by Scott Creighton
Fuck Chris Hedges, sell out piece of shit.
WTF is the world coming to? Webster Tarpley trying to push his listeners to rush out and support Barack Obama’s campaign and Chris Hedges cross promoting the dangers of the international leftists with the likes of Duane Clarridge. God help us.
In an article written for TruthDig, Chris Hedges, the formerly stalwart journalist and left wing dissident, accepts the word of some operative who admittedly assisted in a terrorist bombing in Costa Rica as unquestioned fact when he recently tried to blame the left wing Sandinista government for a bombing obviously carried out by the CIA. The La Penca bombing.
The operative claimed that he didn’t know it, but it was the left wing Sandinista government which planned and carried out the bombing to take out a former member of their government. Course, it took him nearly 30 years to come to that conclusion. But even in Hedges’ article he admits that the target of the assassination attempt had in fact stopped working with them and eventually returned to the Sandinistas. Which of course would make any reasonable journalist wonder if the CIA didn’t in fact have motive to kill him since they were conducting all kinds of terrorism on the country to destabilize it at the time and especially if the target knew details of those attacks and would inform the Sandinistas. Clearly, the CIA had ample reason to kill him.
And of course, the operative who arraigned the bombing has ample reason to lie about who set it up if indeed he had been working for the CIA at the time. All of that seems lost on Mr. Hedges though. He seems quite comfortable helping the former terrorist and the BBC (they are the ones who published the interview with the terrorist demonizing the Sandinistas) demonize the leftist Sandinista government. Thanks Chris. Now go fuck yourself. (What happened? You get a little nervous after your lawsuit and decide to sign on to the winning team?)
Read this quote from Chris Hedges. He gets close, then he misses the point altogether.
Since the attacks of 9/11, the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM)—which includes the Green Berets, the Army Rangers and the Navy SEALs—has seen its budget quadrupled. There are now some 60,000 USSOCOM operatives, whom the president can dispatch to kill without seeking congressional approval or informing the public. Add to this the growth of intelligence operatives. As Dana Priest and William M. Arkin reported in The Washington Post, “Twenty-four [new intelligence] organizations were created by the end of 2001, including the Office of Homeland Security and the Foreign Terrorist Asset Tracking Task Force. In 2002, 37 more were created to track weapons of mass destruction, collect threat tips, and coordinate the new focus on counterterrorism. That was followed the next year by 36 new organizations; and 26 after that; and 31 more; and 32 more; and 20 or more each in 2007, 2008, and 2009. In all, at least 263 organizations have been created or reorganized as a response to 9/11.”
There are now many thousands of clandestine operatives, nearly all of them armed and equipped with a license to kidnap, torture and kill, working overseas or domestically with little or no oversight and virtually no transparency. We have created a state within a state. A staggering 40 percent of the defense budget is secret, as is the budget of every intelligence agency. I tasted enough of this subterranean world to fear it. When you empower these kinds of people you snuff out the rule of law. You empower criminals and assassins. One of these old CIA operatives, Felix Rodríguez, was in El Salvador when I was there during the war in the early 1980s. He wore Che Guevara’s Rolex watch. He had removed it from Guevara’s body after ordering Guevara to be executed in the Bolivian jungle. I would later run into clandestine operatives in the Middle East, Africa or Yugoslavia I knew from the wars in Central America. We would invariably chat briefly in Spanish. It was a strange fraternity, even if I was the outsider. The Great Game.” Chris Hedges
What Chris fails to understand is the fact that it’s these terrorists who create the murder and the mayhem on both sides of the field. It’s not “blowback” that we experience when a bombing goes off and is attributed to some ragtag Muslim Brotherhood group in Yemen or Afghanistan… it’s usually these same contractors pulling off a job which will make it clear that their bosses need more funding to prevent the next “blowback” attack.
