Judge Napolitano Shows his True Colors: Shills on Studio B for Regime Change in Egypt

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Some have claimed that Napolitano did not lie during the interview. I disagree. He did. At the end of this article, I will show with a transcript and links to facts proving that he is lying.

UPDATE: James Corbett gets it wrong claiming that the “revolution” has just begun (I guess he implies that the previous one to overthrow Mubarak was fake) to get rid of the “new” dictator, Morsi. He actually claims that there isn’t much MSM attention being paid to this and then starts to cite a Voice of America article on the subject as a reference. Why doesn’t he just go straight to the source and quote Foreign Policy magazine while he’s at it. Corbett could not be more wrong in his interpretation of the news. He claims that Morsi had declared he is about the “lawmakers” as well as the courts when in fact its the justices that already disbanded the lower house of parliament in Egypt and Morsi was protecting the upper house so they couldn’t disband them as well. He also fails to mention that Morsi wants to retry Mubarak and his crony business buddies for crimes committed against the people during the previous revolution and the fact that the justices all support Mubarak and his crony capitalist friends of the United States. None of this is mentioned by James. “We could be about to see the beginning of a real revolution in Egypt

Thanks for nothing James. Madame Secretary says the check is in the mail. Try reading the constitution that Morsi wants to put to the people for a vote before opening your mouth again.

UPDATE: Michael Rivero gets it right on his show today at What Really Happened. Good for him! Someone let him know about the English translation of the constitution linked below. He could get it to a lot of people out there so they could see what the MSM and the fake alternatives are working against.

UPDATE: Same bullshit story being sold to the left by HuffPuff as well…. that tells you something doesn’t it, HuffPuff and Fox selling the same lies

—–

Judge Napolitano is a liar

Many of the “libertarians” (read as “neoliberals”) out there have been singing the praises of Judge Napolitano for quite a while  now, considering him someone who (and I really hate to use this ridiculous phrase) “speaks truth to power”

I figured all along the guy was just being positioned to have a certain amount of credibility which he would later use in the service of his globalist paymasters one day.

Well, that day is here.

Napolitano just went on Studio B with faceman Sheppard Smith to completely misrepresent the new Egyptian constitution claiming, falsely, that it is “just like Iran’s”, setting up religious leaders as the heads of the country. Nothing could be farther from the truth. He also claims that the constitution is unlike a Western one which emphasizes “individual rights”

The following are excerpts from the constitution in question which prove Judge Napolitano is a liar:

“No political party shall be formed that discriminates on the basis of gender, origin or religion.”

“The State shall ensure safety, security and equal opportunities for all citizens without discrimination.”

“Dignity is the right of every human being, safeguarded by the State.”

“All citizens are equal before the law. They have equal public rights and duties without discrimination.”

“Individual freedom is a natural right, safeguarded and inviolable.”

“Any person arrested, detained or whose freedom is restricted in any way, shall be treated in a manner preserving human dignity. No physical or moral harm shall be inflicted upon that person.”

“The private life of citizens is inviolable. Postal correspondence, wires, electronic correspondence, telephone calls and other means of communication shall have their own sanctity and secrecy and may not be confiscated or monitored except by a causal judicial warrant.”

“Private homes are inviolable. With the exception of cases of immediate danger and distress, they may not be entered, searched or monitored, except in cases defined by law, and by a causal judicial warrant which specifies place, timing and purpose. Those in a home shall be alerted before the home is entered or searched.”

“Freedom of belief is an inviolable right.”

“The State shall guarantee the freedom to practice religious rites and to establish places of worship for the divine religions, as regulated by law.”

“The right to private assembly is guaranteed without the need for prior notice. Security personnel shall not attend or intercept such private meetings.”

Of course, the Studio B website fails to provide their readership with a link to the English translation of the constitution so they could read it for themselves. Instead Napolitano constantly repeats the notion that the White House, the Obama administration, “understands” what is at stake here, i.e. “letting this constitution stand in Egypt” and of course the implication is that “something” has to be done to stop it.

I have posted the full translation of the constitution here and I am still working through it.

For those of you out there still arguing that it’s Morsi who is working for the state department on this one, you’re on the same side as Fox News. Just thought I would point that out.

UPDATE: partial interview transcript:

1. Morsi as “dictator”

SS: the best way to describe what Morsi did was he came in and basically tried to make himself a dictator.

