by Scott Creighton
No Joy in Paulville Today
This is a pretty worthless article so it will be short.
Surprise! Rand Paul is an establishment hack.(not much of a surprise is it?)
His “libertarian” leanings are nothing more than ideological WMDs designed to make the rebel love the fascist ideology of his oppressors.
For years I have also been pointing out the MANY various “little betrayals” that Rand and Ron have been doing.
Flashback – Little Entitled Randie Wants YOU to Sacrifice While He Cashes Those Big Government Checks
NEWSFLASH – Rand Paul is just another corporatist sycophant looking to feather his nest while suckling up to the country’s financial masters. His “libertarian” ideology is the EXACT SAME THING as the neo-liberal economic shock therapy model used by the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds for decades in other countries across the globe. Only difference is, over there they resisted it, here, the Paulites call it “liberty”
Yes, Alex Jones is out there doing damage control on this one. His role in turning the angry youth of the country into austerity measures supporters is exposed once and for all. Rand Paul is sucking up once again to the establishment, as he announced his support for Mitt Romney. And even AJ has to now acknowledge that Ron Paul was just getting delegates to use as a bartering chip for his son’s VP nomination. He also had to admit that Paul was “soft” on Romney from the start and looked to get Rick Santorum out of the nomination process. Pretty much everything that Webster Tarpley said about Ron Paul the other day during his interview with AJ, Alex just had to admit to.
But what he left out of course is the fact that Ron and Rand do nothing except spread ideological poison to young people these days with their neo-liberal libertarian message.And he also failed to mention that major 2.5 million dollar campaign contribution the Bilderberger gave to the Ron Paul campaign, but, that’s just nit-picking at this point. He also didn’t mention how many of Ron Paul’s family members are living off the “big guberment” dime which I found to be quite striking to say the least.
For all his pomp and circumstance, Alex isn’t surprised. He knew this was the point of Ron’s campaign all along. He just doesn’t want to lose his precious page views over it so he’s doing a little damage control just like Lew Rockwell is doing.
I can’t say that I take any joy in this. There are many good people who got caught up in this “revolution” who are certainly feeling pretty bad right now.My heart would go out to them if they didn’t to a man disavow things like social responsibility, social and civil justice, public education, regulating big business, Social Security, universal healthcare which every other industrialize nation has… shit like that. In fact I would be sympathetic to their plight right now if they weren’t… how should I put this… if they weren’t such dyed in the wool neo-liberals.
So, just for shits and giggles, lets have another look at Webster Tarpley’s interview with AJ the other day which seems mighty relevant to the subject at hand.
Filed under: Rand Paul, Ron Paul, Scott Creighton

sorry. I know you liked them.
not so much Rand but Ron, was hoping Rand would turn out more like his father and not a neo-con. I don’t know without a figurehead usa will ever effect a revolution
If this surprises the Ron Paul supporters then they know not of politics, of entrepreneurship and lineage, or of prodigal sons.
Ron Paul is the entrepreneur, the scion of the “freedom” movement and has talked the talk and walked the walk for a number of years now. He has had opportunity for graft, for enrichment, etc., well beyond what he has acquired. He didn’t take it.
At 76 he is tired and has done much to teach. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t have his own foibles- or a prodigal son who is an entitlement baby who has latched onto his father’s reputation to feather his own next- or other relatives who wish to live off the entrepreneur’s money while doing relatively little work. it always happens this way.
Ron Paul has taught a generation of young people about the constitution, about hard money, about the corruption and criminality of the FED, the endless wars, etc. And he has enlightened a large number of people about freedom and the current state of our economy and the criminal class. He is an educator par excellence.
But what his supporters did was turn him into Jesus, to turn him into a messianic figure, when it was uncalled for. He is not Jesus. He does not want to be Jesus. All he wanted to do was to educate.
Now all of the supporters feel betrayed that the prodigal son, who was always the prodigal son (what ophthalmologist starts his own ophthalmalogy society and then cites that as a resume builder for political purposes?). Rand always had the streak of the prodigal son in him.
Get over him, get over the fact that this was not a betray but the rational and expected actions of a prodigal son and get busy, with your own lives, using your own wits and your own creativity to make this society a better society and take it back from the criminal class.
You pumped up Ron Paul as Jesus- he will not save you.
But he certainly has done enough to teach you to do for yourselves.
As painful as this sounds, the prodigal son has done you all a great favor.
This website was long ago tell about Ron Paul and buddy relationship with Mitt Romney. There are plenty of articles to read at the site concerning Ron Paul and his betrayal.
Paul Family Continues To Betray Followers: Rand Endorses Romney
thanks papa. That’s a good article. People should go over and read it.
Regarding Elaine’s “Paul Family Continues To Betray Followers: Rand Endorses Romney” article; the premisses are quite accurate. But, at least as of two or so years ago (unless I missed something) the author was not predicting the utter betrayal of the Paul disciples. I wasn’t around when she “learned he was best friends with Romney in secret.”
She has a truly great blog, her general outlook is quite similar to Scott’s, and she’s right 98% of the time, and possesses amazing research and analytical talents. Like Scott, she has an intuitive grasp of science. I used to contribute comments to her blog, until we had a terrible “falling out” near the end of 2009. I still do not know why that happened, and it still troubles me. We have both lived lives of very high strangeness. A student of many paranormal phenomena; occasionally tinkers with tarot cards, etc. I myself have been involved in shamanism (I am not currently doing shamanic pursuits). But shamanism and paranormal adventures are like oil and water, and just do not mix. Also, we sent emails back and forth, and even phone-called each other occasional, and were basically friends. But I knew that friendship with Elaine was going to be very limited. Anyway, she began accusing me of “stalking” her on her site. Maybe the cards told her I was evil, or decided to disbelieve my bizarre life-story. I was announcing some rather radical political positions. And there was an absurd, protracted altercation concerning flu vaccines, that I clumsily tried to mitigate.
How could I “stalk” her? She has a virtual mountain fortress, lots of guns, technological sophistication, while I have only a small apartment and a tiny income. It’s absurd. Possibly, or probably, it was a small dark agency sting operation. I was extremely disturbed by the whole calamity. At the end, I wrote:
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Just do the click. I have had many friends here. And you accused me of “stalking” you. One click and I will be gone.
You really have to prove your dominance by having benighted commenters baiting me, when you could just ban me?
Think about what you are doing!
(That was always the best advice I was ever given.)
You are not “superior” to me or anyone else.
Lao Tzu was right on the mark!
If you can’t stand up to their argument, then ban them. Don’t fight for no reason.
I never ban a friend. Never have. Friends are worth more than all the gold in this world. Now stop being this way. Even If some “lowly” person such as myself has to deliver this message?
Think about it.
\____________________
Sorry to take up so much of Scott’s space with this seemingly personal comment. But perhaps it will serve as an important warning regarding the sorts of things that can go horribly amiss with websites.
As for Obama, Paul, and Romney, I always knew that: Obama is basically a mere sociopath and not of the most dangerous sort either. Ron Paul is just a play-actor, co-opting the energy that would have manifested had there been no opposition at all. Romney is a very dangerous narcissist who could care less about the “inferior people.” I presumably have to vote for Obama, or more likely, not vote at all. I will probably picket against the elections themselves and their infernal counting machines. As I say over and over:
You should be allowed to vote for as many candidates as you wish (within reason — not the whole phone book). You could give any candidate no votes at all, or 10, or 11, or 12 votes (this is “padded score” voting; the 1 to 9 vote options are padded out to simplify voting and counting). This would reduce the two-party enforcing spoiler effect to almost nothing! And it’s totally simple! The votes are just added up before witnesses at the poling stations on the night of each election, with the results announced before being sent to larger counting stations.
“Democracy” has NEVER worked, and it never will until we acquire this padded score voting. Then elections will actually become consequential, and people will invest the energy to look behind the media curtain.
I tried to watch the Tarpley interview but I gave up in disgust. Alex Jones is the worst interviewer in the history of the universe.
I must admit that I had this Ron Paul shinanagan a little wrong. I looked into Paul when I found out that he seemed to be vehemently opposed to indefinite detention and that Rand had stood against further Iran sanctions. Also, I kept finding videos on the web showing Ron delegates being illegally acted against and accusations that MSM was locking him out. Fortunately, I took the time to read his economic plan and his stance on abortion, this reaffirmed my previous opinion that he was a terrible candidate/human being.
My thought on the matter was that Paul was going to ride the high of dissidents by capitalizing on his supposed status as a political martyr. I believed that he would end up winning an astonishing victory and be presented as the underdogs’ answer to the failure of Obama’s Hope & Change. If he won, then he would serve the same function for the far right as Obama has for the “left”: nobody wants to call out their boy for bad behavior. I figured this would then pave the way for Rand’s rise to preeminence.
I actually thought that this would be a good situation. I mean, either he is going to “clean house” or he was going to make things infinitely worse and then we might all be able to admit that we need a more serious change than what is offered through traditional american politics. Whoops. Got that wrong.
Buyer’s regret finally sinks in. Strange things are happening in “libertarian” (really austerian) land. “Day The World Ended”:
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Classic Sci-Fi Movies
http://classicscifi.blogspot.com/2008/06/day-world-ended.html
Atomic Adaptation — The underlying theory in DWE, is that Nature quickly adapted some creatures to life in an irradiated world. The whole “Matsuo Test” thread sets this up. The massive radiation triggered mutations give creatures armored “atomic skin,” claws, horns and the ability to eat radio-actively contaminated food. A barbaric new “after” world is hinted at with mutant Tommy, Radick and the other business man who stumbled into the valley telling of “others, out there.” Radick coyly tells Rick that “there are wonderful things happening out there” (beyond the ridge), but won’t elaborate. A brave new mutant world?
\____________________
Penny Freeman, former staffer in tears over Ron Paul betrayals
The sheep are crying out for salvation. But the Savior does not appear!
Shit. They’re screwed, huh?
Zombie Apocalypse pre-saged:
OMG!
Day the World Ended (1955) 04 of 08
YouTube is amazing.