by Scott Creighton
Amb. Susan Rice went on ABC to regurgitate the Hillary Clinton line that the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi was not premeditated and thus, there was no way the State Department could have known about it. The FBI “investigation” is still ongoing.
“Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous – not a premeditated – response to what had transpired in Cairo,”
“In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated,”
“We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to – or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons… And it then evolved from there.” ABC News
Interestingly, even though this is the company line, the State Department removed a memo they had published on their website that was posted 5 days prior to the attack telling their embassy staff that even though there ‘may be” reports in the media about pending problems on “anniversary” days, there was “no credible evidence” to support that claim. Basically they were telling their people there were no problems to worry about.
If this line were accurate, why would the State Department pull the memo from their website?
Truth is, it wasn’t accurate.
Amb. Rice’s statement flies in the face of common sense as well as statements made now by multiple officials in Libya.
“Three days before the deadly assault on the United States consulate in Libya, a local security official says he met with American diplomats in the city and warned them about deteriorating security.
Jamal Mabrouk, a member of the February 17th Brigade, told CNN that he and a battalion commander had a meeting about the economy and security.”CNN
This man not only describes his personal meeting with the consulate officials, but he also later described the well planned 3-pronged attack. Having survived the assault, that leads me to believe that as was reported before, 30 Libyans who were assigned to protect the consulate, fled the area early in the attack if not right at the beginning.
“According to one of the Libyan security guards who was stationed at one of the gates armed with only a radio, the assault began simultaneously from three directions.
Heavy machine guns and rocket -propelled grenades were used, according to the guard. He said masked men threatened to kill him at gunpoint for ‘protecting the infidels. He declined to appear on camera for fear of repercussions.” CNN
The Libyan President himself not only states that the attack was planned in advance, but he claims it was “al Qaeda” (our partners in the regime change efforts in Libya) under the direction of “foreigners” who devised the effort a month or so ago.
“The way these perpetrators acted and moved — I think we, and they’re choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, I think we have no, this leaves us with no doubt that this was pre-planned, determined,” Magariaf said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
“And you believe that this was the work of Al Qaeda, and you believe that it was led by foreigners. Is that what you’re telling us?” CBS host Bob Schieffer asked.
“It was planned, definitely. It was planned by foreigners, by people who entered the country a few months ago. And they were planning this criminal act since their arrival,” Magariaf said. Politico
These developments lend even more credence to the idea that the CIA/State Department retooled the “Innocence of bin Laden” failed FBI honeypot film in order to use it to justify a Muslim Fall uprising which they could then use to justify putting boots on the ground and taking over various countries where they forced regime change in the last year. Libya is certainly one of those nations that is targeted but Sudan is probably the most important to them.
Remember how the “Libyan Uprising” started. A few protests in Benghazi were hijacked by some of our “professional jihadists”,the same ones we shipped from Libya to Syria a few months ago. Then Stevens was snuck into Benghazi on a Greek freighter, slinked in like a little snake at night. He then helped coordinate the terrorists actions of the jihadists mercenaries from within and helped plot out the deliberately misleading “news” coming out of the country. Eventually, Chris Stevens is credited with being the main reason NATO was eventually allowed to bomb the shit out of the general population of Libya til their beloved leader was murdered by the very same “professional jihadists” who eventually got the assignment to kill Stevens himself.
To any thinking and informed person who knows what Libya was really like before Hillary Clinton decided to appease her owners by decimating that country for their neo-liberal mergers and acquisitions looting, knows that if Chris Stevens is really as responsible for it as they say, he was actually a war-criminal, not a hero.
Interestingly, the State Department still refuses to release details as to how Stevens died. Could be because his body looks like it was already in a state of rigor mortis when those photos were taken. Also of note, the ENTIRE staff had been moved to another location, but SOMEHOW Stevens was not with them. He supposedly died in a locked room with steel bars on the windows and doors. Also of interest, Stevens wasn’t even supposed to be there. He had been sent to Benghazi to assist in the removal of the staff… how does that happen if the State Department didn’t know anything about the pending attacks and why would they send the highest level diplomat in the country to evacuate non-essential personnel?
There are lots of questions about this situation not the least of which being how they have now suffled the maker of the “Innocence of bin Laden” video off to some secret hiding place. If these people, these “foreigners” have indeed been planning this effort the entire time they were in country, then it would make sense that the blame for this false flag effort falls in the lap of the State Department.