by Scott Creighton
Dr. Judy Wood: Ray Beams from Space, Tesla RayGuns, and a pioneering 9/11 researcher YEARS AHEAD of Dr. Steven Jones.
More dust for our "scientist" - no soup for you
In the time it took Dr. Jones to revive the ghost of Judy Wood and her “ground based Star Wars Technology” theory (read as “ray beams from space”) he could have taken that sample of Ground Zero dust in his hand and tested it for explosive residues, live at their press conference. In fact, he probably could have done it twice. But he would never do that. Instead, he cruised over to the luncheon and breathed life into the decaying corpse of Judy Woods’ sonic space beam theory at our expense.
Judy Wood, for those of you who don’t know, was once affiliated with Jones and Fetzer at Scholars for 911 Truth. She is noted for the now infamous “ray beams from space” theory in which she stated that an orbiting ray-gun zapped the towers to death. This idea was quickly dismissed though and yet she continued with other theories like the “dustification theory” in which she explains how the steel columns were turned to dust right before our eyes (even though the only thing you can see in all the debris pictures at Ground Zero are steel columns… guess they missed those). That idea was a good one because it was supported with what Judy Wood scientifically reported as the “fuzzyblobs” proof, the “fuzzball” proof, and my favorite, the “Cheetos” proof.
Yes, the Cheetos proof.
But Judy wasn’t done there, folks. She had only just begun. She then started looking into the great “Hutchison Effect Weapon“, oh that was a classic. This theory of hers was again supported by more strange pictures and more strange proofs like: bent beams, jellification, transmutation, and the big evidence… holes. Yes, that is right folks, a hole in a pipe and a hole in Building 6 PROVES beyond a shadow of a doubt that a massive electro magnetic Tesla type ray-gun may have in fact brought down the towers and building 7. Just look at those pictures.
Dr. Jones' new mentor
Well, you might think that the good old Dr. Judy had done enough to help establish the credibility of the Truth movement with all those contributions listed above, but no, she had more work to do. After lighting into Dr. Jones and pretty much everyone else, the good doctor then took on her most detailed research to date; 911 Weather Anomalities and Field Effects. That’s right people, Dr. Judy Wood was an early proponent of Steven Jones’ new area of interest, weather weapons, ELF earthquake machines, and the devastating HAARP technologies .
You can go here and read all about how Dr. Judy Wood was writing about man-made earthquakes and hurricanes in May of 2008, years ahead of Dr. Steven Jones. Perhaps we picked the wrong horse in this race.
Years ahead of Steven Jones
Judy hasn’t been doing much in the way of speaking on this subject since around May of 2008. But, now that she has confirmation from our “leading” scientist, I am sure that will all change. Dr. Judy Wood will probably be able to parlay this into at least another two years of UFO radio show appearances.
But I don’t see why she should stop there. After all, she scooped Dr. Steven Jones by almost two years on this startling new evidence. Hell, we should invite Judy Wood to the next press conference. See what she comes up with for the after luncheon October Surprise.
Jones is now walking in the shadow of the Dustification Lady’ greatness… which of course does us all a ton of good. Thanks again Dr. Jones. You have done yet another service for the people of the Truth movement.
(psst. by the way Dr. Jones, I noticed you changed your “100s of tons” of nanothermite” conclusion down to “3 tons”. Kinda makes more sense doesn’t it? Kinda like all those times I have pointed out the implausibility of your first estimate of 100 tons of “unexploded” thermetic material. Next time you revise your story because of something I point out, do me a favor and at least give me a footnote, will ya? I mean, after all, how do you revise down “100s of tons” to 3 tons like that with no new scientific study? That’s like a factor of what? 33.333333333? I always thought one should give credit where credit was due… which explains why I am filling in the missing Dr. Judy Wood footnote for you and your fans.)
Filed under: 001 911 Writing, 002 Scott's 911 Writing, 911 investigations, fake war on terror, Scott Creighton
I don’t have time to wade through arcane sarcasm. Please just say what you mean.
would you tell Shakespeare to stop wasting your time with all that Iambic Pentameter and get to the point?
I am an artist, sir, and arcane sarcasm is my medium.
Hell, i don’t know what Iambic Pentameter is.
How bout this; lets leave Jones to his own devices and find and test the shit ourselves. How bout that?
(seems so naked without my sarcasm…
)
well, she did scoop Jones by almost two years, you know. Maybe he should look her up and get some updates…
look at it this way…
years ago Truth advocates distanced themselves from Wood because she was clearly just jumping from one harebrained after crackpot scheme after another with the obvious intention to undermine the credibility of all of us.
The other day, when Gage and AE911Truth was announcing their 1,000 professionals signed on the dotted line calling for a new investigation, Jones chimed in with one of the very same topics that Wood was drummed out of the movement for promoting.
And what happens? His “fans” make excuses for him.
You think that was just a chance happening? You think Jones doesn’t understand his surroundings? You think he is such a dedicated scientist that he doesn’t understand the politcs of what is going on around him?
to quote an overused phrase, wake up.
This guy has done nothing but push his “don’t test for explosive residue” thermite story since day one.
When thermite was proven to not be able to do what he claimed, he changed to therMATE… when that was proven to not be able to do what he claimed, he changed to SUPERthermite…
and he has flat out refused to test that stuff right there in his hand for the real fingerprint of controlled demolition… residues of conventional explosives like PETN and RDX.
Despite Wood being most likely controlled opposition and an opportunist, you have to admit she has some great photos on her site. Putting her theories aside, the photos themselves open up a lot of questions.
Willy:
You like Choussodovsky, yes? Then here’s some for you.
I think it’s time you looked into Haarp, regardless of what you think of Judy Wood and Steven Jones.
You’re clearly far off the curve on this subject.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=319
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=319
You seem to be missing the point.
Maybe there is an earthquake gun, who knows. Hell, if the army was studying how to run through walls, who knows what other thing they were working on.
That isn’t the point.
The people of this movement seperated themselves, and rightly so, when Dr. Wood started infusing “ray beams from space” and “earthquake weapons” into the 9/11 Truth movement.
They did that because 1. it has nothing to do with 9/11 and 2. to the general layman (99% of the population) it sounds like crack-pot theories, which, by association, makes 9/11 Truth into a “crack-pot theory”.
Now, if we chastised Dr. Wood for doing this in 2007-2008 why don’t we feel comfortable chastising Jones for doing it at a AE911Truth press conference now?
Jones has nothing to do with AE911Truth. Nothing.
What he did he did for a reason.
And if we don’t hold him to the same standards that we held other Truth researchers to, what does that say about us?
Are we any better than the Obamaoids or the Bushites who could NEVER see the obvious right in front of their faces just because they happen to LIKE their HERO?
Not only does his earthquake gun undermine our collective credibility, but so does our hypocricy.
and if you don’t think the JREFers and the debunkers don’t notice, you better go by and read a few of their sites. They think we would support anything Jones said… which makes us look like hypocrites and fools.
that is my point.
Willo:
Wrong target?
You keep on targetting folks who somehow are exposing the lies about 9-11.
If they don’t agree with your theory ,then you take on them.
There is a HUGE SILENT on 9-11 HERE around the world and JUST FEW SCIENTICIFS dare to speak about it.
I support any folk who SOMEHOW asks for a new investigation REGARLESS his theories.
jlennon08, you said, “I support any folk who SOMEHOW asks for a new investigation REGARLESS his theories.”
Did you support Dr. Wood’s federal case that went all the way to the United States Supreme Court? Why is it that the “Official ‘truth’ Movement” worked very hard to suppress that federal case and would not support it?
No, Dr. Wood’s research is not about “space beams.” Steven Jones began that rumor to denigrate Dr. Wood’s work instead of doing any work himself. If Steven Jones had any “evidence” of anything, why has he not submitted it to NIST (a government agency) or filed a federal case like Dr. Wood has done?
Perhaps Jones knows it is a crime to defraud the government and it is treason if done by a government agent. That in itself clears Dr. Wood and implicates Jones and all who support his cover up. Yes, Steven Jones is part of the cover up.
Not long ago i researched her site Completely and i think she was talking about the NUKES theory an Beans from the sky or a plane AND that there was not MOLTEN METAL. .REEEALLY?
I support Dr Jones thermite-NANO THERMITE theory regarless if he found a pound or 10000 KG. It should NOT be there!
Please do not expect people TO be perfect!
By the way NOT a single TRUTHER i know is blocking an INDEPENDENT investigation otherwise would be a LIER not a TRUTHER.
I supported NCY CAN last year and their 80k signatures!
jlennon08
David Ray Griffin, for some reason, spoke right before Jones got up and gave his “engineered Haiti earthquake” speech. He spoke about Cass Sunstein’s essay “Conspiracy theory, causes and cures”. and this is what he said…
“… this paper, according to the paper deals only with conspiracy theories that are false and hurtful and in particular, the 9/11 Truth movement.”
reading from the paper he noted that Cass Sunstein suggested the best way to elliminate the 9/11 Truth movement would be to infiltrate the movement …
“… the best solution therefore would be cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce 9/11 conspiracy theories perhaps by having government agents participate in their chat rooms or even join their organizations under false identities. Thereby bringing cognitive diversity into the groups with the goal of dislodging these beliefs.”
end of Griffin quote…
This is apparently something of a concern for Dr. Griffin, as it is for me.
It isn’t enough for someone to step up and say, here is a theory. it isn’t enough because as Cass Sunstein points out, and Griffin read right before Jones steps to the mic, there have clearly been plans to inflitrated and impair the movement for quite sometime. Sunstein certainly wasn’t the first to come up with this idea. Just read the investigations into the CIA or the history of the Black Panthers.
So I don’t give everybody a free pass just because they say they support our cause.
I support many truth advocates. Gage and Griffin being two right off the top of my head. there are many others.
Jones is different. Mainly because he lied to me. and he won’t test that dust he has right there in his hand for traces of high explosive residues.
He won’t test, NIST won’t test, FEMA won’t test, RJ Lee wont test.
And it’s right there in his hand. a brand new batch. give it to me, I’ll test it on camera, live if I have to.
Bt he won’t. He won’t because Jim Hoffman’s partner, Gregg Roberts, won’t let him. he won’t let anyone independently test that material for traces of high explosives used in the demolition industry. that is the very first test we should have run while jones was trying to tell us regular thermite could take down the towers.
I know it’s hard to scrutinize someone who you have admired for so long. When I figured this out about Jones, I posted a goodbye here, and quit the movement. I gave up. But I came back. I wonder how many others didn’t.
This movement is bigger than jones. I understand your loyaltiy, I really do. but there comes a time when you have to take a stand. jones is doing us yet another disservice. I am not the only one pointing that out.
I value your input here. I value your opinion. we don’t have to see eye to eye on this. just so long as we keep our eyes open.
jlennon08, you said, “Not long ago i researched her site Completely and i think she was talking about the NUKES theory an Beans from the sky …”
Saying something is so does not make it so. You have made false statements about the information on Dr. Wood’s website. That means you are promoting disinformation.
FACT: Dr. Wood has never “promoted NUKES” or “promoted Beans from the sky” on her website, nor has any of her legal documents contained such nonsense.
Google “ray beams from space” and “space beams” and you will discover that it is Steven Jones who is promoting this disinformation that you are propagating.
FACT: Steven Jones, has denigrated the legal action taken by Dr. Wood.
FACT: Steven Jones has not filed a qui tam case of his own.
FACT: Steven Jones has not submitted his so called “thermite evidence” to a government agency. (NIST)”
FACT: Steven Jones knows it is a crime to defraud the government.
FACT: Steven Jones knows it is treason for a government agent to defraud another government agency (NIST).
FACT: Dr. Wood has submitted her evidence to NIST and has filed a federal qui tam case for accountability.
So, jlennon08, are you interested in truth or is your objective to promote disinformation?
how about Dr. Wood’s “Star Wars Beam Weapons” site?
Or her “Star Wars Directed Energy Weapons” site?
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/dr-jones-reanimates-the-corpse-of-the-dustification-lady-dr-judy-woods/#comment-14798
would those sites imply “beams” from space (Star Wars?)?
now, if you go to this Dr. Wood link, you get to hear the spooky music then this voice comes on talking about the “beam” weapons … star wars again…
where did star wars take place… oh yeah… in SPACE
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html#conclusions
hense… ray beams from space
It is clear this is a blog meant to promote disinformation.
It’s purpose is to promote disinformation about the one researcher who is actually holding folks accountable.
don’t blame me. I didn’t design her webpage
Thanks for the link:
“Beam Weapons, Energy Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW):
We have used the terms “beam weapons” and “directed energy weapons” to refer to unconventional weapons (exotic weapons) that are energy weapons. We broadly define DEW as Energy that is Directed and is used as a Weapon. The full range of these weapons is classified information, so we make no limits or distinction of categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that is available. In the following paragraph, we have listed some of the possibilities we are aware of.
Our critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet we make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do we make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it involved scalar weapons, whether it was HAARP (more here and here), whether it involved a nuclear process (e.g. NDEW, more info), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons (cDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what kind of accelerator was used, nor do we claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts that were in the weapon(s).
What we do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed. ”
[EDIT: removed excessive copy/paste SPAM list from website already linked to. please do not copy/paste massive blocks from other sites. links are allowed]
So, what is your explanation of the evidence?
NOTE: ad hominem attacks are not explanations for evidence.
When someone cannot explain the evidence and resort to ad hominems, it is clear they have an agenda that is mutually exclusive of finding the truth.
There is even a book about this:
http//tinyurl.com/911book
well, that’s all you get, one shot of spamming my website with this stuff, then off you go.
BANNED
what did I tell you guys in the article above? Jone’s mentioning of this stuff has breathed new life into the Judy Wood crew.
thank you Steven jones….
That was harsh, Willy. I suggest you stop writing for a while and do some reading.
HAARP is no “Earthquake Gun”
Why are you better than Jones if you are disseminating disinfo yourself, by keeping yourself ignorant of the fact surrounding this particular technology?
Should we thank Jones for that too?
focusing on whether or not they used some HAARP gun to whip up an earthquake in Haiti is a distraction.
What they did in Haiti in the aftermath is bad enough. They have used this crisis to occupy the nation, to inforce their neoliberal reforms, to install Bush and Clinton as honarary emperors, they ignored the suffering and the starving in order to start planning where to let Disney build a sweatshop.
I have been writing about the abuses that have been taking place in Haiti since before the earthquake and certainly since.
You care about the Haitian people? I do.
As far as Steven Jones is concerned, if he wants to start studying earthquake and weather weapons, that’s all good for him, he just picked the wrong day to turn into Alex Jones if you ask me.
My posts aren’t about HAARP being real or not being real, I think I have made that perfectly clear. This post is about the hyporcritical aspect of how Truth advocates will demean someone who says something then turn around and allow someone else to say the same thing without calling him out on it.
Now I know that this is a big day for HAARP advocates and as you can tell from the commenter above, it’s also a big day for Judy Wood followers.
Enjoy your limelight. Just remember it came at Richard Gages’ expense.
And if you were to check out some of the blogs out there, it came at our expense as well.
What if the WTC Towers are not there anymore.
Something must have made the Towers go away . . . very quickly.
What if two horseshoe magnets placed north to north and south to south repel one another even though there is no super duper nano thermite in between them.
What if intense interference zones were set up by hurricane Erin and a easterly cold front on 9-11 were then triggered by a high energy beam that dustified the WTC towers in 10 seconds.
What would the implications be for Dr Judy Wood, Dr Steven Jones, Dr Niel’s Harrit,
and the 1,000 plus architects that Richard Gage has assembled.who signed on the dotted line.
What would the implications be for free energy for all.
Would Dr Judy Wood be many orders of magnitude more intelligent, more analytic, more perceptive, more logical.than the thermite-bombs-in-the-building crowd
or is Dr Judy Wood http://www.drjudywood.com more sincere, more courageous, honest and above all free as the boy in the emperor’s new clothes story to show and tell us what she sees.
.
I think you’ll be glad to hear that the Supreme Court has rejected JW’s Qui Tam Suit. Of course, Wood’s and her devotees haven’t said a peep about this decision.
Supreme Court denies Judy Wood’s Qui Tam Suit –
http://www.beyondpoliticsand911.com/supreme-court-denies-judy-wood-s-qui-tam-suit-t132.html
DYEW
I applaude Dr. Wood for “thinking outside the box” either way you look at it…we have a rogue govenment that is willing to destroy its own people and its own buildings in order to bring about the change that feel is in all our best interests….while you guys bicker like bitchy little girls.
It wasn’t thermite and you know that. It wasn’t nukes, it wasn’t jet fuel, gravity and airplanes….so unless our MIC has been spending the trillions they-ve blown through on hookers pizza delivery and PPV, then you might want to think about acknowledging that there is ‘something out there’ that you have not been made privy to…and are too scared to risk “face” to speculate on.
Dr Wood’s observations of the pictures is spot on. What i see is no rubble pile, no office furniture. No buildings.
What that i cannot say but i can say what i see. That is all.
I don’t know why people can’t ‘see’ that.
Too busy listening to what other people say.
And you call yourself truthers?
Is “Dustification” even a word?
No results found for dustification:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dustification
Isn’t she supposed to be a professor? Then why does she talk like a baffoon?
buf·foon
/bəˈfun/ Show Spelled[buh-foon] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a person who amuses others by tricks, jokes, odd gestures and postures, etc.
2.
a person given to coarse or undignified joking.
Anyways, great blog! Keep it up!
Cheers-
Phil
- Judy Wood accusing Prof. Stephen Jones of 9/11 involvement:
http://drjudywood.blogspot.com/2010/03/tracy-postert-httpwww.html
- Dr. Judy Wood with Nico Haupt
http://drjudywood.blogspot.com/2010/03/tracy-postert-httpwww.html
- Haupt’s YouTube channel dedicated making offensive 9/11 clips
http://www.youtube.com/user/nicoHAUPTSTRASSE
Phil Jayhan,
Dictionaries contain word definitions for knowns. If an object or force is not know nor recognized, how is there to be a definition? If professors can only be one IF they speak what is recognized by those who control the university[or box], then they are no longer on paid staff! It seems Dr. Judy Wood is outside the box when she spoke up about something that was not the Official Version; so in a way she is no longer a recognized “professor!”
Does not that make sense?
It seems debunkers have ego problems which keep them imprisoned in their own box or The System’s box!
Duncan, gov 51 e-state (state of mind/being/reality: each [of us has] an estate [thanks to Trust Law] to claim, with which we may govern of our own self ["outside" The System/the-box], IF we are responsible and keen!)
Willie,
The only thing which keeps me coming back to your blog is your arcane sarcasm. And the good research. Without your arcane sarcasm, what would we be left with? Some fairly dark material and no fun at all in reporting on it. So by all means, keep the arcane sarcasm coming, it is a staple of this site and we demand it not be given up or abandoned. And the customers always right. Thats us by the way. lol
Sorry guys, you are either paid, really jealous that she figured it out before you all did, or just plain duped… Considering the extreme vitriol and obfuscation i’ve seen you all posting around the web, i’d place a large bet on option 1. If by some long shot it’s options 1 or 2, get over it.
Uh oh, looks like some Judy Wood groupies found your site Scott. This could be fun.
To Manny, for me personally it has nothing to do with jealousy, as a 9/11 activist since about 2003 my vitriol towards people like Wood is based in my hatred of disinfo and controlled opposition and the damage it does to pushing 9/11 truth. Judy Wood is pretty fucking obvious, sorry.
Oh, and I see someone above trotted out a false choice-either Wood or Steven Jones. Cant they both be wrong? The buildings were demolished but that doesn’t mean it was thermite or space beams. Larry Silverstein,Dov Zakheim,Frank Lowy and the other 9/11 perps love it when you talk about space beams and mini nukes though. Right Judy? Maybe someone should ask who is paying her.
Manny:
Jealous? Of what? “Puff Balls”, “Cheetos”, and “Ray Beams from Space”?
Or maybe you think I am jealous because Judy Wood cashed in and got a paycheck and I didn’t. Is that it?
That whole group was disinfo – Woods, Jones, Reynolds, and Fetzer… all of em where a psyop and the only people still pushing their obvious disinfo are also on the payroll. So take your bullshit PR marketing drivel elsewhere, you aren’t getting to add this site to your resume.
bye bye
Whoopsie. That was obviously meant to read: If.. “it’s options 2 or 3″… But actually, if it is option #1, it would be nice if you’d all get over that, too. And come on over and join humanity.
Nobody’s groupie here. Big fan of Reality, actually.
Have been a seeker of the 9/11 reality since the moment those buildings peeled open like dust filled bananas. The political lies were plain to see for anyone looking carefully. But good pictures and analysis of what happened down there were not. Not having a computer for many years thereafter, lost track of what was happening in ’9/11 truth’ land. But when i ‘got back online’ things had seemed to pick up, what with all of the ‘truth groups’ all over the place.
Looked all around those sites “pushing 9/11 truth” and they all seemed so weak. Where were the pictures? The analysis? Where is the evidence? All there appeared to be were slogans and petitions. All they’ve found, and can show, is little (inconclusive) red flecks? Where is the bigger picture? This is all that these so called professionals and scientists could come up with? What’s going on here?
And then, somehow, (because lord knows, it’s not easy to come across) i found Dr. Judy Wood’s site. With All of That Evidence. Those pictures i had been wanting to examine for years. The Seismic Data… And then some… Magnetometer readings? Uh-oh…
And – There was a Hurricane? And, no one had been Warned about it??? A Huge Hurricane heads straight for NYC, and no one is warned? Too weird.
And then i saw To What Extent this Researcher has been marginalized. Am smart enough to understand what that means. She’s got the goods, and is being treated like that? Says it all.
Jones is a false choice. He hasn’t got the goods. If he did, he should have taken it to court. He’s a muddler. And a damn poor actor. Same with Gage, Fetzer… Appears that the Entire ‘Truth’ Movement, is in actuality, a movement away from The Truth. The Reality. The Evidence. Not that those participating may not, and do not, mean well. Am referring here to “The Leaders” – Who are leading those who do mean well, down blind alleys. And slinging mud at good people Who Do Have the goods. Damning. Just plain old damning.
Jones f’ed up the work of Pons & Fleishmann. It’s history. You can look it up. And then he was (obviously) assigned to do the same with the work of Dr. Wood. And Fetzer, Gage, different characters in the same play. The game of cover-up, psy-op, obviously requires a large cast of characters. What game is it that you all are playing here?
Check out Dr. Wood’s Request For Corrections & Qui Tam Case. They are wicked good. You can see how professional and damning they are. Then go over and read what FEMA and NIST had the gall to put out. If you are for real, you will laugh your ass off at those sad jokes passing for explanations. She nailed it. She’s the only one who has had what it takes to put it all together, and the guts to take it to Court. Anyone calling themselves a Scientist, (or a researcher) (or a truth seeker) and still pushing the same old silly worn out lies about Judy Wood, is Beyond Discredited. Because, in reality, it’s not about Judy Wood, it’s about The Evidence.
ok, you know what Manny? Just for you I am going to do a little front page article about Judy Wood and Fallout New Vegas… that’s right… Ray Beams from Space, Mini-nukes, and the Lizard People. Just for you coming here, trying to make this site look like idiots with that sill crap about Wood and her “evidence” There’s more “evidence” in Fallout New Vegas than anything on Judy Wood’s ridiculous psyop site.
That’s right everybody Fallout New Vegas has “got the goods”, to borrow an overused phase of marketing middle-management Manny’s…
So, Manny, let your supervisor know that you have successfully instigated yet another expose of the all-too-fabulous Judy Wood psyop. It’ll be right there on the front page tomorrow. Have all your fellow internet marketing office co-workers and their various sock-puppets look for it as well. It’ll be dedicated to you and all that fine work you do defending freedom and liberty from us conspiracy theorists.
(just so you know Manny, capitalizing the buzz words and the catch phases from you action item memo just makes your bullshit all the more obvious. Do youself a favor if you don’t want to lose this job as well and tone it down a notch or two. despite what you hear in the monday morning meetings, “truthers” really aren’t that stupid.)
The footage of the planes hitting the towers was faked.
The building damn near completely turned to dust.
This could very well have been advanced weapons, or devices.
This article is probably a NWO inside write-up.
Dr Wood is right on the money. You people can’t go die.
You are joking, Bob.. aren’t you? LOL
It seems to me that many people here are uninformed or just causing confusion on purpose so others won’t take the time to check out what Dr Wood is telling us.
I think she is right. She is clear, and very easy to understand during one of her lectures on the issue. These lectures are far more informative then just taking glance at her web site.
She has more courage then most people out there to come out and voice what she see’s in the evidence. How many of you people(the ones who make fun of her jargon and terminology) have all the degrees and knowledge that she studied?
Her “dustification” evidence is the only one that fits. By the way, she said in her lecture, that it was not a word, but one she made up to easily describe it. Maybe it will be a word in the dictionary one day.
She used words like “Cheetos” to make it easier, and a bit fun, when she does her lectures.
Another thing, everything is controlled, our minds straight from birth, the TV/internet is the biggest brain-washer out there, and maybe even they control the whether too….. it would not surprise me.
So, I believe the hurricane “Erin” that was not reported on the news during the attacks,(Strange) is where the needed energy came from.
“Common sense: If Dr. Wood didn’t have anything credible to say, why would folks be attacking her so vehemently?”
people attack her so vehemently because Dr. Wood is obviously smarter than this shit so she is doing it to make us look like idiots. That is why
This is the first blog where I have observed ancient zombie articles being exhumed and dressed up with new comments. So, I finally broke down and had a look at the rather confusing Dr. Judy Woods website. She really looks much more like a case of Nutty Doctor Syndrome (NDS) than a psyop agent. The symptoms are nearly unmistakable. The site is chock-full of all kinds of wacky bad science pertaining to a multitude of subjects, one of which happens to be the WTC event. I have seen several instances of NDS over the years, and sometimes they aren’t perpetrated by doctors; sometimes the “masterminds” might be, say, burned out science fiction writers. NDS movements tend to attract relatively ignorant, yet fanatically loyal followers.
I can draw on my previous (mostly forgotten!) experience in electrical engineering and land surveying here. She has a big article about “field effect” affecting some environmental thing or other. But “field effect” happens to be a very important effect in tiny semiconductors, such as the millions of field effect transistors (MOSFETS) in your computer. (It refers to a small voltage at a “gate” controlling a large current in a semiconducting “channel”.) So the terminology is wacky right off the bat. I have worked in microwave frequency coordination, designing land-based microwave signal repeater station systems, mostly comprised of “towers”. This was both intricately (detailed) and conceptually (involving math, etc.) complex. I had to know about the growth patterns of tree species and the likelihood of new building construction, since trees and buildings can block microwave paths. I know a little about physics too. Trust me on this, any sane person who knows more than a little about electronics or physics is going to be very profoundly skeptical of any directed energy explanation of the destruction of the twin towers. It would require something roughly as powerful as a dedicated nuclear reactor just to provide the necessary power, with line-of-sight access to the targets. The directed energy beams, whether charged particles or electromagnetic radiation, would need to be so powerful that they would ionize oxygen in the air, so we would see bright glowing blue plasma beams. Etc. So this just doesn’t add up.
I know of this French doctor (IIRC) who claims the HIV does not cause AIDS. He has a fanatical following too. Of course, in the final analysis, anything is possible, and some wacky notions are rather harmless. I personally like the Subterranean Reptilian Overlords theory.
When I am on a blog where I disagree with the local consensus, I try to avoid taking up too much bandwidth with arguing. I usually just say my piece and get out.
And that,my friend, is her point. To make people who are curious about 9/11 alternative research see her crap and conclude that the 9/11 advocates are all touched in the head.
She started off with Morgan Reynolds and Steven Jones in a group cynically named Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Reynolds pushed the no planes hit the Twin Towers theory and Jones pushed his “thermite, nanothermite, superthermite” crap.
They were actually invited to speak to the Washington Press corp back in 2005 and give brief rundowns of their “theories”
They didn’t ask legitimate Truth advocates with sane evaluations of the facts, they asked these phonies with their “cheetos” and their holograms and ray beams from space.
The intention was to portray Truth advocates as “loonies”, “nutters”, and people who suffer from, oh I don’t know… “nutty doctor syndrome”
but that is the point of doing what they have done and you make my point for me.
she is absolutely disinfo you can tell by the dishonest way in which she conducts interviews. She pretends to be “nutty” but in fact she cleverly attempts to spin facts, misrepresent images, and then distance herself from her own loony statements if she feels her back is to a wall.
The fact that some disinfo actor shows up here every now and again trying to present themselves as a follower of her “research” also goes to show you what she really is. No legitimate Truth advocate believes what she writes. Her “theories” are idiotic and her advocacy is obvious.
She was hired to make us look like “nutty professors” and apparently she convinced a few…
I mean, I really hate to have to bring this up again….
and then there is this…