billion dollar NSA project to be built near BYU’s campus and staffed with many BYU graduates. Gordon B. Hinckley received the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2004.

In view of these contributions to 9/11 research, my friend and fellow 9/11-researcher Kevin Ryan said “Hurray for BYU!” And I have to agree.” Steven Jones

It’s pretty hard to imagine that an institution that believes God will hold you responsible for hindering Bush’s “Global War on Terror”, would finance and support a leading Truth advocate and his “research”.

Unless of course, that Truth advocate is doing something else.

Continue reading

Cuban TV: Bin Laden’s death meant to distract from Libya bombings

from Monsters and Critics

Cuban state media said Monday that the death of al- Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is meant to ‘distract attention’ from the international military intervention in Libya.

‘It catches the eye that the death of the world’s most-wanted terrorist should be announced at a time when NATO is indiscriminately bombing Libya and when one of its air raids on Tripoli caused the death of a son of the Libyan leader, Colonel (Moamer) Gaddafi, and of three of his grandchildren,’ Cuba’s midday news said.

Calling bin Laden a ‘former CIA aide,’ an apparent reference to his fight with the US-aided Afghan rebels against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s, the Cuban broadcaster called the US attack on bin Laden ‘a way to distract the world’s media attention.’

[read the rest, here]

Proposed Testing Procedure for High Explosive Residues in Ground Zero Dust

by Scott Creighton

(The following is a reply to an individual who asked for my evaluation of what would be the best case scenario for testing of dust samples from Ground Zero.  After years of research and considerable amounts of thought devoted to this part of the ongoing unofficial investigation into 9/11, this process that I have devised (along with input from many others) is the best that I have come up with thus far. It considers legal ramifications, potential false samples, corrupted samples, direct sabotage from within the Movement, future debunking talking points, and various other potentially disqualifying factors which might undermine both test results and the credibility of said results. It is by no means the only way to test these materials nor is it written in stone. However it is the opinion of this researcher that if followed, this process, though difficult and potentially expensive, would produce unimpeachable results which would stand-up to the scrutiny of educated debunkers and defense attorneys alike. It would yield hard, undeniable, scientific evidence that massive amounts of high explosives were used during the demolition of the World Trade Center complex. When combined with the uncontroversial circumstantial evidence amassed by researchers like David Ray Griffin, Dr. Grame MacQueen, Kevin Ryan and others, it is my contention and that of others, that controlled demolition will become the accepted narrative in terms of public understanding of what happened on Sept. 11th 2001 and from there a new criminal investigation must follow given the preponderance of evidence and growing ground-swell of public outrage.)

Continue reading

Mineta’s Testimony to the 9/11 Commission Confirmed by Secret Service Log

by Scott Creighton

It would appear that Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta’s testimony before the 9/11 Commission has been verified by documents released back in 2009.  For those of you who don’t remember, Norman testified to the commission that while he was in the bunker at the White House on Sept. 11th, 2001, he heard an individual giving Dick Cheney status reports on the target that was approaching DC. His testimony was left out of the final 9/11 Commission Report and many debunker types, including some fake “truthers” in the movement, have tried to claim that he was mistaken or that it was a “ghost” signal image of Flight 93 (which never got that close to DC, BTW) (watch the video of Mineta’s testimony below)

There was no alarm sounded at the Pentagon prior to the attack. It is clear that they knew of the target’s approach at least 10 minutes prior even perhaps more.  April Gallop recently attempted to sue Rumsfeld and Cheney for not giving the people at the Pentagon any advanced warning of the approaching target. “A career Army officer who survived the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, claims that no evacuation was ordered inside the Pentagon, despite flight controllers calling in warnings of approaching hijacked aircraft nearly 20 minutes before the building was struck.” Pilots for 9/11 Truth April Gallop walked through the damaged area of the Pentagon after the strike and does not believe a 757-200 struck the Pentagon. 125 people died in the Pentagon on Sept. 11th 2001, many of them working in the office tasked with finding the missing 2.3 trillion dollars that Rumsfeld had announced as missing on Sept. 10th 2001.

Continue reading

Presenting the Next CIT Snipe Hunt: Meet Dimitri Khalezov and the Rebranded Mini-Nukes Theory

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE (see the end of this article for an update) UPDATE 2 UPDATE 3 OMG it gets better UPDATE 4 no wait… there’s more… UPDATE 5

The “Citizens Investigation Team” or CIT for short, served a great purpose for the ongoing psyop in the Truth movement. It was a heated distraction for two years which took up a lot of time and eventually drove many in the Truth movement back into the waiting arms of the “rational” leaders who steered them right back to the official story of what hit the Pentagon. They succeeded in making any mention of what happened at the Pentagon aside from that official story such a contentious issue, that it is abruptly dismissed on even well-meaning sites (not to mention the obvious fake truth sites which dominate the blogs).  With such a successful model to go by, is it any wonder that someone would come up with another attempt at it, this time dealing with the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers?

Like CIT, this new distraction is designed to be easily dismissed.  CIT’s claim was that Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon after a major explosion at rush hour in clear weather, and no one saw it happen. CIT’s “evidence” is off-the-record statements from 13 “witnesses” who are employed by either the Pentagon or the Department of the Army, and most of them actually claim that they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. It’s ridiculously stupid but people like Dwain Deets (head of NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center (drone aircraft development)) supported it in a video testimonial, which probably should tell you more about Dwain Deets than anything else.

Imagine that. The head of the agency who created our drone aircraft right up until 9/11 endorsed the psyop that lead to the marginalization of research into the possibility that anything else other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.  Go figure.

Now we have this Dimitri Khalezov guy and his rebranded mini-nukes theory coming out about the same time BYU’s “nanothermite” distraction is losing ground.  Anyone see a pattern?

I was asked by some well-meaning Truth advocates to look into this… it didn’t take long.

Continue reading

911 David Ray Griffin – 911 The Myth and The Reality

Truth and Consequences: A Watershed Moment for Rebuilding a Movement

by Scott Creighton

The website “9/11 Blogger” was exposed as a controlled opposition site years ago by myself and a long list of other well-meaning Truth advocates.  Heavily controlled actually.

Typically I wouldn’t waste my time or yours writing about the goings on over there, but recently it has come to my attention that due to their own overreaching, Blogger could become a kind of microcosm for the Truth movement which allows us to better understand (1) the well-financed and organized effort which has been leveled against our little movement by those who mean to end speculation and reasoned inquiry about 9/11 once and for all and (2) the resilience of those of us who still demand to know the truth and still dare to speak it.

What has happened has become a sort of watershed moment for the Truth movement. The psyop contractors have tipped their hand so we have to decide what we are going to do about it.  Are we going to use this mistake to reclaim what was stolen from us or are we going to fold?

In order to better illustrate the overall objective of the current campaign to demolish the Truth movement, I’m sorry, but I have to delve into a little of the obvious problems with the official story of 9/11. At least, these used to be considered obvious problems, before a certain element of the Truth movement started chipping away at them piece by piece.

Part 1 – A Brief History of An Uncomfortable Truth

Continue reading

(Another) Editor in Chief resigned over the Harrit et al. nanothermite paper

(Can we PLEASE test the Ground Zero dust for high explosive residues now? For two years now, I have been writing that Steven Jones has been running a distraction campaign paid for by neoconservative BYU. Now it seems someone has not only reviewed the Harrit/Jones “nanothermite” paper and found it wanting, but apparently, yet another Editor in Chief over at Bentham publishing has resigned over being associated with the paper. This guy apparently debated Harrit on the subject and wrote a scholarly paper critical of their work. It seems the wheels are coming off Jones’ 5 year distraction project. No wonder they want us to focus on the “fly over” theory.)

by Denis G. Rancourt, Activist Teacher

I was asked by 911 Truth movement researcher and radio host Kevin Barrett to debate Niels Harrit about nanothermite in WTC dust. I agreed and a two-hour live debate was held on November 9th, HERE.

In preparation I read the 2009 paper of Harrit et al. (Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2, 2009, 7-31). I found many scientific errors and concluded that the editorial and/or peer review had been done very poorly. I tried to address some of my concerns with Harrit during the radio interview. Those concerns which I had time to express were mostly confirmed rather than alleviated.

Many members of the 911 Truth movement use an “appeal to authority” argument in advancing Harrit’s paper as “peer reviewed” and Harrit himself as a scientific authority with relevant expertise. Anyone using “appeal to authority” arguments must expect that the authority in question can be questioned.

Even more boldly, some 911 Truthers, including Kevin Barrett, advance that since the Harrit paper has not formally been contested in any peer reviewed scientific article then its methods and conclusions must be valid. I don’t know the name for this particular sophistry but I know that many papers on important topics are wrong, believed to be wrong, and are never contested. This relates more to the social careerism of science than anything else.

I accept that the 911 Truth movement is an important societal movement and for that reason I decided to help clean up some of this crap.

Continue reading

“T.” Carter’s Video Resurgence and the Gatekeepers of the Pentagon

by Scott Creighton

There seems to be a huge effort going on right now to frame the entire question of what happened at the Pentagon on Sept. 11th between two artificially opposed positions:

1. (CIT) – “Fly Over” Theory – Endorsed by the father of modern drones – (CIT actually created their own “Hit List” of people who dared question their all important “13 witnesses” (all of whom work for either the Pentagon or the Department of the Army…go figure))

2. (Gregg Roberts’) – “Believe the Official Story” Theory – endorsed by Donald Rumsfeld (no link needed)

When you get down to it, these aren’t as opposed as you might first think. One says that Flight 77 “flew over” the Pentagon and a bomb or something blew up just before they got there and the other says Flight 77 flew into the Pentagon, even though evidence doesn’t suggest that. Nor does logic for that matter.

Do you see it?  “Flight 77” . In both cases, Flight 77 has to be what people saw at the Pentagon.  And that is the entire point. And that is why someone posted up an old video of a highly questionable ‘witness” over at 9/11 Blogger. Seems that even unbelievable testimony supporting the official story of 9/11 is better than none at all, at our friendly neighborhood “Truth” site.

Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 858 other followers