Follow the Money? God Forbid

(There are so many ties to US and global financial institutions and the events of 9/11, that it is difficult to even categorized them all. But here is one that should obviously been investigated immediately but instead the 9/11 Commission, under the “guidance” of Philip Zelikow, directly lied about information that would have highlighted some very suspicious activities just prior to 9/11 by not only major banking corporations here in the US but also the Federal Reserve Bank itself. These activities would lead most reasonable investigators to believe that there was fore-knowledge of the attacks. That is probably why Zelikow had the Commission lie about the findings. Remember, Bush’s first choice to head “the commission” (after trying not to have one at all for 400 days after the attacks) was Henry Kissinger. Kissinger is a personal friend and business associate of David Rockefeller. And, of course, David Rockefeller owns much of JP Morgan/Chase; as well as controlling interests in several of the banks that make up the Federal Reserve Bank (yes, it is a private entity, not a government agency) not too mention Exxon/Mobile (and they did pretty well since 9/11 as well). And, of course, it was Rockefeller’s man that put the foreign policy team together for Bush in 1998 of rice, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, and Cheney: George P. Shultz. No wonder Zelikow didn’t want people looking too closely at the banking industry leading up to 9/11. This is an important article and it is a privately run site. Great reporting. If you can afford a dollar or two to send to them, I am sure they would appriciate it. You know I rarely encourage donations to sites, but in this case, this work is exactly the kind of informative and important work that needs to continue. Alright, I am off my soap-box. Enjoy the article.)

by Jim Hogue from the Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinal, here.

It’s been over six years since 9/11, but U.S. regulatory entities have been slow to follow through with reports about the complex financial transactions that occurred just prior to and following the attacks. Such research could shed light on such questions as who was behind them-and who benefited-and could help lay to rest the rumors that have been festering.

Warning bells about anomalies in the fiscal sector were sounded in the summer of 2001, but not heeded. Among those who has since raised questions was Bill Bergman. As a financial market analyst for the Federal Reserve, he was assigned in 2003 to review the record of July and August of 2001. He noticed an unusual surge in the currency component of the M1 money supply (cash circulating outside of banks) during that period. The surge totaled over $5 billion above the norm for a two-month increase. The increase in August alone was the third largest single monthly increase since 1947, even after a significantly above-average month in July.

The Real Iraq

(Darryl Anderson tells his story. The MSM doesn’t cover Iraq stories right now because of the upcoming elections. Darryl talks about how the U.S. rules of engagement changed in 2004. We adapted an Israeli tactic of returning fire when fired upon, regardless of Innocent civilians who might be in the way. The idea was that if we kill enough civilians, they would turn against the insurgents. But that isn’t the real idea behind the plan. The plan is designed to continue aggressions on both sides. We kill civilians, they get angry and kill more soldiers, so we kill even more civilians. This idea is not new. Israel does it because a certain minority there doesn’t want peace; they want to wipe out the Palestinians and so they use this tactic to perpetuate their anger. The military contractors, with their connections to the upper leadership of the military brass, has pushed this barbaric policy because they know that if there were a peaceful resolution in Iraq, and the insurgency stopped tomorrow, then they would have no orders to fill for munitions or new weapons, or fighting equipment. In short, they have persuaded the military leadership to use these tactics to continue their revenue stream for as long as possible, at the cost of Iraqi civilians and U.S. soldiers. This is savage capitalism at its most basic level. And it is being practiced by those running this country.)

Lions At the Gate: Our Leaders on 9/11

On Sept. 11th 2001, three men were primarily responsible for taking charge of our national defenses to protect this nation from harm: The President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Vice President. On that day, only one was in charge, by design. these three videos lay out the activities of those three men for those 2 hours of tragedy. where they were, what they did, and why. They are based on the official reports and national record.  Once you see all three, the picture of what happened that day may be just a little clearer. At the end of the three videos is an article from 2007 about what Rumsfeld did that day based on testimony from other Pentagon insiders as well as his Secret Service agent at the time. You will see that the events laid out in the video match up with the insider story perfectly. (videos from 9/11 Blogger, here.)

Where was Rumsfeld…

The Untouchables: Why is Blackwater Above the Law?

by Scott Creighton

This is an excellent interview I found over at After Dowing Street. As I was doing a little research into Nisour Square, one name kept popping up that has a certain significance to it. So I thought you might like to read about it.

Meet George Bush: Watch Him Lie About 9/11 Too…

Special thanks to Alex Jones and others who keep trying to tell us Rome is burning.

Couldn’t have foreseen planes being used as weapons and flown into buildings, huh?

