by Scott Creighton
UPDATE: The Taliban does not attack girls schools because they don’t want girls to attend schools. The fact is, it’s Malala’s father who holds a “traditional” view of the role of women in society. He keeps reporters from talking to Malala’s mother because it’s not her place to be answering questions and he runs schools which refuse to integrate boys and girls in school. The Taliban want girls and boys to go to school together. It’s the Taliban who is more progressive, not the for-profit “girls school”model that Malala’s father will profit from.
“If anyone thinks that Malala is targeted because of education, that’s absolutely wrong, and propaganda of Media…Tehrik taliban’s crime [that our enemies hate us for] wasn’t that they banned education for girls, instead our crime is that we tried to bring Education system for both boys and girls under shariah” Ihsan-ullah-Ihsan, Central spokesman TTP
It should be noted that all Islamic political groups and organisations throughout the Muslim world advocate education for men and women. Indeed, the Pakistani Taliban were angry at the Pakistani Military for besieging and attacking Lal Mosque, and the Jamia Hafsah complex in 2007 – an institution that teaches both men and women.” Abdullah al Andalusi
(end update)
————-
If the studies show that the people of Pakistan hate you and everything associated with you because of the fact that you are killing little girls and keeping children away from schools with your drones, what do you do to counter that?
“Miracle Malala” is what she’s now being called.
Almost every article mentioning her name ends up saying pretty much the exact same thing: “promote the global for-profit education movement“. Ongoing developments show that the Malala psyop is clearly about the promotion of this agenda as well as trying to re-brand the presence of America in Pakistan from a murdering psychotic buzzing presence overhead to that of a sympathetic partner in solidarity with the Pakistani people against their mutual enemy, the Taliban. Doesn’t seem like it’s working mainly because the people of Pakistan aren’t buying the hype, even though their government has cynically blocked sites questioning the Malala psyop.
Gordon Brown – “As Malala fights for her life, a worldwide campaign continues to grow around her in support of her demand for education for every girl.”
Idaho Press - “I am Malala” is a chorus being heard around the world. It is vital to go beyond talking points and find practical solutions toward getting more young girls an education.”
Daily Mail – “… we are standing in solidarity with Malala.’ ‘Education is one of the key things that takes people forward.”
As I have shown previously, many times, Malala’s survival is about as “miraculous” as the ‘Single Bullet Theory” that earned Arlen Specter a lifelong seat at the political table and the Malala psyop is about as obvious when you look at it.
The talking point now is that the Taliban shot her in order to “silence” her criticism of their ongoing war on education for girls in the tribal regions. So in order to avenge her attack, the prevailing PR is to suggest that we step-up efforts to bring for-profit education to Pakistan en masse and increase Obama’s drone strikes. Yeah, that’ll teach ‘em.
Problem is, there is a clearly defined history of this new campaign for a global for-profit education system, a “One World Schoolhouse“model which will offer up a nifty pro-Western education for Pakistan’s children, at the cost of billions of tax-payer’s dollars from the middle class of countries already in the throws of an economic terrorism campaign. Hardly what I would call an “easy sell” were it not for the Taliban having the bad timing that they seem to have.
The Taliban is being blamed for blowing up schoolhouses and imparting a sense of fear and dread on the Pakistani people living in these areas which keep them from going to school. It’s claimed that the Taliban are backwards, trying to keep girls from getting an education.
But all you have to do is dig just a little deeper than the surface level propaganda that is readily available and you quickly find that the overall narrative, just like the claim that the Taliban refused to hand over bin Laden after 9/11, is almost 100% wrong.
The fact is people, are scared to send their kids to school in North Waziristan but not because of the Taliban – they’re scared of Obama’s drones which enjoy an “approval rating” somewhere in the low teens.
“He added that schools in the area were empty because ‘parents are afraid their children will be hit by a missile’.” Daily Mail Oct. 20th
“Some parents admitted—and they were embarrassed to admit this, but they admitted that they wouldn’t send their children to school at certain times, because they were worried about strikes” Democracy Now! Sept. 26th
The drone strikes are dismantling civilization in regions of Pakistan where they are being used to silence dissent. A recent study about how life under the constant threat of death from above shows that people avoid the very kinds of collective human activity and community that makes civilizations what they are. It’s a long term destabilization campaign designed to make people terrified to come together in any meaningful community-based manner. That includes sending your kids to school.
But of course, that’s because the Taliban kills teachers and students, right? Wrong.
“A damning dossier assembled from exhaustive research into the strikes’ targets sets out in heartbreaking detailthe deaths of teachers, students and Pakistani policemen.” Daily Mail
It’s even admitted in this article that the Pakistani military in North Waziristan use local schools in their ongoing military campaigns thus making those schools a target and being able to add them to a list of schools damaged by the Taliban.
Apparently there are disagreements between the Pakistani military and their U.S. advisers about the need to rush into North Waziristan with more military and drone strikes. According to sources, the U.S. is keen to go in immediately while the Pakistanis wish to wait and see how the election goes.
“But, a former US diplomat now serving in an international organization in Pakistan said the American envoy had communicated to the Pakistan’s military chief that the US wanted an immediate launch of NWA operation.” Fars
Maybe the Pakistanis don’t know the elections in this country are rigged these days. Maybe they don’t think they won over enough emotional local support with the Malala psyop even though they did everything they could to control the information their people could access.
The politicians are pushing hard to redefine the perception of American influence in Pakistan while simultaneously killing civilians: a hard sell without something like a good “hearts and minds” psyop.
“While talking to state-run TV here on Saturday, he (Grossman) said that there is need for progress of the education for purifying the society from the terrorism. He said that people in US were shocked on the murder attack at Malala Yousafzai. He said that US know, how much the people in Pakistan are affected by the terrorism and extremism, adding that the US expresses solidarity with the people of Pakistan in this regard. He said that now the ties between the US and Pakistan has been back on track and there are multilateral relations between the US and Pakistan, adding that Pak-US relations are getting better day by day…
… He said that US is seeking for more US companies to make investment in Pakistan. He said that US and Pakistan should promote relations in different fields including civil society and economy.”PAK Observer
(The “civil society” field invariably mean the push for bringing the global for-profit school systems into Pakistan to give the kids a pro-NATO and pro-American education)
The last thing the Pakistani military and their U.S. friends want the people to understand is the fact that this was a staged “hearts and minds” psyop designed to make the Taliban look worse in the public’s view than the Americans who were bombing their women and children on a routine basis.
They understand that their push for billions of dollars to flood into global for-profit education program is going to be a very hard sell without some deeply rooted emotional context on which to build the entire campaign.
And thus the “Miracle Malala” psyop was born and continue to progress exactly as predicted.
.
(Help keep independent journalism alive. If you can, please consider donating to American Everyman BY USING THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE RIGHT. Your donations will help spread honest investigative journalism to more people across the world.)
Filed under: Malala Yousafzai, Scott Creighton

I don’t know whether he’s looking for the Bummer to pin some tin on him sometime, or if he really believes in what he’s doing. It’s a picture of one of our video game warriors that I’m looking at, seated at his armchair station in Nevada, aiming to help some villagers in Pakistan get their thinking right.
Comes along with an article and some other pictures:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220828/US-drone-attacks-CIA-chiefs-face-arrest-horrific-evidence-bloody-video-game-sorties.html
r ap
[...] { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1326644231210-2'); }); The Staged Malala Yousafzai Story: Winning Hearts and Minds While Blowing up Kids in PakistanPosted on October 21, 2012 by willyloman by Scott Creighton UPDATE: The Taliban does not attack [...]
The ¨We the People¨ Petitioning set up by the Osama Administration, is of course a complete fraud. Lets sign it anyway – no?
So far the Petition against the use of drones created 5 days ago, has garnered a measly 9 signatures – all Signatures bear mid eastern names – so american citizens do not care ey? The Petition can be signed by anyone of any nationality I guess that makes the process legally null and void from the start – right?
Here it is: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-drone-attacks-inside-pakistan-and-afghanistan-so-called-collateral-damage-far-more-worse-goals/6nmpJB2Y?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl
Ok, so I signed. I closed the .gov Webpage and then went back to see if I had been added for good. Hmm, went to ¨Open Petitions¨ and could not find specific Petition – it is not listed as an open Petition – Go figure.
So this is getting me a little paranoid, there is now way to get to this petition, except through the link I have posted above. This link was provided by some twitter account and it definitely leads to the white house web page, but if from there you go to ¨open petitions¨ you will not find back – is this a ruse to check who is visiting which kind of websites?
I think they have easier ways to find such websites
F***k paranoid, sign the damn thing show em we are not listening to their media crap, nor do we believe there is one mili ounce of democracy left in the USA. The article @Roy Applegate has posted makes me want to shed tears over my upchuck. Wow, must the Pakistanis, the Iraqis, the Libyans, the Sudanese, the Syrians, and so forth be calm collected and humble people that the CIA is still coordinating their terrorist campaigns. I do not know, but me as a bloody westerner, if I had to pick up the remains of my daughter/son loved one, I would be, well you do not want to know.
I have about had it!
Good article. Thanks.
You are such a liar. Even staunch taliban supporters do not claim this.
Where do guys like you come from? Why don’t you go live with “progressive” taliban for a while? Oh please I beg you.
Security forces using schools as bunkers is pretty well known fact.
For starters one has to ask this question who ransacked Malalas own school?
You would think the Swat Taliban right?
Wrong in the NYT documentary the last bit is when Malalas goes back to her own school which was in shambles used by the Army as a bunker.
Even the story about the Swat Taliban baning girls education is not the whole truth. Malalas own diaries directly contradict this edit.
Its true for most of Swat actually. Same goes for Waziristan you can easily find videos online of destroyed schools . Resident interviewed clearly say it was used by Army.
In fact if you keep digging most of the reporting streaming from Pakistani press borders on the ridiculous.
This is a verifiable fact every story thats makes it to print is approved by the ISI.
As for BBC,NYT their reporting has been atrocious.And that too due to design.
The Taliban in swat are pretty brutal bunch but thats only a part of the whole story.
If anyone is serious about what the whole Swat Campaign was about the best resource is the 50 or so cables in Wikileaks is the place to start.
As with these things the truth is complicated.
Swat was an independent state till 1970. In this time it developed its excellent school system and health system. Then the Pakistan government moved in with it crime lawlessness. Timber and Emerald mafia, Narcotics etc.
This spawned a movement by the name of TNSM that wanted the old laws back before 1970 back and more autonomy.
This movement was ignored sidelined and persecuted by the politicians who were mostly from the wealthy large Land owning Feudal class.
The movement became more radical and conservative over time. Eventually one faction the Fazlullah group became militant.
They started recruiting people from the landless peasant class. They became extremely popular when they start taking on the Land lords.
The military spokesman in an interview to Rageh Omar of Aljazeera himself says the Swat Taliban were popular and were being funded in part by the population donations. Especially women who were for the first time being promised inheritance right who sold their jewelry.
The now exiled Land lords who belong to the ANP mostly per wikileaks organized various armed bands to regain their position. These were operating under brand names like Swat Aman committee, Qaumi Aman jirga etc. However the Swat Taliban subdued them. This made the Taliban more assertive.
In Wikileaks the provincial govt acknowledges it no longer had any informers left in the valley.
Malals father is a part of the ANP and was an active campaigner for these organization,
The Military stepped in and undertook many operating in the valley. This is the time the school blowing up stories started to surface.
Who were the exact perpetrators.
