Updates on the "Innoncence" Psyop and New Cartoons Published to Help Inflame the Region

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE 2: read When Spin Goes Bad: NBC Unintentionally Fingers Our “Sheikists” in “Innocence” Uprising

UPDATE: In the original version of this article, I mistakenly connected Stephane Charbonnier of Charlie Hebdo with a Stephane Charbonnier of Towers Watson. They are apparently around the same age, Towers Watson has a branch office in Paris, and another news site had mistakenly used the Hebdo Chargonnier photo while discussing the guy at Towers Watson. Since Charbonnier’s background was only a tangential element of the original article, I have made a quick edit and left the rest of the original as it was. My Apologies and thanks to Brian and Feodor. SC

—–

French rag insulting Muslims and Jews in the Middle East. Good timing huh?

The “Innocence” psyop is becoming more convoluted by the day while a French weekly magazine, Charlie Hebdo, run by Stephane Charbonnier, a guy you can hardly find any information about, publishes deliberately inciting cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed as well as Orthodox Jews.

If anyone else is thinking about Roosevelt provoking Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, join the club.

The cartoons in question which show Mohammed naked among other insulting tricks, are clearly designed to inflame an already tense global environment. France is pulling their people from various schools and embassies in 20 nations as the publication released yesterday has an image of Mohammed in a wheelchair being pushed around by an Orthodox Jew. A reference to a recent film “Intouchables” is the heading and a caption reading “You must not mock us!” is coming from Mohammed. Intouchables appears to be a “Driving Miss Daisy” ripoff where a rich white aristocrat get paralyzed and ends up having to be pushed around in his wheelchair by a young, black urban kid. The reference of course seems to make Orthodox Jews Mohammed’s servants.

Remember, when first interviewed under the name of “Same Bacile”, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula identified himself as the director of the incendiary “film” Innocence of Muslims and an Israeli-American Jew. He also told several reporters that the money to fund the film came from “100 Jewish donors”. Turns out the film was made in a christian church and Nakoula is anything but Jewish.

Based on these two undeniable facts, one can easily conclude that the psyop is designed to inflame all sorts of people in the Middle East. Not just Muslims.

Globalist instigator Charbonnier says his cover will only “shock those who will want to be shocked“

Meanwhile over at AntiWar, Justin Raimondo uncovers some rather interesting aspects of the funding of the 14 minute “film’ which purportedly started all of the unrest (of course, bombing people, torturing people, ransacking their countries stealing their national wealth and installing puppet dictators couldn’t be the cause of all of this, could it?).

Turns out that the far right-wing organization behind the making of the film, “Media for Christ”, received massive influx of funding the year the film was made.

Media in Christ’s income has recently skyrocketed, according to public records, with receipts totaling under $200,000 in 2009 and prior, rising to $633,516 in 2010 and $1,016,366 in 2011. Where did all that money come from — was it Mr. Sina’s “substantial angel”? Nakoula claims he funded his movie project with money from “over 100 Jewish donors.” Raimondo

Raimondo does not know where that extra money came from and it’s just as likely that it came from the State Department or the FBI as it is anywhere else. He does show that Pamella Geller’s blog was talking about “angels” providing funding to make an anti-Islam film back in Nov. of 2011, but there is no proof that this was that film. Plus, donations to Media for Christ were going up long before that.

Raimondo does point out (as I did days ago) that convicted meth dealer, bank fraudster and FBI snitch Nakoula was released from prison just weeks before starting in on this little project, which is very odd considering the nature of the film and having to use a fake identity to make it would violate the terms of his probation.

Now Nakoula is safely tucked away and the State Department is demanding that no reporters ask questions about the case until they can come up with a better story.

The other day a new video surfaced of the “looters” taking Chris Stevens’ body from the American consulate in Benghazi. Cheering “God is great”, they pull his apparently lifeless body from a window and lay him on the ground outside.

While no one attempts CPR or any other life saving method, and no one seems to be trying to revive him or speak to him, as one would in a situation like this, many have concluded that the crowd seems to be celebrating his death. It’s an understandable conclusion to come to.

The Times and the Associated Press push the Administration line that the “looters” were trying to save him regardless.

That question aside, the video itself illuminates several other questions for me. One of those questions is addressed in passing in the Associated Press article. The most obvious:

“U.S. officials are still trying to piece together how the top American diplomat in Libya got separated from others as staffers were evacuated, suffocating in what is believed to be a consulate safe room.” Associated Press

That’s a damn good question isn’t it? How is it that the staff in charge of evacuating the consulate happened to lose track of the highest ranking U.S. official in the country?

And for that matter, why was he there in the first place after the state department had been warned by several sources that there would be trouble on Sept. 11th?

Stevens had been on a tour of other countries and was called back to Benghazi just in time for the protests. There had been other recent attacks in the area, one on a British ambassador, and staff had been pulled out since June, I believe. So why would the State Department ship Stevens in right before this already volatile situation blew up completely?

“There have been similar attacks in Benghazi on the Red Cross and the UN. It is not clear why the US ambassador had returned to Benghazi at a time of security concerns. On Wednesday the British embassy in Tripoli said that after the attack in June UK diplomats were pulled out of Benghazi. “Nobody is based there permanently. We have a villa there and an office, with staff travelling there from time to time,” it said” Guardian

These questions leave little doubt that something other than simply “intolerant Muslims” are behind this recent upswing in anti-American sentiment in the Middle East.

Not only does it look like Muslims are being deliberately insulted, but also, Israeli Jews as they have been lumped into both the American and the French antagonist efforts.

Webster Tarpley concludes it’s the Mormon faction of the CIA looking to get Romney in the White House while others like Gordon Duff at Veteran’s Today point their crooked little fingers at the Israelis themselves.

Personally, I think you have to go with the facts on the ground which would lead us to an Obama controlled FBI running the Innocence psyop as a holdover from their honeypot “Innocence of bin Laden” scheme, and an Obama run State Department setting up Stevens and failing to warn the consulate (then removing the memo from their website) before the attack. After all, it is Obama’s defense department that is staging massive naval war-games in the Middle East right now, and his defense department that is sending Marines all across the country in response to all of this.

How one gets “Romney and “Bibi” Netanyahu did it” from that is beyond me.

About these ads