Meet Mike Walter: Watch Him Lie About 9/11

This is Mike Walter. Mike is a liar. He is lying about what he saw on 9/11. And here is the proof. (it would appear the WordPress has blocked me from posting a picture of Mike Walter)

***UPDATE*** I have found a video that gives more detail into the statement that Walter made that day. It turns out he was one of many broadcasters that happened to see the Pentagon attack, though they didn’t mention that in the interview. But what I found was another video of him explaining his comments that were taken out of context by the CNN story.

Again,there is a cut-away during the video that he shows, between where he talks about the AA jet and the “cruise missle with wings”. So I am not exactly sure what to think of that. But then he goes into great detail talking about the physics of the wings folding back into the plane.

In his mind, the wings were weak and so they couldn’t withstand the impact and therefore they folded back into the plane. But momentum doesn’t work that way.

A plane flies because the engines pull the body of the plane with them, not the other way around. And the engines themselves were massive, weighing 9 tons each. They had the momentum and they were made of steel and titanium, whereas the body of the plane was made from lightweight aluminum.

And according to this man’s story, the plane was accelerating when it struck the Pentagon, so the engines were in full thrust. They would have become dislodged from the wings and blown clean through the walls like massive cannon balls.

If anything, the body would have crumpled not the engines. There should have been three holes in the side of the building, not one.

Plus, he never mentioned the wings folding back during his original interview. Why is he repeatedly talking about that now? Did he just remember it? And how can this man have seen those wings “fold back” in the millisecond of impact before the explosion?

So I stand by my original conclusion: this man is lying.

(for the record: this officer was there that day and he reported a different flight path than the FAA reported with the flight recorder from flight 77, but aside from that, he points out the the ‘witnesses” from North 27 couldn’t have seen the impact (or the wings folding in) because from the location they claimed to have been at, the view is obscured by trees and the dip in the ground elevation. From that distance and that location, this officer says they could not have seen the impact. I will take this man at his word before I take the word of someone who’s story is still changing to this day. Again I stand by my conclusion: Mike Walter is lying about what he saw.)

Doesn’t giving false witness to a crime make you eligable to be charged as an accessory after the fact? Just a thought.

 

(but his story wasn’t the only one to change…)

 

In a new video out at 9/11 Blogger that details the Mineta testimony excluded from the 9/11 Commission Report, Mike Walter is re-interviewed about what he saw that day.

The troubling part is that his statements now are not the same as when he was originally interviewed by CNN the day of the attacks. In fact, they are vastly different. Mr. Walter needs to be interrogated about why his story has changed; who has made contact with him; and whether or not someone within the FBI or the administration has compelled him to change his story.

(see the video after the break)

Bush Caught Off Guard With 9/11 Question

You almost feel sorry for the bastard. A rare glimpse into the soul of a war criminal.

Dr. Graeme MacQueen Lecture at University of Waterloo

by Scott Creighton

Dr. MacQueen puts the entire collapse sequence into perspective for us. He says you don’t need a PhD to see clearly that there is a serious problem with how these buildings came down and I agree.

We have been programed not to trust out eyes and we have been conditioned not to trust our instincts. On this Memorial Day, I am focusing not on soldiers or illegal occupations, but rather the myth that started it all for us; the myth that changed our last little bit of democracy; the myth that made a lie out of everything that was once good and decent about this country. No matter how many shades of lipstick they put on this pig, the myth of the fire-induced collapse doesn’t ring true; and if those three buildings were prepped prior to the planes hitting them, then this whole thing is a lie, people. And your “democracy” is a pipe-dream and you had better wake the fuck up or accept handing over a dictatorship to your children. Because you lost it on your watch.

(thanks to Reprehensor at 9/11 Blogger for putting this up)

MacQueen NYFD 9/11 witnesses

This is a short video of Professor Graeme MacQueen’s “Eyewitness Testimony” study about what happened on 9/11 as described by the firefighters that day. Important EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY excluded from the official 9/11 Commission Report. Now why would you exclude eyewitness testimony in a criminal investigation, to run with a story that even the FBI says has flaws?

An Open Letter to Steven Jones…On the Subject of Detonator Cord

An Open Letter to Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe On the Subject of Detonator Cord

by Scott Creighton

I wish to first thank each and every one of you for your continuing efforts to bring the serious questions that still permeate the official 9/11 investigations to light. I hope that in time, your efforts will rank among those of Daniel Ellsberg, Bob Woodward , and Carl Bernstein.

I also wish to congratulate you on the recent publication of your peer reviewed article “Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction“, published in The Open Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 2 Issue 1, by Bentham Open. This is a huge step in the struggle for credibility in an atmosphere where any mention of discrepancies in the “official story” of  9/11 equates to professional suicide.

The courage it takes for you to continue your research and lectures is not lost on us and if I may be so bold as to speak for some of the 9/11 Truth seekers; thank you.

But this is by no means a fan letter and I know your time is valuable, so I will get to the point.