Judge: He did.

That’s not true. What Morsi did was prevent the judiciary (who is loyal to the dictator Mubarak) from disbanding the other house of parliament in an effort to keep a new constitution from being written. He protected his office and the remaining elected legislators. It’s also important to note that he was targeted by the judiciary when Morsi reassigned a prosecutor who had just dropped all charges against Egyptian officials who were responsible for the deaths of protesters during last year’s uprising. They were Mubarak supporters and the judiciary wanted them to get off the hook. Morsi reassigned the prosecutor to the Vatican I believe. Morsi also wants to try Mubarak along with the others for those deaths.

Many activists, including opponents of the Brotherhood, criticize the judiciary as packed with judges and prosecutors sympathetic to Mubarak.” AP

“Morsi supporters counter that the edicts were necessary to prevent the courts, which already dissolved the elected lower house of parliament, from further holding up moves to stability by disbanding the assembly writing the new constitution, as judges were considering doing. Like parliament was, the assembly is dominated by Islamists. Morsi accuses Mubarak loyalists in the judiciary of seeking to thwart the revolution’s goals and barred the judiciary from disbanding the constitutional assembly or parliament’s upper house.NPR

“In a nod to revolutionary sentiment, Morsi also ordered the retrial of Mubarak and top aides on charges of killing protesters during the uprising. He also created a new “protection of the revolution” judicial body to swiftly carry out the prosecutions.” AP

Say what you want about his motives, Morsi was NOT setting himself up as a dictator. He was taking necessary action to prevent one branch of government from abusing their powers and thwarting the revolutionary change and accountability the people in Egypt struggled and died for.

Read this section in the new constitution and tell me it describes a dictator only beholding to Sharia law:

Chapter Two: Executive Authority

Section 1: The President

Article 132
The President is the Head of State and chief of the executive authority. He looks after the interests of the people, safeguards the independence and territorial integrity of the motherland, and observes the separation between powers.

He carries out his responsibilities in the manner prescribed in the Constitution.

Article 133
The President of the Republic shall be elected for a period of four calendar years, commencing on the day the term of his predecessor ends. The President may be reelected only once.

The process of the presidential election begins at least 90 days before the end of the presidential term. The result is to be announced at least 10 days before the end of term.

The President of the Republic may not hold any partisan position for the duration of the presidency.

Article 137
Before assuming the presidential position, the President of the Republic shall take the following oath before the House of Representatives and the Shura Council: “I swear by Almighty God to loyally uphold the republican system, to respect the Constitution and the law, to fully look after the interests of the people and to safeguard the independence and territorial integrity of the motherland.”

Does that describe a madman making himself dictator? Do you see any mention of Sharia law?

2. Deliberately misleading his viewers

Judge: While he was doing that, he got the legislature, which was also elected with him, to write a new constitution, without any debate, without any input and against the rules of the present constitution and he’s just putting it out there for the public to vote on

That’s kinda what the revolution was about. Getting rid of the constitution which allowed for a 20 year brutal dictatorship and writing a new one. They’ve been writing it and debating it for months now, and it was supposed to take another 2 months or so of debate and fine tuning. But the Mubarak supporting judiciary got wind of it, because it isn’t a secret, and they figured out that the US and other neoliberal states wouldn’t like it. So, THEY tried to kill it.

As to that last little statement by Judge, “just putting it out there for the public to vote on it”… what a horror that is, huh? Letting the PEOPLE decide if they want it or not.  That’s supposed to be the actions of a guy setting himself up as dictator?

3. Directly lied and mislead his viewers about the judges

Judge: Why are the judges so upset? Well, the Egyptian system of judges is very similar to ours and the British system. Judges can say to the government “that’s unconstitutional you can’t do it”. Not so in the Islamic world. Which is what this new constitution will have. Their goal and object and oath will be fidelity to Sharia law not to the Western law of individual rights and divided powers as we understand it. That’s the problem right now

Aside from a lie of omission which is still a lie (obviously I have already detailed and linked to sources showing that is NOT the problem nor the motivation behind the judges doing what they did… they are loyal to our puppet Mubarak and the powers (U.S., Britain, Israel) that propped him up for decades) what Judge says is absolutely not true.

As I have pointed out in the original article above, individual rights are indeed spelled out, with great detail in the new constitution so Judge’s claim that it does not show fidelity to that need is baseless at best and an outright lie at worse.

Chapter Three: The Judicial Authority

Section 1: General Provisions

Article 168
The Judicial Authority shall be independent, vested in the courts of justice, which shall issue their judgments in accordance with the law. It’s powers are defined by law. Interference in the affairs of the judiciary is a crime that is not forfeited by the passing of time.

As to the divided powers that he claims are in our “Western” constitution but not this new Egyptian one:

Article 6
The political system is based on the principles of democracy and shura (counsel), citizenship (under which all citizens are equal in rights and duties), multi-party pluralism, peaceful transfer of power, separation of powers and the balance between them, the rule of law, and respect for human rights and freedoms; all as elaborated in the Constitution.

Once again, he is absolutely wrong. You may claim that he is wrong due to ignorance, but I feel that if someone goes on the news as an expert in a matter he is duly responsible for what he says in this regard. If he is wrong, and claiming to know what he is talking about, then my assumption is that he is making a false statement on purpose.

As to his claim that the new constitution only seeks fidelity to Sharia law and the judiciary will ONLY take an oath to that:

Article 74
Sovereignty of the law shall be the basis of rule in the State.

The independence and immunity of the judiciary are two basic guarantees to safeguard rights and freedoms.

Article 76
Penalty shall be personalized. There shall be no crime or penalty except in accordance with the law of the Constitution. No penalty shall be inflicted except by a judicial sentence. Penalty shall be inflicted only for acts committed after a law has come into force.

These passages are of critical importance to show what Judge claims is patently untrue. The “law” is the basis of rule in the State, not Sharia law, but the constitution itself. Again this is made perfectly clear in article 76: “ There shall be no crime or penalty except in accordance with the law of the Constitution“… NOT “Sharia law” as Judge claims, but the law of the constitution.

Big difference. he’s using the stereotypical fear of the creeping “Sharia law” boogeyman to influence his Fox News viewers.

As to Judge’s preposterous claim that the only oath they will take is too Sharia law:

Article 86
Prior to the start of his or her tenure, a Member shall take the following oath before his or her Council: “I swear by Almighty God to loyally uphold the republican system, to respect the Constitution and the law, to fully look after the interests of the people, and to safeguard the independence and territorial integrity of the motherland.”

That is the actual oath of office that they are to take in the two bodies of legislature.

Where does that say ANYTHING about Sharia law?

You may argue that Judge got up there knowing nothing about what he was talking about but that does not excuse the fact that he got nearly EVERYTHING he said ABSOLUTELY WRONG in the first part of the interview.

He was SO wrong, and so wrong in ways that support the administration’s posturing for regime change in Egypt, that I concluded that he had to do it on purpose.

And I stand by it.

Morsi is not a saint. But he’s also not Mubarak either.

He’s not our puppet and he’s proved that over and over again. State didn’t like him interfering in the Israeli attack on Gaza and they had to rush down there and take credit for the cease fire agreement that he put together.

They have MANY reasons not to like this man or the direction he is taking the country. Foremost of these is this new constitution which is about as anti-neoliberal as a constitution can get. It is a slap in the face of the globalist agenda and if allowed to stand, to be voted on by the people (which Napolitano seems to resent) it will serve as a bad example to other Middle Eastern nations.

Like Cuba, that can’t be allowed.

As to Judge and my assessment of him, I stand by it. He’s a liar. And I proved it.

About these ads

27 Responses

  1. Been watching this Blowhard Marshmallow with curiosity too. Flat out Fake Huff n Puff. Touching a Turd with gloves on isn’t really touching it at all. When he pulls a Desert Eagle out snaps off the safety and stomps offstage actually hunting the Judas Clones he purports to despise, I’ll raise to him a glass of Cheer.

  2. thank you, figured something was wrong with him … have to admit some of the things he said sounded pretty appealing. i.e., when he said to shoot the drones right out of sky …

  3. I guess the bottom line will be if Morsi, if he gets the chance, upholds the constitution over time.

    We know a little about one country that has/does not.

    The US, Israel, and a few others thrive on the ‘balkanization’ of the region. I think the plan is to never have Egypt become strong so all they can do is watch as the other dominos fall. The Egyptian people will have a difficult time with this and all we can do is pull for them and try to point out the liars.

  4. so, from your English translation … Article 82
    The legislative power shall consist of the House of Representatives and the Shura Council.
    wikipedia … shura coucil.

    looks like the one quote you have calling out the judge for say it is “setting up religious leaders as the heads of the country.” turns out to be true. The fact that it outlines personal liberties not to be discriminated against also appears to be true. But Judge Napolitano didn’t say it that it wasn’t. (or, if he did, you didn’t quote his as such)

    I’m just say’n… if you want to discredit the guy, you’ll have to do better than that.

    • Its the Muslim Brotherhood. They were elected to power by a rather large majority. So what if they have a Shura Council? We don’t so therefore they have to be stopped from putting this constitution to the people for a vote?

      And notice, and I’ve read it so I know, you had to dig pretty deep to find one line which you could claim is along the lines of what Judge said. You didn’t really have to go that far, in the preamble they state that the constitution is founded on Islamic law. But again, so what? It’s the constitution of Egypt not Denmark.

      Look, what Judge dismisses, and pretty much every other MSM and alternative hack, is the rich context of economic liberties and protections that is CLEARLY written into the body of the constitution. Its very anti-neoliberal and THAT is what the US and her NATO buddies can’t have.

      And yes, he did suggest that it wasn’t a document centered on “individual liberties” when he said it was nothing like ours which, in his words, is. Uh, no it isn’t. Not like this. Can you imagine a constitution being written in this country which explicitly states that you can’t be wiretapped or have your home busted into by the cops for no apparent reason? It CERTAINLY deals with civil liberties arguably more than ours does, or what’s left of it anyway.

      So yeah, he did say that, and no, he isn’t right.

      Maybe he isn’t lying. Maybe he’s just too lazy or stupid to have read it before he went on air to rant about it. But here’s the real problem, people like him are setting the stage for YET ANOTHER Libya type “humanitarian intervention” and whether they do it because they are paid or lazy doesn’t matter too much to me, or the people of Egypt for that matter. The result will be the same.

      Here’s an idea: if they are so sure that all of those “hundreds of thousands” of Egyptians don’t want this, why not just wait and let it go to a vote…. why all the propaganda in such a huge rush?

      Here’s why: because the document as written WILL be supported by the vast majority of the people in Egypt. That’s why. That’s also why the larger demonstrations BY FAR as of late have been those in support of the writing of the new constitution and Morsi’s actions.

      Honestly, its not about discrediting the guy. He’s a liar and if you read the constitution and understand what the judiciary has been doing over the past month and who they support, you know that. I don’t need to discredit him.

      What I am trying to discredit is the notion that this is the “real revolution”… its a fake revolution, just like the Green Revolution in Iran a while back, just like the bullshit in Russia a year ago. Another color revolution to stop this constitution from being adopted by the people so the neoliberal technocrats can write THEIR constitution.

      • I totally agree that this new constitution is Egypt’s business, and they need to be allowed to make their choice in a peaceful and dignified manor, regardless of what anyone in America thinks they should do.

        I also admit that it is entirely possible that this new constitution is 100% a better when compared with what they have today. I’m not educated enough in their culture or their old constitution or anything else to have any educated opinion on that matter.

        I just don’t think that has anything to do with the Judges statements, which aren’t false.

        Also, I’ve been thinking about the ramifications of having one house of representatives, and one parliamentary body comprised of people from a particular religion. If that had happened in America’s constitution, that religious Parliament would have been defined as being a selection of prominent protestant ministers (the prevailing religion at the time). Fast forward to today, if our senate was built entirely from people matching that description…. we would have a 100 “religious, right wing, republican” senators. I don’t care what party you belong to, that doesn’t sound pleasant. I don’t care how many amendments you have protecting personal liberties, that’s still a recipe for religious oppression in some form. That is definitely setting up a single religion to have significant power over the entire country.

        All that said, I still agree, its none of our business. Constitutions are written and adopted by those who will be governed. The Egyptians know what they are choosing, and we need to let them make their choices and stay out of it. Put it to vote, and let them govern themselves.

        • “Constitutions are written and adopted by those who will be governed. The Egyptians know what they are choosing, and we need to let them make their choices and stay out of it. Put it to vote, and let them govern themselves.”

          I completely agree with that sentiment.

          • good reply …. let the governed decide how they will be governed….
            and don’t our Congress always start with a ‘prayer’? So the religion of the majority of US is involved in our government?

  5. In regards to “The Judge”, if he really believes in personal liberty, why is he working for a maniacal, oligarchial, scumbag like Murdoch?

  6. I’ve been wary of Judge for a while, especially since all the disinformation he put out about the Federal Reserve and the ridiculous solution he proposed, which Scott talked about a while back.

    For the most part, I really like James Corbett, but unfortunately this is not the first time he has royally screwed. He has shown several disturbing signs of being exactly in the same camp as Judge and AJ.

    I understand “libertarians” don’t like government, and that there are many legitimate reasons to hate government (especially those like the one many western nations currently have).

    However, social welfare and collective action are NOT bad things.

    While I don’t care too much for the Daily Kos, the website does have a very interesting article on this subject:

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/29/1049619/-Why-Libertarianism-Doesn-t-Work

  7. Damnit. WordPress ate my comment again. To repeat:

    I have several things I wish to post about. First:

    I have been very wary of Judge since Scott posted that article a while back regarding Judge’s ridiculous description of the Federal Reserve and even more ludicrous solution to it.

    While I really do like James Corbett, I have found myself backing away from him as time goes bay. This incident is not the first time he has dropped the ball. In fact, he has indicated in several disturbing ways that he is in exactly the same camp as AJ and Judge.

  8. Damnit. WordPress ate my comment again! To repeat:

    I have several things I wish to post about.

  9. First:

    I have been mistrustful of Judge since Scott posted that article a while back regarding Judge’s ridiculous description of the Federal Reserve and even more ludicrous solution to it.

    While I do like James Corbett, I have found myself backing away from him as time goes by. This incident is not the first time he has dropped the ball. In fact, he has indicated in several disturbing ways that he is in the same camp as AJ and Judge.

  10. I don’t know what happened. WordPress keeps eating my comments no matter how I phrased them :(

    • Greenmon, Scott will find your comment when he gets back on… maybe in an hour… so don’t worry…..wordpress eats my comments too….:)

      • Thank you Jan. Good to know, because there is a lot I have to say on this issue… if everyone will hear me out. Lol!

  11. I have been suspicious of Judge ever since I learned via Scott’s article several months ago that Judge had given both a misleading description of the Federal Reserve and a moronic solution to it and the other grievances of Occupy (bash corrupt members of government and let them know we know they are corrupt… like that would ever accomplish anything).

  12. As for James Corbett, I like him, but he has begun to alienate me because he has displayed several disturbing signs of being in the exact same camp as Judge, as well as AJ and other mentally unstable, “big guberment”-hating, “libertarian”, and (often) religiously fanatical “dissidents” throughout the Internet.

  13. I know many people hate government, and for legitimate reasons, but government is not the same as social welfare, cooperation, and doing things for the collective good.

    Just as many “professional” dissidents are really politicians on the outside waiting to get inside, it appears many “libertarians” are really neoliberals waiting to gain favor from the system.

    While I don’t care too much for the Daily Kos, here is an article from that website that handles this topic very well:

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/29/1049619/-Why-Libertarianism-Doesn-t-Work

    • While I generally don’t care for the DailyKos, that is actually a very good article. Another thing that tends to annoy me about the Libertarian types is how they cherry pick quotes and misconstrue things that the US Founding Fathers did to try to make them out to be right wing anarchist/anti government types. They talk about how secession is an American tradition, but George Washington wanted “An indissoluble union of the states under one federal head.”

      John Adams at one point pointed out that “the people” are the worst defenders of their own liberty and must be represented by “a strong central government.” Hamilton also makes similar statements. If people like Thomas Jefferson had been the only personalities around during the forming of this nation, it would have been finished long ago. Thankfully, the smartest of the founders also happened to be the most assertive.

      Don’t even get me started on their attacks against Abraham Lincoln. Okay, I’ve gone off on a tangent long enough, I’m done. :)

  14. Scott here is what the PR is doing to upset Egypt… always using women…..

    http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/05/15675200-men-dont-have-to-worry-about-being-caught-sex-mobs-target-egypts-women?lite

    women are being supposedly abused …. by mobs who support Morsi.

    • thanks for the link. Yeah, I wonder how long it will be before the accuse Morsi of using cluster bombs on the “protesters”. these things follow such a predictable pattern it’s almost funny.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 981 other followers

%d bloggers like this: