by Scott Creighton
As-salamu alaykum, Malala.
In the years that I have been doing this, I have come to understand that some stories need to be written and thus you yearn to do it. Those are a joy.
Others you labor through like any other occupation basically with your eyes nearly closed, reporting what needs to be reported, but with no real passion for simply illuminating more of the dread we see every day. Those you are already numb too.
But there are those few stories which pain you to write, those which you cannot barely stomach the subject matter so you recoil in the old familiar ways. You put those off, you back-burner them, constantly writing them and re-writing them in your head as your day goes on till you sleep and forget till the next day when it’s back and you hate yourself for seeing it while you hate yourself still more for running from it. Those are the stories that make you wonder if any good can come of exposing it but you know you have to in the end. Such is the story of the…
Under Reported Tragedy of Malala – “A Father’s Abuse”
Let us be clear: the Malala psyop appears to have been completely staged. Her “miraculous” recovery combined with the numerous inconsistencies as to the nature of her wounds are impossible to ignore unless one wishes to go though life being led around by the nose by anyone who uses children as props in whatever psyop they need at the time.But that is a choice you have to make. You have to choose to ignore hard facts because the face of the operation happens to belong to a child. That is a choice that I don’t choose to make.
The fact that the multi-billion dollar U.N. Education First campaign was set to kick off at exactly the same time that Malala was shot is not something that you can ignore. Nor is the fact that her father owns a for-profit school which stands to increase in size and scope immensely from this contrived incident. On top of all of that, there was a vast and growing opposition in Pakistan to U.S. drone strikes and their own government’s brutal crackdown on the opposition in North Waziristan which is now silenced because of the staged attack on Malala.
Gordon Brown is heading up the U.N. Education First program and he immediately latched onto the Malala story making her the front person for his multi-billion dollar global privatization scheme. He has a petition out there called “I am Malala” in which he DEMANDS :
- We call on Pakistan to agree to a plan to deliver education for every child.
- We call on all countries to outlaw discrimination against girls.
- We call on international organizations to ensure the world’s 61 million out-of-school children are in education by the end of 2015.
Laura Bush jumped on the band wagon comparing Malala to Anne Frank in which she CHALLENGES us to take up Malala’s cause.
In the wake of the Malala shooting incident, there have been a total of 4 new U.S. drone strikes in the North Waziristan area killing more than 20 people.
These are facts, not conspiracy theories. They are facts which cannot be ignored in the context of this truly disturbing story.
Another fact is this: Malala was an obedient daughter who apparently loved her father so much that she agreed to play this part for him, to change the course of her life so that he could use her to save his own business.
To start off with I wish to say that I owe an apology to Adam Ellick.
He was trying to tell me, to tell us something that I nearly missed the first time around and for that I apologize.
This is not to say that I was wrong for calling Adam a “CIA Mockingbird” journalist in the article I wrote about him a week ago. He probably is. He’s a freelance journalist who runs around to CIA trouble spots writing stories that always seem to help whatever cause or propaganda they are pushing at the time and like he says, he collects old propaganda posters for fun.
But that’s what he does for a living and there but for the grace of God go I
Adam wrote an article about Malala’s shooting and it was published on the same day she was supposedly shot. In that article AND in his documentary that he was called on to produce on Malala in 2009, it seems that Adam was trying to tell one story while really telling another. In that article, Adam made it rather clear that Malala was simply doing what she thought she must to please her father. He even recalled a moment when he offered to help get Malala to a private school in the states, away from all the turmoil, so she could achieve her dream… HER DREAM… of being a doctor.
Adam reported that her father wasn’t quite “finished” with Malala as of yet. Apparently he had big plans for her.
That might be why he has been surprisingly absent during all this Malala lovefest going on.
On the 16th of this month TIME did a piece on Malala which included an interview with Adam. He was pretty straight forward about the message of the film. Not much from Adam since then.
“The saga “is a story about a father and a daughter, more than a story about a girl,” “ Her father has a sort of revolutionary commitment to his cause… I can’t imagine being his child and not fully taking on everything he says,” Time
Adam was sent over to Pakistan to do a story on little Malala when she was about 11. The reason he was sent there in early 2009 was because Malala had been doing a blog for the globalist BBC under an assumed name since January of that year. She had done about 20 or 30 blog entries at the time and for some reason someone thought she earned her own documentary for her efforts.
Turns out, these may not have even been her own efforts.
Her father had put her up to writing the blog. Hell, he may have even wrote them himself.For an 11 year old girl who would later tell the camera that she isn’t political, every single blog entry has a political slant to it. And it seems like it was written by someone trying to get across a narrative while TRYING to sound like an 11 year old girl.
Go here to read the entries for yourself.
The BBC approached him to find some little girl they could create a blog around to bring the situation to light, so he found one girl who’s parents figured it was too dangerous, so he got Malala to lay claim to it.
Three short months later the BBC got the New York Times to send a documentary film maker to highlight her “brave” efforts of 5 months.
Your own New York Times documentary after your father tells you to write a blog for 3 months?
“At the beginning of 2009, Yousafzai had a chance to write for BBC Urdu when her father, Ziauddin, was asked by Abdul Hai Kakkar, a BBC reporter out of Pakistan, if any women at his school would write about life under the Taliban.” Wiki
Her blog started the exact same month that her father’s for-profit girls school had to shut down because of a peace deal cut by Pakistan and the Taliban in the area.
The film wasn’t used as much as I think they wanted to use it. They take clips from it from time to time, but like the TIME article points out, it’s more about the relationship between the father and the daughter than it is about the natural born leader Malala that they wanted to see.
There is a very interesting moment in the film, several of them actually (I recommend you watch it if you haven’t) where Malala is talking about the fact that she wants to be a doctor. She smiles until the shock of what she has done hits her and her reactions is quite illuminating. I took a screen capture of that moment…
Immediately she goes from childish elation on the hopes of her future dream to the horror of realizing she didn’t tell the reporter what her father wanted her to say. She actually begins weeping quietly after she says it while her father turns and looks at her when she says “doctor” and then smiles and stares at her. He never comforts her. She just cries.
Go here to see Part Two of Adam’s film. This scene is at the beginning of the film about 30 seconds in.
The father is a creeper. Look at this still shot taken of that documentary. It even seems that Adam was creeped out by him.
creeper in charge
The man at one point pats his daughter on the head like someone would treat a dog they don’t like very much. It’s uncomfortable watching it. The whole time her father is on the screen it makes you feel like you need to take a shower.
The film makes it clear even after the elongated 3 months of her blogging career… Malala wanted nothing to do with the politics which would save her daddy’s fortunes. She had her own dream… but…
Her father didn’t allow her mother to be filmed in Adam’s documentary. Like Adam would later say, he’s got ” an evangelical way about him.”
He pronounced that his daughter would become a politician and that she would change the world. That is HIS dream. Of course the fact that it just happens to help his personal business is not supposed to offend anyone. But it does. It offends me.
He’s very “old school” when it comes to the role of women. They are to be seen and not heard and apparently only seen when it serves a man’s interest.
The Taliban run schools which teach boys and girls in the same classes. That can’t be in Malala’s father’s mind. He’s too evangelical for that.
His daughter he treats like a commodity, something to use as he sees fit.
During the film Adam talks to him about the dangers of going back to the Swat valley after his activism has been made public. Her father goes on and on about his bravery and his commitment to Swat and says that if they kill him, so be it.
When he says this he is riding in a little bullshit pickup truck with the windows open and his entire family in there as well. He never once gave any consideration to their well being be that they get killed or injured because they are near him or what happens to them when he gets killed.
It just never occurred to him.
They are his possessions. Nothing more.
When Malala was sent off to Britain, her father did not go with her.
How do you explain that?
