“Al Qaeda” Attacks Syria or the CIA Attacks Syria? Which Makes More Sense?

by Scott Creighton

This is just beyond ridiculous now. Identical talking points across the artificial political divide in the MSM while neither publication offers any shred of evidence to prove their claim. Mockingbird is alive and well in the Western press.

  • from the left…. “…appeared to have been carried out by al-Qaida.” MSNBC
  • from the right… “Double suicide car bombings which today shook the heart of the Syrian capital Damascus have been blamed on Al Qaeda.” Daily Mail

Who is al Qaeda? What is their origin? Wasn’t it al Qaeda that helped the “rebels” in Libya kill Gadhafi and “liberate” his people? Now they bomb government buildings in Syria killing 40-50 civilians and we are supposed to think… what?

The Western “press” is having to report on two massive car bomb attacks which happened in Syria yesterday because photos and videos of the terrorist acts are all over the internet. The attacks targeted Syrian government and police killing 40 people, mostly civilians.

The Western “press” is calling these attacks the work of al Qaeda even though that conclusion stands in stark opposition to the national myth of what al Qaeda is supposedly fighting. Why would al Qaeda attack a government that is opposed to U.S. and Western powers? If al Qaeda attacked us because of our “freedom”, why would they attack Syria if as we say, they are an oppressed nation living under the rule of a tyrant? Isn’t that what Bush and Obama both tell us al Qaeda wants?

It doesn’t make any sense and it just goes to expose the vapid and morally bankrupt main stream media for what they are; apologists for and sympathizers with the terrorist organizations who are committing these atrocities in our name and planning them from our shores.

This cowardly attack took place one day after Syria allowed the Arab League observers into their country to see for themselves what has been taking place.

Unlike the reported 5,000 victims of the Syrian regime, this attack has video and photographic evidence. Apparently all those “activists” in Syria are incapable of using the camera feature on their cell phones that the National Endowment for Democracy bought for them.

The Arab League observers are also sure to view the actual evidence of the 2,000 dead Syrian police and military personnel while the Western MSM has to rely on “activists said” journalism to support their claims of the brutality of the Syrian government. If it seems like the evidence gathering part of the visit by the Arab League observers is going to be a bit one sided, it will be. And it also seems like someone out there anticipated that little flaw in their plan to destabilize Syria.

The attacks are clearly designed to further destabilize the nation in order to facilitate the regime change that Obama, Bush, and the Clintons so desperately want.

Stratfor recently released a report carefully detailing the destabilization/regime change process that we use in other countries, using Libya and Syria as two recent examples.

“Clandestine efforts can also include working with opposition groups and nongovernmental organizations to improve their information warfare activities. These activities may progress to more obvious covert actions, such as assassinations or sabotage.” Stratfor

The CIA has a long and bloody history of using terrorist acts to destabilize nations for the benefit of various corporations and international finance institutions.

Al Qaeda was created by the CIA to bring down the Soviet regime in Afghanistan and they have been used ever since to destabilize nations whom we wanted to force regime change upon.  Yugoslavia would be a fine example of that. There have been others. Some closer to home.

These two MSM outlets from the left and the right, blaming al Qaeda for this attack without any evidence to support the claim is ridiculous and pathetic.

Doing so without even attempting to expose where they got that little tidbit of information proves once again that Operation Mockingbird is still in effect in the United States of America.

Where did they get that little talking point from? They got it from the terrorists who planted those car bombs and killed 40 Syrian civilians in an effort to derail the Arab League observer’s visit to Syria…. they got it from the CIA.

About these ads

16 Responses

  1. I know nothing, but can report that “Ishmael Jones” in his book “The Human Factor”, revealing his 15+ years in deep cover, painted a picture of the HQ buraaucracy as incompetent. And coupled them only to failed over-populated schemes.
    He did say that our embassy-located CIA could use the local intelligence services, with all that implies. ??????

  2. The CIA are behind the Iraq bombings too I’d say

    • Yeah, I would have to agree with that.

    • agree entirely. How else do they get their 5 sq mile fortress completed so they will ………never leave. THese false flags help to keep them there in Iraq. Over 10 yrs in a region. It all started in 1989 when Saudia gave the Mafia (US)access to some imaginary protection in the Gulf Straights: Iraq was plundered/dessimated 18 months later with an absolute assurance from Christine Gillespie the US Ambassador “We dont get involved with border disputes” when Saddam mentioned 25 July 1991 Kuiwat was drilling down on an angle getting Iraqi oil…..Oh the lies the perpetual lies.

  3. [...] Scott Creighton – “Al Qaeda” Attacks Syria or the CIA Attacks Syria? Which Makes More Sense? [...]

  4. Scott, are we seeing a morphing of Al Qaeda(as far as it’s public image is concerned) into an ambiguous ally/opponent depending on the circumstances? If Syria is to be overthrown, why wouldn’t our puppet media refer to the attacks on the Syrian state as action by “rebel” or “oppostion” forces, responding to insufferable tyranny?

    • Well, believe it or not, I think they figure they have come up with a better narrative… the Syrian government staged a false flag attack and blew up the people themselves… it seems like this is going to be the direction they try to take the story, rather than explain why al Qaeda linked Libyan fighters and Lebanese terrorists are active in Syria.

  5. Well, believe it or not, I think they figure they have come up with a better narrative… the Syrian government staged a false flag attack and blew up the people themselves… it seems like this is going to be the direction they try to take the story

    To my amazement this is exactly what CNN has been saying all day today, it so happens that this is the only news channel I can receive in a remote place!

    • Hans,
      Is that all the CIA will let you guys in the safehouse look at—-CNN.
      Joking aside, since the intel agents at intel bomb site kept on drinking their tea, I wonder if those killed had their feet shackled to a stake, at least figuratively. You know: you or your family, choose!

  6. Al Qaeda is what we Marxists call objective allies of the Empire – supposed enemies united in their actual goal.

  7. As with the rest of the show, it sounds like business as usual. Whenever there’s talk of suicide/car bomb attacks, I remind people of the incident in 2005 in Iraq when ‘undercover’ UK special forces were caught red-handed in the act of setting up such an attack – http://bit.ly/hULW18.

    As far as al-Qaida goes, I thought it had been settled long ago that, like The Black Bloc, al-Qaida is an MO, a way of working, not an organization.

  8. I think that everyone who frequents this blog realizes that “Al Qaeda” is pure vapor. We were referring to the official myth, or perceived image of this phantom, conjured from the bowels of the imperium.

  9. Thanks for the clarification. What you say wasn’t immediately obvious.

  10. al qaeada= the cia , they have the same leaders. al qaeda is a database of arab zionist working for the cia/mossad, trying to find credibility to the mask by criminalizing Islam.. There actions always work direcly in the hands of zionism/capitalism.

    • This argument is well founded. Every hole I have gone down has looked so in credulous until now. As it has been going on at least since napolian and Abe lincoln .I have seen this branding stamp ( Zionist CIA operation) time and time again). Because of Echelon( snooping on the world) I find it hard to even discuss it openly here for fear of being snooped on. The great rug lumbered on us is by using ‘freedom’ words to label their taking of other nations resources into individuals/ corporate hands: Us federal reserve bank? Personally owned. IMF and world bank? Owned by individuals. Patriot act in USA? The right to be held without a charge or for whatever the State deems is ‘reasonable’ . Inquiries Act in Britain brought in 1 month miraculously before the Zionist staged bombing 7 jul 2005 in London? No enquiry can be independent now as it passes the ‘executive’ desk for ‘appraisal first. They needed this just incase they couldn’t get away with the London bombing. Renaming Tripoli square when the whole population has been slaughtered by these thugs: something to do with freedom. Freedom is the most abused term by these maniacs. Nothing surprises me anymore about the stupidity of the masses and the banal lust for stealing with blood and misery everywhere.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 850 other followers

%d bloggers like this: