by Scott Creighton
A well meaning commenter left a note on one of the Aurora Massacre shooting threads laying out what he believes to be the “simplest explanation” to what happened at the Century 16 theater in Aurora Co. back on July 20th, 2012. the comment he left is well reasoned and makes some very valid points about the direction our unofficial investigation has taken. The reader, Gray, is genuinely concerned about getting to the truth about what happened, but I feel he’s overlooking the obvious in this case, not seeing the forest for the trees so to speak. So I left him a little reply and thought it may be a good thread to post on the subject in light of the strained and convoluted “fake motion letter” that just came out yesterday which I am writing about now. What is below is simply a reposting of that reply I left Gray:
But you see, that is not the simplest explanation of what happened.
Look at all the hoops and rings they are having to create and then jump through to make it seem that Holmes had motive and opportunity to do this crime. How did he learn how to set the traps? Why did he warn the cops? What about the conflicting eyewitness reports? What possible motive did he have to pick that theater? How did he know when the shooting scene was going to take place? How did he set his stereo to go off just then? why use bird shot to reduce fatalities? A “fake goatee”? “Stick figure drawing confessions”? “100mgs of Vicodin”? How did he suddenly become a cold blooded seemingly experienced urban assault killer? How did he know how long he had before the police would arrive? How did he pull it all off and then suddenly become so drugged out they couldn’t even get a mug shot photo of him? etc etc etc
You think that’s the easiest explanation?
No. Not even close.
The easiest solution is this one: it’s part of a larger destabilization campaign, like the many we have run before in other countries, like the several we are running RIGHT NOW in other countries, utilizing an “asset” (foreign or domestic), targeting a carefully selected film for propaganda reinforcement purposes, and targeting a theater chain which just so happens to be in direct competition with the interests that own the school were nearly ALL THE EVIDENCE is coming from because that’s where the patsy was chosen.
That’s the easiest solution to the problem and it’s the ONLY one which conforms to the evidence presented at this point.
Then you throw in the degree to which the MSM pushed the “lone nut gunman” story from the very beginning, going so far as to deliberately misrepresent statements made by his parents, Ray Kelly interjecting the fraudulent story that he “claimed to be the Joker”, Oates immediately stating that they weren’t looking for any other suspects even though their own reports clearly showed that the police on the scene thought there was another and witnesses as well…
… and now all of the distraction being tossed into the mix as well as the judge ordering a seal on the evidence of the case and issuing a gag order which he is clearly selectively enforcing….
uh… if Holmes did it, they wouldn’t seal the evidence and force a gag order on the trial. no way. end of story. the only reason to do that is to prevent information from leaking out that HARMS the prosecution’s case (the official story)
no, the simplest solution to this is that it was as that military guy said in his note, a “mass casualty operation” like the Kandahar Massacre.
Are others now aware of that and helping to cover it up for various reasons? Of course. They weren’t part of it to start with, but they understand that careers are at stake as well as lives perhaps. But the SIMPLEST explanation as to why some are helping to cover this up in the aftermath is this… to expose it would cause civil unrest in that town, perhaps rioting, looting, mass arrests, perhaps even deaths. It might expose an ancillary role played by a LEADING member (or institution) of the community as well as a PRIMARY role by a faction of the military which is CLEARLY capable of doing great harm to the public when it serves their interests.
In short, sometimes exposing the truth does more damage than leaving the lie intact. All you have to do is have a relationship or children to understand that.
So, is “holmes did it” the “simplest explanation” for what happened in Aurora, Co.? No. Not by a long shot. Nor is it the most accurate conclusion based on a variety of evidence as well as the behavior of all parties involved since.