I haven’t seen all of this yet so I can’t endorse it until I do. Perhaps some of you have seen it and can comment on the film. It came out late last week.
UPDATE 6: Ahh, then the film delves into the magic pixie dust drug and shows clips from that video that is making the rounds out there. Let me ask you guys a question…. when the trashy drug dealer finally delivers the drug to the film makers after feeding them a bunch of bullshit about it’s effects for 30 minutes or so, he comes back to the car whacked to the gills on something. According to the film, the drug makes you susceptible to whatever someone tells you, not whacked out high jumping around inside the car. The drug dealer is obviously high on meth or Special K or something like that. The guy was running a scam on them, it’s obvious. Telling them what they wanted to hear in order to take their money and score some drugs for himself. Remember the woman at dinner telling the story of her cabbie uncle getting dosed on the drug? What did she end up saying about it? Nothing. Each story about someone being duped into giving away their shit or stealing from their loved ones while under it’s influence can be explained simply by remembering that is typical behavior of someone whacked out on something like heroin or crack and being manipulated by the people that got them high. They just don’t want to admit it. If the drugged out dealer really could get his hands on a drug like that, why do you think he’s dressed like a homeless man? Wouldn’t he just get the drug, give it to unsuspecting tourists, and take all their money? Think about it folks.
Upon further review, the film does cover some good aspects of the case such as the extra gas mask and the witness statements and the discrepancy between the truth about Holmes’ past and what is presented by the media (and exposing the fact that the police chief didn’t address the questions about the security camera). But in the end, I can’t endorse the angle that some kind of MK Ultra drug/programing was used on Holmes. That evidence just doesn’t add up.
UPDATE 5: As pointed out in this video, the entire story of Holmes’ withdrawing from the university comes from a claim that on June 10th 2012 James sent them an EMAIL. An “email”? Anyone can send an email from someone’s home office or even hack into their account and send it. Less than 10 days prior to the attack they get an email from Holmes withdrawing from the school?
UPDATE 4: Then the maker of the video claims was an assault rifle found inside the theater as well as the one outside based on a communication from an officer in the theater. What the officer said was there were magazines from an assault rifle found in the theater “so everyone be careful” because it’s an assault rifle.
UPDATE 3: The maker of the video superimposed “Holmes received $21,000 in June of 2011″ over a video of a Fox News reporter asking the legitimate question of how Holmes could afford all that equipment and the film maker’s implication, once again, is that the government PAID Holmes to do it and thus, he’s in on it.
It was a stipend to attend school paid in installments through out the year and it started a year prior to this attack, it’s what he lived on all year long. So he didn’t have a big bundle of cash sitting around to pay for the equipment.
UPDATE 2: Listen carefully to the purported audio recording of the police scanner at 6:12 or so in the video. The caption in the video states that Holmes “waited” for the police to arrive on the scene as if he was simply standing around outside the car waiting to be arrested (or shot if he was still holding the guns, that’s what would have happened)
But the recording they play leaves out one or two crucial communications between the police. One of the officers apparently asks “Is that the dude IN the white car?” after the first officer calls for a marked car to go to the back of the theater Sable side to respond to a reported guy in a gas mask. Go here to listen to the entire recording.
cop 1 – “I need a marked car behind the theater, Sable side, suspect in a gas mask”
dispatch – “we need cars south side. suspect in a gas mask”
cop 2 – “Is that the dude in the white car nearby?“
cop 3 – “everyone hold the air one second, cars where that white car in the rear of the lot, is that a suspect?”
cop 2 – “YES! we’ve got rifles, gas masks, He’s detained right now, I’ve got a open door going into the theater
cop 1 – “OK hold that position, hold that suspect!”
That’s a big difference especially considering all the various evidence that Holmes was drugged when found in the car possibly to the point where he couldn’t walk.
Why would the maker of this video alter the recording or leave that out?
UPDATE: uhhh, apparently this video spends a lot of time suggesting MK Ultra and mind control programs which is just another way of saying Holmes did it. The evidence does not show that Holmes was an active shooter in this case. It shows that he was drugged and left in the car to be the patsy.
All the research that I have done into MK Ultra states that they needed a lot of time with a subject completely isolated from others in order to prep someone for those experiments. It’s a process, not simply blowing some magic pixie dust in their faces like something out of an 80s horror flick. Holmes was in school, apparently had an active social life, these facts do not support the MK Ultra hypothesis. Now, if he had disappeared unexpectedly for a period of time (4-6 months) then it may be possible, but again, that is not the history of this case.
Filed under: Aurora Massacre