He really misses the point here…
“These operatives invariably prey on the useful idiots, those naive idealists who bind themselves to a cause and are oblivious to the evil they serve, or to those simply greedy for money and a little power. Joseph Conrad got it right in “The Secret Agent,” his novel about anarchist revolutionaries who recruit the mentally disabled Stevie to place a bomb at the Royal Observatory at Greenwich. Al-Qaida repeated this scenario when it convinced Richard Reid, a petty criminal who was challenged mentally, to get on an airplane with a shoe bomb. The CIA is no different.” Chris Hedges
The CIA isn’t LIKE al Qaeda, the CIA IS al Qaeda. Mr. Hedges needs to do some more research. Does he think it was al Qaeda that got the underwear bomber on the plane to set off his diaper of doom on Christmas Eve 2009? Oh wait, that was the State Department…
The following is probably the most completely irresponsible thing Hedges writes in his article. I’m shocked at how obtuse he could be on this one…
“Torbiornsson, one of those dimwitted “internationalists” who showed up in Managua under the guise of journalism or solidarity, allowed himself to be used by the Sandinista intelligence service. The target of the bombing was the mercurial rebel leader Eden Pastora, once a commander with the Sandinistas who had defected to fight for the U.S.-backed Contras (the CIA found him as unmanageable as the Sandinistas had) before returning to become part of the Sandinista government in Managua. Pastora was wounded in the blast.
… “It took me a long time to understand that it was my friends who put the bomb,” Torbiornsson told the BBC in speaking of the Sandinistas. “It has been like a wound in my soul. … I cannot emphasize how sorry I am.”” Chris Hedges
It’s been a ploy by the CIA for decades to use agents under the cover of being journalists. That is a very old trick of theirs. So I wonder why Hedges doesn’t wonder about Torbiornsson’s possible CIA affiliation.
Good thing Hedges isn’t the only investigative journalist out there…
The bombing led to an investigation by Tony Avirgan (an American journalist injured in the bombing) and his wife Martha Honey, and they concluded that the CIA was responsible.[3] In 1986 the Christic Institute filed a $24M lawsuit on their behalf against several individuals all associated with Oliver North; including Rob Owen, John Hull, Richard Secord, Albert Hakim, and Thomas Clines.[3] However the case was thrown out in June 1988 and the Christic Institute was ordered to pay approximately $1 million in costs to the defendants.[4]
In 1990 the Government of Costa Rica accused the CIA of orchestrating the bombing using two intermediaries. Charges of murder were laid against Felipe Vidal, a Cuban-American, and John Hull, an American farmer who lived in Costa Rica at the time[2] and who had been previously named in the Christic Institute lawsuit.[4] Wiki
In the end, Hedges sites a Miami Herold “investigation” when concluding that it was the Sandinistas who carried out the attack. Hedges fails to mention that the Miami Herold is a radical anti-Castro, anti-Socialis rag and of course they would have assisted the CIA by reaching their conclusion. There were several other investigations which point the finger of blame directly at the CIA.
The basis of the Miami Herold investigation was some of the suspected bomber’s fingerprints ( a guy named Gaguine) they took to an expert… in MIAMI (anti-Castro Cuban perhaps?). That’s the “evidence” of the Herold “investigation” but alas, it didn’t hold up to further scrutiny (not that Hedges took the time to mention)
“However, in 2008, Costa Rica’s chief prosecutor who saw Gaguine’s file in Buenos Aires said that Argentine authorities never made a positive identification of Gaguine’s body and that the case remains open.”
So why is Chris Hedges starting to help demonize the international leftists by offering credibility to this farce put out by someone who clearly aided in a terrorist attack that killed 3 journalist and wounded several others?
You have to ask such questions when someone like Chris Hedges tells the same bullshit story as a known liar and CIA operative Duane Clarridge.
So now after his attempt to sue the feds over the NDAA 2012, all of a sudden, Chris Hedges is propping up the likes of the BBC, the Miami Herold, and Duane Clarridge. Guess that whole “indefinite detention” thing scared Chris a bit more than I thought. Sad ain’t it?
“These clandestine armies travel the globe, awash in hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, sowing dragon’s teeth that rise up later, like the warriors in the myth of the Golden Fleece, to become mirror images of our own monstrosities.’ Chris Hedges
Thanks for the backhanded support of the latest meme from the destabilizing CIA Chris… the “blowback terrorism from the international leftists”. With the coming troubles right around the corner and the NDAA ready to go, I guess they’re justified rounding us up now, huh? Course they won’t be picking you up anytime soon… not now… not now that you got your mind right…. right Chris?
Filed under: Chris Hedges, Neoliberalizing America, Scott Creighton
Wow, Hedges backing up Dewey Clarridge http://www.namebase.org/cgi-bin/nb01?Na=clarridge+duane did he get a visit from the men in black?
He’s going to be involved in a debate on Sept 12th with some of the former members of the Occupy movement about the tactics they should use (if they ever get around to starting up again… I guess they won’t do that while Obama is still running against Romney). Hedges will be arguing for the “lets just stand there and get beat on the head”philosophy according to the write-up about the debate.
http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20120816084827965
It’s funny, his recent article about “The Cancer in the Occupy Movement” correctly pointed to the agents who were there to make the movement look like hooligans and thugs, but I don’t think he mentioned once the agents that were there to guide the people into cordoned off little parks far away from anything just sitting around playing guitars and sharing food.
Are you going to possibly elaborate about Webster Tarpley? I’m rather surprised that he is now supporting Obama, but it pains me to listen to any of his podcasts…
His Aug 18th podcast is just full of anti-Romney talking points which are basically true, but he keeps making it seem as if Romney is the elite’s choice and that things would progress a lot slower if Obama stays in charge. It’s ridiculous. The neoliberalization of the country is progressing faster under Obama due to the left cover he provides and after the “election” it will speed up immensely, but the left will continue to remain silent. Obama will be much worse (and he’s been pretty bad thus far) after the “election” because he has nothing left to position himself for and they will need a major ground swell for Jeb Bush in 2016. They couldn’t have picked a worse two men to run against Obama if they tried, and trust me, it’s not by accident. The whole point is to keep Obama in office and it will work. What they want though is not to have to tweak the numbers with their electronic voting machines so they are pushing the left to get behind Obama and Webster is helping them out. Whether he knows it or not, I don’t know.
I suspected Tarpley recently after he changed his position on the constitutionality of the individual mandate in the health care law (read as “insurance industry permanent bailout plan). Again, like in this case, his logic was convoluted and strained. He’s too smart to actually believe what he was saying, but he said it anyway… again, what he was arguing for (just like now) is that we don’t “waste time” fighting the wrong fight. He actually claimed that Obama was the right fight back then (and he pats himself on the back as being the “best one back then” fighting against Obama being elected (I did my part as well as did many others, thank you Webster)) but isn’t now. I guess it’s a variation of the “least worst” hypothesis… not very convincing.
I’m also getting sick of him constantly pushing his books.
Then he drifts off into some kind of history lesson to show everyone how scholarly he is. He rants on and on for an hour’s worth there at the end. I’m sure what Romney’s great uncle did back in 18whatever is incredibly relevant to Tarpley, but it isn’t that much to me since he’s just a fall guy anyway.
Hate to say I told you so but if they fail the 9/11 litmus test they likely are not legitimate “journalists” or activists. Hedges never struck me as a legitimate dissident.
Damn, Scott — You still waste time reading stuff by the idiot Chris Hedges? I stopped reading the bullshit on TruthPig five years ago. And Chris Hedges? Figetaboutit! He’s an obvious asshole. Really! Like I’m going to read one word of his toxic pearls of wisdom!
As for Webster Tarpley, I certainly don’t agree with all of his analyses, but he should be taken very seriously. Yeah, Obama is 100% a Western Globalist Cabal tool. But, as always, the Republicans have managed to find an even bigger monster with the hideous Romney Creature. So what do you suggest? Abandon democracy and just don’t vote?
Fortunately for me, I live in a county that has left behind the two-party lock-in of plurality voting. Because of our rallying and protests, I get to vote for whomever I want. Thanks to padded score voting, I can give as many candidates (up to 20, since we can’t hog the election booths voting for everybody in the phone book) as I want: 1.0, or 0.9, or 0.8 votes. They each can get 1.0 (100%) of my vote, or 0.9 (90%), or 0.8 (80%) of my vote. So there is absolutely no two-party lock-in. Therefor I have a simple and practical available strategy.
Based on degree of preference, I will give Cynthia McKinney 1.0 votes, and Ralph Nader 1.0 votes. And will give Dennis Kucinich and Jesse Ventura 0.9 votes. Based on degree of perceived viability, I will give Barack Obama 0.8 votes, since I certainly don’t want to give any votes, or advantage, to the hideous Mitt Romney.
Unlike the majority of hapless Americans, strategic voting is available to me, and I intend to use it.
WordPress ate my comment again.
It’s been a ploy by the CIA for decades to use agents under the cover of being journalists. That is a very old trick of theirs. So I wonder why Hedges doesn’t wonder about Torbiornsson’s possible CIA affiliation.
Perhaps because Hedges is also CIA? That’s what I’m taking away from this. I’m with Chris above saying “told ya so” regarding ALL journalists of “repute” who don’t get 9/11 and won’t go on record. Most of them are probably just scared, intimidated by the CIA directly or indirectly, and then a few more “edgy” ones like Hedges are actually on the payroll. Just a theory that makes sense.
And, to those thinking someone like Hedges couldn’t possibly be tainted, here’s an interesting example, just revealed: ‘Activist’ Richard Aoki: FBI Informant
Cap’n got a big gun, ’bout a .99 caliber
Cap’n got a BIG gun, ’bout a .99 caliber
Cap’n got a BIG GUN, ’bout a .99 caliber
If he ever catch Luke he gonna shoot ‘im down
…right Chris?
(Thank you, Mr. Cash)
r ap
I really appreciated your comments on the Hedges article.
Damn, Scott — You still waste time reading stuff by the idiot Chris Hedges? I stopped reading the bullshit on TruthPig five years ago. And Chris Hedges? Figetaboutit! He’s an obvious asshole. Really! Like I’m going to read one word of his toxic pearls of wisdom!
As for Webster Tarpley, I certainly don’t agree with all of his analyses, but he should be taken very seriously. Yeah, Obama is 100% a Western Globalist Cabal tool. But, as always, the Republicans have managed to find an even bigger monster with the hideous Romney Creature. So what do you suggest? Abandon democracy and just don’t vote?
“Abandon democracy”? Wow. I guess I haven’t been achieving what I hoped to since starting this website if my readers still think this country is a democracy.
(give you a little hint: the republicans “managed to find an even bigger monster” with good reason… because their programs are going to be implemented by Obama with little to no resistance from the left)
Where do you think the left and the antiwar movement would be right now if McCain had been killing people with drones at the rate Obama is? Where would they be if McCain signed the NDAA at midnight on New Year’s Eve? If it was McCain who packed his White House with all the corporate interest CEOs, where would they be? Sitting at home praising his name like they do with the current president?
Here’s a little trick for you… one person, one vote, on paper, counted by hand while observers watch (international observers as well). End electronic voting machines altogether. That’s not hard to imagine is it? Guy (gal) with the most votes wins. That’s a form of representative republic democracy. That’s what we used to have, kinda…. in an electoral college kind of way…
What we have is not democracy and showing your opposition to the corrupt system is not “giving up on democracy”, quite the opposite in fact.
When people in other nations refuse to participate because they know our puppets there are rigging the elections, when 10% of the population take part in an election, it shows the world that the people know what is up.
“Rock the VOTE!” right? “Vote or Die!” there’s tons of campaigns designed to get people out there to vote, not so “democracy” is served, but so the APPEARANCE of consent is displayed to the world.
Personally I suggest we finish what Martin Luther King set out to do (before they killed him)… that’s a good start.
I pay attention what all kinds of people say, and he’s far from an idiot. I read what the MSM puts out, what the Times writes, the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Guardian, even publications put out by the Council on Foreign Relations and the old PNAC and it’s subsequent off shoot NGOs. I mean, how do you understand what the threat is, unless you pay attention to what they’re doing?
And I stopped taking Tarpley seriously after he endorsed the constitutionality of the individual mandate in the insurance bailout bill. Pretty much any thinking individual would do the same. Sure, he’s right on Syria, but that just buys him much needed credibility.
Of course I do not believe the US has (or has ever had) any democracy. And I have stated just your position on hand counted paper ballots here many times. For example:
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
American Everyman — Barack Obama is Guilty of Murder, It’s Just That Simple
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/barack-obama-is-guilty-of-murder-its-just-that-simple/#comment-36231
Our fake “democracy” is worse than a joke! We have machines to cast and count our votes? Voting machines are 10,000+ times easier for the manipulative leets to hijack in coordinated scams. Obviously voting should be done only with pen and paper ballots. Every community of 5,000 citizens should have its polling and counting stations run by a randomly chosen jury, certainly not by some politician.
[….]
The votes should be added up before witnesses at the poling stations on the night of each election, with the results announced before being sent to larger counting stations.
\____________________
But I also know that these measures not nearly adequate. Without padded score voting to cure the two-party lock-in caused by the spoiler effect, we still have no choice. Once the people realize that they finally do have real choice, they will take interest, and begin to second-guess the false multimillion dollar ads.
I say the best strategy is to protest in demand of these voting reforms.
Frankly, I do not believe people “on the left” (The vast m-a-j-o-rity, I think) are fooled by Obama one bit. The Occupy and 99% movement protested under Obama. I say 9/11 is the real reason people don’t protest much anymore. The Real Truth is that everybody who is not especially talented at fooling themselves is deeply aware that the Twin Towers were blasted to powder with explosives. And this was not done only to enable the start of wars. Just the jets crashing into the buildings would easily have accomplished that. The buildings were exploded in order to unconsciously instill acquired helplessness in the population. So now there are far less protests in general. I say it has nothing to do with the Obama presidency.
I also question the abandonment of Tarpley and Kucinich over Romneycare/ Obamacare. It did get the government camel’s nose much deeper under the healthcare tent. I think that law is dreadful, sometimes one must take one step backward to be in a position to move many steps forward. So I understand their halfhearted support of it from a strategic perspective. What’s the use of idealism without strategy?
In fact, the state of Vermont has subsequently adopted universal free healthcare. And as a resident of Massachusetts, I know that we effectively do have universal care here (although I still think the law is awful). Actually, most Massachusetts residents are satisfied with the new law:
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
WBUR Poll: Most Mass. Residents Support State Health Care Law — February 15, 2012
http://www.wbur.org/2012/02/15/health-care-wbur-poll
And from former Sen. Rick Santorum last month we heard, “it (Romneycare) was the basis of Obamacare and it was an abject failure.”
Selected WBUR Poll Data Points:
View On Massachusetts Health Care Overhaul:
- 62% of those polled said they support the 2006 law
- 33% of those polled said they oppose the law
Its Influence On National Law:
- A m-a-j-o-rity (54%) said they think the state law was a “m-a-j-o-r influence” on the national overhaul
- 28% said it was a “minor influence”
- 11% said it was “not an influence”
Romney’s Health Care Stance:
68% said they think Mitt Romney disagrees with the national overhaul because he’s “trying to win votes”
So you might think this drubbing would rub off on Massachusetts residents, about two-thirds of whom have consistently endorsed the state’s coverage plan since it passed in 2006. Not so. In the latest WBUR poll, 62 percent support the law and 33 percent oppose it.
