“First of all, I THINK, there’s never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil.”

by Scott Creighton

“First of all, I think, there’s never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil.”

“The administration (the OBAMA administration)  has not carried out drone strikes inside the United States and has no intention of doing so.”

President Obama couldn’t bring himself to say that a drone has never been used against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil.

Seems like an easy statement to make, right? No drones used against citizens in this country?

Think again jackasses. There is a REASON they couch their statements in such a legalese manner.

Yes, a drone has been used against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. It happened back in 2001 at the Pentagon despite what disinfo agents like Mike Rivero claim. That was not Flight 77, it was one of the two missing Global Hawks painted to look like Flight 77.

Not hard to figure out when you look at the prevailing evidence.

“First of all, I think, there’s never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil.”
“The administration (the OBAMA administration) has not carried out drone strikes inside the United States and has no intention of doing so.”

About these ads

7 Responses

  1. Scott, speaking of 9/11, did you hear about what happened to Philip Marshall?

    Really spooky stuff… :(

    • no. What happened?

    • It looks like yet another neutralization. Greenmon didn’t give any links so I had to do a bit of an investigation. Here’s a synopsis on Boing Boing (Philip Marshall allegedly shoots his entire family, then himself, a few days ago):

      http://boingboing.net/tag/philip-marshall

      But Wayne Madsen (who I basically trust) uses an InfoWars video (I’ve not so much faith in them) to broadcast his Really Shocking investigation into the bizarre Philip Marshall neutralization scenario:

      Wayne Madsen Investigates Suspicious Murders of Activists

      • I don’t know. Big red flags on this one. I am ALWAYS skeptical of any so-called truth advocate who is former CIA. Plus the guy was “setting up his ex-wife in the import business in Turkey”?!?! What?

        No note, just “went off”, local kids told to mention a diagnosed mental illness in conjunction with firearms?

        Yeah it sounds very odd. But in the end, again, when a CIA guy comes out claiming to be in the movement and gains a certain amount of traction and attention by getting a book published (you know how hard that is these days?) I have to wonder.

        Perhaps this has more to do with the “business’ he was setting up in Turkey. He was after all involved in Iran-Contra running guns and drugs for the CIA.

        Think Turkey has some guns being run in there these days to the FSA?

        Could he have been using his ex-wife as cover on the business license?

        Does that sound a little more current and possibly relevant? Another Iran Contra gone bad?

  2. but its OK to carry out drone attacks on citizens of other counrires.
    implied in Obamas statement is a tacit admission drones are dangerous and frightening

  3. But, how many bullets were pumped into that pick-up truck driven by those two lady paper carriers?

    Reminds me of some words in a song? I’ve heard:
    “…the more evil the empire
    the more paranoid the society…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 906 other followers

%d bloggers like this: