by Chris Hedges, TruthDig
Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s decision to vote “yes” in Sunday’s House action on the health care bill, although he had sworn to oppose the legislation unless there was a public option, is a perfect example of why I would never be a politician. I respect Kucinich. As politicians go, he is about as good as they get, but he is still a politician. He has to run for office. He has to raise money. He has to placate the Democratic machine or risk retaliation and defeat. And so he signed on to a bill that will do nothing to ameliorate the suffering of many Americans, will force tens of millions of people to fork over a lot of money for a defective product and, in the end, will add to the ranks of our uninsured.
The claims made by the proponents of the bill are the usual deceptive corporate advertising. The bill will not expand coverage to 30 million uninsured, especially since government subsidies will not take effect until 2014. Families who cannot pay the high premiums, deductibles and co-payments, estimated to be between 15 and 18 percent of most family incomes, will have to default, increasing the number of uninsured. Insurance companies can unilaterally raise prices without ceilings or caps and monopolize local markets to shut out competitors. The $1.055 trillion spent over the next decade will add new layers of bureaucratic red tape to what is an unmanageable and ultimately unsustainable system.
The mendacity of the Democratic leadership in the face of this reality is staggering. Howard Dean, who is a doctor, said recently: “This is a vote about one thing: Are you for the insurance companies or are you for the American people?” Here is a man who once championed the public option and now has sold his soul. What is the point in supporting him or any of the other Democrats? How much more craven can they get?
Take a look at the health care debacle in Massachusetts, a model for what we will get nationwide. One in six people there who have the mandated insurance say they cannot afford care, and tens of thousands of people have been evicted from the state program because of budget cuts. The 45,000 Americans who die each year because they cannot afford coverage will not be saved under the federal legislation. Half of all personal bankruptcies will still be caused by an inability to pay astronomical medical bills. The only good news is that health care stocks and bonuses for the heads of these corporations are shooting upward. Chalk this up as yet another victory for our feudal overlords and a defeat for the serfs.
The U.S. spends twice as much as other industrialized nations on health care—$7,129 per capita—although 45.7 million Americans remain without health coverage and millions more are inadequately covered, meaning that if they get seriously ill they are not covered. Fourteen thousand Americans a day are now losing their health coverage. A report in the journal Health Affairs estimates that, if the system is left unchanged, one of every five dollars spent by Americans in 2017 will go to health coverage. Private insurance bureaucracy and paperwork consume 31 cents of every health care dollar. Streamlining payment through a single nonprofit payer would save more than $400 billion per year, enough, Physicians for a National Health Plan points out, to provide comprehensive, high-quality coverage for all Americans. Check out www.healthcare-now.org. It has some of the best analysis.
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry’s version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama’s director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.
Obama and the congressional leadership have consciously shut out advocates of single payer from the debate. The press, including papers such as The New York Times, treats single payer as a fringe movement. The television networks rarely mention it. And yet between 45 and 60 percent of doctors favor single payer. Between 40 and 62 percent of the American people, including 80 percent of registered Democrats, want universal, single-payer not-for-profit health care for all Americans. The ability of the corporations to discredit and silence voices that represent at least half of the population is another sad testament to the power of our corporate state to frame all discussions.
Change will come only by building movements that stand in fierce and uncompromising opposition to the Democrats and the Republicans. If they can herd Kucinich and John Conyers, the sponsors of House Resolution 676, a bill that would create a publicly funded National Health Program by eliminating private health insurers, onto the House floor to vote for this corporate theft, what is the point in pretending there is any room left for us in the party? And why should we waste our time with gutless liberal groups such as Moveon.org, which felt the need to collect more than $1 million to pressure House Democrats who had voted “no” on the original bill to recant? What was this purportedly anti-war group doing anyway serving as an obsequious recruiting arm of the Obama election campaign? The longer we tie ourselves to the Democrats and these bankrupt liberal organizations the more ridiculous and impotent we appear.
“I’m ready to listen to the White House, if the White House is ready to listen to the concerns about putting a public option in this bill,” the old Kucinich said on the “Democracy Now!” radio and television program before he flipped. “I mean, they can do that. You know, they’re still cutting last-minute deals. Put the public option back in. Make it a robust public option. Give the people a chance to really negotiate rates with the insurance companies … from the standpoint of having a public option. But don’t just tell the people that you’re going to call this health care reform, when you’re giving insurance companies an even more powerful monopoly status in our economy.”
Filed under: dennis kucinich, get to know a sellout, Healthcare Reform Fraud

Kucinich, despite his carefully cultivated image, has a long history of being a phony.
Unfortunately his 2008 presidential campaign website is shut down, else I’d link you to the page on it laying out his conditions for “ending” the Iraq war: Get an international military force to take the place of the US! (Hey, isn’t that what Bush the Dumber had tried to do in the first place? Contrast that with — whatever else one thinks of him — Ron Paul, who kept saying: “We marched right in, and we can march right out.”)
Of course, it makes a lot of sense that Obama would fly Kucinich around in the official, taxpayer-underwritten jetplane of the imperial presidency: They’re both major phonies who based most of their presidential campaigns pretending to be antiwar so as to appeal to their liberal, Democrat bases, knowing full well those bases would cut them a lot of slack once in office.
I stiill support kucinich as Michael Moore does.
The article did not mention that not a single Republican voted for this bill even as ccrporated as it is. The folk above mentioned: Paul a supporter of the “free marked health system” . He is not the solution neither..
Yes the two parties System sucks
Now it is up to the American People and the few decent DEMOCRATATS PLUS Bernie Sanders Get at least a payed public option.
Somethings have to be done LITTE by LITTLE.
Keep on the good fight!
“If they can herd Kucinich and John Conyers… onto the House floor to vote for this corporate theft, what is the point in pretending there is any room left for us in the party?”
No point in pretending. I used to think I would make exceptions and vote for a “good” Democrat in a bad party. Now I see the party affiliation as prima facie evidence that they don’t deserve my vote. I will never vote for another democrat.
Yea this mchealthcare is going to reduce the deficit. What is the number being thrown around 940$ billion, so you know it is at least double that. How is spending a couple trillion going to reduce the deficit. The talk radio is going nuts over mchealthcare. Some callers have called in whooping and high fiving saying wooo I got healthcare now. I needed a good laugh on a Monday.
Still pounding on Kucinich despite rather than hundreds of different Democrats who are responsible for this I see.
Kucinich held a vote in Congress two weeks ago to try to force an end to our criminal wars. This site chose NOT to devote one word to his effort. This site felt that huge vote a minor rebellion with 65 votes in favor was not newsworthy.
That is how the most notorious Obama propaganda outlets played it too, Huffpost, Alternet, The Nation, RawStory, and all of the pro war corporatist disinfo sites covered this exactly the same way……….no coverage.
But just because there was no reporting does not mean that Obama and Rahm were not enraged by this Kucinich peace effort. Revenge was swift.
Slandering Kucinich on his health care vote is just the first revenge play by corporate Democrats. Clearly willy loman serves at the pleasure of the corporate scum and is quite willing to go along with the liars.
The many criticisms of this health care bill by Kucinich over the past several months also appear to have been given the short shift at this site. But they sure are down with the attacks on Kucinich. Fucking dirty lying disinfo agents.
‘Triple Casey ‘ again again again…..saying the same thing thing thing, …what? Is that all you trolls are throwing up this month?
But if the same thing is true, what is wrong with saying it?
Kucinich is the ONLY Democrat who ever comes close to doing the right thing.
So what does this site do? Keeps on promoting the vile Democratic party as some sore of viable option (what a joke!) and also does the bidding of the party bosses with daily hit pieces on Kucinich.
You want to act like a bunch of dishonest pricks, spinning lies about the Democratic party? You should expect to be called out like that more often……….and yes I am the same commenter as CCC, just using a different browser.
Kucinich is a good man.
The Democratic party is the Republican party.
willy loman is paid to lie about those basic facts, and he does.
well, Lifelog Dem/CaseyCasey Casey… since you have admited what I already knew from your IP address, that you are in fact posting as two different people here to try and pretend there are more people who share your opinion, and since I can’t find other comments under these names at other websites, I can only assume you are with a PR firm using some kind of Tru-cast type software targeting blogs that touch on this subject.
Normally I wouldn’t care too much, I get those types all the time here, but since you have chosen to call me a liar and a “disinfo agent” over and over again, when clearly you are the one paid to spread PR as if it were your own opinion, I guess I will just have to ban you (both “yous”).
Opposing points of view are welcome here, but professional PR assholes are not.
My guess is, since Dennis DID turn his back on us, part of his payment may very well have been a deal with the Democratic Party to use PR firms with Tru-Cast type software to try and help mitigate the damage his flip-flop would produce. Which means, it’s likely that you are in fact hired by the very democratic party you speak of to try and help sure-up his reputation. Just a guess.
I don’t think I know of many people and websites that have been more supportive of Single Payer Healthcare than I have, nor do I think many are as honest about the state of affairs in the democratic and republican parties these days.
But the fact is, Kucinich turned his back on us, just like many others who had promised to stick to their guns and vote NO if there wasn’t a public option included in the bill. Dennis was just one of many, but unlike the rest, Dennis chose to become a champion of this issue, which of course makes him more of a target when he turns. It’s not our doing. It’s his.
No. Dennis Kucinich does NOT deserve our support in the future nor does he deserve our votes. How are we to ever trust him again to stick to his word after this?
His credibility is gone. I don’t give a shit about his past. I don’t give a shit about what he says or does in the future. Here, your word is your bond. You either keep it or you don’t. And by psoting as two seperate people, you have also broken your word, in a sense, and you too, are gone. Bye bye now.
Hey Lifelong Dem! Why don’t you take your fishing gear and troll elsewhere? You can chum using your two bit sound bytes. Don’t waste your time here when you can spend it more profitably over at OpEd Snooze. You will have more fun preaching to your choir. You stay here and we’ll just hammer you. A troll is just another ugly fixture squatting under the bridge of reality. Personally I think (with very few exceptions) we should vote OUT all incumbents!
vote ‘em out and set limits on how many terms they can serve. two at most. we see what the career politicians have given us these past few election cycles. get ‘em all out, I agree
Good reply, Willy,
He was certainly ill-informed, and a highly insulting rascal.
He could actually been hired by Dennis’ campaign manager to try and mitigate the damage prior to the upcoming elections. who knows. But whatever he is, “they” are, they’re gone now…
Let’s see what CHOMSKY thinks about the “bill”:
“If I were in Congress,” he said, “I’d probably hold my nose and vote for it, because the alternative of not passing it is worse, bad as this bill is. Unfortunately, that’s the reality.”
“If it fails, it wouldn’t put even limited constraints on insurance companies,” he explained, noting that the bill takes “at least has some steps towards barring the withholding of policies from people with prior disabilities.” The consumer protections from dodgy insurance practices are among the bill’s most popular components.
The mandate to purchase insurance has been a central qualm of progressives and conservatives opposed to the effort. Chomsky, while admitting it’s a boon to insurance companies, called it a “step toward universality,” asserting that “without some kind of mandatory coverage, nothing is going to work at all.”
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor added that it’s a damning referendum on American democracy that one of the most highly supported components of the effort nationally, the public insurance option, was jettisoned. He partly blamed the media for refusing to stress how favorably it’s viewed by the populace.
“It didn’t have ‘political support,’ just the support of the majority of the population,” Chomsky quipped, “which apparently is not political support in our dysfunctional democracy.”
http://rawstory.com/2010/03/noam-chomsky-health-bill/
I’m not exactly sure what that is supposed to mean, lennon.
Are you suggesting that because this is what Chomsky says, it’s the “smart” thing or the “reality” based course of action to take?
Well, we all know what is “reality” based opinion of 9/11 is worth, don’t we?
And don’t I remember you having a rather low opinion of Mr. Chomsky based on his assessment of 9/11?
I guess my point is, Chomsky is right on a great number of issues, this one he isn’t.
This bill is NOT going to get better… it’s going to get worse. The Senate isn’t finished with it yet, remember?
Now that the insurance companies have clearly won this first major battle, all the rest will be much easier.
They will be endowed with more money and very little by way of real regulation.
This is the first step… but not our first step, it’s theirs.
and of course, Chomsky has a very nice insurace coverage plan as a tenured professor at MIT.
And he might even have stock in insurance companies.
Holding one’s nose and voting for this bill is not what I hope I would have done (tho I know full well how working with people daily encourages go-along-to-get-along even in the most cranky). I blame Kucinich more because he blinked, ditto Dean. The dangerous part of the story is what happens next, while most will be glad to drop the whole issue and the pitiful substance that is in this Bill can be further eroded in reconciliation. Kucinich could have stood tall and rallied people for the Public Option: for that he should not be forgiven.
We can’t possibly keep holding out hope for the Democrats. They’ve always been the soft-sell-out crowd. It’s past time to call them out right along with the GOP.
Chomsky’s well known, “Who cares” response to 9/11, as well as his idiotic opinion that the government can’t keep secrets, makes Chomsky’s musings irrelevant lately. He was much sharper a decade or so ago, but today, besides supporting Finkelstein, he gets more and more annoying to listen to. He recently said on Democracy Now, “No one in their right mind would want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.” I guess one has to be in a “Right” mind when speaking about Iran. It’s the same shit you hear on T.V. Iran is dangerous. Period. Hilary Clinton just said that if Iran gets the bomb, there will be an arms race in the Middle East. Chomsky may as well have said that shit. He won’t say that the U.S. doesn’t want them to have the bomb because the U.S. simply wants to invade them. Some years ago he may have said that, but not now.
Chomsky is some tired, old philosopher who still thinks making critical remarks about the New York Times is ‘radical’.
Did Chomsky really say that on Democracy Now? I’m not surprized, but I am disappointed. Though I kind of understand his point on 9/11, I don’t share it. His “what difference does it make” attitude is based on the fact that this empire has killed a million since based on those deaths, the 2,770+ is a mere pitance in comparison.
Here is the link to the Democracy Now/Chomsky thing:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24986.htm
It’s the way he says everything in this lecture which is actually worth dissecting. At one point he can’t even say the main thrust of his argument: Iran, being pushed into obtaining a “nuclear deterrent” by the West, Chomsky quotes someone as saying; “If they’re not developing a nuclear deterrent, they’re crazy.” He doesn’t say this himself. He distances himself, plants the seeds of the danger of such a thing occurring, because we all know what an aggressive nation Iran is, having invaded no other nation for centuries. I think they hold that in common with the South Pole.
His subtleties in the past would disclose Western crimes, but now he subtlety embraces Western propaganda.
I’ve noticed one thing about Chomsky; he is very astute when it comes to pointing out the mistakes and crimes that have been made in the past, not just by our country, but by others. But all too often he is reluctant to address them as they are happening.
He does however, as you mentioned, present an honest view of the Israel/Palestinian conflict, which I think still gives him a strong measure of credibility, as many, way too many, refuse to accurately address that issue.
Actually willyloman, I don’t agree with the two-state solution that he advocates. I think Israel should give equal rights and protection to the Palestinians. That should be what the peace process is about instead of these racial laws that Israel should be condemned for. There is no reason for Jews and Palestinians not to have equal rights. The Israelis continue to push for aggressive segregation instead of integration. Civil rights in this country allowed people to live with other people even though many said that that was no longer an option. There is NO reason why that cannot happen in Israel/Palestine. For some sick reason the American people say either Israel is right, or the two-state solution is the only viable one. When I think it is giving a pass to Israeli crimes and their twisted racial laws.
though I agree with you and what you see as clearly race based laws in Israel, which are indeed part of the problem, what is often refered to as a “two state solution” I wonder about sometimes.
Its as if there isn’t already two states.
According to the 1967 June accords, and according what every other nation on the planet already recognizes, Palestine is already a state and Israel is slowly but surely encroadching on it with their aparthied wall.
If there is to be a “one state” solution, I wonder just what that “one state” would be called according to its supporters? Israel or Palestine?
It’s hard to be out there by yourself against the herd, and then get old too. Chomsky may deserve criticism in some areas, but he also deserves respect.
Israel wants a one state solution with all Palestinians and Arabs gone. And they don’t care much if that also means dead. Going back to 1967 borders has become impossible, so has the Two-state solution. Israel depends on the US to supply the weapons of genocide and they aren’t shy about it, so we need to be clear about US complicity and its goals too. Israel/US have become the Nazi’s of our generation.
Willy… how about “Palsforeal”? Or better yet “Feralpals.”