CIA Asset Julian Assange is Going to Tell Us How To “CHANGE” the World Tomorrow

by Scott Creighton

This is psyops control. Here are the facts.

The rolling psyop known as Julian Assange is not done with us just yet.

After serving as the CIA’s front-man for the distribution of phony intel for a couple years (and getting paid well for it) and then living like a king in an English mansion under “house arrest” for 500 days (while the patsy Bradley Manning is in lock down 24/7), now Julian is getting his very own interview based TV show.

And what pray-tell is going to be his focus? He’s going to tell us which new “revolutionaries” we can trust. He’s going to tell us which direction we should take our revolution. He’s going to tell us how “we can change the world” as the global reaction to neoliberal globalization is starting to take off.

He’s going to tell us what the world will be tomorrow (if you’re naive enough to listen to people like Julian Assange, I will tell you what the world will be tomorrow: it will be Chile under the dictator Pinoche, Indonesia under Suharto, Russia under Yeltsin, . And that’s a fact)

Julian Assange lives with a globalist billionaire in the heart of the new imperialist England and he’s going to tell us 99%ers what we should be doing and which “politicians, revolutionaries, intellectuals, artists and visionaries” we should trust and follow.

Anyone else see an inherent problem with that?

With yet another economic collapse just off the horizon and the Occupy Spring taking shape and the entire European continent rioting, you don’t think steering the boiling over dissident movement would be something that the CIA, NSA, and the State Department would be interested in, do you?

If a psyop gets any more obvious than Julian Assange, I haven’t seen it. Well, maybe that woman from Libya who claimed she escaped a brutal 3 day gang rape and her first thought was to run to a hotel and hold a press conference. That’s probably a little more obvious. Or maybe Syrian Danny or the incubator babies story….but Julian of the Mansion ranks up there.

Unfortunately as you know there will be those on the dissident left and right who buy into this shit, believe it or not. Let’s see how our old friend Glenn Greenwald writes about it.

“A WikiLeaks press release states, “‘The World Tomorrow’ is a collection of twelve interviews featuring an eclectic range of guests, who are stamping their mark on the future: politicians, revolutionaries, intellectuals, artists and visionaries. The world’s last five years have been marked by an unrelenting series of economic crises and political upheavals. But they have also given rise to the eruption of revolutionary ferment in the Middle East and to the emergence of new protest movements in the Euro-American world. In Julian’s words, the aim of the show is ‘to capture and present some of this revolutionary spirit to a global audience.’””  RT

Does anyone remember how much we trusted al Jazeera English after their great coverage of the Egyptian protests? Anyone getting the feeling that Russia Today is headed down the same path AJ took right after they earned our trust?

The RT article announcing this weekly psyop is hinting that the proven NSA asset “Anonymous” may be one of his first interviews.

The guest list has not been revealed, but it has been hinted that the first guest will be someone controversial. A tweet from the WikiLeaks account asks provocatively, “Any bets on who The World Tomorrow’s first mystery guest(s) are?” It then adds the hashtag “#ExpectAssange” — a play on the Anonymous slogan, “Expect us.” RT

For those of you who don’t understand how these games are played, I’ll give you an example. If a law enforcement agency wants to get a new man on the inside of an organization, say a mob organization, what they do is they have someone who is already on the inside vouch for him. Someone with “street cred” so to speak. This is the same thing they do when trying to influence movements of different types.

Take for instance the Truth Movement (or what’s left of it). You have a fake “truther” named Jon Gold. His idea of the “truth” of 9/11 is whatever George Bush and Dick Cheney told us… plus.. “foreknowledge”… well, foreknowledge minus insider trading which he doesn’t think took place. Well, you have that guy (which no real Truth advocate believes for a second) write a book and then you get Sibel Edmunds of Boiling Frogs to stand beside him claiming he is the real deal. Then Gold promotes Sibel’s LIHOPy book and BINGO… you have the APPEARANCE of a consensus in the hijacked movement.

See how that works? One fake vouches for another fake. Jon and Sibel = Julian and “Anonymous”

In the world of organized crime, this kind of game can be a bit dangerous. In the world of crime fighting this can be very very dangerous. But in the world of dissident movements, what’s the risk? Remember that guy who was busted infiltrating that movement down in New Orleans? What happened to him? Nothing. He went on after he was exposed to start some new assignment and that was the end of it. What happened to Nurse Nariah (whatever her name was) or that guy who pretended to be the “Gay Girl from Damascus” or “Syrian Danny” once they were all exposed?

This is how they work.

Right now we are on the edge of a massive popular uprising and it just so happens that their two most successful psyops are about to go on one of the most respected news outlets left to us to tell us what to do.

Get it?

Assange himself says in the trailer for the show, “Today we’re on a quest for revolutionary ideas that can change the world tomorrow.” RT

oooooo…. Julian himself tells us what to do…. oh I can’t wait… and “Anonymous” will be there too? And it’s on RT? Well hell, that must be legit.

If you notice though, at the end of the RT article, they seem to be presenting a little disclaimer. Turns out RT didn’t produce this CIA/State Department psyop… some “independent” company out of London produced it. I wonder if it is owned by the same globalist billionaire who is letting Julian live in his mansion while under “house arrest”

“A press release for the show, however, emphasizes that it was put together by an independent UK producer and that RT is merely serving as the initial broadcaster. Negotiations are presently underway with other possible licensees, who might broadcast longer versions of the same interviews.” RT

Seems like RT is already making sure they can distance themselves from this psyop even before it launches it’s first installment. Can’t say I blame them but I do blame them for airing it on their channel in the first place.

No… we don’t need Julian to tell us how to change the world, thank you very much. He took fake files from the State Department and handed them over to globalist institutions like the New York Times and Der Spiegel, turned a nifty little profit off of that, and then he went to bunk with some billionaire globalist in London for 500 days (or so they say) with a little tracker thing attached to his leg.

Most of the Wikileaks revelations served the interests of the global elites including falsely proclaiming that most of the Arab world is threatened by Iran which is bullshit.At one time when people started seeing that his “leaks” never happened to mention anything done by Israel, he claimed he had some groundbreaking revelations coming out about that fascist government but they never materialized. Go figure.

John Young of Cryptome said years ago that he knew Assange and Wikileaks was a CIA honeypot from the start and he was correct.

Now they are trying to cash in on his “street cred”, street cred that was given (“given”.. not earned) him by the likes of Amy Goodman, Glenn Greenwald, and Daniel Ellsberg.If you still that that is a group of true dissidents, I can’t help you.

All I can say about this State Department infomercial is: Don’t believe it folks and don’t watch it.

Let them know via their own ratings tools that we can’t be fooled by their Disneyesque smoke and mirrors.

The PR and influence peddling institutions think they’re the real power behind this country and time and time again they’re proven wrong but they just keep plugging away telling themselves they are smarter than all of us. They’re not.

If you don’t take the hint from me, take a cue from the RT article… there’s a REASON they posted the disclaimer in their press announcement and the article about the show. RT is trying to tell you something. The reason is… it’s BULLSHIT.

Don’t watch the show. Tell others its bullshit. Make sure Julian and his NSA handlers get the rotten tomatoes ratings they deserve.

No more Syrian Danny no more Gay Girl no more Julian of the Mansion. We’ve outgrown it. We’re tired of the bullshit. That’s it.

This is going to be our revolution and NOTHING they do is going to hijack it.

Whomever he puts on that fraud of a show of his is suspect. Whomever is on that show of his is just as much of a fraud as he is.

We saw through Invisible Children and Kony 2012 in record time (less than a day I believe) and we will see.. through.. this.. too.

No prepackaged heroes, no ready-made leaders. It’s ham-handed and obvious and we are too tired and angry to fall for this shit.

Their lies are more obvious than ever and they damn well know it.

We’ll pick our own visionaries, if we pick any at all, thank you very much.

Tell Julian and his handlers and his internet sweeping sock puppet opinion shapers they can go straight to hell.

The World Tomorrow is ours to decide, win or lose. Assange can fuck off. And you can quote me on that.

About these ads

34 Responses

  1. Well put Scott. We the truly enlightened do not need to be told what to believe or do; we are ready to act on our own.

    A question for everyone: is there any way at all we can at least begin to hack away at the left cover?

    If anyone has answers, I could really use some…

    • Use their social engineering techniques against them i.e. Twitter.
      One tweet that’s gone viral attacking a pinacle of the left cover can be found at #democracynow:

      Business Huntyer ‏ @BHuntyer
      Reply
      RetweetedRetweet

      #DemocracyNow the #PsyOps Tool of McCain/Lieberman #CIA deathsquads in #Syria http://tinyurl.com/7guygqq & http://tinyurl.com/cvn6u2z @amnesty #UNGA

      One of the links in the tweet goes to an article by John Walsh trashing Amy Goodman, the other link goes to an article on the McCain/Lieberman visit to Turkey as heros of the Syrian opposition.
      The tweet links Amy’s agenda to that of McCain/Lieberman in regards to Syria.
      CounterTweet and counter re-Tweet other tweets that’s in part how Kony_2012 went into meltdown

      Daniel

  2. Great article – I have had my concerns about RT and hinted at them in some comment otherwhere on this blog – let us hope RT`s disclaimer is a true nudge in the right direction tough.
    RT has been good in exposing quasi political lies… but have they helped to shed light on the corporatist/globalist shadow government profiting from these lies? Well, perhaps they have, but does anyone know by chance who funds RT?

  3. I did watch today’s episode, in spite of the call not to watch it. Not because I don’t agree that Assange is more than suspicious, indeed, I find him to be an Israeli asset as well, but because he was interviewing Nasrallah, whom I respect.
    I recommend watching this interview, because Nasrallah is always worth listening to:)

  4. good article, especially the reminders about assange and the summary of how psyops work. i’d disagree here tho, “Whomever is on that show of his is just as much of a fraud as he [assange] is.” i’d say the sentence before is a better approach, i.e., “Whomever he [assange] puts on that fraud of a show of his is suspect.”

  5. Actually, Assange could not be more obvious even if he had “CIA” stamped on his forehead. Sad that anyone would miss that!

    Would I appear on his show? Probably not, unless they guaranteed I could state the obvious.

  6. Would I appear on his show? Probably not, unless they guaranteed I could state the obvious.

    If you looked at Assange broadcast you would have seen that they were 2 others. One was the translator the other was the Hezbollah man who was there to make sure that Assange did not misdirect on the agreed script. I think without these guarantees Nasrallah would not have agreed to appear.

  7. Excellent article Scott, very perceptive. Most will fall for the psyop, despite Assange’s thorough debunking only one year ago. They’ve enhanced his ‘renegade rebel’ image with street cred via this bland ‘controversy’ intv. Most will believe… Like they have complete amnesia. Give the kids enough time for their attention spans to be distracted and forget, then trot it out again.

    The CIA’s new strategy: mimicking the genuine grassroots protest activist movement and co-opting its appearance, tactics and methods. This is inverse Gene Sharp all the way. Recall the Obama campaign (how they cheered like he was a rock star?) All predictable. This curveball is about as real, independent and spontaneous as the Arab Springs, and manufactured by the same production company.

    Julian’s offices look like that of a grassroots, working class 99%ers activist hut alright: What fools(they rightly it seems) take the 99% for…

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1337014/WikiLeaks-bunker-Julian-Assanges-subterranean-Bond-villain-den.html

  8. ‘a problem i have with the translator is his (media?) tendency to use the word ‘regime’ when referring to the syrian government…NOW would this same translator refer to the UK or US govts as ‘regimes’? the use of this word over and over conditions the listener…since ‘regime’ suggests something uNsavory, illegitimate something to be removed.

    ‘Assange 16:09: ‘tunisia declares it will not recognise the syrian regime…’

    why not ”tunisian regime declares it will not recognise the syrian regime…’

    why is the word ‘regime’ used for a legitimate govt and why is it not used for one that has no legtitimacy?
    Colour revolutions give the illusion the regime that enters power is somehow legitimate…as it must have the support of the masses…when behind the scenes are lies US regime

    ‘the translator then goes on to refer to the new tunisian regime as ‘the young new government…’!!!

    this confirms the translatior(who is he by the way? a member of SOHR?) is skewing the interview to subtly demonise Syria

  9. Scott, ,
    well done again for hitting the nail on the head, but a few comments to make.
    I can’t subscribe to advice to see no evil hear no evil etc.
    Surely we know enough that if we cant trust anyone, and I am fully prepared to accept that we cant trust Assange , then why should we have faith in Scott either (Tho in fact I do)

    Isn’t a better defence than instead of turning away and not watching, to equip ourselves with the knowledge and tools so that we can watch and see for ourselves?
    Whilst I accept the merit of giving the first guest a voice denied elsewhere, I have several problems with the presentation and content of the interview.

    I found this to be a very odd 30 mins of TV.
    For starters the question to Nasrallah as to why Hezbolla fired rockets into Israel can do nothing but conform to the Israeli narrative about justification for their ‘defence’ measures., along with the not so hilarious joke promoted by Assange that took up a lot of interview time.

    The editorial choice of having Nasrallah make all his comments to a third party point of view so that he never addressed the viewers has to be a mistake, intentional or not, automatically prejudicing and distancing the viewer from empathising with the subject, and deviating from the absolute norm of interview convention.

    In total I found the interview to be disappointing and a wasted opportunity, except for the PR value of having a great deal of screen time validating Assange’s integrity through close ups of him.(The new Lawrence? Triumph of the Will even?)

    What was more disturbing was the 24 hour coverage of the event on RT along with accompanying interview with Assange, where he bigs up his credentials as the only calibre of person (through his own well publicised endeavours) who could attract such a calibre of guest to our screens?

    I cant nail it with the prescience that Scott often articulates, but I just got the impression that this was talking loud and saying nothing, and that it mainly gave Assange an excuse to wear his “I am not an Israeli/ CIA Spy” badge during future interviews.
    At the end of the day I regretted the loss of other RT shows in its place , like the Alyona show, (which is not without its own presentational idiosyncrasies), and it took me 24 hours (in fact until her next show) to find out for example that even the Buffett rule had been defeated. (Unreported elsewhere on Raw story & Rt & certainly not the BBC etc.)

  10. Forgive me for being naive but what evidence do you have that Assange is psyop?

  11. OMG! This website is run by a complete idiot. GET A JOB or AT LEAST A LIFE

  12. Webster Tarpley : US and the geopolitical situation in the World

  13. Hopes all is ok, Scott.

    Hope you’ll post more articles soon. Always brighten my day… even it the news is grim. Because I learn a lot ;)

  14. The purpose of United States psychological operations (PSYOP) is to induce or reinforce behavior favorable to US objectives – how can exposing the truth about Americans Murderous foreign policy, thus turning the whole civilised world against you, benefit America – if it is a Psyop, it’s a CRAP one!

    • You have to understand the nature of Psyops operations. It’s not as simple as “good vs bad”. Sometimes it’s shades of grey.

      Take for instance the “Collateral Murder” video which set off the whole State Department cables “leaks”

      Everyone knew even prior to the release of the video that we were killing civilians at record rates in various countries. So the “news” of the leak wasn’t ground breaking.

      So what did the video show/ It showed targeting people from an air support gunship, a long ways away, targeting and killing a number of people who just so happened turned out to be journalists and two children and a family who showed up to help wounded people.

      But, what does it do?

      Well, if you look at the video closely what you see is one guy at the beginning peeping around a wall holding a tri-pod for his camera. Well, that tri-pod easily LOOKS like it could be a RPG launcher.

      You also had 3 individuals who were CLEARLY carrying Ak-47s. They were security hired by the journalists.

      The story goes that a ground team was heading to that area after a firefight a mile or so away. They end up on the ground in the area a few minutes later and are viewed in the video saving a couple of children.

      The video shows at best what could be described as “the fog of war”

      There are CERTAINLY better videos out there if you wish to see the brutal murder of innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq, but this one was hand selected to be “leaked” because it could EASILY be dismissed as mistaken identification of civilians as hostiles.

      In the end of the video it shows US troops rushing children in the van to a medic who ends up saving their lives after our gunship shot them. Happy ending and all.

      Remember Assange promising to release “leaks” showing Israel’s involvement in all of this? Whatever happened to those leaks?

      How about that Swedish guy (Danish?) who took all those files showing how much the elites in America were hiding in offshore bank accounts? He was charged because he refused to turn the files over and is now in prison. He finally decided to hand over the files to Assange and Wikileaks so that it would be made public. Remember that? What has Wikileaks done with the info/ Nothing. It remains to be seen while the whistle blower rots in jail.

      Assange was outed earlier on as a CIA asset. Even before they opened their doors so to speak, they were getting press from the complicit media as a “dissident leak” website. How does that happen?

      John Young of Cryptogon, a real leak website, outed Wikileaks as a CIA front operation years ago. And he was correct then.

      Wikileaks is a honey pot. It is a black hole for anyone who is a whistle blower and chooses to send their information to them. God knows how many people have shared their inside information with Wikileaks only to be rounded up later and have their evidence evaporate, never to be seen again.

      It’s not just “good and bad”

      There are clever little shades of grey. It’s when you start understanding them that you really “wake up’ as it were.

    • Let out limited info to protect the really damaging info from reaching the public. Thats what wikileaks does.

      As Scott points out, Israel never gets touched. Red flag. Same with the promised bank cables. They never surfaced. Red flag. Assange said-“9/11 is not a real conspiracy blah blah”. Red flag. Constant MSM coverage from before they even puit out a single “leak”. Red flag. There are tons of red flags. The psy op worked brilliantly. Wikileaks has not stopped any wars, in fact they helped foment some.

      • If Assange is CIA, what is the point of his seeking asylum in Equador? Is it just theater?

        • Yes, I think it likely is just theater. I will be shocked if Assange ever sees an actual jail cell, whether he “flees” to Equador or not.

  15. scott and chris,
    excellent replies and analyses. thanks.

  16. I agree it’s just theater. And a distraction. Nato has ramped up it’s destabilization campaign in Syria, economies are crashing, and all the “lefties” can talk about is whether poor leetle Assange is going to get asylum. I find the timing of this another clue.

  17. Now he is trying to fool Ecuador. I truly hope they will NOT take him in.
    By the way, CIA spy Golinger in Venezuela also uses (abuses) RT for her fake shows. Could it be that RT has been bought up secretly by some western Zionists?

  18. Any Evidence of assange being a CIA conduit? Why would he release so much damning evidence of corruption if he was a puppet? Any his accomadation these days is no mansion!

  19. To all the people asking for “evidence” that Assange works for CIA —

    Can you cite one person, in the entire history of the OSS/CIA, who worked covertly for them but was “outed” as an asset?

    You make it sound like there’s a stamp on the person’s Driver’s License that says “CIA Asset”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 920 other followers

%d bloggers like this: