Follow the Money? God Forbid

(There are so many ties to US and global financial institutions and the events of 9/11, that it is difficult to even categorized them all. But here is one that should obviously been investigated immediately but instead the 9/11 Commission, under the “guidance” of Philip Zelikow, directly lied about information that would have highlighted some very suspicious activities just prior to 9/11 by not only major banking corporations here in the US but also the Federal Reserve Bank itself. These activities would lead most reasonable investigators to believe that there was fore-knowledge of the attacks. That is probably why Zelikow had the Commission lie about the findings. Remember, Bush’s first choice to head “the commission” (after trying not to have one at all for 400 days after the attacks) was Henry Kissinger. Kissinger is a personal friend and business associate of David Rockefeller. And, of course, David Rockefeller owns much of JP Morgan/Chase; as well as controlling interests in several of the banks that make up the Federal Reserve Bank (yes, it is a private entity, not a government agency) not too mention Exxon/Mobile (and they did pretty well since 9/11 as well). And, of course, it was Rockefeller’s man that put the foreign policy team together for Bush in 1998 of rice, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, and Cheney: George P. Shultz. No wonder Zelikow didn’t want people looking too closely at the banking industry leading up to 9/11. This is an important article and it is a privately run site. Great reporting. If you can afford a dollar or two to send to them, I am sure they would appriciate it. You know I rarely encourage donations to sites, but in this case, this work is exactly the kind of informative and important work that needs to continue. Alright, I am off my soap-box. Enjoy the article.)

by Jim Hogue from the Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinal, here.

It’s been over six years since 9/11, but U.S. regulatory entities have been slow to follow through with reports about the complex financial transactions that occurred just prior to and following the attacks. Such research could shed light on such questions as who was behind them-and who benefited-and could help lay to rest the rumors that have been festering.

Warning bells about anomalies in the fiscal sector were sounded in the summer of 2001, but not heeded. Among those who has since raised questions was Bill Bergman. As a financial market analyst for the Federal Reserve, he was assigned in 2003 to review the record of July and August of 2001. He noticed an unusual surge in the currency component of the M1 money supply (cash circulating outside of banks) during that period. The surge totaled over $5 billion above the norm for a two-month increase. The increase in August alone was the third largest single monthly increase since 1947, even after a significantly above-average month in July.

David Ray Griffin at the EU Parliament 2008

Part 1

(Part two after the break) There have been several investigations that have begun to take place in official government settings across the globe, focused on the events of 9/11. Italy, Japan, Germany, and the EU to name a few. None of them have access to critical US information, like our congress would have, were they really interested in figuring out just who was behind 9/11.

Kind of like the anthrax attacks that preceeded the signing of the Patriot Act. Once they traced the strain of anthrax to a US military supplier in Virginia, the case suddenly just went silent and no one ever really spoke of it again.

Peer Reviewed Study of New Evidence in WTC Dust

 by Scott Creighton 

There is a new important study of physical evidence from the WTC just released by the combined efforts of 8 researchers, 5 of whom hold PhDs.

Headed by the efforts of Dr. Stephen Jones, this peer reviewed paper details the scientific study of evidence collected from the site of the World Trade Center. Specifically, the paper addresses the discovery of micro-spheres in the WTC dust collected at the scene.

“The formation of molten spheres with high iron contents along with other species in the WTC dust required extremely high temperatures. Our results are compared with those of other laboratories. The temperatures required for the molten sphere-formation and evaporation of materials as observed in the WTC dust are significantly higher than temperatures associated with the burning of jet fuel and office materials in the WTC buildings.” (From the Abstract of the paper “Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction” by Dr. Stephen Jones, et al.)