Obama's Willing Executioners

by Scott Creighton

“To know and not to know

To be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies

To hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them

To use logic against logic

To repudiate morality while laying claim to it

To believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy

To forget, whatever it was necessary to forget

… consciously to induce unconsciousness” 1984 part 1, chapter 3, pp 32

The success of the skillful marketing campaign of Product Obama™ both before and after the election, is so overwhelming, his administration is capable of doing almost anything in the eyes of his flock with no determinable consequence to his manufactured mythology.

No matter how grievous, no matter how much it is obviously a continuation of the previous hated regime’s affront to the civil liberties of the American people, the laws of this country and the international community, the Obama/Clinton regime’s calculated demolition of the morality of the left has forced Obama’s apologists into a kind of willfully self-induced coma which they will surely languish in for another 4 years while the rest of the world pays a terrible price.

The global elites who profit, who feed on war, depression, terror, and suffering could not ask for a better front-man. They could not ask for a more complicit and cowardly population at the heart of their economic and military engine of their full spectrum global dominance.

Where Hitler’s Willing Executioners failed, they will succeed. They are Obama’s Willing Executioners and they are proving to be the greatest threat humanity has ever faced.

“If Bush, the Bush administration, didn’t like somebody, they’d kidnap them and send them to torture chambers. If the Obama administration decides they don’t like somebody, they murder them, so you don’t have to have torture chambers all over,” Noam Chomsky

If we as a civilized nation were to hold our presidents accountable for the crimes committed by them in our name, we would have to indict every single living president and re-write the history books, change airport and hospital names, and completely rethink the history of this country since it’s inception.

Yes, other presidents have committed atrocities in the name of democracy and humanity for the purpose of nothing more than the greed of a few extremely wealthy bankers, business owners, and Wall Street investment houses. But that doesn’t mean we must turn a blind eye to our current occupant of the White House simply because others got away with similar crimes.

In a New York Times article President Peace Prize admits he is the one who decides who lives and who dies by extrajudicial homicide via drone or Special Operations Forces strikes.

Barack the Decider.

Who will he kill next? It’s a secret. But that’s ok cus he’s “The Greatest Man of Our Generation”.

This same Times article starts off by mentioning the Dec. 17th 2009 cruise missile strike in Yemen which murdered 23 children and many other innocent civilians in a particularly brutal fashion. This subject, this impeachable crime (we are not at war with Yemen and the ONLY reason we attacked these people was to support the brutal dictator Saleh who has only recently been bribed by Hillary Clinton to step down) has barely ever been mentioned in polite circles.

I have written about it extensively.

Admitted by the administration, they have avoided the sticky problems of civilian casualties in their Death Squads from Above drone campaigns by simply labeling everyone a terrorists who happens to die as a result of their bombings.

“The article describes in detail how “Mr. Obama has placed himself at the helm of a top secret ‘nominations’ process to designate terrorists for kill or capture, of which the capture part has become largely theoretical” — an actual presidential-led death panel (as always in American media parlance, “Terrorist” means: individuals alleged by the U.S. Government — with no evidence, transparencey or due process — to be Terrorists). Specifically, Obama himself “insisted on approving every new name on an expanding ‘kill list,’ poring over terrorist suspects’ biographies on what one official calls the macabre ‘baseball cards’ of an unconventional war.” In total secrecy — with no transparency or oversight of any kind — he then selects who will live and who will die.” Glenn Greenwald

Remember a couple of things.

• These people are convicted of nothing, they are simply accused
• international and national laws prohibit the wanton murder of individuals on merely the say-so of any self-proclaimed tyrant
• Evidence must remain secret due to national security reasons
• We are not at war with the vast majority of the nations where these attacks take place
• The only oversight is from this group of deciders who have ties to globalist institutions as well as to various corporations and financial interests
• The CIA is the main power behind the drone strikes and it was always the CIA who created and supported the death squads in the various countries where they overthrew democratically elected leaders and installed tyrannical despots and dictators.

Recently Barack O’Bush recently expanded the authority for the CIA to launch even more drone strikes in Yemen in support of a president elected in a “one candidate election” to include targets where the identities of the intended victims weren’t even known to the CIA Death Squads at the trigger. The “one candidate election” scheme worked so well for the globalist elites, they are pushing for it to be a model for other Middle Eastern nations.

“The United States has begun launching drone strikes against suspected al-Qaeda operatives in Yemen under new authority approved by President Obama that allows the CIA and the military to fire even when the identity of those who could be killed is not known, U.S. officials said.” Washington Post

Leon Panetta, a long time Clintonista and current head of the Pentagon (and still head of the CIA in my opinion) recently went before congress and let them know he had no intention of coming to them to ask permission to launch new attacks in other countries, but not to worry because they would “seek permission” from the UN or other foreign authorities (like NATO perhaps?)

“Let me for the record be clear again senator so there is no misunderstanding: when it comes to the national defense of this country, the president of the United States has the authority under the constitution to act to defend this country and we will. If it comes to an operation where we are trying to build a coalition to work together to go in and operate as we did in Libya, Bosnia, for that matter Afghanistan, we want to do it either with permissions by NATO or by the international community” Leon Panetta

Hillary Clinton recently set out a plan in which she is organizing a group of international Special Operations Forces in order to fight “global terrorism” again, without the need for congressional or American citizen approval. Considering how she reacted to the vicious and highly illegal murder of Moammar Gadhafi. I can only envision this to be a global Death Squad operation similar to NATO’s Operation Gladio.

“… she described a vision in which shadowy U.S. and allied Special Operations Forces, working hand in hand with America’s embassies and foreign governments, together play a key role preventing low-intensity conflicts. And where prevention fails, the same commando-diplomat team goes on the attack, combining the Special Operations Forces’ fighting prowess with the language and cultural skills of State Department officers.

She cited the U.S. intervention in Yemen and the American-led manhunt for rebel leader Joseph Kony in Congo as early examples. In Congo, diplomats met with Congolese officials, preparing the ground for commando manhunters months in advance. In Yemen, the State Department counters extremists’ propaganda with its own pro-government messages while Special Operations Forces partner with Yemeni troops to attack the insurgents” Wired Magazine

Clinton’s plan was simple, direct, and to the point: they would use our Special Forces and diplomats to collaborate with complicit leaders in other countries in order to implement our version of neoliberal economic genocide and in order to ensure it’s success, they would use the Special Forces as a modern day above board death squad to go out and hunt down our collaborator’s opposition or others in the country who look to oppose our freedom loving wishes.

In order to support this kind of global regression to the worst of human endeavors, the congress is looking to remove any restrictions on the government being able to propagandize the people of the country. In essence, they want to be allowed to lie to us for our own good.

“According to Michael Hastings : “The new law would give sweeping powers to the State Department and Pentagon to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public. “It removes the protection for Americans,” says a Pentagon official who is concerned about the law. “It removes oversight from the people who want to put out this information. There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false.””  Occupy Corporatism

Notice the mention of the State Department, ie, Hillary Clinton.

These are only a few of the most recent impeachable acts committed by the current regime in power. Remember, Hillary Clinton’s husband was impeached for simply lying about having sex in the oval office. Now she wants the ability to lie to the American people about issues that may end up causing WWIII and will certainly cause the deaths of countless innocent people.

All of this, these most recent betrayals of the Peace Prize “winning” product Obama, promise but a hiccup in the social unconsciousness of his die-hard lemmings.

But these are far more than simply betrayals like Obama’s refusal to include proponents of single-payer systems in his healthcare reform meetings or his support of FISA immunity or his adoption of the Bush tax cuts for the rich or his many, many appointments of the same financial terrorists who created this mess in the first place.

These acts are not betrayals. They are treason they are murder they are warnings and glimpses into a future world the likes of which his apologists can’t even begin to imagine.

Like Hilter’s Willing Executioners before them, Obama’s are rushing headlong into a vortex that they will never be able to understand let alone control or reverse once the powers that be select another puppet president. And then, in 2016, when Jeb Bush is in the White House, where will Obama’s apologists be then? When the drones fly over this country armed to the teeth, when Hillary’s death squads seek out targets in Iowa or Virginia, where will they be then?

Ah, but this is simply logic and we all know that logic can’t factor into these equations of politics and elections anymore. Only the emotional connection between the voter and the product are allowed. The blind emotional context of the mythology of Obama is allowed. All else is moot.

“To know and not to know

To be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies

To hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them

To use logic against logic

To repudiate morality while laying claim to it

To believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy

To forget, whatever it was necessary to forget

… consciously to induce unconsciousness“

About these ads