“Even with all the attention the Massachusetts law has gotten nationally, it really hasn’t driven down support among voters here in Massachusetts,” said Steve Koczela, president of the MassINC Polling Group, which conducted the poll.
The difference between national and local opinions about the law is part politics, part misinformation, and partly a difference of experience, said Robert Blendon, a professor at Harvard Kennedy School. Massachusetts residents are living with the law. Opinions outside the state are based on speculation.
\____________________
So while Obamacare might, for various reasons, not work out as well as Romneycare, and is a lifeline for insurance companies, it might not be a complete disaster. And it will push the federal government further into the healthcare “game.”
Fortunately for me, I live in a county that has left behind the two-party lock-in of plurality voting. Because of our rallying and protests, I get to vote for whomever I want. Thanks to padded score voting, I can give as many candidates (up to 20, since we can’t hog the election booths voting for everybody in the phone book) as I want: 1.0, or 0.9, or 0.8 votes. They each can get 1.0 (100%) of my vote, or 0.9 (90%), or 0.8 (80%) of my vote. So there is absolutely no two-party lock-in. Therefor I have a simple and practical available strategy.
Based on degree of preference, I will give Cynthia McKinney 1.0 votes, and Ralph Nader 1.0 votes. And will give Dennis Kucinich and Jesse Ventura 0.9 votes. Based on degree of perceived viability, I will give Barack Obama 0.8 votes, since I certainly don’t want to give any votes, or advantage, to the hideous Mitt Romney.
Unlike the m-a-j-o-rity of hapless Americans, strategic voting is available to me, and I intend to use it.
Like I said, WordPress ate the above comment, which I broke into three parts above. Then I noticed that the third part contained the WordPress-verboten word “m-a-j-o-r”.
The above narrative is, of course, fictional, and only given to demonstrate a point.
Tarpley has an audio podcast channel.
It is very nice to have a decent podcast receiver to easily receive and organize podcast subscription audio and video files!
The necessary Python interpreter:
Python_2-7-3_CPython
http://www.python.org/download/
The FREE gPodder podcast receiver/ organizer:
gPodder_3-0-4
http://www.softpedia.com/get/IPOD-TOOLS/Podcast/gPodder.shtml
“gPodder is an easy-to-use application designed to help you download and manage free audio and video content (“podcasts”). Watch or listen directly on your computer.
“Download podcasts (recurring audio, video, etc. programs) from the Internet and watch them on your computer or on the go. By gPodder allows you to check for new episodes and download them easily and fast.”
Requires free Python 2.7x or newer (but NOT Python 3.x), (and PyGTK*). NOTE: The easy way to get PyGTK is to install gPodder while online; otherwise you must hack around a bit.
Mac and Linux versions of Python 2.7x will run it too. The Linux version should be installed via a package manager.
It’s easy to have a great podcast receiver!
Note: take care that a firewall does not get in the way of the online gPodder install!
I became wary of Hedges when he refused to cover deep events, and when he continually used the “blowback” explanations, and when he towed the obviously bogus official story on things like the Yugoslavia wars.
Now he really alienated me. Seriously? Demonizing the Sandinistas and other leftists for no other reason than a straw argument that draws a completely false equivalence between the neoliberal scumbags and good people who want a better world?
He just went miles over the line.
That’s probably the best summation of the way I feel about it that I have read. Short and to the point. Yeah, he’s taken some stands that caused me trouble in the past, troubled my support for him and his work. But this is way too far.
I remember when he first started getting into the Occupy movement, I and others were already saying it had been hijacked at the top and he kept insisting that it hadn’t. Well, he’s since come to a different conclusion about that, but this is going way too far especially when you look at the sources he cites.
Yeah, way over the line for me as well.