Come Get Me Glenn

Since, as Paul Joseph Watson points out,  Mr. Beck and Chris Mathews have both decided (and by “decided” I mean “were told”) it’s time to start demonizing 9/11 Truth Advocates in public again, I figured I would rather stand up than stand down. So both of those two guys can go to hell and I am reposting some of my more interesting articles on the subject of what really happened on Sept. 11, 2001. Enjoy.

9/11 Shock Opera… Act 4 – Building 7 and Flight 93: The Grand Finale that Wasn’t

 Scott Creighton (reposted from May 25th 2009)

Prologue: The Premise

Take yourself back to that day when you watched or listened to the attack on America; the day that everything changed. Remember where you were, who you were with, and most importantly, how you felt.

cnn_911_screenThink about the last few events of that day; how the news of the Pentagon being hit by something was followed almost immediately by the unexpected complete collapse of the South Tower (WTC 2). Remember how we had barely recovered from that shock, one that we were forced to watch in horror over and over again, when the unspeakable happened; the North Tower (WTC 1) fell in exactly the same way; at an eerie and almost supernatural speed as plumes of smoke and steel columns flung across city blocks.

Now I want you to put yourself in that very moment, once again, and prepare yourself for the missing final act that never took place and yet may be one of the most telling and condemning pieces of evidence in the ongoing unofficial investigation of 9/11.

The 9/11 Shock Opera

-  Flight 93 and Building 7 –  The Grand Finale … that wasn’t.

The North Tower has fallen and people are in absolute disbelief.  The grey faces staring back at us through the live news reports tell the story; they are blank with shock like infants in a war zone.

Continue reading

Sneak Peak: Revised Demolition Theory Hypothesis

by Scott Creighton (re-posted from Sept 16, 2009)

I know you guys think I have been slacking, but there are things in the works over here.  Really.  I mean it.  You don’t believe me?  I know you don’t… so here’s a sneak peak at my Revised WTC Demolition Theory Hypothesis.  More careful study of the NCSTAR1 report (a troll suggested I do it) has turned up some interesting facts like:

1. the composition of the trusses themselves (no A-36 structural steel, but rather a combination of ASTM A-242 and an ASTM A-572 equivalent)

2. the number of the trusses (nearly doubled the 23,000 of my first estimate)

3. the existence of an ELECTRICAL WIRING DUCT that ran next to most of the trusses and embedded in the concrete once that was poured (very important for the DET CORD theory)

4. pictures of a few scraps of the trusses recovered from Ground Zero

Anyway, I am still working on it.   So here are a few technical drawings that I have just completed showing in detail, what I think caused the destruction of the Twin Towers.

Det Cord runs through electrical ducts pre-fabricated in floor sections. No drilling or cutting required.

Det Cord runs through electrical ducts pre-fabricated in floor sections. No drilling or cutting required.

(see more details after the break)



Some revisions based on the NCSTAR diagram located on page 6. Notice the electrical ducts and the doubled trusses.

Standard floor sections as shipped and installed in WTC 1 and 2

Standard floor sections as shipped and installed in WTC 1 and 2

Lightweight concrete poured over floor sections after installation would cover electrical ducts.

Lightweight concrete poured over floor sections after installation would cover electrical ducts.

The composition of the trusses was not simply carbon and iron as has been suggested by many others.  That would be the main composition of A-36 structural steel. But as NIST points out, in the fabrication process of the trusses, the company that made them substituted a higher grade steel, a HSLA steel, for the parts of the trusses that were to be comprised of A-36 structural steel.  They also used ASTM A-242 steel in the trusses.  This could explain the reports of silicone, sulfur, and various other metals found in the “iron rich spheres”.

Continue reading

The 46,000 Missing Trusses of 9/11

by Scott Creighton (reposted from Aug 9th 2009)

also read Sneak Peak: Revised Demolition Theory Hypothesis

***UPDATE*** note the updated truss count. My original estimate of 23,000 trusses was based on the idea that they used single trusses in between the section breaks when in fact they did not, they used double trusses everywhere on each floor. My first count was based on doing a layout of the truss structure and then simply counting and multiplying that number by the number of floors which used these trusses. Turns out, the number of missing trusses is actually double my original number… about 43,000 – 46,000. With that one exception, I believe the research in this article still stands.

***UPDATE*** Please check out the companion article, The 6,000.

According to the official explanation of the collapse of the Twin Towers on Sept. 11th, 2001… the initial plane crashes damaged the core structure of the towers enough so that when the resulting fires “weakened” the floor trusses, the result was that the remaining floors above the areas of the plane crash and fires crashed down on the undamaged parts of the buildings, and “pulverized” them in a gravity driven demolition of sorts.

This “official” explanation, which if left unchallenged, stands as the basis for the endless “War on Terror”, the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan, the attacks on the general population of Pakistan, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, warrentless and illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens, and various other assaults on our democratic freedoms… is basically a lie.

It is impossible.

Continue reading

The 6,000

by Scott Creighton (reposted from Aug. 11, 2009)

***UPDATE*** At the end of this article, I have added a plan view layout and cross-section of what I hypothesize as the potential det cord layout plan for a typical WTC floor.  Scott has asked how the cord may have been used, so I thought I would include the drawings.


In yesterdays article titled “The 23,000 Missing Trusses of 9/11“, I questioned why it is that I can’t seem to find one single truss (of the 23,300+ of them from the Twin Towers) in all the photos of the debris and the clean-up process at Ground Zero.  I went further and hypothesized that the missing trusses may in fact be the mysterious “tons of iron-rich (read as “steel”) spheres” that Jones and others have found.  It would seem a logical assumption.

As odd as their absence from the debris field is, when you understand how these truss sections were fabricated and installed, it makes the story of the missing trusses an even greater mystery.  And perhaps an even bigger clue.

The 6,000

High above the Manhattan skyline, in the early 70’s, over 6,000 of these prefabricated floor sections were hoisted by construction cranes and then set into place by union steel workers fabricating the World Trade Centers.   On Sept. 11th 2001, according to the official record of that day, they simply fell and in so doing, disappeared into the history books as if they never existed.

typical 60' floor section WTC

typical 60' floor section WTC

I for one, would like to know how that is possible.

Continue reading

BBC Piece Post-Mortem: Mark Loizeaux and the Special Engineer

by Scott Creighton (reposted from Feb. 16, 2009)

It is difficult for me to know where to begin peeling away the layers of misinformation the BBC peddled to their audience in last weeks exposé on the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center in New York.

There are so many people out there grinding away at exposing the flawed production, I don’t feel the need to repeat what they have already done with journeyman-like effectiveness, yet there is something that I have yet to see addressed that I feel is crucial to exposing the overall lack of trustworthiness of the piece. And there is another related aspect of it, that I feel may in fact, be almost an unintended admission, of sorts.

At issue? Mark Loizeaux’s direct misrepresentation of facts and Peter Hayden’s uncanny admission about a “special engineer” on site before Building 7 came down,  and how those two things may in fact be related.

Continue reading

Unbelievable: NIST Uses CDI (suspect?) To Prove No Controled Demolition

by Scott Creighton (reposted from Aug. 22, 2008)

Yesterday, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a division of the Department of Commerce, finally released it’s report on the cause of the mysterious collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. There have already been several to jump out in front and claim that this puts an end to the “conspiracy theories” that have surrounded Building 7’s inexplicable destruction, since it happened on Sept. 11th 2001.

We really have a new kind of progressive collapse that we have discovered here, which is a fire induced progressive collapse. In fact, we have shown for the first time, that fire can induce a progressive collapse.”. Shyam Sunder. (first time in history and flies in the face of what we know about engineering and the laws of physics. But, they NEVER tested for explosive residue and yet, this is the “first time” this “new” phenomenon occurred? Right.)

Steven Jones and Richard Gage have already come forward and denounced NIST’s finding as implausible.

NIST’s entire theory is based on the idea that regular office fires burned hot enough to cause a failure of a key connection in a key area that cause “global” and symmetrical failure to occur. This is highly improbable at best (since it never happened in the history of steel framed high-rise buildings). NIST is basing their findings, not on forensic evidence but rather a computer simulation; a computer simulation that they programed and tweakedandif it’s anything like their “computer simulation” they did to come up with the “global collapse” scenario of the North and South Towers, then they will NEVER allow an architect or engineer anywhere near the simulation program so they can evaluate it’s accuracy.

But that isn’t the big news flash that should be coming out of this report. The fact is, it looks like the sole reasons that NIST is claiming that they concluded there was no “controlled demolition” of Building 7 appears to be coming from Mark Loizeaux; the owner of the demolitioncompany that was on scene of the WTC destruction right after 9/11 and a man by his own admission, called his friends in lower Manhattan on Sept. 11, 2001 and told them to get out of the area because he knew the buildings would come down.

Mark Loizeaux is listed on page VI in the report’s credits as having been a contributing contractor for the report.

Continue reading

Shyam Sunder of NIST Caught in a Lie

by Scott Creighton (reposted from Aug 22, 2008)

Shyam Sunder of NIST says that there was no explosive sound loud enough to have been an explosion that could have taken out one of these columns. Here is a recording of 2 of them:

(following text from the NIST press release available here. )

The NIST team found no evidence that explosives were involved in the collapse.”

Because they didn’t LOOK. (NIST admitted they NEVER TESTED FOR EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE. “NIST did not test for the presence of explosive residue and such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive.”)

Our analysis shows that even the smallest explosive charge that was capable of bringing down the critical column in the building, had it occurred, we would have seen sound levels of 120 to 130 dbs, a half a mile away. That (could) have been an incredibly loud sound, and that sound was not picked up by any of the videos or the witnesses we have talked to.” Shyam Sunder.

Perhaps Mr. Sunder never saw this video. Then again, maybe he is just full of shit. Watch his shifting eyes when he talks about “no video recordings of such explosions” and you decide which it is.

Demolition Theory Hypothesis

by Scott Creighton (reposted from Mar 2009)

The following is a quick outline of what I believe happened to cause the collapse of the World Trade Centers on Sept. 11, 2001.  It is an attempt to show that conventional demolition materials could have been, and probably were used in the demolition process. This is only PART of a larger work that I am putting together incorporating technical information of PETN (det cord), findings of Steven Jones (iron rich micro-spheres), dust particle contents reported by several sources, images showing the different colored clouds formed during the demolition of the towers, lateral ejections of large (complete) sections of exterior column assemblies,  missing floor systems (trusses and floor pans), and images of the steel and concrete dust at ground zero.

This is only the images of my hypothesis of the demolition process. More info to follow.



(The images of human figures included in these are needed for perspective. It is not intended to be graphic in any way. They were only included after careful consideration and it is not my intent to cause undue harm or discomfort to anyone connected with those that lost their lives on Sept. 11th.  But too be honest, the vast majority of the innocent people that perished on that day died as a result of the “collapse” of the towers, and not from the initial impact of the planes. Therefore, though it is uncomfortable for me to include them, I feel I must for these two reasons.  We are talking after all about an act of murder, and leaving the images out, I believe would do a disservice to those victims who lost their lives when the towers came down. I apologise to all who may be offended by their inclusion in these illustrations, but know that care was taken in the decision to include them.)

demolition wave

[more images after the break]

Continue reading

Some Straight Forward Questions For Steven Jones on the Subject of his Research

by Scott Creighton (reposted from April 07,2009)

Nearly one year ago, in May of 2008, I made a mistake;  a mistake that  I will correct at this time.

On May 25th of 2008 I wrote… An Open Letter to Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe On the Subject of Detonator Cord.

The letter deals primarily with the possibility that detonator cord which consists of the high-explosive PETN, was used to pulverize the concrete floor systems in the Twin Towers and that the iron-rich spheres that Jones had discovered in the Ground Zero dust may in part be the missing trusses from those very floor systems.

PETN filled det cord commonly used in demolitions

PETN filled det cord commonly used in demolitions

(look at that one on the right. That has the relative detonation velocity equivalent of 1 stick of dynamite for every 5-6 feet. Imagine what 3 or 4 lengths of this stuff run 4 feet apart under the floor pans and above the trusses would do to each floor. Now THAT would explain the missing floors and the dust all over lower Manhattan. Too bad no one in the Truth movement wants to test for it.)

