Obama on prosecution of CIA torturers:
“Mr Obama gave an assurance that “those who carried out their duties relying in good faith upon legal advice from the Department of Justice… will not be subject to prosecution” BBC
Nuremberg Principle IV states:
“The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.“
We all know by now that torture does not produce actionable intelligence of any kind. We know that now but they knew that… then. So the question is; why did they do it? Why did they risk prosecution, imprisonment, the loss of their careers… why did they torture people in the first place, if it wasn’t to gain intel? What does torture really accomplish that was worth the risk?
If we understand the reason, then we begin to understand the likelihood that it will happen again. Especially now that the new administration is utilizing this ridiculous “I was only obeying orders” defense to absolve those responsible. Were they only obeying orders when they tortured children?
As Bruce Fein, a key participant in the efforts to impeach George W. Bush, puts it; ‘… Obama has proven a political coward dangerous to the republic.”
Filed under: Uncategorized | 16 Comments »