At one point he claimed that he was preparing for her funeral but that makes no sense. She was there, without him or the rest of the family, alone in a foreign country, after supposedly being shot, for serious surgery.
And he didn’t show up for 9 days?
He gave a press conference making a big deal about finally going to see his daughter in Britain. He was with a ranking politician in Pakistan where he made the claim that HE had seen “doomsday” and that HE had gotten through it. Then he went to Britain to see his recovering daughter and take this press photo in which AGAIN he looks like a pure creeper.
a little game: find the CREEPER
Look at the expression on these children’s faces.
I want you to do something. Look at the little boy on the right, the little boy on the left, and then Malala.
Then look at daddy and how he has grabbed their hands for the “special moment” in this PR shot.
Tell me what you see.
You can’t look at Malala’s mother because according to the creeper, she’s not worthy of being seen.
Now look back at Malala.
Ziauddin Yousafzai is a used car salesman. He’s a piece of sh*t trading on his daughter’s innocence to rebuild his failed business. God help him if she was actually shot and he acts this selfishly.
But I don’t think she was. Not even Ziauddin could be that much of a bastard.
Malala’s father promises to take her back to the scene of the crime. He has to otherwise all of this, the arraignment with the BBC, the meetings with the U.S. and British politicians, the documentary, all of it is for nothing if he doesn’t go back to Pakistan and open up an even bigger for-profit school system with all that U.N. money that is about to flood the area.
Again, he is brave. He is not concerned about his life being in danger. After all, he has seen doomsday and come through it. He’ll take his pet child Malala back with him and pimp her out to whichever politician wants to get a show with “our daughter and hero” and which ever one needs to take her along for an election speech or a fund raiser.
After all, she’s a politician now. Daddy’s little girl is all grown up now it’s time to put her to work. All that education stuff can take a back seat. There’s gold in them there hills and daddy’s mining for it.
This is the real tragedy of Malala a story of how a girl’s ambition, her dream, meets a waking end at the hands of the one who is supposed to nurture it. We applaud while daddy abuses because it makes us feel good to see another innocent corrupted. This is the real tragedy of Malala; she’s nothing more than a creeper’s prop, a ticket to ride the globalists dream.
I will not write of this again. I wish her peace where ever she may find it.
In this sense she is just as much of a victim as all those whom the drones have killed or maimed or orphaned. War is terrible but betrayal if forever.
As-salamu alaykum, little dreamer.
Filed under: Malala Yousafzai, Scott Creighton
Excellent post Scott.
thanks. i really hated writing this. i hate thinking about it.
I’m not convinced you really did hate writing this piece. However, we have to take your word for it.
I am very concerned that you know nothing of Pakistani or Islamic culture (or perhaps you do, but are counting on your readers lack of knowledge to convince them that this otherwise loving father is in fact a villain) as many of your ludicrous accusations toward Mulala’s father can be easily explained from within the culture.
For example,
It is a common sight to see muslim fathers to pat their children on their head and it is in itself a show of affection. Many Muslims would NEVER pat a dog at any point.
Many muslim women who remain covered, or out of sight when faced with males that are not family members do so by their own choice. The fact that Mulala’s father permitted her to be filmed demonstrates that he allows some choice on this matter. I know mulsim men who after settling in the West no longer desire their women to remain covered or secluded and yet the women themselves can not break free of the habit they have been raised with.
Unfortunately whether or not your story actually holds any truth at all, is certainly debatable but you sir, come off sounding like someone who’s piece has been commissioned by the Taliban themselves. You can freeze a screen shot of anyone from film and have them looking strange, evil even. This does not constitute evidence that the person actually is. I saw a litle girl crying because her dream of education (at all) was threatened, let alone her lofty ambition to become a doctor. See what your cynical eye may see, Say what your acid tongue may say, write what your uneducated mind may believe, but, but will any of this help a little girl left lying in a hospital bed?
I think not.
Malalas father sheds some tears – watch at min. 0.47: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXjQ2MsrsYY
Do Mulsims pat their sons on the head also? Guess every culture has their own style of affection.
Sorry Bev, “freezing a screen shot” does not explain that young girls reaction to forgetting to say what her father told her to say. It’s a video. She breaks down in tears while he leers over her with his sickening car salesman smile… then he “corrects” her by saying she will be a politician focusing on girl’s education.
That’s not a screen shot Bev, that’s the documentary.
Also of note, the guy who made the documentary certainly hints at the exact same thing in his Oct. 9th op ed about her having been shot. You can go read that yourself and find out that what I am saying is in fact true.
And for the record, she doesn’t need help lying in that hospital bed as your appeal to emotional authority might suggest. Haven’t you been keeping up? Her recovery is “miraculous” or don’t you take the time to actually listen to what her sainted father says?
And lastly, I have seen and can easily link to THOUSANDS of videos of Muslim men comforting their children with real tenderness, not patting them on the head like WE pat dogs, thank you very much. most of the time they are having to comfort their kids after they have been injured or terrorized by a drone strike…
truly excellent
Beautiful…
This post made me sick to my stomach, but I’m still glad to have found a new angle to this truly tragic story.
Scott Creightons’s story seems totally cynical to me. I am questioning what looks like a motivation of drawing attention to one’s self as primary. Edmund Coppinger
Scot, this piece really brought tears to my eyes with end, “I will not write of this again. I wish her peace where ever she may find it.”.
I have seen with my own eyes the condition of a dad who lost his 18 year old daughter to the clutches of dengue virus in Lahore. The posts he made on the Facebook page, you could feel the sadness and pain that cost him. But look at this creeper in the pictures, I ask, Is that a moment to smile about? Even the little one the right seems to be forced to smile. And the fact that her mother is no where to be seen in any of the pictures and interviews clearly shows that he is a man only after MONEY and his family does not promote that Malala goes out in the main stream and fight for the rights or what ever. It goes to show that he is indeed a conservative that he doesn’t allow his wife to come infront of the camera, a point which Adam clearly highlighted. A man who can not speak english well in a press conference, going after promoting education.
May the Lord bless all those who can see through the curtains of illusion and deception and write about it. May the wrath be upon those who hide the truth and ban freedom of expression when it is suppose to be free. One day people will look back at this story the same way they look backed at 9/11, Iraq WMD war, JFK, MJ, Diana, Bhutto, Zia ul Haq. These celebs were treated as Pawns. My prayers for sister Malala. She is indeed innocent.
Salute to Scot. You are a brave soul!
Scott, well done for continuing to ask the right questions, however I object to your insinuation (without further evidence) that Gordon Brown may be a pedophile.
He may be a war criminal, bankster pimp, fake left pseudo socialist , but I don’t know of any connection of him to the breaking pedophile investigations which are to the great shame of the uk, and have quite rightly touched a national nerve. Tom Watson certainly did not suggest him and was referring to someone connected to the Thatcher gov instead.
The story is of huge importance and could well lead to dead bodies in a Jersey children’s home which have ‘failed’ to be properly investigated a number of times. However to lightly joke (?) that Brown is connected , belittles the seriousness of this investigation to the uk, and lowers your standard IMO to a level where people can easily dismiss you as a conspiracy nut , and click away, when I believe that you write things that should be read by as many as possible.
You may be correct,but I find it interesting that this case allegedly involves a number of ranking officials in London and so did the 2010 story from Mike James which specifically named Brown along with others. I do not know the outcome of the older investigation but I imagine it was silenced and Brown thoroughly discredited as one might expect in cases like these. I also find it odd that though no mention of which former Prime Minister was made in his speech, everyone is ready willing and able to quickly lay it at the feet of a dead and gone Prime Minister rather than potentially leave living ones in the cross hairs. Though it may be that it isn’t Brown, the reality is, even if it was from a former regime, Brown undoubtedly had to have known of it’s existence, this ring I am talking about, and what investigation did he or even Blair run? Perhaps I should have linked to the older James investigations as well in the article but as I am sure it has probably already been “debunked’ as the case may be, I left it open to the reader’s own personal understanding of the case.
But Brown has been directly implicated in this kind of activity before, right or wrong, and the Watson speech deliberately left open the subject of which Prime Minister he was speaking about.
And as we all know, far far too often, not-for-profits such as the one Brown is heading up are exposed in some kind of exploitation of the very children they are created to assist. We know that from Sandusky’s little program and from various others over the course of history recent and past. IMO I would rather err on the side of caution than worry about my being labeled a conspiracy theorist… again.
Now, that said, that is why I included the question and the link as I did.
If you have information about the older investigation that I should see, then I can certainly modify the article and will do so after careful consideration.
thanks.
As usual, you are better informed than I am, and I did not know about the story you expanded here. I only saw the Tom Watson allegation in reference to your link, and noted that it could not be Brown as he was not connected to the Thatcher Gov. I have done a few searches on rumors relating to the Jimmy Savile accusations but had not yet seen any Brown story. As regards to the cover up, fair point.
With 12 TV personalities apparently to face questioning on allegations in the next few days, and the BBC and a former PM implicated , suppression of the Jersey investigation common knowledge, this could go all the way given public interest & demand.
Then again it could well be another cover up.
Thanks for the info
Actually, even with that information, I have taken your advise and removed the link in question. The reason being, there were a lot of alegations and false arrests under the Operation Ore program which I am sure you are aware. I don’t think it would be out of the question to assume some “investigator” could make a connection between a leading figure and the operation for their own purposes. It seems no one else was reporting on these connections, though Blair did go to great lengths to cover up the results of certain parts of the investigation.
This guy also went so far as to suggest the massacre at the school by the scout master in 96 was because the kids “knew too much” about the pedophile ring, which I find a little far fetched. If you don’t want to call attention to a pedophile ring, don’t whack em all in one shot at one place… tends to make people a little suspicious if you know what I mean.
All that said, he may have known or been involved. I don’t know, but based on the questions you bring up regarding this latest statement in Parliament, and my own questions about the history that I myself cited, I feel it’s better for the integrity of the subject matter at hand to let that particular question be addressed another day in another article.
Thanks for your candor.
Hey willy, I watched the video. The point where she cries, at first it seems she smiles and then starts to weep. I couldn’t understand why she smiled. Why would Adam kept on filming her crying? I might be confused here, but doesn’t it sort of imply that she wants to become a doctor but then the fear of the Taliban creeps into her mind and she starts crying… .? And why the hell does her father laugh after that. She is so sweet ….
It is a very odd moment, one that makes you feel bad simply watching. Her reaction is normal for a child. She smiles at first because she said what she wanted to say inspite of what she was told to say. But she immediately sees something in her father as he turns instantly when she says she wants to be a doctor, what she sees makes her regret what she said. Maybe she simply forgot and by covering her mouth she is unconsciously attempting to take it back. Why she starts crying I don’t rightly know. It’s honest though and has nothing to do with the Taliban, it has to do with the grinning man sitting next to her who smiles a deeply disturbing grin in order to cover up his displeasure at what she said. It’s a scary moment when you look at it in the context of what she says about “her dream” and his and when you consider all the other factors involved which implicate him as using his own daughter to further his personal business agenda.
I understand that there are different beliefs in different cultures and in some places children, especially female children, are considered an asset more than an individual. I understand that.
As to why Adam left that scene in, you have to look at his writing and his interviews on the subject which I link to. The guy did a good job with the documentary because I think he made the film he wanted about the situation he found rather than making a propaganda piece. He left it in because I think he wanted people to see this for what it was. He wanted people to see the father for what he was. I think he kinda fell for Malala and empathized with her in this situation, and so he made the film he wanted to make and not the commercial he was paid to make. And that has probably cost him in the long run. For that I give him credit.
:’(
Thanks Scot
Scott I love your work but I have been checking all of your links on the Malala story and I cannot find a single one that states that the UN eduction program involves for-profit schools. They all state it as an ambiguous “public/private partnership”. Your elucidation of the rest of the Malala operation is excellent, and I understand perfectly the global scam of privatization/charter schools, so I’d like to credit the assertion. It is very likely that it means ‘for-profit’, but you have repeated the claim many times and there seems to be no actual corroboration of it. I may well have missed something but I don’t even see a link that states that Malala’s father’s school is for-profit. Do you have any links that state it unambiguously in either instance, especially the UN program’s? Unfortunately, even though I’d like to credit it, it kills the credibility of the assertion when the linked references don’t state it.
What do you think it means when they report that he owns the school and it’s the sole source of income for the family? I don’t care if he calls it a “non-profit” or not, if he’s profiting from it and looks to score more contracts and thus more pay, it’s a for-profit institution.
Now, had you watched the video made by Adam Ellick that I have put links to several times, you would clearly see in the video that Adam shows how payments being made to Malala’s father from parents of children in the school have been declining for some time even before the problem in Swat. Payments from parents means its a private for-profit school. So yes, either way, it’s a for-profit venture for her father.
How many “not-for-profit” scams have been exposed over the last couple of decades?
That’s what “public/private partnership” means; it means “unleashing the power of the free markets” to do public services. Do yo think the Global Business Coalition for Education and their founders like Hess and Chevron are doing it for the pure love of educating the children?
No, the UN site doesn’t say they are going to hand over all the education money to Goldman Sachs once they get it…
… but then again, when Clinton and Bush did their little infomercials asking people to put partisanship aside and donate to the Haitian Relief Fund they didn’t tell people they were going to let the Haitians rot while they built an industrial park for a South Korean textile company either.
Brilliant Scott – you really know what you are doing, pure sanity here thanks.
Malala, One great person.
“Great”? Her father forced her to be his mascot for his failing business and that makes her “great”?
You are right, Scott. The child will be exploited by her father, just like Elian Gonzalez has been exploited by his father and Castro. By the way, the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords was another one of those medical miracles… with political benefits.
Giffords was in rehab for a year and she still cannot speak as fluently as she used to and she still has scars…. what miracle?
Gonzalez was raised by his legal father…. his mother risked killing him… our American courts sent the boy back because it was the right thing to do He is not being exploited by anybody except by people like you, maybe.
You are one sick person, I come from Pakhtunkhwa,and seen the destruction of girls schools by militants, even the leader of the TTP issued to have her killed, he admit it, clearly infront of media, its a shame that westeners living in warm homes would write such jibberish about my hero. Shame on you.
Soldat Amir…. The emotions you are expressing are totally understandable.
But the fact that this one shooting of a school girl is a staged event does not mean there are no real “destruction of girls schools” incidents.
You might want to ask yourself why all those others receive absolutely no interest from the western governments and media, while Malala is offered the royal treatment from day one.
actually if you watch that video documentary made about Malala, you will notice that both Malala and her father talk about the Pakistani army moving into these school buildings and effectively destroying them. In fact, the school he owned as it shows in the film, was used by the Pakistani military and destroyed by it.
True… But….
It’s just that I feel when people’s core beliefs are challenged and shaken off their foundations, along the lines of the incident(s) we are talking about as far as Soldat Amir is concerned, there is really no net gain in the direction of opening their eyes, since they react exactly like he is doing here: Insult, denial, disbelief and total dismissal…
So, in my long years of arguing about similar paradigms, historical facts and concepts, including the existence of god, jesus, easter bunny, etc., I have learned to start small with the truth serum and avoid the possible allergic reactions.
So, I figured I’d just give him something digestible to think about.
LOL…. allergic reactions…. I’ll have to remember that….