Theoretical placement of det cord

Theoretical placement of det cord

Continue reading

An Open Letter to Steven Jones…On the Subject of Detonator Cord

by Scott Creighton (reposted from May 25th 2008)

and  ***UPDATED***

An Open Letter to Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe On the Subject of Detonator Cord

I wish to first thank each and every one of you for your continuing efforts to bring the serious questions that still permeate the official 9/11 investigations to light. I hope that in time, your efforts will rank among those of Daniel Ellsberg, Bob Woodward , and Carl Bernstein.

I also wish to congratulate you on the recent publication of your peer reviewed article Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction“, published in The Open Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 2 Issue 1, by Bentham Open. This is a huge step in the struggle for credibility in an atmosphere where any mention of discrepancies in the “official story” of  9/11 equates to professional suicide.

The courage it takes for you to continue your research and lectures is not lost on us and if I may be so bold as to speak for some of the 9/11 Truth seekers; thank you.

But this is by no means a fan letter and I know your time is valuable, so I will get to the point.

Continue reading

The Hypocrisy of Rachel Maddow’s Tireless Propaganda (or) Welcome to “News Entertainment Television”

by Scott Creighton

News Entertainment Television

Rachel Maddow (a propagandist for the media arm of a major defense contractor, worldwide insurance conglomerate, and potential global warming profiteer … General Electric) has lit into Glenn Beck (a propagandist for a neocon war-monger, media mogul, and globalist billionaire … Rupert Murdoch) over the recent “Bill Nye the Science Guy’s” appearance on her show where he (a guy who’s Planet Green paycheck is dependent on the continuation of the Global Warming fear mongering that people like Maddow keep pushing) made the stunningly unscientific claim that questioning the status quo thinking on global warming is “unpatriotic”.

In an earlier article I already pointed out how ridiculously unscientific Bill Nye’s pathetic argument was and how Rachel should have provided her audience with a disclaimer about Bill Nye’s current employment at Planet Green. But I guess that would have made it too easy for her audience to understand why Bill was so desperate to come on Rachel’s show with absolutely no scientific information whatsoever. So I won’t go back over that except to say that this is the sum total of what Bill Nye (the “science guy”) brought to the table on Rachel Maddow’s propaganda piece about anthropogenic global warming.

There’s more energy in the atmosphere and this is stirring things up,” Nye said. “If you want to get serious about it, these guys claiming that the snow in Washington disproves climate change are almost unpatriotic 

… To deny what scientists or scientific evidence is showing, is inappropriate. And as I said earlier, to me, when I get wound up, it’s unpatriotic Bill Nye

That’s not really very “scientific” now is it, Rachel?  In fact, that seems kinda “Carl Rovian” if you ask me.  Since when is it “unpatriotic” to question flawed scientific results? Especially when those flawed results are being used to attempt to pass global measures of economic, social, and industrial hegemonic domination?

Continue reading

“Economic Terrorism”: The Consequences are Poverty and Mass Unemployment

by David DeGraw, Global Research

“The American oligarchy spares no pains in promoting the belief that it does not exist, but the success of its disappearing act depends on equally strenuous efforts on the part of an American public anxious to believe in egalitarian fictions and unwilling to see what is hidden in plain sight.” — Michael Lind, To Have and to Have Not

Yes, of course, we all have very strong differences of opinion on many issues.

However, like our Founding Fathers before us, we must put aside our differences and unite to fight a common enemy. It has now become evident to a critical mass that the Republican and Democratic parties, along with all three branches of our government, have been bought off by a well-organized Economic Elite who are tactically destroying our way of life. The harsh truth is that 99% of the US population no longer has political representation. The US economy, government and tax system is now blatantly rigged against us.

Current statistical societal indicators clearly demonstrate that a strategic attack has been launched and an analysis of current governmental policies prove that conditions for a large majority of Americans will continue to deteriorate. The Economic Elite have engineered a financial coup and have brought war to our doorstep. . . and make no mistake, they have launched a war to eliminate the US middle class.

Continue reading


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 851 other followers