State Department Circles the Wagons on the "Innocence" Psyop - The People Aren't Allowed to Ask Questions

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: Anti-Islam film excuse for more US boots on ground: Analyst (someone else comes to the same conclusion… no wonder the State Department says “no more questions”)

“How DARE you question the Great and Powerful OZ!?” Victoria Nuland

That darned internet is screwing up a perfectly good psyop once again!

Victoria Nuland has told the press that the State Department isn’t going to allow anymore questions about the consulate attack in Benghazi which claimed the lives of Chris Stevens and 3 other U.S. citizens even though it has become clear that the state department knew about the pending attacks 48 hours in advance and thus, they are culpable at least as far as criminal negligence is concerned. Could people lose their cushy jobs? Did they “allow” it to happen or “make” it happen? No one gets to know because no one gets to ask…

“All aspects of the attack, including what led up to it, its causes, the identity of the perpetrators, and the circumstances surrounding the death of Amb. Chris Stevens and the other three Americans,are off limits for reporters.” Foreign Policy mag

Nuland states that because the FBI is heading over to Libya to “investigate” what happened, no one in the Obama regime will allow questions about any aspect of this current psyop.

Reporters who were present at the time she made the draconian proclamation reminded her of the misinformation that the Clinton State Department had given at the beginning of all of this, and asked if she was good with letting that disinfo remain til further notice. “Yep” was pretty much her answer.

“The U.S. government is going to be happy to let incorrect information stand?” one reporter asked.

“I will make a personal pledge to you that if I become aware that information we gave that first night is radically wrong in a way that you deserve to know, I will do my best to get that information to you,” Foreign Policy mag

In other words, (please read in an angry, shrill voice) “shut the fuck up copyboy and give us time to fix the spin!!!!“

What has happened is the story has been blown wide apart. Thanks to the few real reporters out there still investigating news, we have come to understand that their little narrative isn’t holding up and more and more it looks like this entire thing was simply an early October Surprise made to order by the imperialist West looking for justification to put boots on the ground in various “7 countries in 5 years” nations.

What we have found out is that:

1. the State Department knew of the pending attacks at least 48 hours prior to the first attack on the Benghazi consulate.
2. The prime suspect is a convicted drug dealer and bank fraud felon who turned into a confidential informant working directly with the feds (FBI?)
3. It looks like the “Innocence of bin Laden” “film was an FBI honeypot sting looking to entrap Muslims in the Hollywood area which failed miserably
4. The consulate security provided by Libyan factions fled, all of them, rather than remaining to protect the Ambassador as Obama said at one time
5. The consulate security may have even tipped off the raiding mob as to the location of the 4 U.S. citizens who died
6. Security at the consulate was very lax considering the warning that the State Department had prior to the event.
7. Cris Stevens did not in fact die in a mortar attack as was originally reported by the State Department and judging from the condition of his body, it looks as though he was beaten and possibly killed up to 30 hours prior to the photos taken of him in the consulate yard.
8. Serious questions arise as to why Stevens was in Benghazi in the first place seeing as how he had been on a diplomatic mission in Germany and other locations and returned to Libya just in time for this event.
9. The “film” itself was partially produced on a lot used to make TV’s “JAG”, an expensive location for a guy who couldn’t rub two dimes together without having to tell his probation officer about it. Who funded the psyop?
10. And who exactly reedited the crappy honeypot movie in the first place to serve this need and then translated it and made it available to the Egyptians to publicize anyway? Aren’t the Egyptians on board with the globalist state department? For that matter, aren’t the al Qaeda terrorists who we paid to overthrow Gadhafi our puppets as well? I wonder why they would suddenly attack our consulate some 48 hours after the State Department knew all about it.

While the FBI dances off to Benghazi to look for some captured member of the growing Green Revolution to frame up, they have secured Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, whisked him away dressed like the Mummy, so he can’t run his mouth anymore and screw up their little destabilization keystone.

They put him under “wraps” so to speak because the LAST thing they want is for someone to get a picture of this guy to the actors in the film and ask them if it’s Sam Bacile.

Someone should probably remind Nakoula of that little “Dr. Ivins” story as he turns himself over to the “protection” of the FBI.

The fact that Victoria Nuland had to put the kibosh on the whole story, front middle and back, tells you a lot about how well they think these things out before lighting the matches.

There are several good articles I have written on the subject of this “Innocence’ psyop and the FBI sting operation that led up to it.

check them out here.

About these ads