I think its a mix of both. Some were targeted being military facilities, others were blown up by the military. Some were blown up by the taliban.
The TNSM brokered a peace deal and a compromise that was broken by the govt on the pretext that 30 people from swat had entered a neighbouring district.(Buner)
The Army operation was brutal. The worst atrocity being the siege on Mingora. By conservative estimates 1500 people died. The Taliban left Mingora to stop the artillery bombing.
On the Malala story the model was provided by another girl in Feb 09 Hina khan. How ever she never took of. But the story is identical.
Eventually BBC came up with this story and will fully endangered a 11 years old.
Still the public opinion was against a military campaign. Eventually the BBC stepped in again and concocted a video showing the Taliban flogging a women in Publicly..
Unsurprisingly the journalist is closely linked to the ruling ANP and its think tank AIRRA. He now works for Radio mashaal.
This fake video turned the tide in the govt favor.
There is alot more to all of this:
I have tried to collect them into one post
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?137447-Swat-Truth-is-the-First-casualty-in-War&highlight=truth+casualty
Scott, or any one else having read my above comment with the link to the ¨stop the drone attacks…¨ petition – why has nobody here signed it (yet)? I am a bit curious.
Yes I called that petitioning system a fraud, but some Pakistani getting tired of having to fear for his family most probably created it… however it may be, is there a good reason for not signing, excepting that one thinks it would have no impact anyway?
When the whole Whitegov petition thing started, there were two that got a lot of traction. In fact, the biggest one was to re-investigate 9/11. it was marketed very well in the Truth community. It was the #1 petition for a couple months. They just simply removed it after a while like it was never there. But they had a nice list of Truth activist’s names to pull from.
The other one that I remember was about pulling out of Afghanistan. That too got a lot of traction… was eventually removed from the site I believe.
I don’t advocate Whitehouse.gov petitions though I don’t mind if someone puts up a link to them. Even if you got a million signatures, eventually they would simply remove it, take the short PR hit, and it’s soon forgotten. sorry
Thank you, I do understand they remove petitions prematurely – fraudsters – I guess I just thought that having a petition like this gain some traction even if being removed would garner some attention – the more of those they remove, the more they are outing themselves as completely untrustworthy.
I am happy with your answer tough and will not post another one of those petitions even if you would not mind.
If you are really into it, don’t do a petition at the White house site, do it at Petition online or something like that. They offer free hosting of petitions and you can keep track of the signatures and it’s pretty inexpensive to have it printed and mailed when you reach your goal. I would help you promote something like that. i actually wrote one years ago trying to get the House to remove Pelosi from the Speakership on the grounds that she defamed the institution by not moving to impeach Bush and Cheney.
only got 10,000 signatures, but it was a good effort I think
http://www.petitiononline.com/everyman/petition.html
I would certainly support such an effort were you to make one.
Ok thanks, I will look into it and report back – and 10,000 is not that bad even if it does not cut the cake.
If you want to do it this site can help promote it. Back in those days I was getting a thousand views a month. Now I do that every three hours. I’m serious. I think with the right effort you could be looking at a quarter million. Think about it.
Those view counts are a petition in itself – I will think about it tough and perhaps I can come up with a petition that somehow takes in account the below comment by Jan…
Brian, I have signed many petitions in the past 10 years and nothing ever came of them…. we no longer have the kind of government that listens to Americans.
remember the petitions to charge Bush with war crimes? Plenty of signatures… but it just disappeared….
petitions to stop the wars….. nothing…came of them…
.
That is so frustrating – I have signed my share as well, also it seems not as many people creating petitions anymore.
How about petitioning a more international body than the US?
But then what truly int. Org. is not in reality run by the US? And if one is not then the reason for that would be that we need not petition them concerning the US, as the US is very likely the reason for them being an Org. independent of the US…
[...] The Staged Malala Yousafzai Story: Winning Hearts and Minds While Blowing up Kids in Pakistan (willyloman.wordpress.com) [...]